Google Cloud Executive Who Sought Pentagon Contract Steps Down (nytimes.com)
Diane Greene, whose pursuit of Pentagon contracts for artificial intelligence technology sparked a worker uprising at Google, is stepping down as chief executive of the company's cloud computing business (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source). "Ms. Greene said she would stay on as chief executive until January. She will be replaced by Thomas Kurian, who oversaw product development at Oracle until his resignation in October. Ms. Greene will remain a board director at Google's parent company, Alphabet," reports The New York Times. From the report: The change in leadership caps a turbulent three years for Ms. Greene, who was brought on to expand Google's cloud computing business. Google Cloud has struggled to make major inroads in persuading corporate customers to use its computing infrastructure over alternatives like Amazon's A.W.S. and Microsoft's Azure. In a blog post published by the company, Ms. Greene said she had initially told friends and family that she was planning to run Google Cloud for only two years but stayed for three. Ms. Greene, a widely respected technologist and entrepreneur, said that after leaving Google Cloud, she planned to help female founders of companies by investing in and mentoring them. Ms. Greene joined Google in 2015 when it acquired Bebop, a start-up she had founded, for $380 million. Ms. Greene defended Google's pursuit of a Defense Department contract for the Maven program, which uses AI to interpret video images and could be used to improve the targeting of drone strikes. In March, she said it was a small contract worth "only" $9 million and that the technology would be used for nonlethal purposes.
His own company screwed him over some hypersensitive snowflake employees. Iâ(TM)m glad he quit so he can go somewhere that understands how enterprise and government business works in the real world.
Funny how they seem to have reservations about the US, but happily help China with surveillance and oppression. This is ironic, because China bans Google from doing business on their soil.
Listen to the foreign employees who hate to see a strong american military.
"[Green] planned to help female founders of companies by investing in and mentoring them."
Since this is apparently OK, I take it that if a male executive wants to exclusively help male founders of companies by investing and mentoring them, rejecting female founders solely because they lack a Y chromosome, that's OK too, right? What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, after all.
They forced the woman out - even after she agreed with the employees demands - and was replaced with a man.
Where’s this vaulted diversity the company talks about?
The man is not white. Intersectional victimhood studies ranks male people of color as more oppressed, and therefor more deserving, than a white women who is not gay.