Slashdot Mirror


US Bans Exports To Chinese DRAM Maker Citing National Security Risk (zdnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from ZDNet: The Trump administration on Monday announced it was banning U.S. exports to a Chinese semiconductor firm named Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Company, citing national security concerns. In a statement released by the U.S. Department of Commerce (DoC), officials said the Chinese chipmaker posed "a significant risk of being or becoming involved, in activities contrary to the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States." DoC officials are now barring US companies from selling any products to Fujian Jinhua, which was recently nearing completion of a new dynamic random access memory (DRAM) factory project. "When a foreign company engages in activity contrary to our national security interests, we will take strong action to protect our national security. Placing Jinhua on the Entity List will limit its ability to threaten the supply chain for essential components in our military systems," said Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce.

101 comments

  1. They are involved in IP theft. by yooy · · Score: 5, Informative

    They are involved in IP theft. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0...

    1. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the people modding you read all 10 pages of that story

    2. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are involved in IP theft.

      Aha, they're the reason we need IPv6!

    3. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      That's OK, they won't get in any trouble, they'll only have their lifestyles re-implemented.

    4. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong.. they engaged in IP copying. No matter how much some groups scream, copying information isn't, and never will be theft.

      Gosh, how is it that there are so many legal scholars like you on Slashdot?

    5. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wrong wogboi. Copying my IP is theft of my IP. EOF. Shut down the chi.com thievers ... remove their market and bust their gub'mnt pimps.

    6. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your semantic juggling doesn't make you any less of a clown. They did bad shit. Happy now.. jees

    7. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's ok. These are not the droids you're looking for. He can go about his business"

    8. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are involved in IP theft.

      If a Chinese makes a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and trims off the bread crust, he is violating US Patent 6004596. Is there anything the Chinese can do, such as blowing their noses, without violating some U.S. patent?

      In other words, why should China respect U.S. patents if most of these patents are total garbage?

    9. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      You can't steal IP. i don't think you know what IP is.

    10. Re:They are involved in IP theft. by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      US patents are exactly that. US patents. they don't effect China in any way.

  2. In other words... by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    "When a foreign company engages in activity contrary to our national security interests, we will take strong action to protect our national security. Placing Jinhua on the Entity List will limit its ability to threaten the supply chain for essential components in our military systems," said Wilbur Ross, Secretary of Commerce.

    In other words, ya gotta pay to play bitches! Call me when your check clears.

    1. Re:In other words... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In other words, China has a big red button somewhere that p0wns anything connected to the network that has that brand of RAM.

    2. Re: In other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why ban just one company? If the theory is that the government of China is behind it, they could proceed with any other Chinese company right? Or just make up a new one?

  3. Our beloved president's noose is getting tighter.. by bogaboga · · Score: 0

    Way to go Mr President. While your noose [around China] is surely getting tighter, it may be advisable that you evaluate whether in the end, you may bite the arm that feeds you.

    Folks are already paying a bit more for goods coming from China; China could dump the dollar. If this ever happened, we'd be in big trouble, fast.

  4. Export control for competitive advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All rather rich coming from Wilber Ross former vice chair of the bank of cypress.

    "Jinhua is nearing completion of substantial production capacity for dynamic random access memory (DRAM) integrated circuits. The additional production, in light of the likely U.S.-origin technology, threatens the long term economic viability of U.S. suppliers of these essential components of U.S. military systems."

    If competition is now a national security issue what isn't? Is there any limit to what controls designed to prevent export of Nuclear and military technology be used for? I understand the Micron drama but it's an abuse to misuse export controls in this way for revenge.

    1. Re: Export control for competitive advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's hilarious to watch certain people bitching about less regulation then complain about this - a somewhat amateur free market move (I'd have at least changed code names)

    2. Re:Export control for competitive advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ross is a notorious Asset Stripper, who made a career of forcing companies into untenable positions, taking them over, and then gorging on the remains. He is also thoroughly tangled up in the Trump Family/Russian businesses. No surprise there.
      He has had no interest in National Security before, and it is incredibly unlikely that he has any interest in it now, unless he can personally benefit. The question is, which _US_ businesses is he actually trying to extort from this time?

