Slashdot Mirror


Apple Will No Longer Reveal How Many iPhones, iPads, and Macs It Sells (theverge.com)

Yesterday, during the company's Q4 earnings call, Apple's chief financial officer Luca Maestri said the company will no longer report unit sales of its main hardware divisions, including iPhones, iPad, and Mac. "This is the same as protocols Apple already follows for its smaller devices, such as the Apple Watch, AirPods, and HomePod, which are bundled under the 'Other Products' category," The Verge reports. From the report: The announcement comes after iPhone unit sales percentage was unchanged year over year, despite a revenue bump of 29 percent. The decision to stop disclosing unit sales is because that figure is "not representative of underlying strength of our business," Maestri said. "A unit of sale is less relevant today than it was in our past," he says, adding that unit sales increase are still a clear part of Apple's goals. While unit sales may not accurately represent Apple's business performance, it's a figure that analysts and journalists have used to calculate a product's average selling price. For example, that number can provide insight into how well different iPhone models are selling, as newer iPhones like the XS, XS Max, and XR are priced higher than older models like the now-discontinued SE, 6S, and 6.

158 comments

  1. Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No other company does and it all it does is a few with their Wall Street numbers reguardless of what their income levels are.

    1. Re:Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess that the point is that they were happy to report it when it made them look good and positively impacted the stock price. Now that their sales numbers are flattening out they are going to stop communicating this information to the shareholders and the rest of the market.

      Seems a bit cuntish. But then we are talking about Apple, so...

    2. Re:Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because their sales are declining in unit terms, so they've made up for that by boosting prices, which will cut units further. It's clouding insight into future performance at exactly the time it matters most.

    3. Re:Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any company will brag with the best numbers it has, if the numbers turn bad however.... For most companies indeed, unit sales do not matter, profit does. But for a company that has built it's business on image and market share, the unit sales matter, especially if they fall year after year. If they lose market share and their popularity drops, then soon enough it will reflect poorly on their profitability.

    4. Re:Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No other company does and it all it does is a few with their Wall Street numbers reguardless of what their income levels are.

      No other company except for Tesla and how it breaks out model unit sales, or GM, Ford, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc.

    5. Re:Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most other companies are not utterly dependent on such a narrow set of products that are critically reliant on maintaining marketshare for their future success. iphones go down and while it may not reveal itself on the bottom line in the year it occurs it has a serious longterm impact to a large array of revenue streams for them.

    6. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's stupid. A company doesn't care about the stock price after the first sale of stock. Regardless of how much price changes the company never receives more money or has to return money.

    7. Re: Why should they? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That's stupid. A company doesn't care about the stock price after the first sale of stock. Regardless of how much price changes the company never receives more money or has to return money.

      OK, I'm going to explain to you why a company cares about a stock price after the first sale. Are you ready? You might want to sit down for this.

      Because, in Apple's case, they've been buying back as much stock as they can with their windfall from the Trump tax giveaway. In fact, Apple is one of Apple's biggest shareholders. So if the stock goes up, they will be one of the biggest beneficiaries, after Berskshire Hathaway and Arthur Levinson, who is Apple's biggest shareholder and - ready for this - also the chairman of the board of Apple.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isnâ(TM)t that insider trading?

    9. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, executives have to declare stock sales months in advance. Then they have to actually sell at whatever the price is on the predetermined day.

    10. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, Apple not only retires their repurchased stock, but currently holds no treasury stock at all.

    11. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As far as I know it is impossible for a corporation to own stock in itself and I am embarrassed on behalf of pope ratzo, even more so for anyone who would take anything he says seriously, ever again.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    12. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Companies care about their stock price because if it does not go up, major shareholders will get together and throw out the current management. Happens all the time. Another major reason is employee stock compensation, top employees head for the exits really fast if their options go underwater. There are other reasons but those are the big ones for tech companies.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it can. Indirectly. If the company buys back its own stock and retired it the price basically increases. Since executives hold shares too itâ(TM)s in their best interests to do this. It also drives the price up which is good for investors. So he was right.

    14. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It does not matter whether a company retires its own shares or not. If not retired (struct from the register by shareholder resolution) then it is simply unissued stock, pure paper. It is common for companies to have unissued stock, this has no effect whatsoever on the share price or any other valuation measure.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    15. Re: Why should they? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      So in effect, executives have to plan months ahead what they will do that raises or lowers the stock value on the day of sale.

    16. Re: Why should they? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Pepsi would have a similar problem with the volume of their sale of sugar water to kids if they weren't diversified into other markets like Pizza Hut, etc.

    17. Re: Why should they? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Or if they believe in the company, they could just hold the stock long term and only sell it after they leave. Or if they suck at their job, hold onto it and sell after being fired. If they are truly awful, the stock price would probably go up.

    18. Re: Why should they? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Wouldn’t they want it to go down though so they can buy up even more? The profits are obscene enough that the dividend will tide investors over and anyone on the inside could get a big payday if Apple gets enough control to make an offer to go private.

    19. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase you all are looking for is "Treasury Stock".
      Apparently no one else in this thread understands basic accounting.

    20. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McD will prolly do the same as soon as their sales begin to decline

      Hypocrites

    21. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      A common one I see often is the belief that a company buying its own shares increases the price of the remaining shares. No. Because the decrease in company value exactly balances the larger portion of the company represented by each share. The share price therefore remains the same.

