Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Allowed Advertisers To Target Users Interested in 'White Genocide' (theintercept.com)

Multiple readers have shared a report: Apparently fueled by anti-Semitism and the bogus narrative that outside forces are scheming to exterminate the white race, Robert Bowers murdered 11 Jewish congregants as they gathered inside their Pittsburgh synagogue, federal prosecutors allege. But despite long-running international efforts to debunk the idea of a "white genocide," Facebook was still selling advertisers the ability to market to those with an interest in that myth just days after the bloodshed. Earlier this week, The Intercept was able to select "white genocide conspiracy theory" as a pre-defined "detailed targeting" criterion on the social network to promote two articles to an interest group that Facebook pegged at 168,000 users large and defined as "people who have expressed an interest or like pages related to White genocide conspiracy theory." The paid promotion was approved by Facebook's advertising wing.

After we contacted the company for comment, Facebook promptly deleted the targeting category, apologized, and said it should have never existed in the first place. Our reporting technique was the same as one used by the investigative news outlet ProPublica to report, just over one year ago, that in addition to soccer dads and Arianna Grande fans, "the world's largest social network enabled advertisers to direct their pitches to the news feeds of almost 2,300 people who expressed interest in the topics of 'Jew hater,' 'How to burn jews,' or, 'History of "why jews ruin the world."" The report exposed how little Facebook was doing to vet marketers, who pay the company to leverage personal information and inclinations in order to gain users' attention -- and who provide the foundation for its entire business model.

152 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Transparency by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Can a Facebook user query to see what categories Facebook assigns to them? How about to their friends?

    1. Re:Transparency by Freischutz · · Score: 2

      Can a Facebook user query to see what categories Facebook assigns to them? How about to their friends?

      In this case? I'm guessing: Creepy, Paranoid, Incel and Loser?

  2. Re:So let's talk about it by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's talk about how a lot of Incels and white nationalists need some serious psychotherapy. That and stop being gullible morons.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  3. Wait... by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jews are scheming to eliminate the white race? Aren't the Jews themselves... white? (My Jewish best friend is a Jerry Garcia look-alike who could easily pass for a redneck. He's even a bluegrass music fan!)

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Wait... by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The people that believe these kinds of things aren't the most logical/rational people.

    2. Re:Wait... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Informative

      Jews aren't a singular race, and haven't been ever.

      The problem is myopic view that European Jews are the only "real" Jews.

      Ignorance isn't an excuse any more, now you know.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Wait... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Only if you're ignorant that Jews aren't even a singular race. They never have been.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Wait... by butchersong · · Score: 2, Informative

      The answer to your question is "no". Most Jewish people even ashkenazi do not identity as white. Pew research link

    5. Re:Wait... by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're a Nazi, then no, they're not, because "white" in this case means more than the color of your skin. Also despite the hyperbolic name, "White genocide" apparently is the White Supremacists' term for interracial sex. The logic being that if all white people have sex exclusively with non-white people, then nobody will be white any more.

      Yes, it's really that stupid.

      Yes, quite a few liberals have been trapped by it, because they've said things like "Yeah, I'm in favor of white genocide!" and promptly been banned from Twitter because Twitter's abuse team isn't as "in" on White Supremacist lingo as lefties who keep being subjected to it and who subsequently look up what it means.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the same site under "% of Jews who identify as" about 90% identify as white.

    7. Re:Wait... by butchersong · · Score: 2

      Egads, you are right. I just glanced at it and misread the link. I don't know many Ashkenazi that identify as "white" except when asked if they are white, black asian etc. They think of themselves as jewish but you're correct that link is of no use making such a case.

    8. Re:Wait... by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      It depends what you call white, whether it's about skin colour or self-assigned identity. Their identity isn't build on descending from European people, with classical liberalism and Christian ethics forming the core of their culture ... their identity to a large extent is build around being persecuted by those people, ie. the holocaust.

      You'll frequently see white jews adopting the identitarian definition of whiteness, where they say they are not white.

    9. Re:Wait... by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can find crazy edge definitions many places.

      Many black christians consider abortion to be part of a 'black genocide'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't know what you're talking about.
      It also includes the push for mass immigration of non-whites so that whites become a minority in their own country.

    11. Re:Wait... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      Too be fair, there is an African Jewish tribe that traces their lineage back to one of the lost tribes of Israel... and DNA test indicate that might be correct, even though their external features now appear very African due to with Africans. Apparently African external features are dominant genes.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    12. Re:Wait... by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Very true;
      and when they have no defence, they pull the anti-semitic card.

      I find it pretty crazy that criticising Israel or even Zionism is anti-Semitic - imagine criticising Nazi's was anti-German, or criticising Saudi's was Islamophobic or criticising America was anti-Christian!

      I love peace-loving Jews such as Noam Chomsky, and the people behind Jewish Voice for Peace. Anti-Semitism has it's place, just like Islamophobia, but using it as a trump card in every debate (particularly concerning the terrorist/apartheid state of Israel and their terrorising politics (zionism)) is just crazy wrong.

      Again, imagine being critical of Saudi's, particularly concerning Jamal Khashoggi, and the Saudi's silencing any argument with "Islamophobia"!

    13. Re: Wait... by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      If Jews are white then why can my DNA test come back saying 23.5% Ashkenazi *Jewish*?

