Slashdot Mirror


Intel Publishes Its First Modern Windows Driver for PCs (pcworld.com)

Intel has published its first Modern Windows Driver for several of its modern integrated GPUs, representing a new way for graphics drivers to be pushed to your PC -- and something to keep an eye on until the new driver infrastructure settles in. From a report: Modern Windows Drivers, also known as Universal Windows Drivers, are a new feature of the Windows 10 October 2018 Update that takes advantage of the UWP infrastructure within Windows 10. As Microsoft explains it, a Modern Windows Driver is a "single driver package that runs across multiple different device types, from embedded systems to tablets and desktop PCs." The first Intel driver to take advantage of this is labeled UWD 25.20.100.6444. Microsoft doesn't intend for you to do anything different to obtain the new Modern drivers. If you own a prebuilt PC, the PC maker will continue to be the first place you should check for updated drivers, according to an Intel FAQ. That's because the universal driver includes a base driver, plus optional component packages and an optional hardware support app. The latter two are written by the system builder or OEM, while the former is written by the GPU maker itself.

78 comments

  1. God damn Store by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These fuckers better be available for download separate from the Store.

    --
    http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    1. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are available separately, but they pull the GUI component from Store and it is an UWP app.

      No sign-in / account required.

    2. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you get the drivers if the store has been entirely disabled (as many enterprises do through group policy)?

    3. Re: God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes directly from intel and the normal download page

    4. Re:God damn Store by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Why? What in the summary makes it sound like you actually *want* these drivers? I envisage a 1.5GB download full of useless crap to do some basic thing.

      Plus you just know it's going to be forced down your throat with a Windows Update anyway.

    5. Re: God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be a problem if you want a network card driver.

    6. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought we had modem drivers for decades.

    7. Re:God damn Store by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Eventually, it prolly will be the only way to get them.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    8. Re:God damn Store by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      Universal drivers are distributed through Windows Update

      https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...

      Or you could read the fucking article and see that there is a download link on Intel's website.

      https://downloadcenter.intel.c...

      Oh no Microsoft is doing something, time to shit your pants in terror!

    9. Re: God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you use a second computer, your smartphone, or go to a public library with a flash drive to download the files there. There are plenty of ways to get network drivers without pre-existing ones on a PC.

    10. Re: God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like HP printer "drivers"!! 4GB of crapware and shovelware and nagware, for one 200kB actual driver.

      Oh and AMD Catalyst C# junk, bleah

    11. Re:God damn Store by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Or what? What are you going to do? A bit fat lot of nothing. Windows isn't a fucking democracy. You'll take what they give you and you'll fucking like it.

    12. Re: God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts.

    13. Re:God damn Store by gtall · · Score: 1

      Usually we just puke in disgust.

    14. Re:God damn Store by mikael · · Score: 1

      Plus telemetry to send back to the mothership, backdoors for law enforcement, with gaming adverts popping up whenever you want to change settings.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    15. Re: God damn Store by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Nope ... Just time to recognize that a collosal clusterfuck is in the making.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Modern" Windows is shorthand for "Walled Garden Company Controlled" Windows. So don't hold your breath on that one.

    17. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss US Robotics. Rockwell made a damned fine modem. Better than this motorolla/aris bullshit we get stuck with these days.

    18. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Massa whoops dat ass wit da stick, lil ol me's juss gits used to it. When Massa lifts dat stick over hissm head, I's still flinch ta dis day. But it not Massa's fault. I thanks him ever day...

      Ummm hmm hmm hmmmmmmmm

    19. Re:God damn Store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss US Robotics. Rockwell made a damned fine modem. Better than this motorolla/aris bullshit we get stuck with these days.

      Those were Texas Instruements chipsets that US Robotics/3Com used.

  2. No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, I don't want your bloated driver code that you had to make run on all these different systems. I want the driver that was designed to be efficient on the hardware and OS that I installed.

    Bleh.

    1. Re: No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised a Windows user even understands this concept you bring forward. Lol

      If you care about bloatware, you are already using the wrong OS.