      Captchas here keep on getting very odd: pandas

  5. Crying wolf by ilsaloving · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever since Trump declared Canada to be a threat to national security, it's really hard to take these declarations seriously.

    I wonder what deal is he trying to wrangle from the company. Maybe he needs more investments in his golf courses and hotels.

    1. Re:Crying wolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever since Trump declared Canada to be a threat to national security

      We must not allow a maple syrup gap!

    2. Re:Crying wolf by Vanyle · · Score: 1

      You can have a threat that is not intentionally harmful.

    3. Re: Crying wolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You win the Internet!

      I literally spit my coffee out while reading that!

    4. Re:Crying wolf by Aighearach · · Score: 0

      Those Canadians would still be selling burnt syrup ....
      .. if it wasn't for AMERICAN ingenuity and reverse osmosis filtration! .....
      .. Terrible, so sad...

    5. Re:Crying wolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to make that argument you should show why Canada is harmful and a threat to national security, because that is the statement you are making.

    6. Re:Crying wolf by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well we better build our own strategic maple syrup reserve to match theirs.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  6. Re:Our beloved president's noose is getting tighte by andydread · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So will China

  7. Re:Our beloved president's noose is getting tighte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Better the biting of the arm, well hand actually, happens now, rather than later on when the damage is even more irreparable.

  8. Re:National security concerns? by Colourspace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China are clearly IP thieves, have been for some while, and are working against the west with no idea or desire of how to play fair. There is no international law in place of preventing this either, and at this point, it's unlikely there will be either. This is pretty much immutable at this point. So what are your plans for stopping this? No, I'm not an American (thank fuck, thanks for ruining it for the rest of us), and find Trump abhorrent in general, but I do find this his 'even a stopped clock is right once a day' moment.

  9. Re:Our beloved president's noose is getting tighte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They, and the communist party, can bare it.

    An elected official? (And with term limits) Not so much.

  10. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, much as I am loathe to defend a treasonous nazi fraud (and asshole) like Donald Jumpsuit Drumpf, "he" didn't ban anything. Furthermore it's a SINGLE company's products, not "all chinese RAM" as you seem to think.

    There's actually a fairly simple rationale in this case - we cannot trust Chinese government ownership (specifically, Communist Party ownership!) of mission critical components ripe for abuse that can't be easily detected.
    You are of course absolutely right about the price fixing companies, they should also be sanctioned appropriately. Then you go off into another argument about gun control... it doesn't follow.

    So to recap, Trump's a moronic fraud, but let's be very specific about the treasons (plural) he's ACTUALLY guilty of, (with evidence, yes) as opposed to being reactionary weirdos ourselves, yes? Shape up.

  11. Hate the man? Love the policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes it takes a unpolished, sometimes a-hole to smash everything that's been going so wrong with globalization back in line. Well planned partnerships and fair cooperation is good for everyone but when someone steps out of line a stiff jab in the jaw will usually get them back in line, fast.

    1. Re:Hate the man? Love the policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two years now I've been reading posts like this. "I hate Trump herp derp but I like this...."

      Thing is you will vote in the moral equivalent of Hillary despite yourself at the next opportunity, and then cringe every time he/she/it sells out the country again.

      Consider that maybe the thing to do is just opt out? There are plenty of people that can handle the diet of red pills necessary to manage things. If, despite yourself, you're going to help the wrong side and saddle us all with the damage the thing to do might just be to leave it alone.

      It's an option.

    2. Re:Hate the man? Love the policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amusingly his actions will have the opposite affect. rather than bringing them into line it will accelerate china's move to be self reliant on their own manufacturing screwing over US manufacturing long term. These are very short sited actions.