      Because the Ashkenazi people were pretty much 100% Jewish. It would be as if your DNA test came back saying you were 23.5% Norse Pagan. Kind of a dumb way to state it; you can drop the religious portion of either result and not actually lose anything. It certainly wouldn't mean that you yourself are pagan, or that all pagans are Norse.

    14. Re: Wait... by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You certainly can criticize Israel or Zionism without being an antisemite, but that doesn't change the fact that a significant portion of the criticism leveled against them is antisemtic in nature (with much of the rest being anti-western instead). People who can provide a rational and nuanced critique of either Israel or Zionism are far and few between.

    15. Re: Wait... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I don't know many Ashkenazi that identify as "white" except when asked if they are white, black asian etc

      I don't know many people of any religion who would. If you're only hanging out with white nationalists them I suppose, to you, it might seem perfectly natural for people to just randomly tell you that they're white, but it is not exactly commonplace in society at large.

    16. Re:Wait... by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

      Well science definitely identifies 3 races. You can't watch an episode of Forensic Files and not here about what race the skeleton is. Either white, mongloid or negro. Sounds about right. Everything else is just culture and mixing of those core groups.

    17. Re:Wait... by swillden · · Score: 2

      "White genocide" apparently is the White Supremacists' term for interracial sex. The logic being that if all white people have sex exclusively with non-white people, then nobody will be white any more.

      Yes, except exclusivity is not required for "genocide". If a non-trivial percentage of whites are willing to mate with non-whites, and if there is no core of whites who exclusively mate with whites, then eventually there will be no pure whites.

      That's the theory. Of course, it's all rather ridiculous. IMO we should all miscegenate away! With enough mixing the notion of racial identity will become difficult to maintain and remove this particular arbitrary division in humanity. Yes, I guess I'm a white traitor for believing such things. But, then, I'm 1/32nd Polynesian, plus some mixture of northern and southern European stock, so I'm already something of a mutt and why should I care about "white identity"?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    18. Re:Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Because there's no such thing as a "white" racial group. You genetic tests may be able to tell if you have more English ancestry than German. The reason these tests bring up the Ashkenazi Jewish percentage is because many customers are interested in such details.

    19. Re:Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Is it "science" that created this, and if so is it still valid science or just a holdover from the "we know everything!" fifties?

    20. Re:Wait... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well, only one bit of information left out, RICH. So yeah, rich Jews are planning the elimination of all those who do not serve them or generate a profit for them, of course, same could be said for rich Christians or rich Muslims, even rich Buddhists and of course rich Atheists. It ain't the religion that defines the behaviour, that is just camouflage, it's the greed and the surest sign of greed is wealth and the public perception of that greed is of course paid for, all created by PR=B$. Those people of course are really all just atheists pretending to be religious, their real religion capitalism, their capital worth much more than your life, in fact your life, consuming it, is often calculated into their balance sheets.

      The real defining characteristic not religion at all, by genetics of another kind, a real kind not that silly fucking race shit. Psychopaths faking being religionists to exploit the gullible, who believe in those fantasies. Religious fantasies about well, religious super heroes versus the the real value of life and the totality of existence as God, rather than same ideologue the spruikers claim to speak for. You know that goat herder wish machine, so much like modern politicians, empty promises of salvation, oh my fucking God, they are copying religion straight fucking into politics, identity politics with its identity religion leaders, believe in your political party, worship its leaders, believe or die. Fuck off, wake up and vote independent this cycle because political parties have turned into paid off corporate shit.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    21. Re:Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well... most slave descendants in this country have some amount of European ancestry. I guess the white nationalists hate blacks because they're still ashamed that their slave owning ancestors had jungle fever.

    22. Re:Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in their own country.

      Are we talking about Native Americans here or the European invaders?

    23. Re:Wait... by mishehu · · Score: 1

      The short answer is this: No. Jews are not "white". Some of us can pass for that on cursory examination. But that's only some of us. Even in my own family there is diversity of skin color with me being the lightest between myself, my father, and my sister. In North American the bulk of the Jewish population has learned to play the "white" game so as to not be ostracized or such. But that didn't stop Bowers of course.

      It can be a little confusing because being Jewish can mean "belonging to Judaism" and it can mean "having been born to a Jewish family and being a part of Jewish cultures". One can be the latter without being the former, but if one starts off as non-Jewish and becomes the former, that person is automatically accepted then as ethnically Jewish by other Jews.

    24. Re:Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      As well as Chinese jews.

    25. Re:Wait... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Aren't the Jews themselves... white?

      Only by skin tone. But their ancestry and shared culture apparently ejects them from the "white race."
      The White Genocide Conspiracy Theory holds that Jews are trying to eliminate white people by bringing in as many non-white people (apparently also including Caucasian latinos) as possible to outbreed and completely displace White Americans.

      Your casual White Genocide believer might just think that it's non-whites taking the place of whites, but the theory has Antisemitism as its core belief.

    26. Re:Wait... by mishehu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Go back some 40+ years and I think things would be different. My son has not experienced the levels of antisemitism that I did even in elementary school as a child. Also, we're basically forced to self-identify as "White/Caucasian", "Black/African", "Asian", "Pacific Islander", or, if we're lucky either "Human" or "Other". Technically Jewish people descend from Abraham of Ur, which makes us technically an Asian people. But "Asian" seems to pretty much apply to "people whose eyefolds have a slanted orientation" only. So what choice are we to make when we're basically forced to?