      Even OSX is way less bloated than windows at this point.

      To be honest, this is the kind of bloatware I'd rather have. I can see this benefitting mobile devices especially since driver support is terrible.

      Hopefully this leaks into the Android and Linux mobile platforms and helps out the custom dev scene with better hardware support.

    2. Re:No, just no... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just want a driver install package that only installs the files for the architecture it is running on. For example, if I'm on amd64, I don't need drivers taking up space for Sun3, MIPS, POWER, SPARC32, and ARM.

    3. Re: No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you care about bloatware, you are already using the wrong OS.

      To be entirely fair, most default Linux distros include drivers for *absolutely everything* by default.

    4. Re: No, just no... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The key is that you can tweak this with Linux. If you want a really lean install, throw net install (e.g. Debian) on and only put the bits on that you need. Have a big drive, lots of RAM, and don't want to be bothered with esoteric shit? Install everything-but-the-kitchen-sink (e.g. Ubuntu). Want something that fits on your USB stick for rescuing? Download a premade image (e.g. SystemRescueCd).

      You can do this stuff to some degree with Windows as well, but not as easily and not as legally/safely. What you describe is a feature of Linux, not a flaw.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:No, just no... by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      Why would the driver be inefficient? Any benchmarks to backup your claim?

    6. Re: No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The key is that you can tweak this with Linux.... You can do this stuff to some degree with Windows as well, but not as easily and not as legally/safely. What you describe is a feature of Linux, not a flaw.

      Sure it's a feature of Linux to trim things down, which is why I said the driver cornucopia is a feature of the Linux "distros." Also, generally, Linux drivers tend to introduce much less bloat than their equivalent Windows drivers. The drivers that come with the kernel, anyways.

      However, it's entirely possible, legal *and* supported to slim down a typical Windows install as well:
      https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/manufacture/desktop/dism---deployment-image-servicing-and-management-technical-reference-for-windows

      My friend prepares VM images for a major university and has a sweet custom Windows install image that *only* has drivers required for the VM. The entire install is automated, takes something like a minute to go from a blank image to a running GUI-less server. Of course he has equivalents for RHEL and Suse.

    7. Re:No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saving 100kB isn't even worth the time spend discussing this thread.

    8. Re: No, just no... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, you certainly can - with a fair amount of effort - pare down Windows. There are also embedded versions of Windows - for years we shipped equipment with XP Embedded. But these are not readily available, and for most people they are violating copyright when they acquire such an image - also putting themselves at risk for malware. "Small and Light" is a definite advantage of Linux, even if Ubuntu begins to approach Windows in bloatiness. Just for scale, a regular install of Windows is around 12 GB (16 if you let it install Office). Ubuntu comes in around 2GB. At the extreme end, Damn Small Linux gives you a full graphical interface for 50MB of disk space while Windows IoT Core (smallest Windows embedded version) requires 2GB, though it only uses 1GB and reserves 1GB for updates.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is not cost effective for a company to make a driver efficient AND work on every platform. These are two mutually exclusive ideas unless you have money to burn.

      Also devs, both hardware and software no longer appreciate the need for slim code as processor speed, memory and hard drive space are comparatively cheap.

      Check out the demo scene if you are not familiar with what can actually be done in 64K or even 4K of code

    10. Re:No, just no... by 0ld_d0g · · Score: 1

      Because it is not cost effective for a company to make a driver efficient AND work on every platform.

      I don't agree with such a broad claim. We have the same binaries that run efficiently on a Xeon, a Pentium 4 and a Core i5. Those are vastly different platforms, that only look similar because of a common virtual interface (x86 ISA). In a similar fashion, the OS presents an file-system abstraction to the software you use, be it a NVMe or a Spinning Disk HDD or a network based storage device. A device driver essentially ferries data back and forth from a device (modulo obvious caveats and simplifications). If the device is the same, say a mouse or a VR headset, or a network card, then its good if the OS vendor can provide a common interface for developers to develop against. Sure every abstraction has a cost. But development/productivity on multiple platform also has costs.

