Slashdot Mirror


Tantalizing But Preliminary Evidence of a 'Brain Microbiome' (sciencemag.org)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Science Magazine: We know the menagerie of microbes in the gut has powerful effects on our health. Could some of these same bacteria be making a home in our brains? A poster presented here this week at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience drew attention with high-resolution microscope images of bacteria apparently penetrating and inhabiting the cells of healthy human brains. The work is preliminary, and its authors are careful to note that their tissue samples, collected from cadavers, could have been contaminated. But to many passersby in the exhibit hall, the possibility that bacteria could directly influence processes in the brain -- including, perhaps, the course of neurological disease -- was exhilarating.

Talking hoarsely above the din of the exhibit hall on Tuesday evening, neuroanatomist Rosalinda Roberts of The University of Alabama in Birmingham (UAB), told attendees about a tentative finding that, if true, suggests an unexpectedly intimate relationship between microbes and the brain. Her lab looks for differences between healthy people and those with schizophrenia by examining slices of brain tissue preserved in the hours after death. About 5 years ago, neuroscientist Courtney Walker, then an undergraduate in Roberts's lab, became fascinated by unidentified rod-shaped objects that showed up in finely detailed images of these slices, captured with an electron microscope. Roberts had seen the shapes before. "But I just dismissed them, because I was looking for something else," she says. "I would say 'Oh, here are those things again.'" But Walker was persistent, and Roberts started to consult colleagues at UAB. This year, a bacteriologist gave her unexpected news: They were bacteria. Her team has now found bacteria somewhere in every brain they've checked -- 34 in all -- about half of them healthy, and half from people with schizophrenia.

13 of 65 comments (clear)

  1. Contamination by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The work is preliminary, and its authors are careful to note that their tissue samples, collected from cadavers, could have been contaminated.

    This seems like the type of thing they should try to verify before running around and shouting about possibilities. If it's true that this brain microbiome exists in humans, it's probably just as true of rats, or at least other primates. Get some live samples there before getting too excited.

    1. Re:Contamination by sgage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are trying to recruit people to research this. It is very important, and needs to be publicized, if only to refute it. But what is wrong with starting a conversation?

    2. Re:Contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      After all what DO people expect microbes to do to dead cells?

      Re-animate them.

    3. Re:Contamination by clovis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Whoever wrote the Slashdot summary should have taken the few seconds to read the abstract they linked to. From that abstract, here's the author's claim regarding contamination.

      To eliminate the possibility that the presence of bacteria was due to contamination, we examined germ free mouse brains (n=4) processed in an identical way; we did not detect any bacteria. The observation that the location of the bacteria was highly specific and deep within the specimens also argues against contamination. Interestingly, there were no structural signs of inflammation in any of the brains examined. It is presently unclear the route of entry bacteria take to the brain, but the evidence of them in axons and at the blood brain barrier supports previous speculation.

    4. Re:Contamination by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Not in an age were every preliminary grande claim gets funding, while solid, slow and often boring, but long-term hugely profitable research gets overlooked...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Contamination by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

      Whoever wrote the Slashdot summary should have taken the few seconds

      Dang, with that low ID I can't make the "new around here" jokes ...

  2. In the Brain but not in the Brain? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

    Got to be careful, they might well be in the brain technically ie in the blood vessels in the brain but they might not be actually in the brain. If they show up in the most in the regions with the highest blood flow, that would tend to favour them being in the blood vessels in the brain and not in the brain itself. The route into the brain, well, that should be obvious, any concussion that generates a haemorrhage, allowing infected blood to enter brain fluid. The frontal cortex would of course be the area must subject to impacts and bleeding and as a result breaching the blood brain barrier.

    So say that one small car accident, where you get a bit of a bump and a bit of brain blood leaking but you have a particular minor infection at that time. You could imagine that contagion spreading amongst families with a history of violence, all those blows to the head, allowing more chances for infection.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. No surprise by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course there are microscopic life forms living in our brains. Without them, how would people be able to harness the power of The Force?

  4. Good, science as it should be by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Present a hypothesis to explain new data, then test that hypothesis by falsification.

    Showing that there are alternatives is good and correct.

    Misunderstanding by non-scientists merely shows schools do not teach people correctly. That's not the scientists' problem.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Good, science as it should be by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

      Present a hypothesis to explain new data, then test that hypothesis by falsification.

      Hold your horses cowboy. You are talking to non scientific crowd. They have already forwarded your statements via twitter and facebook, "Science advances by falsifying data! Science proponent open admits it and is proud of it!"

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. Virus that makes you like cat, cat urine smell. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Toxoplasma Gondii is a virus with fascinating life cycle. It matures and reproduces deep in a cat's gut, but its eggs hatch inside mice bodies. Mice coming in contact cat urine, feces, get infected and they lose the fear of cats and they start liking the smell of cats and thus get eaten by the cat. Thus allowing the virus to reach where it can reproduce for the next generation.

    This virus infects humans too. They become very fond of cats, cat smells.

    So we know there are viruses (or virii?) that live in brain without causing too serious immediate damage. So why not bacteria?

    In some sense our bodies are symbiotic collections of individual cells.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Virus that makes you like cat, cat urine smell. by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      That's not a virus, but a single-celled eukaryotic parasite with what would be considered spores or cysts, rather than eggs. Those kinds of organisms have an easier time of going where they please in the body, because they can force their way through some tissues. Viruses would have to go up the nerve fibers to get into the brain, as far as I am aware. Bacteria are kept out by the blood brain barrier, and generally cause inflammation wherever they do end up; this is why bacteria in the brain are surprising, as inflammation there usually presents some adverse symptomology.

  6. That's Funny by q4Fry · · Score: 2

    The most important words in scientific progress: "Hmm, that's funny."