      As an exercise, assume that a company has only two shares issued, and its entire assets consist of $100 in the bank. Each share is obviously worth $50. Now the company buys back one of the shares, the company is now worth $50. And there is now one share outstanding, representing the entire value of the company. That is, $50. Hmm, magic, the share value did not change. And like magic, this principle holds no matter how many shares there are or what the company is worth. The technical term for this is "mathematics".

      Of course it gets more complicated when you mix in some emotions, and a liberal sprinkling of stupidity.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    22. Re: Why should they? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Wouldn’t they want it to go down though so they can buy up even more?

      They could make the price go down any time they want, just by releasing sales figures again.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    23. Re: Why should they? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      As far as I know it is impossible for a corporation to own stock in itself and I am embarrassed on behalf of pope ratzo, even more so for anyone who would take anything he says seriously, ever again.

      The part your missing is that the largest tranches of stock are being held by APPLE EXECUTIVES.

      And trust me, bucko, they're not retiring those shares.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    24. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employees are idiots if they work for anything but hard cash

    25. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      You know why they call it Silly Valley.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    26. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      the largest tranches of stock are being held by APPLE EXECUTIVES.

      You are deeply clueless about all matters financial, yet you blow hard on the internet.

      0.1% of Apple is owned by insiders.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    27. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      They could make the price go down any time they want, just by releasing sales figures again.

      You got that right. They could also make the price go down by never releasing sales figures. See how it works?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does the "other" mean.

      It's over 38% of the owners.

    29. Re: Why should they? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      You are deeply clueless about all matters financial, yet you blow hard on the internet.

      Yeah, yeah. The only problem is, the top five shareholders of Apple stock are all Apple executives.

      https://www.investopedia.com/a...

      And nothing about your link contradicts my point: That the biggest individual beneficiaries of Apple pumping their stock price are Apple execs. And not surprisingly, they're the ones making the decisions on the buybacks (which by the way, strengthen their voting positions and enrich them greatly).

      So, this all goes back to my original comment, which was a response to someone who claimed that "Apple doesn't benefit when their stock price goes up", and I explained why that was not true.

      You might want to figure out what we're talking about before you jump in and beclown yourself with something you know little about.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      the top five shareholders of Apple stock are all Apple executives.

      Individual shareholders. See 0.1%, above. Bucko.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    31. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      That's the general public. Do you talk that way in general life?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    32. Re: Why should they? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Individual shareholders. [investopedia.com] See 0.1%, above. Bucko.

      Right. Individuals who are making the decisions at Apple.

      Gosh, you're just so close to understanding. Don't give up.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    33. Re: Why should they? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      You said "the largest tranches of stock are being held by APPLE EXECUTIVES."

      That is just wrong and stupid.

      Fighting with a pig, I know I just get dirt on me.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    34. Re:Why should they? by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      They're allowed to withhold that info from shareholders? I know publicly traded companies have to release their tax information publicly, but... not sales figures?

    35. Re:Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a shame they did not hit Zuck's Sinagoge while he was in it.

    36. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stock market people love numbers but it skews the outlook for the company (good and bad) when the wrong interpretation is pushed to pump/hype/short/dump the stock.

      So this just takes that analysis away from them. It affects exactly zero stock holders.

    37. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car numbers matter because unsold inventory is dumped at the end of Q4.

      Smartphones are just sold until there is no more of the initially produced inventory. If something doesnâ(TM)t have a good uptake or is recalled due to a dangerous defect then they cease all production and recycle them.

    38. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know it is impossible for a corporation to own stock in itself and I am embarrassed on behalf of pope ratzo, even more so for anyone who would take anything he says seriously, ever again.

      Want proof Popey must be right? The greatest moron on the interwebs, Tough Love ( 215404 ) itself says he is wrong.

    39. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the largest tranches of stock are being held by APPLE EXECUTIVES.

      You are deeply clueless about all matters financial, yet you blow hard on the internet.

      0.1% of Apple is owned by insiders.

      The Top 5 Individual Apple Shareholders (AAPL) - all from Apple. Fuck you, you bloody moron.

    40. Re: Why should they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could make the price go down any time they want, just by releasing sales figures again.

      You got that right. They could also make the price go down by never releasing sales figures. See how it works?

      Like all other companies do? You heard it first from Tough Love, the fucking moron: Apple is only the "most valuable company" because they reported sales numbers.

  2. I guess that what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when your unit sales start to slip.
    If apple cant brag they hide information.

  3. translation... by ad454 · · Score: 4, Informative

    We are still making money in the short term by overcharging suckers, while losing market share, and also pushing iOS developers away from the Macs they required.

    This is the problem with the short term thinking and incentive structures in western multi-nationals corporations, who only care about the next quarter or so. Which is typically done at the expense of long term business viability.

    1. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Market share doesn't matter in their iPhone division, at least. They've the luxury brand market tamped down pretty well. They don't want to risk cannibalizing sales by releasing cheaper iPhones.

      What they should be worried about is losing desktop and laptop sales. They have almost nothing for actual serious professional users. Trashcan Mac Pros are old and can't be upgraded. The iMac Pro is new, but it's an all-in-one that can't be upgraded. The new Mac Mini is an i3 for $800.

      Their laptops are overpriced and irreparable. Their insistence on using only Thunderbolt means overpriced dongles are needed for everything.

      I'm not quite sure why anyone would buy a Mac unless they absolutely require some Mac-only software.

    2. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderbolt 3 is compatible with usb-c u fuckin mong.

    3. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 10yr old MBP5,2 running Mojave without issues.