      If I'm selling RAID controller chips, I don't want to write separate drivers for HP UX, IBM OS/360, RHEL, NetBSD, etc etc. Or worse, have drivers for one OS lag behind in features compared to others.

      Maybe if I was a wall street trading firm and I needed to store/access data in sub millisecond timeframes - then sure optimize away. Obviously for some use-cases time is literally money. Most modern driver-model abstractions allow an escape hatch where you can deal directly with the lower level API.

      Check out the demo scene if you are not familiar with what can actually be done in 64K or even 4K of code

      I don't think people want to run software that only runs on a fixed hardware platform like a C64 or an Amiga. It takes people months and sometimes years to develop those 1-2 minute intros.

    11. Re: No, just no... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That isn't even close to true. You won't find a single desktop distribution that includes drivers for embedded devices, and vice versa.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re: No, just no... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That is a disingenuous claim. You are acting as if application programmers and device driver writers are interchangeable. I assure you device driver writers focus on efficiency, and never call third party libraries. And since there is always that one idiot let me state explicitly that kernel calls are not third party.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re: No, just no... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      To be entirely fair they're usually installed as modules that aren't loaded unless they are needed. But of course, you'd know that if you weren't busy speaking out of your ass.

    14. Re: No, just no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be entirely fair, most default Linux distros include drivers for *absolutely everything* by default.

      But only the required ones are actually loaded. Your actual running system will only have a minimal necessary set of drivers.

  3. More ways to screw up your system by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On a regular basis, when the "updates" and "patches" are pushed out, we invariably have people whose drivers have been replaced by these supposedly universal drivers.

    Then we have to go back and put in the original drivers we use in our images to get them up and running.

    I wonder how many end users will be afflicted by this bug and not have any clue how to correct things?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:More ways to screw up your system by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      On a regular basis, when the "updates" and "patches" are pushed out, we invariably have people whose drivers have been replaced by these supposedly universal drivers.

      I call bullshit given that this form of driver only works on a brand new Windows 10 1809 release which few people are running, and Intel's driver was the first such driver released and has been out for less than a day.

    2. Re:More ways to screw up your system by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      we invariably have people whose drivers have been replaced by these supposedly universal drivers.

      Wow, sounds like you've had a lot of problems in the last 4-5 days of these universal drivers existing. It sounds like it feels like years to you!

    3. Re: More ways to screw up your system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Every windows update bricks my audio driver. Every single time windows updates, it replaces my audio driver with some Realtek bullshit. So every time I install an update I gotta rollback the god damn drivers.

      If you think this isn't going to cause the same problems, we'll then you are an idiot.

      You were saying?

    4. Re:More ways to screw up your system by gravewax · · Score: 1

      That is fucking impressive. What model time machine did you use to travel to the future to access all these universal windows drivers?

  4. Modern drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern bugs

  5. Modern by peppepz · · Score: 2

    According to Intel, you can only use the executable installer provided by Intel or your PC maker. If you use the “INF/Have disk installation” or any other method of installing drivers, Intel warns that that could cause “minor to catastrophic issues or system instability.” That’s because it bypasses Intel’s own installation method.

    Yup, here comes modernity.

    1. Re:Modern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I was, wondering if this'd be like the "hp unified printer driver" hell, a gigantic download that gets you imperial fucktons of crap you don't need along with the less-than-a-half-percent-of-total sized actual printer driver you actually need... but no longer have any other way of obtaining.

      intel managed to fuck it up even harder. Congratulations, intel.

      Man, always when I learn about this sort of thing I'm glad I made damn sure my printer talks PostScript and my computers run Unix-like OSen, running classic lpr only.

    2. Re:Modern by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Once an Intel driver has been updated to a Windows Modern Driver, rolling back to the older drivers is a âoecomplex processâ that can result in system instability, particularly in regards to graphics drivers

      For this reason, we're not providing the ZIP file for the next several driver releases while users transition to this new Microsoft driver platform.