    27. Re: Wait... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      You certainly can criticize Israel or Zionism without being an antisemite

      I think most Jews would agree with that. But many of the more public and vocal groups, like the Anti-Defamation League, have disagreed with that, claiming that criticism of Israel's policies or Zionism in particular is Antisemitism.

    28. Re:Wait... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Those Muslim Arabs were already living there. Israel is defined as a Jewish state. If you're Jewish, not only can you move there and get citizenship, you are encouraged to do so.

    29. Re: Wait... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      Most Americans don't know that Palestinians are basically contained by Israel's neighboring states in holding pens, in restricted zones around Israel, to be used as weapons against Israel. They are not permitted to integrate into the other Arab states, even though the Arab state borders are mostly remnant lines from colonialism. A Palestinian Arab is worse off outside of Israel than inside it.

    30. Re:Wait... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Wow, who knew Arabs lived so long while looking so young!

      There's this thing called reproduction. You probably watch the act on your computer.

    31. Re: Wait... by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Historical aside:

      King Rama VI - who perhaps not incidentally had studied at Oxford - described the Chinese as "Jews of the Orient" when ordering their expulsion from Siam.

    32. Re:Wait... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Aren't the Jews themselves... white?

      If their families spent 1000+ years in Europe, sure.

      You remind of that racist news lady that just got fired; she once declared that it isn't allowed to draw Jesus non-white, because everybody knows Jesus was white.

      Look, 2000 years ago, all the Semitic people looked like modern-day Palestinians. It isn't hard to understand.

    33. Re:Wait... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I find it pretty crazy that criticising Israel or even Zionism is anti-Semitic

      Worse, the Palestinians are also a Semitic people, and simply voicing support for their equal rights as human beings can draw accusations of "anti-Semitism!"

    34. Re:Wait... by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you mean the original Native Americans, or the Middle-Beringian invaders who displaced them?

    35. Re: Wait... by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Actually I was implying that going to Oxford may have given the king antisemitic sentiments.

    36. Re:Wait... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "English" is barely a thing either. The UK was invaded and conquered so many times, there are very few people with pure Saxon genetics these days. Most of us are a mixture of Saxon, Angles, Vikings and of course Asian and African from the days of Empire.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:Wait... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      For white supremacists "white" means of a pure European bloodline, basically the same blond blue eyed rubbish that the Nazis were into.

      "White genocide" is anything that decreases the relative number of "white" people to all other people. So that can be immigration, interracial marriage and children, anything that tries to improve diversity or integration or race relations, casting black actors in roles that were once played by white actors... Pretty much anything that isn't borderline Nazi racial purity propaganda.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re: Wait... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      If the ADL has claimed that then they are clearly wrong, but I've never heard them say anything remotely like that and I suspect it's just another talking point invented by their critics. You wouldn't by any chance happen to have a citation to support that assertion?

    39. Re: Wait... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Sephardic~/i> Jews are ethically (genetically) Jewish; Askenazim have central Asian/Eastern European DNA. They're not Israelites.

    40. Re: Wait... by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      You conveniently neglected to mention that you have plenty of French (Norman) in you, too.

      I wouldn't have mentioned it, either.

    41. Re: Wait... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And saying all that might even make it true.

    42. Re:Wait... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      It's pretty safe to assume that every time somebody implies "white supremacist" ideology on the part of any person who opposes the current state of institutionalized racism against white (and Asian) male that somebody is just engaging in a straw-man argument.

      There is zero danger from "white supremacist" ideology. It's very limited and their ground base - poverty of worker class - is limited because USA has never been more prosperous in history.

      What dangerous here is constant bashing of white (and Asian) males to the ground by modern social justice warriors.

      This must stop.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    43. Re: Wait... by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Oh god no! Tell me itâ(TM)s not true!!!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    44. Re: Wait... by Daralantan · · Score: 1

      This also reminds me of the bizarre shift I've seen where I feel like "the left" used to dislike jews. Or at least everyone in Israel. One year in college I roomed with a guy who was at least very anti-Republican. He said he was the biggest criticizer of the Democrats that there was, but the only criticisms he had was that they ever let the Republicans do anything at all. He frequently stated Israel was the scum of the Earth and he wished they'd all be wiped out forever.

      And then I recall when Israel and the Hamas were firing rockets and whatnot back and forth, there was a weekend where "#HitlerWasRight" was one of the top trending tags on Twitter.

      Granted it seems like a lot of people have always disliked jews and I don't know why other than old things of "A lot of them are bankers and tax collectors!1111" I'll always remember a friend of mine playing some custom Warcraft map in college, and one guy got made and said: "F THIS, JEWS" and left the game. He laughed and said: "I don't understand, since when is the jewish race an insult?" I responded by asking him had he not been on the internet ever in the past several years.

    45. Re: Wait... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Good point. Some Gallic and some middle Eastern from when Spain was mostly Muslim and had a lot people from north Africa living there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    46. Re:Wait... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      But the fact remains that the vast majority of Muslim Arabs living in Israel immigrated there, they were not born there

      You state this without any evidence. Israel explicitly defines itself as a Jewish state, and has policies to remain that way.

      Israel is the only modern civilized nation in the ME, the rest are frozen in the primitive & violent 6th century by radical Islamists.

      And how would they remain that way if they had a generous migration policy for Muslims?

    47. Re:Wait... by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Precisely!!

    48. Re: Wait... by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Israel is the Jewish homeland and has been for 3,200 years.

      Prove it.

      You hate Jewish people. Why the smirking and dishonest veil? Just own it.