    3. Re: Hate the man? Love the policies by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      You are so cute.

      Helping the wrong side?

      Dude... you are the disease. Red pill, wrong side, the world is not binary. Right and wrong arenâ€(TM)t the only options. There are at least 50 shades of... well whatever.

      Stop fucking polarizing. Polarization is the sickness of America. Itâ€(TM)s fucking toxic and you and any other asshole who votes red or blue is responsible for the downfall of the U.S.. I mean seriously, get a book and learn what happened to the Roman senate due to polarization.

      When someone says â€oeI dislike Trump, but...†even if I disagree with their â€oeBut...â€, I still like to see when people start realizing that even the asshole kid in school can do something they like once in a while. Itâ€(TM)s called wisdom.

      Get some.

    4. Re:Hate the man? Love the policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine you are one of the largest manufacturers in the world and one of your parts suppliers tries to dictate terms of how you operate. What are you going to do? you seem to think they will just bow down submissively and obey, that is not how the world works. All this will do is potentially gain some short term benefits while Chinese manufacturers and for that matter others in the world work to displace the US reliance as the supplies can't be trusted any longer. this is fucking brain dead policy.

    5. Re: Hate the man? Love the policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange man bad Orange man bad Orange man bad Orange man bad Orange man 4EC75A32 *** FATAL EXCEPTION ERROR IN MODULE NPC.DLL ***

  12. Re:National security concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer the "If you throw enough shit at the wall, some will stick" metaphor better when it comes to trump.

  13. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DRAM prices have been falling for a couple months now. RAM I bought a year ago for $200 are now selling for $130-$140. It had stayed at $200 until about june/july.

  14. Re:Screw Trump by damicatz · · Score: 1, Troll

    We also can't trust the American government with ownership of mission critical components. And government and corporations are just as entangled here as they are in China, the US government simply does a better job of obfuscating it.

    Literally almost everything Trump accuses China of doing, the American government is equally guilty of doing. There are no good guys here.

  15. Re:Our beloved president's noose is getting tighte by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

    So will China

    China knows Trump will be out by 2024 at the latest. Perhaps as soon as 2020, if everything at Walmart ends up with jacked up prices. Trump's support base aren't exactly the kind of people who enjoy spending more money for things (otherwise they wouldn't be so afraid of the socialism boogeyman).

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  16. Re:Our beloved president's noose is getting tighte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are already doing this on a regular basis to the detriment of governments every where. Currency speculation has become rampant and has a negative impact on market trading around the world.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/j...

  17. Exports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arent these made already in China?

  18. Re: Our beloved president's noose is getting tight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. America can buy that same crap from s. Korea, Japan, Germany, and America. It may go up a bit, but it will drop again. But China will lose 10% of their economy, and that does not include the EU market which is also looking to follow suit.

  19. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a bit naive, if more or less factually correct, however when the US spies on itself it's at least slightly differentiated from a military adversary spying on us. It's a different mission, for better or worse - it is different.

    Consider also, the US has a mission and responsibility to secure systems against foreign adversaries. That's a non-trivial point.

    But again, TRUMP is a moron who has about zero point zero say in anything the US does here. He signs his name, that's his core competency. He isn't picking companies out as security threats, thank god. He's the autographer.

  20. Re:National security concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is the US , you have had the 3 letter agencies steal tech foryou for years, you are just pissed the chinese found an easier way to do it ,they use the greed american companies against themselves .

    Oh noes there is still a dollar in somebody leses pockets !! got to have it.

  21. Re:Snopes Fact Check: MOSTLY TRUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There has been little pushback from the left or right concerning the sanctions and increased tariffs the Trump administration has enacted against China or Russia. Hell the Chinese have been practically mute on the increased tariffs. Maybe they are just waiting things out to a new administration takes office? If that's their plan they might be in for a rude surprise when the next administration maintains and even strengthening the existing sanctions and tariffs. Trump has did something none of his predecessors would ever think of. He has rightly pointed out that the existing US trade policies and trade agreements put the US at a disadvantage. Trump's domestic and international detractors are not disputing the unfair agreements they are just upset he has brought the subject up in the first place. He broke the "Never talk about fight club" agreement.