      We're just in a transition period where you could end up with two different driver models conflicting. So we stick to installers so that they can automagically do the necessary house cleaning for the swap. Then once we're on the new driver model go back to standard INF installations if need be.

    3. Re:Modern by toddestan · · Score: 1

      How can they reasonably switch everything over to the new model? My Windows 10 laptop is old enough that I don't expect any driver updates. The graphics driver I'm using now actually targets Vista, of all things. Maybe Windows 10 +1 they can fully deprecate the current driver model, but Windows 10 is going to be stuck supporting both models indefinitely. Granted, the new Microsoft doesn't really seem to care as much about breaking people's computers, but I don't think they'd get away with this one.

  6. Is it Y2K compliant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    does it fix any floating-point errors?

    1. Re:Is it Y2K compliant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it fix any floating-point errors?

      Hold up there, mister. There's modern and then there's cutting edge. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.

  7. Windows S mode by mccalli · · Score: 2

    Sounds related to making sure Windows S devices can be kept up to date. I'm thinking of devices in the Surface Go class (I don't know if that has an Intel GPU or not, but you get the idea - that kind of a device).

  8. Drivers are now apps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only apps can app apps, and appy Apptel knows that modern appy app apps need modern appy app drivers!

    Apps!

  9. Remember the USB 1.0 standard by randomErr · · Score: 4, Informative

    The original USB 1.0 standard had written into it the ability to have a universal driver system. When plugged in the device would upload a drive payload in a Java applet to allow at least partial operation until a platform specific drive could be found. For security reasons and the fact Java wasn't installed everywhere that was quickly dropped from the USB standard. Microsoft is just replicating that idea but in .NET instead of Java.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Remember the USB 1.0 standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately .NET execution ties this to Windows and doesn't work for anyone on other operating systems that still make use of such devices.

    2. Re:Remember the USB 1.0 standard by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      At one point Windows machines had drivers for USB CD ROM Drives by Flash storage came out later, so they didn't have drivers for flash storage. Some flash storage drives would present themselves as a CD Rom drive and a flash storage drive. The CD Drive would contain the drives which would be installed, because autoplay, and the flash drive would work after the drivers started working. Sounds like a pretty good solution to me. It would be nice if more USB devices presented themelves as flash drives or CD drives so that basic drivers could be installed. This would be super useful for things like wifi/ethernet USB devices, but might also be useful for other things like printers, so you could install the basic drivers, or just run a program that would get the drivers off the web without having to go search for them.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Remember the USB 1.0 standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB GSM modems use a different approach: they are first visible as a mass storage device containing the Windows drivers and the driver itself can switch the device to a proper mode. It's a pain to use under Linux because of that of course.

    4. Re: Remember the USB 1.0 standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heard of Mono?

    5. Re:Remember the USB 1.0 standard by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some mobile phones from ZTE would do the same. The memory of the phone became a virtual disk drive, and it would even reroute your PC's routing tables to go through the mobile network.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  10. argumentum ad novitatem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_novelty

    "The appeal to novelty (also called argumentum ad novitatem) is a fallacy in which one prematurely claims that an idea or proposal is correct or superior, exclusively because it is new and MODERN. "

    A single package necessarily contains lots of optimizations for multiple platforms that takes advantages of the peculiarities of that platform. Packaging them altogether in one, simply means drivers you don't need are waiting on drives you do need to be fixed to make the bundled fix.

    But hey.... it's *modern*, so that's good right?

  11. YAY! More Bloat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So to get one driver, I have to have all drivers. Nice going.

  12. ALL YOUR BASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    driver are belong to MS.

  13. Intel has had bloated driver packages for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some Intel video driver packages are well over 100MB. If you are counting bytes, the actual driver files for a particular machine are only a small fraction of the package.

    Intel isn't the only vendor with bloated drivers, just the first one that comes to mind.

  14. how old is not modern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long has it been since Intel last published drivers if a new release is being referred to as modern? The way it's repeatedly phrased makes it sound like Intel hasn't dabbled in drivers since Windows 95.

