Google Says Adding Dark Mode To Apps Saves Battery (betanews.com)
Dark Mode is not just more aesthetically pleasing to many people, there are real battery-life boosts to be had -- and Google has the numbers to prove it. From a report: Touting the benefits of Dark Mode, Google showed that with screen brightness set to 50 percent, using YouTube with Dark Mode enabled resulted in 14 percent less battery usage. With screen brightness set to 100 percent, the saving jumps to 60 percent. These are not numbers to be sniffed at, but the biggest savings are to be seen on phones with AMOLED screens as anything that is black does not require pixels to be powered. Slides from the event show Google comparing the power usage of its own Pixel phone with an LCD iPhone 7. It shows a 63 percent battery saving when displaying a screenshot of Google Maps in normal and night mode.
Aren't normal screens backlit by an LED array and they're on constantly and black pixels just blocks and absorb or reflect the light? So making an app all black would simply make your phone warmer and the only solution is dimming it?
Not dark mode. Take the glaring blinding white of Google's home page makes it impossible to use inside a moviehouse or place of worship...
I have a better alternative up front.
Don't use your fucking smartphone inside a moviehouse or place of worship.
+1 million informative.
#DeleteFacebook
Behold, the lack of power of the dark mode.
This is not an illusion, a rip-off, or a ninja technique!
Now why has Google been burning my eyes and draining my batteries for years with their excessive use of all-white UXs?
Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
Yeah, but, can I eat popcorn and slurp a giant soda in church and stand up, raise my hands, and "speak" in tongues in a movie house? No? Then, why are you equating these two things?
Thanks for admitting your design team is being run by retards.
Whether or not black pixels save energy is the technological equivalent of the "are eggs healthy" debate:
CRT screen? Black saves energy over white by not firing the beam at the dark pixels.
LCD screen? White saves energy over black by not diffusing the backlight.
OLED/AMOLED screen? Black saves energy by not lighting the pixel.
So will the next revolution in display technology swing the pendulum back?
An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
Google finally realises what Samsung users have known about for over 8 years thanks to a long history of using OLED displays.
Seriously the energy saving benefits on not lighting the screen up actually made it into Samsung's variant of Eclair back in the day which gave you the option to use a dark mode or invert the display.
...are good with me. I've always hated white backgrounds and dark text/objects, on any screen, small or large. More eyestrain, less distinct objects/letters/whatever. So fine, make all the blank areas black. BTW, how do I get Slashdot to use a grey background???
And yet their homepage is still white. A blog post some years ago calculated that a black Google homepage would save 750 megawatt-hours a year. http://ecoiron.blogspot.com/20...
Does anyone remember http://www.blackle.com/ ?
Why is this news? We've known this for years:
https://www.greenbot.com/artic...
What next? We need Google to announce that water is wet so that people can finally go jump in a lake?
They compared the ORIGINAL Pixel to the iPhone 7, not the Pixel 3. Both phones came out in 2016, just one month apart. Please learn how to read before you start jerking your knee, you illiterate, raging fanboi.