Slashdot Mirror
In an Open Letter To EU's Competition Commissioner, 14 European Shopping Comparison Services Say Google is Not Making the Search For Products Fairer (bbc.com)
Google is not complying with European demands that it must make the search for products fairer, rivals say. In an open letter to the EU's Competition Commissioner on Thursday, they wrote: We are writing to you as leading European comparison shopping services (CSSs) to express our collective view that Google's "compliance mechanism" in the Google Search (Comparison Shopping) case does not comply with the European Commission's June 2017 Prohibition Decision. It has now been more than a year since Google introduced its auction-based "remedy", and the harm to competition, consumers and innovation caused by Google's illegal conduct has continued unabated. We therefore respectfully urge you to commence non-compliance proceedings against Google. BBC offers some background: In June 2017, European competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager ruled that Google had abused its power by promoting its own shopping service at the top of search results, and demanded that it provide equal treatment to rival comparison sites in future. She issued a record fine of $2.7bn -- the largest penalty the European Commission has ever imposed. She also demanded that Google end its anti-competitive practices within 90 days or face further costs. Google is still appealing against the fine, but has come up with a system that it says makes shopping fairer. It changed the shopping box, which is displayed at the top of search results, so that it is no longer populated with just Google Shopping ad results, but gives space to other shopping comparison services, who can bid for advertising slots.
Making a search engine "fairer" in this sense means making it less fit for purpose.
A search engine should give the most relevant results, not the most "fair".
It allows all of the 'stores' to bid on the items at the top. I mean do these ppl think that they get it free? Obviously not. Google is not giving away things.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Can't say I like the way google has been going lately but Google's business is part helping people find things, part pointing them at particular things, why in hell anyone would think they should be forced to host their competitors in their place of business is a complete mystery.
Should they give free adds to Amazon ? After all Amazon serves as a shopping service ? What about Ebay ?
The EU has always been horribly obvious about being bought and paid for by European aristocrats, the ancien regime that never really went away, this is just a further attempt by them to shakedown a deep pocket.
Google's "compliance mechanism" in the Google Search (Comparison Shopping) case does not comply with the European Commission's June 2017 Prohibition Decision.
Is there a reason why we would expect those fellas to say anything different or in support of Google? They need to hammer and keep hammering hard till some court smacks them down.
"We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers." -- Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, 1998.
Aliexpress for cheap stuff I don't need real soon, Ebay for used stuff, local stores for stuff that's a ripoff to get shipped, Amazon for everything else. People use google's shopping results?
Google owes you nothing.
If you don't like it, do what i do. Don't use it. I know it's really hard to believe, but there are other sites on the internet besides Google, Facebook, and Amazon.
It's amazing. It's almost like the internet gives you choice. Including the choice to create or destroy monopolies. Maybe you should think twice before creating them instead of baaaahing like a sheep and doing whatever the marketeers tell you to do.
it links to a story, and copies whole paragraphs from said story, which is again an article that copies whole paragraphs from a complaint on another website. It's almost like the bar to entry for a story is n +1, where n is a story from another website, and the number is the percent of words needed to be added to the original story to become a new (non)story. At the very least make it seem less like plagiarism by rewording it.
you wear sunglasses at night, don't you?
Because when you're cool, the sun shine on you twenty four hours a day!
I'm curious if the sites demanding the government force Google to link to them, for fairness, also are fair in that their search links to Google.
That would be fair, right? If I demand your search has to link to me, obviously I make my search link back to you, right?
That is value for the consumer. Provide or just get off the market. Quit whining about it if you cannot compete.
Global freedom will not survive Google.
In their search results, on what page do they put the links to Google?
I'm happy to finding thrm anywhere on any of the sites from companies who are complaining. I don't see a link to Google at the top of any of these pages.
http://www.foundem.co.uk/searc...
https://www.redbrain.com/
https://pricespy.co.uk/search?...
The only mention I see of Google is that Redbrain promises advertisers that they can manipulate Google search results for them.
Your tiny little country is only half China's total, good for you. But why is your Country 10X Canada or 13x Australia of 8x Germany?
Why are you more than all 28 EU countries added together? You are the 2nd worst in the world but think you are good? Did one of your daddys drop you on your head when you were little?
You don't have to be a subsidiary to be independent.
You aren't necessarily independent if you are a subsidiary(why would you be?).
Do you have any idea at all what you are talking about?
If these shopping sites are so much better and more efficient than Google in identifying deals, surely word would get out and their popularity would soar. What I find is that, so often, they link to sites that don't even have the product available. Mostly, the aggregators just clutter up the search results when I am trying to find actual vendors. Yes, Google should pay much more to governments in the countries where it operates, but fining them for ad practices that are the only possible means of supporting their many free services, is not the way to do it.
Seems so simple, and if fair, Google should be out of business very quickly. Perhaps even blocked in the EU.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Communist all the way, and what's more they are experiencing a depopulation for some reason or other.
What the fuck? Has Xi pounded your head against the wall too much?
UK has one of the lower emissions, and we continue to drop ours.
And comparing us to EU shows a real lack of IQ on you.
Now,go back to your bog, you git.
You must really hate that guy for showing all your lies. Enough to blame him every time you disagree with random AC's.
Or did you just make up shit again to blame on someone else because you could never find an actual lie of his?
Who even mentioned the UK?
Oh no one did, you are just trying to change the topic to hide your lies again. Pathetic.
Is American CO2 more than the whole EU or not?
Stop pretending to be clean loser.