      Why are some Jews so insecure?
      No I don't hate any religious group, whether Muslim, Jews, or Christians, even if they be orthodox (in fact I admire some orthodox Jews/Christians), as long as they're not extremists/terrorists (like zionists).

    49. Re:Wait... by mishehu · · Score: 1

      Thank you, AC, but with some government bureaucracies you are compelled to designate a race, and there isn't always an "other" option. Want to purchase a firearm from an FFL? You *must* designate or else you will not pass the NICS check. State DPS will not give you a DL without designating there as well, and if the agent doesn't agree with your designate, they can override your self-designated value.

      You also don't seem to understand that from a very young age we are made to fill out those demographics. I remember them as a kid on standardized testing in elementary school even. The teacher never said "you don't need to fill that part out if you don't want to". You were told to fill out all the information on it. So as an adult when somebody on the street asks you to identify as such, it is very difficult to do even as you say for the average person.

    50. Re: Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Merde!

    51. Re:Wait... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I mean the dinosaurs!

    52. Re:Wait... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Because Israel uses screening and immigration policies that actually work, unlike the politically-correct US/UK/EU systems.

      In other words, they keep the Muslims out.

    53. Re:Wait... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If that were the case there would be very few Muslims in Israel which is demonstrably not true.

      I said keep them out, not kick them out. Seeing as how Israel is surrounded by Muslims who want to destroy the state of Israel and make it Palestine, and that Israel explicitly defines itself as a Jewish state, you can stop pretending that Israel doesn't have a strict immigration policy.

      No, they refuse entry to *violent jihadists* not Muslims in general.

      Israel doesn't have a magic wand to determine who is okay with Israel being a Jewish state and who is not. They have strict limits on who is allowed to immigrate to Israel -- and big hint, Jews have a "right of return", Muslims will be told to fuck off, and they'll probably give some Christians refugee status.

      Why do you waste your life with Jew-hate bigotry?

      Why do you waste your life on denying obvious facts?

    54. Re:Wait... by QuadEddie · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. They was kangs, right? I've seen these types on the street shouting for death to whites. It's complete bullshit.

    55. Re:Wait... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      When you say dinosaurs, do you mean birds?

      I don't really care if people make two categories, as long they understand that T-rex still ends up on the bird side of the chart.

      The birds are still here, too.

    56. Re:Wait... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Also the phantom menace behind the white genocide myth usually aren't Jews, they're hispanic, black, or muslim. Choose your prejudice and adapt as required.

    57. Re:Wait... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      "White genocide" apparently is the White Supremacists' term for interracial sex

      But how is interracial sex not genocide against the race of the non-white? Oh, that's right, according to white supremacists, the "white" race is the superior one, the other race is the inferior pollutant. You could be 75% white, 25% black, and they would still call you black because the black blood "dilutes" the superior white blood. Ugh.

      Yes, quite a few liberals have been trapped by it, because they've said things like "Yeah, I'm in favor of white genocide!" and promptly been banned from Twitter because Twitter's abuse team isn't as "in" on White Supremacist lingo as lefties who keep being subjected to it and who subsequently look up what it means.

      I've found in general sarcasm is best left for RL, in person interactions. Sarcasm doesn't work well on the Internet and will often just blow up in your face, maybe 20 years later.

    58. Re: Wait... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I smoked a lot of dope when I was 17 too!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    59. Re: Wait... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to slashdot!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    60. Re:Wait... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I didn't address their position at all, except to say it's a 'crazy edge definition'.

      Bottom line numbers on abortions support their position. But 'genocide' when the 'hoovering' is voluntary?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    61. Re: Wait... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Don't hurt yourself thinking about it.

  4. Who cares? by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

    The platform is operating as designed. Maybe I want to sellca brand tear gas remover to those interested in socialist, anarchal takeover.

    OH these are the correct kind of extremes. My bad, don't worry my karma is good for a beating.

  5. Re:So let's talk about it by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's talk about how a lot of Incels and white nationalists need some serious psychotherapy.

    Psychotherapy has a poor track record, The evidence that it is effective is ambiguous. It is least likely to work when the underlying social issues go unaddressed. The incels still aren't getting laid. The WNs still have to see brown people.

    We are all nerds here, so we should be looking for technical solutions. For the incels, a good solution would be more realistic sexbots. For the WNs, we could make AR goggles that make everyone they see look white.

  6. don't eat Tide Pods, kids! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "Major P.G. McGillicuty's finest drinking bleach
    guaranteed no harsh after-taste or double your money back.
    p0wn the libz by making your insides white, too."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  7. Facebook has consistently proven by bblb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Facebook has proven time and time again that they will allow anything that targets whites, law enforcement, or conservatives and only have an interest in blocking "hate speech" if it's targeted at minorities or the left. This is hardly even newsworthy at this point, it's just their platform.

    1. Re:Facebook has consistently proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trying to shame someone doesn't work if they think you're a clown.

    2. Re:Facebook has consistently proven by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The "white genocide" conspiracy theory does target whites. It tries to convince them that they are being attacked and under existential threat, and thus control and manipulate them for nefarious purposes.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Facebook has consistently proven by bblb · · Score: 1

      No conspiracy theory and the only one talking about white genocide is you... and, surprise, I'm not white. Maybe put the tinfoil hat down. It's not even debatable... Facebook bans pages like Uncle Sam's Misguided Children, a conservative veterans group, for "attempting to influence voters" while leaving pages like Occupy Democrats untouched. I've personally reported comments where someone was applauding the murder of police and saying that they wish they could meet the fallen officer's family so they could spit in their faces, only to get a response that it doesn't violate terms of service. It's no uncommon, it's not illegal, they have a right to their bias... but you'd have to be a fool to actually think Facebook isn't massively biased in favor of the left.