    China brazenly ignore 3 of the underlying principles of all the international trade agreements and practices.

    The Chinese subsidize manufacturers which lowers the price of their major exports. They manipulate their currency instead of letting their currency value float in the international baskets. This also helps lower the prices of their exports. They do not respect any IP whether it be technical or simple entertainment. They basically steal technologies from others which cuts down on the R&D expenses they would incur if the technology is home grown. China has built their economy on quantity instead of quality and innovation. China has always practiced the China First methodology when dealing with the international community. Trump is only returning the love in terms the Chinese government can understand. The US might have a strong military but that is insignificant when compared against US international financial resources and power. Hell the Chinese government has stored vast amounts of it's wealth in the US. US Bonds and Securities are the most stable and reliable in the world. The billionaires in "the party" want the bulk of their wealth stored some place safe in case China goes tits up and they need to run for their lives.

    The Chinese government is still an authoritarian government they are just real good at controlling the information flow to the rest of the world. At this very minute they are operating "Re-education" camps for their indigenous Muslim citizens. People forcibly removed from their homes and sent to camps and forced to renounce their religion. Cameras are installed in houses to watch for any Muslim practicing their religion. They make cash incentives available to any who turn someone in to the authorities if seen breaking the rules.

  22. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But again, TRUMP is a moron who has about zero point zero say in anything the US does here. He signs his name, that's his core competency. He isn't picking companies out as security threats, thank god. He's the autographer.

    In other words, just because the government did it, does not mean Trump was responsible. If it is highly controversial, stupid, racist, misogynistic, said on fox news in the last hour, etc, well we can look closer at Trump. If it is a reasonable move without fanfare, it is likely just a symptom that the entire bureaucracy isn't broken yet.

  23. Independece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US is making anything in their hands to force the Chinese to become more independent in technology.
      Let me tell what is going to happen,
    - They are gong to buy the technology from other countries willing to selling it.
    - US companies will lose business opportunities because now they are a competitive disadvantage with others companies willing to supply the same goods.
    - Chinese companies who weren't able to compete because the preference for foreign technology, they now become an option and recollect more money that will
    reinvest so their technology will become even better.

    Remember folks, US put a ban on exporting Nuclear Technology to China, guess what nation is going to built HALF of the nuclear reactors in the world in the next ten years, you guessed, China.
    How many reactors U.S. is planning to built in the next ten years, ZERO.
     

  24. America: past patent pirate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    China are clearly IP thieves, have been for some while, and are working against the west with no idea or desire of how to play fair.

    Is turnabout fair play? "Why America was the China of the 19th century."

    * https://foreignpolicy.com/2012/12/06/we-were-pirates-too/

  25. Fucking the life of Americans isn't enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for fucking up the market for the whole world America.

  26. Re: Snopes Fact Check: MOSTLY TRUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    China is a communist country first and foremost. Youâ(TM)re forgetting this in most of your arguments.

    Chinaâ(TM)s government manipulates the international markets to enable them to eventually collapse the whole thing. If China is able to manufacture and produce everything needed without concern for money, they can effectively cut off the rest of the world. They have taken over market segment by market segment and made it so nearly everything from tooth brushes to airplanes cannot be manufactured without them providing at least some of the critical components. Go ahead and try to build an F-35 without buying epoxy for circuit boards from China. Try to run the oil economy without components from China.

    Within 5-10 years, China will be the only self sufficient industrialized nation in the world. They actively collect recyclable waste from every country in the world. As such, they have some of the richest stockpiles of natural resources anywhere and in quantity. Hell, they practically own the entire rare earth minerals market.