      Apple makes a great os, but I'm not a fan of their mobile devices.

      I'll probably never buy another Apple laptop new again, but their older hw is definitely built military grade!

    4. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPhones are not a luxury brand, something like Vertu is. iPhone is just an overpriced brand that pretends to be a luxury brand, yet still remains attainable for a common consumer. And it has done so very well indeed.

    5. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Market share doesn't matter in their iPhone division, at least. They've the luxury brand market tamped down pretty well

      You call fool some people some of the time.

      You can even fool all people some of the time.

      But you ain't gonna be able to fool all people, all of the time !

      Let's see how long Apple can fool those fanbois ...

    6. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. The connector is the same (and it's shitty) but the signaling is very different

    7. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh... Yeah they need to maintain their market share \ presence.

      Can you imagine a user who paid $1200 getting the apps that are socially demanded months after Android users (who often pay half as much or get twice the goodies for the same price)? Or it never gets ported?

        You're not going to feel "luxurious" any more... If anything you're going to feel gouged.

    8. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the mong whom obviously doesn't understand the electricals of either.

    9. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll probably never buy another Apple laptop new again, but their older hw is definitely built military grade!"

      No, you just got lucky and got one that somehow managed to pass QC the first time.

      No single piece of Apple equipment, from computer to phone, is MIL-SPEC compliant to any degree.

    10. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderbolt 3 is compatible with usb-c u fuckin mong.

      Yeah, and neither of those interfaces is compatible with 90% of the hardware market, u fucking mong.

      And the 10% of hardware those interfaces natively work with are so stupidly overpriced you're practically forced to buy a reasonably-priced USB alternative and make it work with a fucking overpriced dongle.

      Anyone defending Apples I/O moves of late is either an idiot or an iWhore.

    11. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some well run companies like Berkshire Hathaway could care less to impress Wall Street. There's actually alot of them. JNJ, GD, Fairfax Financial. I could go on.

    12. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He is talking about the US military. It doesnâ(TM)t mean tough, it means expensive.

    13. Re: translation... by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      So like the sellers of luxury automobiles in 1928 they have a secure market. Go Dusenberg! Hurrah, Pierce-Arrow! The market of wealthy plutocrats will never shrink.

    14. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hurrah, Pierce-Arrow!

      I believe the period-correct interjection you are looking for is "Huzzah!"

    15. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luxury ? Not really. It might have been that way years ago, but when I now see iPhone toters I think to myself that they're suckers, or at best (friends and family) I silently feel sorry for them to be bound to a proprietary, limited and expensive ecosystem with no easy way out.

      A bit like former gentry overcome by upkeep costs.

    16. Re: translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, TB3 is faster than USB-C.

    17. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone defending Apples I/O moves of late is either an idiot or an iWhore.

      Those options are not mutually exclusive, and usually exhibit a considerable degree of overlap.

    18. Re: translation... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The connector is the same (and it's shitty) but the signaling is very different

      The connector is not shitty, it's a fine piece of work in terms of capability, ergonomics, form factor, mechanical stability and basically all the things that matter about a connector. Thunderbolt 3 conforms to USB Type-C physically, electrically and protocol-wise, using Type-C's "alternate mode" functionality to provide PCI-E and DisplayPort functionality. So I take issue with your "very different" characterization, it indicates that you have not bothered to read the Wikipedia page or "Thunderbolt Technology Community" page, or any other accurate information. (BTW, you'd be an idiot to trust my post too, just go right ahead and check it.)

      USB-C and its Thunderbolt 3 superset are high minded, ambitious projects, apparently well executed, but with obvious potential for compatibility nightmares. We are right now on the verge of finding out just how bad that is going to be. Let's hope for the best.

      What you can connect to what depends very much on the controller hardware on each end and the software driving that controller hardware. For example, to connect a monitor you need hardware such as DisplayPort, which is (apparently) always supported by Thunderbolt 3 controllers, but does not necessarily require Thunderbolt 3 because it is one of the "Alternate Mode partner specifications" defined for USB Type-C. HDMI is another alternate mode partner specification defined for USB-C. Apparently, Thunderbolt always provides HDMI 2.0, but this can also be provided without Thunderbolt. Confused yet? You should be. If not, then you just don't understand.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    19. Re:translation... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The foul mounted troll is actually right, Thunderbolt is a superset of USB-C. Seems to be you who doesn't understand the electricals.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:translation... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Non-Apple USB C devices such as Moto G6 (recommended!) do just fine with hardware compatibility. I don't need any dongles at all, just cables with type C instead of micro B. The computer/power wart end remains type A. This is fairly painless.

      Type C on both ends gets into guaranteed crazy land, where Apple is jumping in with both feet. Saner companies are introducing host-side type C gradually as just one of several ports, typically also including several type A, at least one HDMI, and a DisplayPort. Maybe in five years that will evolve to just type A and type C. VGA ports became scarce years ago and DVI is starting to vanish in favor of HDMI. Good riddance to DVI, what an annoying cable to connect! And I hope HDMI dies out soon too, with its consumer electronics association roots, and also being a pretty crappy plug ergonomics-wise, but realistically all those TVs are going to keep it alive for some time.

      DisplayPort connectors are probably going to die out before HDMI because type C is so much nicer. Which is perfectly fine with me, because I, like many people, don't yet own a single DisplayPort capable monitor. So I will just keep my wallet in my pocket until USB C monitors become common, not just on the high end. Ideally, classic DisplayPort never becomes part of my strange cable collection.