  15. In readiness for non-win32 windows next year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Next year sees the biggest change in Windows to date, as MS launches the Xbox Two- a 24gb+, 1080TI+ class GPU, and 8+ Zen2 core CPU. For FIVE HUNDRED dollars. And it runs full windows store apps with keyboard and mouse- a full non-win32 PC as well as a console.

    With this new console PC hybrid, thanks to AMD and TSMC's new 7nm process, high end gaming PCs are literally rendered obsolete pricewise. The rest of the 'independent' PC market must follow the Xbox Two's example, and finally accept the death of (third party) win32 support- hence Intel's actions.

    Microsoft hopes to gain full control of all software running on future PCs- like Apple does today with iOS. Before FULL comes the Google android 'experience' where 'sideloading' is seen increasingly as an 'illigitimate' way of using your PC.

    Now to the dribblers, yes I know Microsoft has had CRIPPLED non-win32 versions of windows before, and even a broken ARM version. But today, the NEW non-win32 windows, that also supports ARM, is the MAINLINE 'Windows 11' that will come to life with the Xbox Two. Its entire selling point will be that unbeatable hardware spec for that unbeatable 500 dollars. Sony has the PS5 in the same timeframe, but that console, probably with slightly lesser specs than the Xbox Two, focuses on a AAA VR experience. And the PS5 cannot be used as a general PC, of course (at best it could be given Android app store support).

    All industries change when the 'race to the bottom' perfection of mass produced items reaches a key moment. The 'big tin' PC finally stops making sense, even to 99.9% of PC enthusiasts. Neither AMD nor Nvidia wants to offer DISCRETE GPUs of 1080TI+ performance for any kind of sane price. Nvidia's latest slightly better 2080TI costs well over ONE THOUSAND dollars, and the chip breaks down after several hundred hours of use.

    Efficiency of scale, focusing on a single perfected design (the console) cannot be beat or even approached. But the tech in consoles, until 7nm, always ran behind reasonable power wokhorse PC specs. No longer. 7nm changes the world. And gives Microsoft the monopoly control over commercial software Gates always dreamt of.

    UWP (is that the acronym?) is designed from the ground up to kill the freedom win32 programs gave us. Even today a win32 program runs like a dream on Windows 10, whereas games written to UWP container specs take forever to load, cannot allow seemless ingame switching to the desktop, and use far more resources with a truly lousy memory management system. Inside, Windows 10 fully supports all the Win32 APIs going back to day one, and they are light and highly efficient. Paid shills who'll try to tell you Win32 is obsolete or 'insecure' or works less well with Windows 10 are outright liars.

    UWP has NSA back doors backed into its fundamental design. The Intel CPU flaws that serve the intelligence community were the original backbone of UWP thread mechanisms. Win32 programs can be made secure by skilled programmers, UWP programs cannot, since they must rely on MS black-boxes.

    It doesn't matter. No-one will be able to argue against the specs and cost of the Xbox Two.

    1. Re: In readiness for non-win32 windows next year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Valve was right all along.

  16. No Change For Most of Us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we're using a computer more than a year or 2 old, nobody (Intel or otherwise) is going to update the driver anyway. Especially, no OEM is going to develop or update auxiliary packages attached to Intel's driver for anything more than a year or 2 old, if that - same time frame as firmware updates in general. Tablets in particular are abandoned upon shipping by the OEM, and this delivery track will not change that. So all that anybody would get with these is the Intel driver delivered through the Store rather than though the traditional driver update methods. I think the comment pointing out the Windows S connection has it right.

  17. Not completely true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To their credit, HP provided SPECTRE-related firmware patches for certain enterprise-targeted computers going back 5 years or so. I think some other vendors updated machines that old or even older.

    Granted, 5 years isn't nearly long enough, but it was more than 2.

    Expect "big name" companies that have "a lot to lose" in terms of alienating customers to fix critical security bugs for more than 2 years, especially when large customers or large classes of customers - think corporate - are involved.