    By pumping Chinese money enmass into the western economies, they provide greater means for Westerners to depend more on China for bare survival. Letâ(TM)s be honest, why horde the money if you can use it to devalue the currency internationally as well as cause devestating international inflation.

    Within 5-10 years, China should be able to implement a token or credit based national income with no dependence outside of China. They can financially seal their borders and deny necessities of life to any country that refuses to either become part of China or that impedes their interests in taking over Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, etc...

    Why do people constantly forget that the agenda of China is not capitalism. Itâ(TM)s communism. Watch pretty much every governmental program in China and ask yourself âoeHow can this help further the communist interest?â

  27. Re:Our beloved president's noose is getting tighte by Aighearach · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Dude. The Orange beast is fed by Russia. It's a natural gas steam engine.

  28. Re:National security concerns? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    Well, that's an encouraging amount of progress. To admit that the man might be right twice a day is a huge step forward. Not too long ago people were non ironically calling him a fascist dictator, which he clearly is not. Let's keep up this trend and soon enough he'll be just another politician you hate.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  29. Re: Our beloved president's noose is getting tight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    number pulled from your ass...

  30. Re:Agreed, the numbers don't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2014, the unemployment rate for black people was over 11%. Now it's under 6%, the lowest in history.

    That asshole is signing into law policies that work.

    No it was lower before the civil war.

  31. The Other Shoe Dropped by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now that Bloomberg article makes sense: it was supposed to set the stage for this. The doubt thrown on it has made them walk back the rhetoric, so the 'national security' verbiage doesn't make so much sense any more. That said, aside from some novel rowhammer-style attack (was that ever fixed?), I can't see DRAM being a security problem. Reliability, yes, but not security.
    In any case, the military will add it to their 'will not buy' list, just like other Chinese/Russian tech. Trying to impede the completion of the factory is unnecessary unless they think it'll produce relabeled counterfeits. Presumably, Chinese-made NAND isn't a problem? The NAND fab they're about to open is going to have 50% larger production than the world's current-largest NAND company, and that's going to cause prices to plummet fast.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:The Other Shoe Dropped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A DRAM that can be read out remotely, how could that ever pose a security issue?

    2. Re:The Other Shoe Dropped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lithography equipment itself to put in the factory is very expensive and only made by ASML and Canon. You need tech from both to get a semiconductor fabrication plant up and running. These aren't off the shelf systems.

      Neither company is based in the USA, but both will probably be subject to USA export restrictions, because they also have big dealings in the US.

      My guess is that 'factory nearing completion' means it's time to install that expensive equipment, and by timing this now the US can hurt China most (since they have already spent most of the money on the factory, but now won't be able to start operation), and also Japan and the Netherlands (since they lose sales of their equipment), while helping a USA business (Micron) by keeping it having a cartel-monopoly.

  32. Re: Snopes Fact Check: MOSTLY TRUE by Type44Q · · Score: 3, Interesting

    China has been exporting deflation to other countries by keeping prices low you idiot.

    No Comma Faggot, is that you?!

    You don't really understand the whole 'currency thing,' do you? The Chinese need to keep the value of their currency down if they want to keep their prices low (i.e stay competitive), not the other way around.

  33. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...If it is highly controversial, stupid, racist, misogynistic, said on fox news in the last hour, etc, well we can look closer at Trump. If it is a reasonable move without fanfare, it is likely just a symptom that the entire bureaucracy isn't broken yet.

    Wish I had mod points, that was very insightful (assuming you weren't trying to be sarcastic).

  34. Re: Our beloved president's noose is getting tight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. America can buy that same crap from s. Korea, Japan, Germany, and America.

    And where do you think they get it from?
    You Americans sure loves to feed your middle men.

  35. Re: Our beloved president's noose is getting tight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1 gallon of milk has always cost about the same as 1 gallon of gasoline.
    Food in the US is cheap.

