Slashdot Mirror


Influencers Are Being Paid Big Sums To Pitch Products and Thrash Rivals on Instagram and YouTube (wired.com)

"Influencers" are being paid big sums to pitch products on Instagram and YouTube. If you're trying to grow a product on social media, you either fork over cash or pay in another way. This is the murky world of influencing, reports Wired. Brands will pay influencers to position products on their desks, behind them, or anywhere else they can subtly appear on screen. Payouts increase if an influencer tags a brand in a post or includes a link, but silent endorsements are often preferred. An excerpt from the report: The suggestions started early. Months before Lashify had officially launched, one of her investors, who had ties to the cosmetics industry, pulled her aside. He told her to prepare to pay influencers to speak positively about her lashes on YouTube and Instagram. She thought he was being dramatic. He wasn't. Lotti recalls the investor saying that if she wanted Lashify to succeed, quality didn't matter, nor did customer satisfaction -- only influencers. And they didn't come cheap. She was told to expect to shell out $50,000 to $70,000 per influencer just to make her company's name known, an insane amount for a new startup. There was no way around it; that's just how things worked.

4 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like extortion by DaMattster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds like extortion for the digital era. What's left unsaid, but clearly implied, is that if you don't fork over big money to influences, your product will be trashed.

  2. Re:The hell you say! by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Celebrities also used to do this more subtle endorsement where they'd be paid to use products publicly without running commercials.

    I think we're splitting hairs where we're willing to say a celebrity's compensated public use of a product doesn't classify as commercial; although subtlety is an important component of advertising, since we all think we're too smart to be influenced by advertising.

    Influencers is an interesting tag, and speaking for myself and me only, I've also never quite understood why people who can act in movies are somehow qualified to make important contributions with their opinions that suggest preference for candidates and political positions.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  3. Re:The hell you say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that you call any of those frauds "successes" just shows how completely dishonest and lacking intellectual capacity the Republican party embodied here by yourself has allowed itself to degrade to.

    I wonder how you'll spin Federal prison for fraud, collusion, conspiracy and more? Good luck with the indictments next week, traitor. Not to mention "peace on the Korean peninsula" lol you retarded GOP liars crack me up.

  4. And what if its politics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And what if the influencers are there to deceive voters during elections? What if the money is foreign even? Or sourced from criminal funds for criminal purposes?

    Someone paid James Edward O'Keefe III, aka Project Veritas to make fake that fake Acorn video and pay off the lawsuits he lost as a result. This is no small amount.

    If you look at FACT, a money laundering front for conservative causes, that's funding everything from fake videos, to astroturfing to "Judicial Crisis Network'... promoting Brett Kavanaugh. ...

    It was run by Whitaker, Trump's new pick for DOJ head, and he got paid $900k from it in 9 months alone just before being appointed to Trump's DOJ.

    That's a huge money laundering outfit there funding a lot of astroturfing.

    https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/vbabz9/what-we-know-about-fact-the-conservative-watchdog-that-paid-trumps-ag-dollar12-million

    You can't really pretend its a minor thing here. It certainly isn't.