Slashdot Mirror


People Who Prefer Black Coffee Are More Likely To Have Psychopathic Or Sadistic Traits, Study Finds (rd.com)

A new study conducted at the University of Innsbruck in Austria finds that people who drink their coffee black often has psychopathic or sadistic traits. The study surveyed more than 1,000 adults about their taste preferences with foods and drinks that are bitter. They also took four different personality tests that assessed traits like narcissism, psychopathy, sadism, and aggression. From a report: Researchers found a trend that suggested a correlation between preferences for black coffee, and other bitter tastes, and sadistic or psychopathic personality traits. They also found that people who enjoyed milky or sugary coffee, and other sweet flavors, generally tended to have more "agreeable" personality traits like sympathy, cooperation, and kindness. The closest correlation found in the study was between bitter foods, like radishes and tonic water, and "everyday sadism," or the enjoyment of inflicting moderate levels of pain on others. The researchers went further, suggesting that this association between bitter foods and psychopathic tendencies could "become chronic" and get worse with time.

1 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. Re:This is stupid junk science. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Attacking journalists? Nice. You just put yourself in the basket of deplorables with Trump and Musk. Listen to this exchange:

    Kara: "You pick fights with the press over Twitter, and then you have all your fans, of which there are many. Are you aware of what they do once you start them off?"

    Elon: "Well, I have to say, my regard for the press has dropped quite dramatically."

    Kara: "Explain that, please."

    Elon: "The amount of untruthful stuff that is written is unbelievable. Take that Wall Street Journal front-page article about, like, âoeThe FBI is closing in.â That is utterly false. Thatâ(TM)s absurd. To print such a falsehood on the front page of a major newspaper is outrageous. Like, why are they even journalists? Theyâ(TM)re terrible. Terrible people."

    Kara: "I get that, but do you understand the mood in this country around the press and the dangers of attacking, especially when the president is doing that? In quite an aggressive, âoeenemy of the stateâ and everything else. Itâ(TM)s disturbing when someone like you as a leader does that, too, or goes along with it."

    Elon: "The answer is for the press to be honest and truthful, and research their articles and correct things properly when they are false. Which they donâ(TM)t do."

    Kara: "Okay. But Iâ(TM)m asking if you understand where it goes to."

    Elon: "Yes, of course I do."

    Kara: "What do you think of that? Are you worried about unleashing a dangerous cycle that a lot of the press are worried about? Justifiably."

    Elon: "I suggest the press take it to heart and do better."

    Kara: "What about what Donald Trump does, about âoeenemy of the peopleâ? Do you look at it that way?"

    Elon: "No."

    Kara: "Just that you donâ(TM)t like falsehoods."

    Elon: "Yeah. There are good journalists and there are bad ones, and unfortunately the feedback loop for good versus bad is inverted, so the more salacious that an article is, the more salacious the headline is, the more clicks itâ(TM)s gonna get. Then somebody is not a journalist, they are an ad salesman."

    Kara: "What about things that are just critical of you that you donâ(TM)t like? Do you think youâ(TM)re particularly sensitive?"

    Elon: "No. Of course not. Count how many negative articles there are and how many I respond to. One percent, maybe. But the common rebuttal of journalists is, âoeOh. My articleâ(TM)s fine. Heâ(TM)s just thin-skinned.â No, your article is false and you donâ(TM)t want to admit it."

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!