    Medications are an indication of price gouging made possible by requiring everyone get "insurance".
    That distorts the supply and demand curve, much in the way easy to get loans inflate college tuition prices.
    Not to mention this jerk who milked it as much as he could.

    Rents are going a little crazy in several cities, but only due to the number of people relocating to an area. Prices are quick to rise and slow to fall. Your best bet for rents is to have a generic job that can be done anywhere and move to a location that isn't in demand. Don't get attached to an area if it isn't affordable to you, be pragmatic. You can move back if you like once finances are fixed (i.e. owning multiple rentals in a cheaper city).

    The cheapest car I've ever purchased was $800. It drove on the road for a couple years too.

    This 3BR/2BA property is available as a rent-to-own for $395/month - within commute distance to Oklahoma City.
    527 W College Avenue
    Seminole, OK 74868

    Work smarter, not harder.

  36. Re:Slashdot is now loved by degenerates by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    It's really precious that you think the degenerates weren't always here. What you are noticing is that the quality posters have left, so the signal-to-noise ratio has lowered.

    You didn't notice the noise when the signal was strong. Now you are straining to hear it through the static.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  37. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ".If it is highly controversial, stupid, racist, misogynistic, said on fox news in the last hour, etc, well we can look closer at Trump" - Because Trump himself supports such stupid shit, being a retarded traitor. What's hard about this?
     

  38. Commie IPhones by johnsie · · Score: 1

    Lots of Americas are dependent on Chinese made Iphones. Not sure how that can be seen as secure. Surely the fact that so many communications devices in the US use chinese made hardware is an even bigger national security risk.

  39. Re:National security concerns? by Tom · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could replace "China" with "The United States" in your comment above and you would be absolutely spot-on about the early days of the US, as they blatantly broke British copyright laws, printed books cheaply without paying royalties and such.

    Somehow, it seems emerging powers, if large enough, routinely take that route.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  40. Just more market protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When a foreign company is entering a valuable market which we want to control, we will take action to protect the freedom and safety of the American people" blah blah blah.

    "We invented all the things (with help of 5 million foreign H1B workers who account for 70% of the scientific output for the last 2 decades) and so everyone is stealing our IP" etc. etc.

    The grand American delusion that nobody else knows how to invent, build, or make stuff.

  41. Re:National security concerns? by houghi · · Score: 2

    China are as much IP thieves as anybody who ever broke a copyright law. Their idea of the time of copyright is 0 years instead of eternity and more for the US.
    Just like the US used to do in the past.

    And as there was no risk to national security, he was not right to call that in to block it. That means the blocking of the company is not right.

    Just because you shot a convicted terrorist by accident does not mean it isn't manslaughter and wrong. BOTH parties can be wrong.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  42. Canada strong army by JcMorin · · Score: 2

    Don't forget Canada have submarines to blast the US from behind! https://www.theglobeandmail.co...

  43. Bloomber was right after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About secret bugs installed in servers etc....

  44. China has filed more patents than US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The notion of crying about IP theft is a bit dated.

  45. Re: Our beloved president's noose is getting tight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has this weird corruption that Medicare isn't allowed to negotiate price of medicines.
    The analogy with college tuition is apt. I suppose college needs more government funding and less loans. Contrary to "popular belief" that would be efficient and the general public or tax payers theoretically have their say. Very remote and theoretical say, but this shouldn't be given up.
    With medications there's far less excuse for gouging. University real estate and professors are expensive, but making 100,000 boxes of pills instead of 50,000 isn't expensive at all. You in the US have an expensive Frankenstein system that doesn't answer any ideology anyway, capitalist or socialist or otherwise. It's some sort of mafia racket with Christian inspired necessity that keeps the emergency rooms open, because you can't be "evil" down to that point of locking ERs to the destitute and the working underclass or it would cause unacceptable health and sanitary problems.

    Solving that single issue might solve much of what is wrong with the US (violence, poverty, financial insecurity) because the issue is so big.