      Dropping type A right now, today, would just be pure idiocy, but I expect that Apple is fully capable of it and will do exactly that.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    21. Re:translation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: Don't buy Moto unless you plan to install a custom ROM.

      Head on over to reddit's r/MotoG if you want to see the drama about the Moto G5+ (retail US version) being the only SKU in the world that's not updated yet. The same week everyone else got Oreo 8.1, the RETUS G5+ got Android 7.0 w/ August 1, 2018 patch level.

    22. Re:translation... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      So far I'm not complaining, my G6 came with Oreo and supposedly there will be a Pie update in 19Q1. Already got a couple of security updates to 8.0.0, I'm calling that so far, so good. If the Pie update arrives I'll upgrade that to excellent, and of course we need to see how long the updates keep coming, especially security updates.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  4. Sustainability. by msauve · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A trillion dollar company, supported in vast majority by (essentially) a single product. Why wouldn't they try to obfuscate when basic facts start looking "iffy?"

    Really, the whole iThing ecosystem came to be in 15 years, and it's a monoculture. It's a huge bet for it being sustainable. Heck, 15 years ago, GE was king of the hill and way more diversified, look where they are now.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Sustainability. by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple painted themselves into a corner on this one. To make the numbers it was just way easier to jack up prices than to attack the bargain hunter segment, which is most of the market and the only part that is still growing. Too late now, the value gap between Android and Apple is almost a factor of two, if Apple tries to close it they will be faced with a revenue collapse the likes of which the tech industry has never seen.

      Apple might get lucky and make it through 4Q without a revenue miss but it's a crapshoot. After that, well... all I can say is, Apple is on the verge of becoming number 3 in volume behind Huawei and by this time next year they could be number 4 behind Xiaomi as well. The total market is saturated, no question about it, so all that comes right out of I-phone unit sales. Just no way to make up the revenue gap by price increases.

      So place your bet... Apple misses big in 4Q? or they keep the game going for another couple of quarters before chickens come home to roost? The 7% haircut today says, smart money knows Apple is a growth stock no more, it's a shrink stock if anything. The technical term is Peak Apple.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Sustainability. by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A trillion dollar company, supported in vast majority by (essentially) a single product. (...) Really, the whole iThing ecosystem came to be in 15 years, and it's a monoculture. It's a huge bet for it being sustainable.

      Where that "one thing" is near the ultimate convergence device replacing your dumbphone, MP3 player, palm pilot, camera, GPS tracker and so on. And according to StatCounter more people browse the web on phones than desktops. There's a lot of good arguments against Apple, but this is a bit like saying a car company depends on a demand for cars. While that's true it's kinda hard to imagine modern society functioning without cars or something so close as to practically be cars. If I stare into the crystal ball I don't see smartphones going away the next 10, 20 or 50 years so the market seems extremely sustainable, the only question in my mind is if they're made by Apple.

      There's lots of cheaper alternatives than Apple, there has been and there will be. But for a device that people use so much I don't think there's any reason to think the premium market is going away. And in some ways Apple is obviously pushing boundaries like with the A12/A12X chip, it's expensive but it's also the fastest on the market. And not everyone is a fan of the world's biggest data mining company being the other choice. If Apple is going down it's primarily because they priced themselves out of premium and into the luxury market with $1000+ phones. At least they support old phones so you can have one for years, unlike Android where all the cheap phones lose support real quick.

      And IMHO they have one of the biggest market opportunities possible to launch their own ARM line of laptops/desktops and take over a huge market from Microsoft/Intel. Do they have weaknesses and threats too? Sure. This is not investment advice. But the people who declare it dead or dying will probably end up just as disappointed as those who wanted Micro$oft dead. They obviously fumbled the ball quite a bit and missed out on the whole phone market, but to really go away they have to hit a dead end hard. It happens sometimes like Nokia did, but that's actually the exception not the rule.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re: Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol their processors are a joke.

      Anyone can make a fast processor. You could even drop an i3 or a ryzen chip intoba phone and blow away any ARM based processor.

      The super fast processor isn't going to be useful to you if it doesn't have power left to use it. Doing things like browsing and watching videos and playing games, the Galaxy range kicks their ass by at least 30 minutes, typically closer to an hour.

      Can you imagine if all the gate i people doing at Android (not optimized for a single device, interpreted languages take more power, etc) were true? How much longer the the phones would last?

    4. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...a revenue collapse the likes of which the tech industry has never seen."

      I'm sorry, but from that point on, I can't help but picture you as an orange-haired moron ;)

    5. Re:Sustainability. by Teckla · · Score: 1

      To make the numbers it was just way easier to jack up prices than to attack the bargain hunter segment, which is most of the market and the only part that is still growing.

      iPhones are arguably less expensive than bargain Androids once you factor in how much longer they're supported.

    6. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but from that point on, I can't help but picture you as an orange-haired moron ;)

      NPC.exe is executing code as expected.

    7. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple makes great super fast processors that have to be throttled within a year to keep the CPU from sucking the battery dry.
      Typical apple; smoke and mirror tech.

    8. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a total BS. I buy cell phones around $200 mark and I had an iPhone while working for Apple. Granted $200 phone today does not have as good camera as top of the line iPhone but it is about the same as iPhone-6. The rest of the phone is pretty good. I can buy new phone every 2 years and still will not come close to price of an iPhone. And new phone will come with better camera and new battery.
      It is all about ecosystem. If you like apple, you suck it up and pay premium. Even my fellow engineers with 6 digit salaries are thinking twice about upgrading an apple phone, it got so expensive.