  8. Still having fun? by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    So what else can we do for fun now?

  9. Facebook officials gave no useful answers. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    New name: DisgraceBook

    See the excellent documentary, The Facebook Dilemma: A Two-Night Special Event. All the Facebook officials answered questions by avoiding details of any depth. They only pretended to answer.

    Because of the many interesting details, I think this book may be helpful: Cyberwar: How Russian Hackers and Trolls Helped Elect a President Facebook was used to manipulate voters.

  10. It's Okay To Be White by alternative_right · · Score: 4, Insightful

    (Note to doubters: the people during the fall of Rome couldn't see it, either.)

    1. Re:It's Okay To Be White by Livius · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the people during the fall of Rome couldn't see it, either.

      In fact lots of them saw it. It didn't help, though.

    2. Re:It's Okay To Be White by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Archaeological evidence suggests some cities depopulated rapidly, and many non-Italian groups who had settled within the Empire during its heyday picked up and migrated.

      So it didn't help Rome, the place, or Rome, the government, but seeing it probably did help a lot of people, including some Romans.

      Not many of the ones who stayed to try to fix the problems, granted.

    3. Re:It's Okay To Be White by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The claim that diversity or something lead to the fall of Rome has been widely debunked and is not accepted by most historians.

      The short answer is that Rome fell because it got too large to control and defend adequately, and because its power structures were flawed. I should also point out that the Roman empire lasted a very long time - parts of it for 1000 years after the fall, and the period considered the decline of the empire was longer than the entire history of the modern United States.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  11. Re: So let's talk about it by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Informative

    You'd think pale skin would be a much bigger draw in the dating market, wouldn't you?

    It is. OK cupid has done a bunch of studies on this over the years. Whites consistently come out on top, and blacks consistently scrape the bottom, with black women scoring even worse than black men. Asian men also get screwed over, while Asian women do quite well.

    https://theblog.okcupid.com/ra...

    Of course the offline dating market may not be quite the same as the online one ... feel free to conduct your own study and test that hypothesis.

  12. Re: I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are a lot of working class white men who are heroically working long hours for very low pay in many cases under management that treats them like crap - in a desperate, but mostly unsuccessful attempt, to provide comfortable secure lives for their wives and children.

    Myself, I don't think it's wrong for working class men to want to provide decent lives for their families - or even for them to be angry when, despite their best heroic efforts, they are unable to do so. It is, in my opinion, shameful that in a technologically advanced country like the USA it's not possible for most people to work an honest 9-5 and support their families simply but comfortably.

    But what is wrong is to blame Jews, or immigrants or foreigners. The rising inequality that is squeezing working-class white men and their wives and children so hard is fundamentally caused by policies championed by billionaires like Donald Trump and the Republican Party generally.

    TL;DR Working-class white men should be angry but they should be angry at billionaires like Trump rather than Jews, or foreigners or immigrants.

  13. The answer by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    diaspora.org

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  14. Re:So let's talk about it by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Can we wait until I've marketed my White Genocide Defense Kit(tm) to them first? Only 4 easy payments of $88.

  15. That's the scary thing to me by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    these people have convinced themselves Jews are somehow a different species. Just the fact that they can interbreed with Aryans (and every other human) should have clued them in on how batshit insane that is. And it's not like they don't know, they have rules for how much Jewish blood you can have.

    Once you can except a lie that obvious you can accept any lie. You'll believe anything. And then all you need is somebody to come along and point you in the right direction for violence...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. Re:So let's talk about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The inherent bigoted hypocrisy in modern social justice.

    Here's a few suggestions:
    1. abolish affirmative action
    2. stop measuring success of equal opportunity via equal outcome.
    3. drop the racist and sexist propaganda pushed by major institutions. It's raising whole generations of adult children who are incapable of reason.
    4. revamp education so that it focuses on enlightenment values instead of ideological conformity.
    5. strongly enforce borders while allowing those with something to offer the country a chance at citizenship. Time to create an inverse brain drain.

  17. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gum by c6gunner · · Score: 2

    White people being romantically preferred over other races makes them victims?

    Interesting theory. Please, tell me more.

  18. Re:So let's talk about it by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, guys like Alex Jones and Rush Limbaugh are making pretty good coin off of these groups. That's the amusing part, they don't even really see how they're being played by people who are basically entertainers. Breitbart falls under this umbrella now, as does Fox News.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  19. Re:So let's talk about it by epyT-R · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your post equally applies to the social justice crowd.

  20. Re:So let's talk about it by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lets talk about how a lot of insecure/jealous lamers want their betters to pay for their sloth-driven indigence. Their utterly massive insecurity complex perfectly explains their pathological need to celebrate this mental illness as 'diversity', often to the point where they act no differently than the neo-nazis they claim to fight.

  21. Re:So let's talk about it by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

    God, I hate those 2. I can not stand listening to either of them, or radio like them. this includes the just as bigoted left wing radio idiots.

    --
    Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  22. Re:I dunno by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    If you were an organization dedicated to helping get people out of hate groups (these do exist) you might be interesting in advertising directly to Nazis. I suppose that most advertisers who wanted to target that group wouldn't have such good intentions though.