  46. Re:Slashdot is now loved by degenerates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    very poetic... now take those headphones off and start reading.

  47. Re:Screw Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's still bad. With Windows 10 - 56 megabytes used by the calculator!, Ubuntu 18.04 64bit instead of Ubuntu 10.04 or 12.04 32bit , or web pages even with noscript and ad blocking, you just need more and more RAM. I had it better a decade a decade ago with 2GB RAM than today with 4GB RAM. I can't justify upgrading to new PC hardware because 16GB was high end a decade ago and still is high end today, such that it's the highest size on many products and is even unavailable on today's "netbooks" :)
    Halved priced per gigabyte would be good, low end needs to go back to 8GB, 16GB more common.

    My tab hoarding isn't even helped by RAM starvation, I'm not able anymore to load my tabs and prune them.

  48. Re: Snopes Fact Check: MOSTLY TRUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about more fact checking such as this article.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/22/technology/china-micron-chips-theft.html

  49. Re:Snopes Fact Check: MOSTLY TRUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The US might have a strong military but that is insignificant when compared against US international financial resources and power.

    What are you even blabbing about?

    Soft power is a lot easier to lose then hard power and Trump is doing his best to erode US soft power all over the world, for no apparent reason other than to appease his idiot base.

  50. Re:National security concerns? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    So two wrongs make a right then?

    Look, there's no comparing a small agrarian republic printing books and a megapower stealing stealth fighter designs and nanotech fabrication techniques. Not in the same ballpark, not the same league, ain't even the same motherfuckin' sport.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  51. So what happens to the American companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that were exporting? Does the government make them whole? Of course the Chinese will explore the option of retaliating in kind.

  52. Re:National security concerns? by Tom · · Score: 1

    So two wrongs make a right then?

    No, actually three wrongs make a right, provided you turn on average 90 degrees.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  53. But not imports from same company? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    So they ban exports to Fujian, but not purchasing and importing from the same company? Did I miss something in the announcement underneath all the chest-thumping?

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:But not imports from same company? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Fujian still has not started manufacturing a single damned thing yet.

  54. Re:National security concerns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So two wrongs make a right then?

    Look, there's no comparing a small agrarian republic printing books and a megapower stealing stealth fighter designs and nanotech fabrication techniques. Not in the same ballpark, not the same league, ain't even the same motherfuckin' sport.

    Hey wait a minute, 6 months ago you said "China has TONS of internal problems. They have 300 million "modern" people, and one freaking billion poor peasants that they're responsible for."
    So in 6 months they went from backwards shithole to "megapower"?

  55. DUH! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    The Chinese will take the ram, reverse engineer it, and then dump THEIRS on the market cheaper, driving out the competition, then jacking the price up when they have the entire market. How do you think they got so successful in everything else? They COPY everything. In fact, in most places, to do business there, you have to give up some of your property "secrets".

  56. Re:Snopes Fact Check: MOSTLY TRUE by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

    Mute? The Chinese enacted counter sanctions on all their major US import products. Which include agricultural produce and airplanes and airplane parts. They also tried to negotiate with the US, but since each negotiator the US has sent them so far sings a different tune, they have realized it is better to just wait until the US has its mid-term elections until they try again.

  57. Re:National security concerns? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    There was more to it than that. The USA "stole" things like steel manufacturing processes and railroad technologies like steam engines, etc. Before that a lot of cotton-mill designs were also copied without license.

  58. Re:National security concerns? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    So two wrongs make a right? It's OK for China to do? I can eat ice cream for dinner because Billy's mom let him do it? This is just whataboutism.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  59. Re:National security concerns? by TRRosen · · Score: 1

    China are clearly IP thieves,

    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. You can't steal IP it doesn't physically exist. You can violate it, you can't steal it.

  60. Re: National security concerns? by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    A very slow clap for you, perhaps one of the most irrelevant pedants of all time.