    9. Re: Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be surprised how quickly the customer herd will head for the exits once Apple loses it lustre and becomes stale.

    10. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? All of a year before Apple starts throttling them to "preserve battery life" and definitely not to annoy you into buying a new phone?

      I think I'll stick with Android - better hardware, better camera, better software, better value.

    11. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take that bet. Apple with have a record quarter for December ( which you call Q4 but it's really Q1 for them ) .
      They just released an entire new tier of iPhones for more expensive prices and you think they're going to have shortfall? There is no revenue gap. There wasn't even a revenue gap this quarter. They had record revenue. They sold fewer units and wall street morons who weren't paying attention assumed that meant that things are tapering off.

      What is a value gap? How are you calculating value? your average android device might be great... really great. Twice as "great" as the latest iPhone.
      Are people no longer buying the iPhone? Are iPhones selling half of last quarter so that your favorite Android is not selling double? No? Then there's no reason to worry about a "value gap".

      Trust me. Apple is now making more profit in the App Store alone than some android manufacturers are making in revenue.

    12. Re: Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't dispute the facts, so brings out a tired strawman. Yawn. You repubtards are so gullible and see through.

    13. Re: Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are your sources?

      You sound like a stock holder.

      You ask a bunch of questions but provide nothing but hot air.

    14. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you factor in how long the typical person owns a smartphone.

    15. Re:Sustainability. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support does little to grow sales when the prices are so high.

      iPhone revenue is UP this year, but the numbers sold is Down. To Apple, the cost of the iPhone was the same as the last one, but the cost to the consumer was higher. Where is the value?

      The growth is not in the high-end, it is in the mid to low end. Will Apple diversify with lower cost options? NO. Why pollute a premium brand with a cheap product. It's not like the 5C was a sales winner.

          TOM...

  5. Reality Distortion Field by somenickname · · Score: 4, Funny

    These are not the numbers you are looking for...

  6. Hmm, sales are down? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    I'm wonder if this isn't a sign that sales are down?

    e.g. Blizzard did the same thing with WoW when they peaked at 12 million subs and were hemorrhaging customers.

    1. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We already know that I-phone sales are down, it was in the quarterly report. The fact that Apple will keep unit sales numbers secret from now on means they know that sales will soon be a lot more down from next quarter on, probably forever, and that's how the market read it today.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by berj · · Score: 1

      We already know that I-phone sales are down, it was in the quarterly report

      We do? It was?

      The year ago quarter they sold 46.7 million phones. This quarter they sold 46.9 million.

      FY 2017 they sold 216.8 million phones
      FY 2018 they sold 217.7 million phones

      Which of those figures show that sales are down?

    3. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 4, Informative

      We already know that I-phone sales are down, it was in the quarterly report

      We do? It was?

      The year ago quarter they sold 46.7 million phones. This quarter they sold 46.9 million.

      FY 2017 they sold 216.8 million phones
      FY 2018 they sold 217.7 million phones

      Which of those figures show that sales are down?

      You are cherrypicking data. Their sales dropped after 2015.
      FY 2018 they sold 217.7 million phones
      FY 2017 they sold 216.8 million phones
      FY 2016 they sold 211.9 million phones
      FY 2015 they sold 231.2 million phones
      (Sales continuously increased before that time.)

      Also, the issue is not that their sales are dropping, it's that their rate of increase is dropping, which is indicative of lack of enthusiasm in their product.

      You can see this from their sales trends here and here .

    4. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      To be precise, Apple's 4Q I-phone sales were flat as they have been for 16 quarters now, and missed expectations. Worse, Apple provided revenue guidance for Q1/19 about $1 billion below analyst's expectations, suggesting a solid miss on I-phone sales. Much much worse, Apple announced it would no longer provide I-phone sales numbers, leading investors to expect the worst. See, Apple is supposed to grow but this very definitely is not that.

      Now Apple investors are wringing their hands and fretting what's going to happen when Apple is finally forced to drop prices to slow down loss of market share. It is abundantly clear that AAPL is not where you put your retirement savings.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    5. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      On the conference call, Tim Cook said it is Apple's objective to always grow unit sales and at the same time he had his CFO state that they would be keeping those unit sales secret from now on. (Why Tim Cook was not man enough to state this himself... oh wait.)

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re: Hmm, sales are down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that most of Appleâ(TM)s sales are not in dollars, currency exchange rates have a large effects - and the dollar is strong. Indeed they said it will cause a $2b hit. I think too often people are just focused on the US market.

    7. Re: Hmm, sales are down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youâ(TM)ve been posting irrational dire predictions about Apple here for years. And you have wrong over and over and over again.

      Why so angry?

    8. Re: Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      What irrational predictions? Apple's share of the smartphone market did shrink. Apple's unit growth has now stopped. Soon Apple's revenue growth will stop.

      You worried? Just don't own AAPL and you will be ok. I would suggest also not owning an I-phone because it makes you look stupid, but that's just what I think. You go right ahead.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    9. Re: Hmm, sales are down? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      They seem more jubilant than angry.

    10. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Teckla · · Score: 1

      We already know that I-phone sales are down, it was in the quarterly report.

      Okay, I've got to ask: Why do you spell it "I-phone" rather than "iPhone"? :-)

    11. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm wonder if this isn't a sign that sales are down?

      They still have to tell their major shareholders about profits.