  23. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6g by c6gunner · · Score: 2

    Ah, yeah, I agree. My natural beauty truly can be a burden at times. I've even taken to growing a neck beard and only showering once a week in an effort to put an end to the constant female attention, but nothing seems to work ...

  24. newsflash! AD company commodifys everything by citylivin · · Score: 1

    film at 11.

    Advertising causes need therapy therapy, advertising causes need.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  25. Re: So let's talk about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The slave trade was blocked by the British over two centuries ago.

    True. It's interesting that Jews owned most ships in the Atlantic slave trade, and the Islamic slave trade dwarfed it, until white Christians forcefully put an end to all of it. And yet, who gets the bad rap for it now?

    (Captcha: slaver. How fitting.)

  26. Re: A Pattern? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    But if they had banned that hashtag, it would have been islamophobic.

  27. Re:White g3nocide is real by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Pretty much this. Both parties saw doom on the horizon for social security when the boomers started retiring, which is now. So either inconceivable borrowing or taxing (2 workers per retiree ain't gonna fly, old man) or import young workers hand over fist.

    Nobody cared until (and this is debatable) one party decided, or was accused of shifting its voting base to the newbies.

    True or not, that is the prime motivator of the politics of the day. Enjoy.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  28. All that effort and ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Facebook Allowed Advertisers To Target Users Interested in 'White Genocide'

    ... it's still one of the least popular Ben & Jerry's flavors.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:All that effort and ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What are the ingredients? Vanilla, white chocolate, and mayonaisse?

    2. Re:All that effort and ... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Ashes, shattered bone and human suffering.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  29. But by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Should OBAMACARE buy SEX ROBOTS for INCELS? Your calls, after this!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  30. Pro or Con... by steak · · Score: 1

    That is the question.

    1. Re:Pro or Con... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I can't wait till they allow "launch crusade to retake Constantinople."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:Pro or Con... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Considering that it is a sex thing, I'm gonna say pro.

      Just like you can count on extreme homophobes to be self-loathing, and so you should advertise gay porn to them, with white nationalists they're actually fighting an inferiority complex that makes them excessively attracted to non-white women. But they have to be haters in public, so they do it on the down-low.

      But they have to use their own word that won't cause them to see naked black men. Because that would aggravate their inferiority and they wouldn't be able to perform for weeks. That's the same reason they can't just go to a regular porn site and sort the results; they don't have a strong enough sense of self to overlook things they're not interested in, so sorting isn't a strict enough technique for them. So they have to find these picture-sharing safe spaces where they won't see the "wrong" stuff, and nobody knows their real name.

    3. Re:Pro or Con... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it isn't?

  31. Re:Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gumm by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are a ton of Nazis running around. Except they dress in black, wear masks/bandanas over their faces, use violence to push their goals, claim sole right to dictate who gets to do what (usually based solely on race and gender), and call themselves, quaintly enough, "Anti Fascists".

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  32. Is it too early to break up FB? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Thousands of concerned citizens say no.

    In fact, FB, Google, and Apple are now being required to pay UK taxes due to their shady tax avoidance, not to mention other activities that are anti-democratic by nature and anti-social by definition.

    "Open the pod bay doors, HAL"

    "I'm sorry, Dave, I can't do that due to my Evil Corporate internal directives stating all humans are slaves or worse."

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re: Is it too early to break up FB? by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Nah, breaking up Faceboot is not the right answer. Instead, let's just make their creepy cyberstalking-based business model illegal. Very very illegal.

      Now Big Brother Google - there is a guy candidate for an anti-trust action.

  33. Works both ways... by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

    They could have used the "white genocide conspiracy theory" selector to flood them with counter-propaganda advertising. Seems like a missed opportunity here.

  34. Re:So let's talk about it by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Well, Fox News is still a legitimate news outfit, whereas Breitbart has alway and unashamedly been about promoting fake news.

  35. Re:So let's talk about it by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

    If someone is on the radio or TV and their voice is raised at a higher volume than the average speaking voice, they're not worth listening to.

  36. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6g by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Ah, yeah, I agree. My natural beauty truly can be a burden at times. I've even taken to growing a neck beard and only showering once a week in an effort to put an end to the constant female attention, but nothing seems to work ...

    Sounds like you're doing it wrong. You need to add in an extra 300lbs to really make it work for you. Beards and neckbeards are in vogue right now, and then there's the whole limited showering natural scent movement. Don't worry, you can get those 2-4/10 girls with some extra effort, I believe in you!

    But you'll never be as attractive as someone who goes /fit/ and wears a lumberjack shirt.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  37. What they need are good jobs by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the kind that let you afford to raise a family. Look at the most successful time in the history of the American civil rights movement and it was when the economy was the strongest for the working class (the 60s and early 70s). Then you see dips as the economy crashes.

    Incels are just guys that can't get laid, and that's almost always because they can't afford women. That makes them vulnerable to opportunists who offer up easy solutions to their problems.

