Google Cloud Executive Who Sought Pentagon Contract Steps Down (nytimes.com)

Diane Greene, whose pursuit of Pentagon contracts for artificial intelligence technology sparked a worker uprising at Google, is stepping down as chief executive of the company's cloud computing business (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source). "Ms. Greene said she would stay on as chief executive until January. She will be replaced by Thomas Kurian, who oversaw product development at Oracle until his resignation in October. Ms. Greene will remain a board director at Google's parent company, Alphabet," reports The New York Times. From the report: The change in leadership caps a turbulent three years for Ms. Greene, who was brought on to expand Google's cloud computing business. Google Cloud has struggled to make major inroads in persuading corporate customers to use its computing infrastructure over alternatives like Amazon's A.W.S. and Microsoft's Azure. In a blog post published by the company, Ms. Greene said she had initially told friends and family that she was planning to run Google Cloud for only two years but stayed for three. Ms. Greene, a widely respected technologist and entrepreneur, said that after leaving Google Cloud, she planned to help female founders of companies by investing in and mentoring them. Ms. Greene joined Google in 2015 when it acquired Bebop, a start-up she had founded, for $380 million. Ms. Greene defended Google's pursuit of a Defense Department contract for the Maven program, which uses AI to interpret video images and could be used to improve the targeting of drone strikes. In March, she said it was a small contract worth "only" $9 million and that the technology would be used for nonlethal purposes.

Comments

VMWare

[110010001000]

She was also one of the founders and CEO of VMWare. No idea what BeBop was/is.

Re:VMWare

[mnmn]

She was part of the best leadership VMWare ever had. There's a crowd of developers who want to follow her. It's sad that she had to leave GCP this way, but I agree with the ethics of it. She will do well wherever she will go.

Funny how they are happy to play with China...

[Anonymous Coward]

Funny how they seem to have reservations about the US, but happily help China with surveillance and oppression. This is ironic, because China bans Google from doing business on their soil.

Re: Funny how they are happy to play with China...

[bsDaemon]

Given all the Chinese they hire, its probably for the best anyway to keep them from working on Us govt things. Google (and silly com valley) doesnâ(TM)t have a monopoly on smart people, but does seem to have an out-sized share of weirdos and people who think more highly of their themselves and their abilities than they can necessarily back up.

That they would rather spend their precious time on earth working at an ad agency that has tricked people into believing it is a tech company is interesting, but so long ad theyâ(TM)re over there doing that, i can be where I am not having to interact with them. Consider it a indirect side-benefit of Federalism, I suppose.

Way to go

[Anonymous Coward]

Listen to the foreign employees who hate to see a strong american military.

Men need not apply

[K. S. Van Horn]

"[Green] planned to help female founders of companies by investing in and mentoring them."

Since this is apparently OK, I take it that if a male executive wants to exclusively help male founders of companies by investing and mentoring them, rejecting female founders solely because they lack a Y chromosome, that's OK too, right? What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, after all.

Re:A man would’ve stayed

[Anonymous Coward]

They forced the woman out - even after she agreed with the employees demands - and was replaced with a man.

Where’s this vaulted diversity the company talks about?

The man is not white. Intersectional victimhood studies ranks male people of color as more oppressed, and therefor more deserving, than a white women who is not gay.

Re:Ever worked for a government contractor?

[mikael]

It was the same decades ago. And it's the same with a lot of embedded/electronics companies. They stick to hardware they know that will work, even if it is decades old, because that's what the whole company and the principal engineers used back then. And if they do have the newest/latest hardware, all the software must be backwards compatible with the old hardware, so you won't get to use the new features of the new hardware. Anything career building will be outsourced to a contractor, to make sure you don't learn anything transferrable. You'll have a three month or six month notice period which makes it impossible to change jobs.

They might have found it so hard to find staff that they offshore some work. So then they need headhunters to literally hunt down people with embedded experience. And I literally mean "hunt down". Stalking people via LinkedIn by looking for keywords. Even getting GCHQ to monitor Emails and social media for anyone posting a CV, then using those Email addreses and accounts to make connections. Sometimes even sending anonymous Emails or Linkedin messages providing "careers advice".