      This is more about hiding it from everyone else.
      If number of sales indicates that they should have a lot more income than they claim then it isn't that hard to estimate how much taxes they dodged.
      Keep the sales hidden and you can tell IRS whatever you want.

    12. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Did you know what I was talking about? Yes? Then we're good. That's why I spell I-phone that way, so you know what I'm talking about. It's not my job to do your branding for you.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by berj · · Score: 1

      Now who's cherry picking? 2015 was a massive outlier. Pent up demand for a large phone was satisfied when they released the iPhone 6. 2016, while a decrease from 2015, it was still a huge increase over 2014 and the trend continued upwards ever since.

      Indeed it has slowed (as sales invariably must) but none of this is what the post I responded to said. They said that the iphone sales are down now and that this fact was admitted to in the quarterly report. Which is just not true.

    14. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by berj · · Score: 1

      Oh wait.. what? Go ahead. Complete the thought. Own up to it. You can do it.

      Also.. if you read the transcript of the call you'll see that it was Luca who said "I can reassure you that it is our objective to grow unit sales for every product category that we have". Tim said nothing of the sort.

    15. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by berj · · Score: 1

      So in other words.. not at all what you originally posted (that we *know* iPhone sales are down and this fact was clear from the q4 earnings report).

      When you say "sales are down" it is assuredly *not* a more precise clarification to say "well.. actually they're flat". Apple has many times offered guidance lower than analysts' expectations. This is nothing new.

    16. Re: Hmm, sales are down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't you dispute being called out for cherry picking data? Instead you replied to a post about nothing.

      Could it be, you knew you were wrong in the first place? And now don't want to own up to it?

    17. Re: Hmm, sales are down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't cherry pick data if he's listing ALL of the data points. Do you even know what cherry picking means?

      You are a fucking idiot. Seriously. So the data showing a trend is him cherry picking data? Fuck off shill.

    18. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      That's why I spell I-phone that way, so you know what I'm talking about.

      To be honest, it makes you look ignorant.

    19. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      To be honest, getting triggered by I-phone makes you look like a snowflake.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    20. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm not triggered by you looking ignorant. I'm just telling you that your fly was open.

    21. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Better look down.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    22. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      I-phone.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    23. Re:Hmm, sales are down? by Tough+Love · · Score: 0

      Apple sales growth is down. Way down. Shark Apple needs to keep moving, otherwise it drowns.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  7. Very telling ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... it is.

    There's a good reason to abandon bragging rights.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  8. Declining sales maybe? by rnturn · · Score: 1

    "The decision to stop disclosing unit sales is because that figure is 'not representative of underlying strength of our business,'"

    Really? It seems to be a major part of the yearly (or so) Apple product rollouts... all the people lined up around the block waiting for days for the newest iStatus product. Come to think of it... I haven't noticed those spots on the nightly news for a while. Maybe the lines aren't that impressive any more. Has it gotten harder to find enough suckers to stand in line to fork over a grand or more to get the latest shiny bauble that's only marginally shinier than the old one?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Declining sales maybe? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      "The decision to stop disclosing unit sales is because that figure is 'not representative of underlying strength of our business,'"

      Really? It seems to be a major part of the yearly (or so) Apple product rollouts... all the people lined up around the block waiting for days for the newest iStatus product. Come to think of it... I haven't noticed those spots on the nightly news for a while. Maybe the lines aren't that impressive any more. Has it gotten harder to find enough suckers to stand in line to fork over a grand or more to get the latest
        shiny bauble that's only marginally shinier than the old one?

      Yeah, the new iPhone came out and not one of my friends who are Apple fans said boo about it... they were so quiet about it that I thought that they had turned into real zombies (vs just Apple zombies)... but it turns out that they were just dressed up for halloween... (grin)

  9. Business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Milk the suckers dry.

  10. Sales are slowing...So by supercell · · Score: 1

    Over the past 8 years the sales of iPhones has exploded, now they are slowing, so they are trying to hide/bury these numbers. It's that simple. They will try to grow revenue , not buy volume sale of phones, but through unit average cost and related services.


    As an investor I want as much data and transparency as possible, this is worrisome as they are intentionally trying to obfuscate some key metrics.

    1. Re:Sales are slowing...So by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      And the higher the price, the faster the volume shrink. Also kicks the stuffing out of online subscription numbers, if that is the salvation they hope for.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    2. Re:Sales are slowing...So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... this is worrisome as they are intentionally trying to obfuscate some key metrics.

      .

      Gee, why would you "worry" when a company is making a concerted effort to LIE by omission ?

      I'm joking, above.

      What Apple is doing is part lying, part denial, and part self-sabotage. It is shameful and it should be a signal to run for the lifeboats while there are still lifeboats to jump into.

      The phrase "decline and fall" comes to mind. I am not in the least surprised to see this happen while Tim Cook is at the controls. The only thing that prevented it from happening sooner is that Apple had considerable corporate momentum. But that momentum doesn't last forever, and that's what we are witnessing now : the Apple train is out of fuel and it is grinding to a halt.

      I honestly wonder whether Jobs appointed Cook so Apple would deteriorate and the world would see that without Jobs, Apple is a shadow of the Apple that flourished when Jobs was in command.

    3. Re:Sales are slowing...So by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      How long can that $1000 price cover for the costs of the parts?
      The number of units sold will have to keep up for the profits to stay up.
      The only way out if numbers sold is not working anymore is cheaper than China production lines.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re: Sales are slowing...So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not an investor, you are a speculator

    5. Re:Sales are slowing...So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are insane and delusional if you think an iphone actually costs anywhere near $1000 to make.