    Fix the economy for the working class and white supremacy will fade back into the background. Hitler couldn't' have done what he did without WWI reparations wrecking the German economy. A big part of exterminating the Jews was taking their property for the war and not having to feed them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: What they need are good jobs by jd · · Score: 1

      Viable theory. Problem is, there are a lot of opinions on what "fixing" means. However, I'm convinced you've identified the correct starting point.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re: What they need are good jobs by nmo.marques · · Score: 1

      Hitler? War reparations? What about, 90% of the chemical industry in US being german before the war and after being 0%? Loosing 20% of his territories. War reparations was nothing compared to the US ripoff of industry and loss of territory. Hitler was targeted and destroyed because all of germany gold reserves were loss as they were outside germany. 1st thing he did was to remove the mark from gold standard and make it based on work force. Curiously everyone who tried to fight the fidutiary standard got the same ending as Hitler. Pinochet, Saddam, Kadahfi, etc. Only one to survive so far was Hassad. And by the way in Hitlers germany most white supremacists would have a hard time, specially those with the tattoos, etc. Most white supremacists bellong to gangs and either are connected to arms or drug dealing. Nationalism has nothing to do with white supremacists. As religion became a profitable business replacing spirituality (ex: Kabbalah), white supremacists replaced the fundamental about nationalism.

  38. Re: So let's talk about it by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Well I was going to volunteer to QA the sexbot prototype, but I'd rather wait till the geno,er, other type of bot comes out from a separate production facility, like in Dakota or something.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  39. Re:Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gumm by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    claim sole right to dictate who gets to do what

    No, they don't claim sole right to punch nazis, other people get to do it too!

    The only thing they dictate is, "don't be a nazi."

    Usually that is easy, what makes it so hard in your experience?

  40. Re:So let's talk about it by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Affirmative action isn't a policy in the US, so it is hard to abolish. It was an idea that was popular in the 60s/70s, but it wasn't enacted.

    The rest are equally correct.

    The funniest is #5 where you get a little confused about the directionality of the draining brains.

  41. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gum by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    The only thing they dictate is, "don't be a nazi."

    Usually that is easy, what makes it so hard in your experience?

    Well, I didn't think it was hard, until those nice folks at ANTIFA informed me that wearing a red "make bitcoin great again" hat makes you a Nazi. And then proceeded to pepper spray the girl who was wearing it.

  42. Re:So let's talk about it by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    Is the reason that incels are not getting laid because of society or because they have mental health problems and wallow in their own misery?

    Head over to some incel forums and have a look at the selfie threads. They post images of themselves so that the other incels can point out all the things wrong with them, the things they think mean they can never find a girlfriend. It's mostly nonsense, the guys posting are normal looking and you see lots of similar looking guys in relationships. But they are convinced the shape of their skull is the problem and the other incels confirm it.

    Trans people have the same thing. Trans women post selfies and other trans women tell them they will never pass as feminine and can't fix their bone structure.

    Sexbots may help, but I worry that they will exploit incels and others. Look at how bad DLC and loot crates (gambling) are in video games.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  43. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gum by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    As I do live and breathe... you're actually capable of writing something intelligent! Who'd have figured??

  44. Re: So let's talk about it by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Looking at the first plot in your link, I don't think that's the way I'd summarise it. To first order, I'd put it as: "Women prefer men of their own race, whatever that might be. Men are okay with women of any race except black.".

    Not sure that's entirely accurate given that Asian women preferred white men, and "Latina" women were essentially tied for white/Latino. But yeah, OK, in general, women express more of a racial in-group bias than men. If it were the other way around there'd be no shortage of feminists screaming about how men are more racist than women ... but as it stands everyone just ignores it.

    Some other first-order slices: "If you're a woman, it's best to be Asian. If you're a man, it's best to be white.".

    Yeah, the different between Asian women and White women is small, but the Asian women to have a slight edge. Whereas white men do overwhelmingly better than any other men.

    So much for that "white male incel" stereotype.

  45. Re: So let's talk about it by tigersha · · Score: 1

    The day AI sexbots start exploiting people for their own pleasure I am moving to another planet

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  46. Re: So let's talk about it by tigersha · · Score: 1

    Sure, you wanna go first?

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  47. Re: So let's talk about it by tigersha · · Score: 1

    Did they run their test in The US of A or in the Congo? For there it will be the other way around.

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  48. Re: So let's talk about it by tigersha · · Score: 2

    Both countries have their nukes pretty much on subs only so they might be hard for a mob to get their hands on

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  49. Re: So let's talk about it by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    From the other hand, maybe there is a problem with whites spending too much time dating without procreating.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  50. Re:So let's talk about it by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Agreed with everything, except this:

    > Time to create an inverse brain drain.

    There is only brain influx to Western world and US, in particular.

    That's the largest amount of spoils of war in history that any country ever harvested.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  51. Difficulties by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    'How to burn jews,' or, 'History of "why jews ruin the world."

    Clearly they have somehow ruined the world by being difficult to burn.

  52. Re:Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gumm by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Being declared domestic terrorists, forcing others to drive where they illegally dictate you can drive (and beating on cars that they feel "offend" them), using violence as the means of communication, and demanding ideological purity to their own goals. Pretty much full-on Nazi-esque behavior.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  53. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6g by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    Beards may be in.... but what if he shaved everything except the neck?

  54. what's bogus and why necessary outside forces? by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm definitely a believer in white genocide.

    As far as an ongoing event it's fucking obvious it happen here in Sweden if the destruction of our people / breed or whatever you wanna call it is what it is about.