    Bottom line: The company's "fix it or not" attitude will be driven by money. If you buy a 3 year old used PC or graphics card that wasn't used much by "customers that count," though, then you are probably out of luck.

  18. Oh good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now all our drivers can be giant bloated pieces of shite that force down updates whenever changes are made in support of some device no one uses or cares about! I LOVE the idea that my computer is going to be one giant repository of driver code that has nothing to do with my system and that this huge database of drivers will be requesting updates through the Microsoft Store ensuring that every time I turn on my computer I am reporting every last detail of my system config and usage through that platform! I'm sure this will have exactly ZERO impact on my usage and that I won't be harassed by those "Schedule when to install Windows Updates" prompts anymore because these will all happen in the background, continuously, especially while I play video games and need every last bit of bandwidth! The FUTURE is here! /s

  19. Another nail in Win 7's coffin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When new hardware only offers support for the new driver model, old OS's wither away.

  20. And it shall be called ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... systemd.

  21. Another new way to do a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a great opportunity to learn another process to update a specific piece of hardware!

  22. But it's the very best oil lamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nevermind those "package manager" quantum dot LED lights over there.
    They've only been around for several decades.

    Get our oil lamp instead! The very best oil lamp that was ever made!

  23. Hybrid? As long as it has DRM, it's not a PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just a standard PC, like a Dell, in a slightly unusual packaging.
    The only difference is that it has Digital Restriction Management. So there may be a bog-standard PC inside, but you'll never get to use the thing as a PC.

    - - - - -

    Why? (I assume everyone here knows this, but just in case:)
    Because a personal computer is a *universal* information processing device, that is personal to the one *programming* it, to do what he needs.
    In this case, it certainly is a PC to the Content Mafia, and to Microsoft. But they wrap it into a set of fixed-function modules called "apps", like an outdoor kiosk device. And you never get to actually access the PC below it.
    Cause then the coke heads of the Content Mafia couldn't keep their imaginary artificial scarcity monopoly up. A monopoly over making copies of the work of their victims (artists), that guarantees them (but not the artists) free money without working for it. By simply handing out mere copies. *Our* money, that *we* actually *had* to work for. Not also mere copies of our money!

  24. And on the Linux front??? by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    So on the Linux front do things get better or worse?

    I almost transitioned an older laptop to Linux but tried Win10 first and the graphics drivers were much improved.
    I has a nice big disk and a CDROM to rip music with... Then cygwin rsync to other machines and Bob's yer uncle.

    Un-documented hardware is a global security risk.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    1. Re:And on the Linux front??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel has had "universal Linux drivers" for years by putting their official drivers in Linus's source tree and upstream Mesa and Xorg. AMD's new "amdgpu" stack does the same thing.

  25. Ironically, these saved my PC two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So on Weds of this week I was using my PC - Intel 6th gen NUC - when suddenly the screen flickered black for a moment. And suddenly my audio had stopped working, and there was a big red X on the volume icon in the systray. Yes, Windows 10 had helpfully auto-updated my perfectly working graphics & HDMI audio drivers to what it thought was better - killing my audio.
    So I went to downloadcenter.intel.com to re-install the drivers *I* want to use (because f*ck you, Microsoft) and these UWDs were the only ones available. With some trepidation I downloaded & installed them. They appear to work perfectly, albeit without the GUI applet that the older Intel drivers had.

    TL;DR: these new drivers work better than what Microsoft foist on you. And once again, f*ck you, Microsoft.

    (yeah yeah, "cool story, bro"... bite me, I just wanted to vent my ire)

    1. Re:Ironically, these saved my PC two days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Windows 10 had helpfully auto-updated my perfectly working graphics & HDMI audio drivers to what it thought was better - killing my audio.

      If it was needed, another reminder that with Windows, your device belong to MS, not you.

  26. This is why Merica is failing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, right here in that post, PERFECTLY describes the problems with Americans.

    1. Re:This is why Merica is failing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe is the one with bloated regulations serving a thousand special interests.