    6. Re: Sales are slowing...So by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will start selling Apple Music on Android. It could do as well as iTunes on Windows, or that QuickTime player for Windows with the brushed aluminium frame did. They could integrate the Apple Watch to connect to Amazon Echo.

    7. Re: Sales are slowing...So by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Good idea. I suggest they start an orchard, they've already got some investment in branding. But not sure how strong the market is for black apples though.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    8. Re: Sales are slowing...So by KixWooder · · Score: 1

      Apple Music (streaming service) has been available on Android for some time.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    9. Re: Sales are slowing...So by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      I probably didn't know that because I've banned the Google Play Store from my phone.

  11. History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://fossbytes.com/why-2700-apple-lisa-computers-are-buried-in-a-landfill/

  12. won't filings and such report them anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sec filings, annual reports... a trillion dollar public company has obligations to report certain things, and unit sales better be one of them.

  13. He's talking FRNs but nobody sees it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A unit of sale is less relevant today than it was in our past" ==> "A unit of FINANCE is less relevant today than it was in our past"

  14. Dear Apple, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go fuck yourself.

    Regards,
    A former customer

  15. Basically Apple lost Jobs and the company is done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I was ever a fan of Steve Jobs, but lets be honest with ourselves. The company isn't worth shit without him in charge. Remember what happened last time????

  16. I used to be an Apple fanboy ; now I am done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, since Jobs got sick and even more so after he died, Apple has made mediocre hardware and OS X has become worse with
    each revision.

    This is all pretty discouraging. I know Microsoft sucks, and now Apple sucks too. I sure as hell don't intend to use anything Google has to offer because I trust Google about as much as I would trust a rattlesnake.

    Is Linux the smart choice these days ? I am sincere when I ask this. I know next to nothing about Linux. I need a secure and reliable system which allows me to do some photo and video editing. I believe I am done with Apple laptops and their phones too. I just cannot pay for what I see is less value with each passing year. The last Apple laptop I had that I thought was genuinely a nice piece of gear was a 2013 Retina 15". I don't want what Apple is selling now even if they give it to me for free. The new Apple stuff is just insulting to people who know what good hardware and software is.

    1. Re: I used to be an Apple fanboy ; now I am done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can try Linux for free for a month before buying it so there is no risk.

    2. Re:I used to be an Apple fanboy ; now I am done. by mangastudent · · Score: 1

      Is Linux the smart choice these days ?

      If you aren't able to or can't justify learning how to maintain a system from the command line, it might be your least worst choice. I'm switching to OpenBSD myself, which requires that, can't tell you without doing some research if it has video editing software ported to it.

    3. Re:I used to be an Apple fanboy ; now I am done. by supertall · · Score: 1

      As long as you aren't married to specific professional applications that do not support linux (Adobe Lightroom/Photoshop, for example), then you can probably get by just fine.

  17. So what kind of graphs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is timmy going to show at the next keynote? One showing off the increasing ASP or just a profits one. That is going to go over real well.

    1. Re: So what kind of graphs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably a graph of his rapidly declining e-penis size if heâ(TM)s honest.

  18. Not specific to Apple, smartphones in general by perpenso · · Score: 2

    Smartphone sales have saturated in North America and Europe. Combine that with performance that far exceeds most user's needs so people are waiting longer to upgrade. Its nothing specific to Apple, all the manufacturers are seeing this. And we already saw this with computers, saturation, performance beyond need, upgrade timeframes lengthening, ...

    1. Re:Not specific to Apple, smartphones in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes all manufacturers are seeing this, but no not all manufacturers are affected equally. most of the manufacturers in the smartphone industry their smartphones are a relatively small part of their revenue and present very little downstream sales. Apple is the opposite, the iphones are a critical part of their revenue and profit and it also represents massive downstream revenue for things like iTunes.

    2. Re: Not specific to Apple, smartphones in general by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Can't Apple sell Macintoshes and wristwatches made out of any Iphone parts they are unable to sell? Isn't there a strong untapped market for laptops and wristwatches made out of proprietary cellphone parts?

    3. Re: Not specific to Apple, smartphones in general by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Necklaces and bangles made out of unsold I-phones should do well. Maybe just add straps and turn them into flipflops.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  19. Apple not losing market share ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Apple is not losing marketshare. Smartphones sales have hit a plateau for everyone. We have saturation in developed nations and devices who's performance far exceeds the needs of most users so upgrades are less frequent. Smartphones are repeating the saturation and performance conditions that we have already seen with personal computers.

    1. Re:Apple not losing market share ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone has an Apple phone :-)

      Well, the problem Apple has is that these phones will be a commodity some day. Kinda like how a basic Calculator is no longer $400.

      When people in 5 years get EVERYTHING they need from a $100 smartphone, who on earth will pay $1000 for an iPhone?

      Google went with a free OS. They get a cut of the apps. The end game for hardware (long term) was obvious even in 2007. But those Apps. Those will always be a revenue stream until there is a market change. Hardware markets never were unknowns.

      So yes, they will lose market share. Just wait.

    2. Re:Apple not losing market share ... by Tough+Love · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple is not losing marketshare.

      Apple is losing marketshare.