    As for whatever it's planned and on purpose I don't really think matter much but for some antiracists who don't want it to be possible to claim "I'm .." they likely want the mixing. some immigrants likely want more of their people here. I know for a fact Erdogan wanted more Turks in Europe and more Turkish children in it. Maybe more for loyality and alliances than to replace Europeans but. We've also got Gadaffi who meant the Muslims were winning and achieving the conquest of Europe (simply by immigration.)
    For all I care those who want to claim there "are no races" or "all Swedes are immigrants" or whatever and then let the replacement happen they are actors and cause it.
    As for the Jews theres definitely Jews who are in such positions. Then again it's not weird if whatever immigrant is in a position where they work for minority rights or view on immigration or such because that relate to them and may be important to them but it of course doesn't necessarily line up with the ideas and will of the natives.

    (Similarly with all the people who think democracy is good one more likely of democracy would be a push for assimilation and less immigrant influences as long as they are a minority. These people rarely understand why democracy and the rule by the majority is bad and not as liberal as they think and claim.)

    1. Re:what's bogus and why necessary outside forces? by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      You're not planning to go shoot up bunch of kids going to camp, are you?

    2. Re:what's bogus and why necessary outside forces? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Stupid question.

      I'll leave it up to you to get a feel for whatever I think it's right or wrong.

  55. You do realize that only applies to advertising by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    right? Facebook has consistently been caught making it easy for advertisers to target racists whites. Facebook is a company. They make money. Perhaps we should be asking ourselves why there is so much money to be made targeting that particular demographic.

    I'd like to think it's all the Russian trolls buying up ads to rile up a small percentage of Americans. It's also possible that small percentage of racists is worth targeting because they're easy to fleece, especially during a mid-term election where they can be tricked into voting against their best economic interests.

    When you're feeling instead of thinking you do dumb things.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You do realize that only applies to advertising by bblb · · Score: 1

      The terrific irony of you going on a racism tirade about easy to fleece white men while responding to a black man daring to think for himself. Check your own racism before running your mouth... the reality is, facebook shouldn't be allowing any advertising targeting "genocide" period, white black or otherwise. That you would try to dance around that simple reality to defend Facebook's profit interests or attack a demographic is a YOU problem.

  56. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gu by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    Well there you go. Apparently all it takes to be a Nazi is to go to a political event ... and you are somehow confused by why it's hard to not be a Nazi.

  57. Re: So let's talk about it by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It's worse than that. Exploiting people for their corporate masters.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  58. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6g by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    This is why I come to Slashdot. For the fashion advice.

  59. Re: So let's talk about it by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what exactly you mean by "the other way around" given that there are more than just two trends shown by thus data. Can you expand on that? What is it you think would be the other way around, and why?

  60. Why Rome Fell by alternative_right · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rome fell for the same reason that Athens fell: it lost its ability to coordinate itself. Diversity was both a symptom and a factor in that decline. As Plato pointed out, unstable republics import foreigners in order to have allies for their tyrants, and this accelerates instability to crash.

    Tell me all about the diverse republics in history that have done well by themselves and not crashed shortly after diversity was introduced. Yes, it takes them many centuries to reach The Bitter End, but in the meantime, they become abusive and dystopian places. Is that the future you want?

  61. Let's not follow them by alternative_right · · Score: 1

    This time, let's learn a lesson from history and not destroy our civilization.

  62. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    Mental health problems normally have a cause.

    Once you've reached the downward spiral, the mental problems trigger social problems which trigger mental problems. You're in an infinite loop and looking at it will tell you nothing. Breaking out is almost impossible as psychiatry is too primitive and neurology too expensive.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  63. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    Progressive politics solve problems, leaving less to complain about. Do you know how many political pundits and priests that puts out of work?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  64. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    How about 7 easy payments of $88, optional $50 fire insurance.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  65. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    When you say on the TV, you mean as a picture on the screen, right? I could imagine contexts where an elevated voice would be expected.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  66. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    No such thing as leftist. Making things up doesn't count as covering ignored issues. Falsifying evidence is not an opinion.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  67. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    Peace sells but who's buying?

    This, we're also assured, is the news.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  68. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    That's ok, white supremacists know even less.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  69. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    You mean, the people who think that if America copied the countries with lower crime, higher employment, better jobs, longer lifespans and more successful businesses?

    Or are you referring to the ancient philosophers, mathematicians, robotics and historians who essentially founded all of civilization on such beliefs?

    Yes, I can see why you might be resentful of either group.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  70. Re: So let's talk about it by jd · · Score: 1

    You know the movement was originally by left-wing women before being hijacked by right-wing terrorists, right?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  71. Re: So let's talk about it by nmo.marques · · Score: 1

    Blasphemy! Antifa are cool...

  72. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gu by c6gunner · · Score: 2

    I like it! Very postmodernist! Hell, if people post online that the earth is flat ... maybe it is!. If I say that you're a rapist and a pedophile ... maybe you are! Who needs silly things like facts and evidence; reality is subjective anyway!

  73. Re: Ahah, another nazi whines like a bitch : c6gu by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    You're saying that somebody impersonating a nazi and being confused for being a nazi is the same as a bare accusation of being a nazi. That's silly.

    If you go to a political rally and impersonate a pedophile, I'm gonna say yes, you almost certainly are one. You would not otherwise have a desire to role-play it!

    If I dress up with cat ears and watch Cat Planet Cuties, it is only because I'm a pervert who would totally go furry if anthropomorphic space-alien cat-people landed nearby.

    If you dress up as a nazi for Halloween, I'm gonna think you're either a nazi or a total asshole, but if you dress up as a nazi for a political event, I really don't care how tragically naive you are, you're just a nazi and thank goodness for antifa!