Slashdot Mirror


Why Some Open-Source Companies Are Considering a More Closed Approach (geekwire.com)

There's no question that the concept of open-source software has revolutionized the enterprise software world, which spent billions of dollars fighting the mere idea for several years before accepting that a new future had arrived. But more than a few people are starting to wonder if the very nature of open-source software -- the idea that it can be used by pretty much anyone for pretty much anything -- is causing its developers big problems in the era of distributed cloud computing services. From a report: Two prominent open-source software companies have made the decision to alter the licenses under which some of their software is distributed, with the expressed intent of making it harder -- or impossible -- for cloud computing providers to offer a service based around that software.

Two companies do not a make a movement. But as the cloud world packs its bags for Las Vegas and Amazon Web Services' re:Invent 2018 conference next week, underscoring that company's ability to set the agenda for the upcoming year, the intersection between open-source projects and cloud computing services is on many people's minds. "The way that I would think of it, the role that open source plays in creating commercial opportunities has changed," said Abby Kearns, executive director of the open-source Cloud Foundry Foundation. "We're going to see a lot more of this conversation happening than less. I would put it in a very blunt way: for many years we were suckers, and let them take what we developed and make tons of money on this."

Redis Labs CEO Ofer Bengal doesn't mince words. His company, known for its open-source in-memory database (used by American Express, Home Depot, and Dreamworks among others), has been around for eight years, an eternity in the fast-changing world of modern enterprise software. [...] "Ninety-nine percent of the contributions to Redis were made by Redis Labs," Bengal said. There's a longstanding myth in the open-source world that projects are driven by a community of contributors, but in reality, paid developers contribute the bulk of the code in most modern open-source projects, as Puppet founder Luke Kanies explained in our story earlier this year.

2 of 144 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't matter. by andydread · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They shouldn't forget that regardless of the % of paid vs non-paid developers on a project the reason why they have the market penetration they currently do is because their products are FOSS in the first place.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, they contribute back bug fixes to the core product but they often don't contribute back functional additions.

      But if they switch to someone else's product, you won't even get the bug fixes.

      My company uses many FLOSS products, and for most of them we wouldn't even have considered them if they were closed source. With FLOSS, you can try the product for free, you can look at the source when the documentation is weak, there are usually good online forums to ask questions, and the danger of an orphaned product is less.

      For most of these products, we contribute nothing back, but we don't cost them anything either. But we do pay for some support, submit a few patches and add to the online knowledge base.

      These companies closing their products may find that a small slice of a big thing was better than a big slice of nothing.