Slashdot Mirror


Why Bigger Planes Mean Cramped Quarters (popsci.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: The ironic thing about the compressed state of air travel today is that planes are getting larger. The jet I was on, an Airbus A321, stretches nearly 23 feet longer than its predecessor, the A320. More space, more passengers, more profit. These bigger planes are increasingly the most common Âvariants -- both on American Airlines and across all carriers. The current Boeing 737s, the world's most flown craft, are all longer than the original by up to 45 feet. And yet, on the inside, we're getting squeezed.

That's because more space doesn't equal more space in Airline World. It equals more seats -- and typically less room per person. In 2017, for example, word leaked that American was planning to add six economy spots to its A320s, nine to its A321s, and 12 (that's two rows) to its Boeing 737-800s. JetBlue is reportedly ramming 12 extras into its A320s, and Delta's will gain 10. And, come 2020, you'll likely find more seats on every United plane. In Airline World, they call this densification, which is a silly word. Passengers call it arrrgh!

Consumer Reports recently polled 55,000 of its members about air travel. There were complaints about all aspects, from ticketing to agents checking carry-ons at the gate. But 30 percent of coach-class fliers rated their seats as outright uncomfortable, and every airline received extremely low scores on legroom and cushiness in economy. Clearly, things are dismal and seem to be getting even worse. They're so bad, in fact, that last year, nonprofit consumer-advocacy group FlyersRights.org filed a suit against the Federal Aviation Administration, after lobbying the agency to stop the squeeze and standardize seat sizes.

15 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Thing is... by YuppieScum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that they didn't complain about ticket prices.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:Thing is... by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly.

      Everyone's always willing to complain, but yet they continually want cheaper and cheaper flights, while the actual costs of operating an airline just keep rising. Customers want more destinations and more airport services. Somebody's going to be paying for that, so it comes at the cost of legroom.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Thing is... by Pulzar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, yeah, ignorant people are scared of a "prop plane..."

      It's not that simple. Even WestJet says that they are only more efficient on short-hauls, less than 300 miles. They are louder, they generally don't fit in normal gates and require buses / walking to the plane, they have very little overhead room... They introduce a new type of plane to be handled by ground crews in many small airports with small crews.

      There are real disadvantages, along with advantages. If they made sense for an airline, the "sacred of prop plane" wouldn't be an issue, just like it's not an issue for Porter.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    3. Re:Thing is... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dash-8s work fine with jetways -- they need an adapter gangway that mates to the lower door height. But the same applies to small jet aircraft like the ERJ, CRJ, and BAE146. The reason jetways aren't used for many short-haul flights isn't due to aircraft type, but because smaller airports and regional terminals weren't set up for them.

      https://www.eiaviation.com/wp-...

    4. Re:Thing is... by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the things they don't tell you about capitalism in civics class is that companies do everything they can to avoid competition by making their prices hard to compare with other vendors. They do this by making transactions absurdly complicated (car dealers), by bundling irrelevant stuff into the deal (mobile phone companies, cable companies), unbundling essential stuff (airlines and baggage fees) or by adulterating/diluting their product (airlines and seat sizes).

      If you are price comparing two tickets between the same destination, the airlines make it quite difficult to figure out what you're getting for the price, the incidentals you'll have to pay, and even the certainty that you'll actually be able to board the plane. There's intense competition to get the lowest found ticket price in a computerized search, but a price ranking of alternatives is highly unreliable.

      On top of this, many airline passengers are in the same position that Microsoft Windows users were for many years: other people make the purchasing decision. I once had an employer book me on an itinerary that took twenty three hours from the time I boarded in Manchester, NH to when wheels touched down in Sacramento, thanks to layovers in Newark and Phoenix. Normally I'd fly out of Boston (where I live) and it would take about eight and half hours, but my boss figured out he could save fifty bucks by making me drive an hour north to a smaller airport.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Thing is... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not exactly. Most accidents happen during takeoff or landing. Turboprop planes tend to fly shorter flight legs, therefore more takeoffs/landings per hour, even 4x as more. (This even takes slower speed into account).

    6. Re: Thing is... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

      The purpose of a business is to maximize profits, not to "survive".

      This is just tall people expecting short people to subsidize them.

      Tall guys get all the chicks, they are paid more, and now they are trying to take away the one thing that works in favor of short people: cramped airline seats.

      Short people need to stand up for their rights ... and if nobody notices, they need to stand on a stool.

    7. Re: Thing is... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

      How is your Napoleon complex faring? Sounds like you skipped your meds today....

      You can laugh now, but someday I will dance on your grave: short men live longer. ... and you will pay more for your extra-long coffin. Enjoy the legroom.

    8. Re: Thing is... by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you try registering it as a emotional support animal? They have to let you take them on board for free, otherwise it's like racist or something.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Thing is... by mattb47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the cell phone, car, cable, and airline industries have nothing on the health industry on obfuscating pricing.

  2. Solution is simple... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go back to live evacuation tests. Require that they use airline CEOs, upper management, and their families as the test subjects... If the plane can't be evac'ed in 90 seconds without injury, increase seat pitch and try again.

    If a few airline upper managers get hurt during an evacuation test, maybe they'll realize WHY extremely dense seating is a bad idea.

    1. Re:Solution is simple... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Use the CEO, upper management and their families as test subjects, stuff the rest of the plane with homeless people and then tell everyone the first 20 to exit the plane get 50 bucks.

      Then start looking for a new CEO and upper management. And pay your cleanup crew handsomely, they earned it.

      (that "first 20 to exit get money" test was actually done when airlines found out that the evacuation tests worked like a charm while there were many unnecessary deaths in real emergency situations. People don't act civil when their life's at stake...)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Re:What happened to competition and free market? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, if only for safety. Small-pitch seats are much more difficult to evacuate in an emergency than seats with more legroom. There should be actual, live-person evacuation tests for any proposed seating configuration of an aircraft, not just for the manufacturer's original/intended seating plan.

  4. I'm seriously pondering traveling as freight by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    More legroom, fewer crying kids, what's not to like?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Re:What happened to competition and free market? by danlip · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Crashes" generally don't involve evacuation, because every one is instantly dead. Situations like US Air 1549 (the one that landed on the Hudson) or AA 383 (caught fire on take off) are much more common. No one died in those, but would the results be different if they were more packed? Emergency aircraft evacuations happen about once every 11 days in the U.S.