      Now Apple is already down to 11% of the worldwide market and was passed by Huawei at 15%. Xiaomi is now only 2% behind Apple, coming up fast, and Oppo is 3% behind. Apple will soon be fourth or fifth by market share.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re: Apple not losing market share ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, do your homework. With Google you are the product. Their free OS just the drug used to get you to freely consent to giving them practically every detail of your life, from where you travel to what you buy and every thing in between.

    4. Re:Apple not losing market share ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Smartphones are already a commodity. I can buy a cheap Android phone at Walmart for $100 in a pay as you go plan. This has been true for years and it has little impact on Apple's sales, nor Google's sales, nor Samsung's sales. People are buying higher end Apple, Google and Samsung phones because they want the newer features and performance that 4-5 year old hardware and 4-5 year old Android versions can provide.

    5. Re:Apple not losing market share ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smartphones are already a commodity. I can buy a cheap Android phone at Walmart for $100 in a pay as you go plan. This has been true for years and it has little impact on Apple's sales, nor Google's sales, nor Samsung's sales. People are buying higher end Apple, Google and Samsung phones because they want the newer features and performance that 4-5 year old hardware and 4-5 year old Android versions can provide.

      Until the economy shits the bed next year. Smartphones aren't velum goods, we're just used to thinking of them that way because they saw their heyday during a period of long economic growth.

  20. Tim Cook buys budget underwear in bulk* by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Perhaps that says something regarding the future of the company.

    * https://www.businessinsider.co...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  21. Mighty Republican Of It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you are tanking you don't open the drain cocks.

  22. "We well stuff" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all you need to know.

  23. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it. Apple has terminal diarrhea. And incidentally, fuck the Zuck.

  24. It's about value by indytx · · Score: 2

    Apple was first, and it locked in a lot of older folks who had more disposable cash. Meanwhile, my employer bought me a mobile, and it was never an iPhone, so by the time I needed to buy my own, Android was pretty equivalent and MUCH less expensive, so I went with Android. As a huge plus, Android phones can sideload.

    On the other hand, I was a super Mac fanboy . . . until its products provided less value--less bang for the buck--than the competition. I'm typing this on the second work/gaming laptop that I've purchased since my last MacBook purchase. Sure, it's Windows, and sure, some things about Windows are annoying, but how much would a MacBook with a fast GPU, expandable RAM, fast SSD, and huge second HDD cost? Oh, wait, you can't buy one, but something ALMOST equivalent is twice as much. Double. 2X. The operating system is not so fantastic, the Foxconn production lines not so much better for Apple than the Foxconn production lines for other manufacturers, to justify this kind of premium.

    People know value . . . eventually. Apple used to be rather innovative, and their products, while much more expensive than the competition, were priced according to their value. Now Tim Cook is just wringing out the profit machine. There is no vision at Apple. Cook's a logistics guy, a Wall Street darling, but he's not a leader; he's just in charge. There's a huge difference.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
    1. Re:It's about value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple was first

      First what?

      Meanwhile, my employer bought me a mobile, and it was never an iPhone

      Oh, you're talking about smart phones. I see. Yeah, so I had one in 2006, and yes it was called a smart phone.
      They were not first, unless you're specifically talking about the (nearly) full screen touch interface for a phone, which if you think about it is pretty fucking meaningless, but whatever.

  25. Sell your Apple stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no joke. There are other stocks that are profitable in both short and long term. Apple stock will be a gamble.

  26. They only admit iPhones and Macs join the failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already do not report numbers for their failures like iWatch.
    Now they only admit iPhones and Macs are joining this category.

    So in fact they are revealing all you need to see the big picture. Apple is dead.

  27. I suppose by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    this probably means that their sales are falling and they want to protect their stock price. The last thing they want is all the executives loosing their bonuses!

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  28. We all know the real reason. by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    With flat unit sale numbers, there is a limit to how much they can keep increasing prices to maintain revenue growth before sales starts to drop.

  29. Number of Products and Cashes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they sold 500 billions of iPhones then multiply by its avg price of $500 each resulting a total cash of $250000 billions.

    But the company can lie in how much is its revenue for paying lesser taxes or VATs.

    If any company that does not count the number of sold products and it does with improper cashes then it is illegal and against the states administrations.

  30. Of course not by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    You reveal such numbers when they are great. When they are not, you just keep quiet. Par for the course.

  31. If they were to make a decent laptop again . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . sales would go up.

  32. no iPhone SE, no purchase from me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still think of my iPhone 6 SE as a new phone and am expecting it to last a few more years -- when it is time for me to buy a new phone, there better be another new iPhone SE out there, otherwise I'll start having to buy one of those malware ridden android phones (my brother's android phone has so many distracting popups from the default uninstallable software that the provider added which leads me think that an alternate option is to just not get a phone and live like the good people of the 1930's did)

  33. Your citation: market down 2% apple up 1% by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Apple is not losing marketshare.

    Apple is losing marketshare.

    You are mistaken, from your own citation: "Global smartphone shipments declined 2% annually ... Shipments for Apple were up 1% annually". That's a share increase. You are confusing market position with market share.

  34. Or, you know, NOT . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew that one constructive Apple thread was going to be a one-off.

    To all of those suggesting that they're hiding something, I'd like to remind you of a few facts:
    1) Apple reported units SOLD (as in, to end-users for money) -- Everyone else counts units SHIPPED (to warehouses to languish?)
    2) Apple ONLY sells high-end phones, Android market share always counts every last phone even if it's limited functionality.

    Disclaimer: None. If I were to buy an Android phone, or build a linux box, it would cost as much as the corresponding apple product because I don't want to be saddled with half-functional technology.