Slashdot Mirror


Jailed 'Iceman' Hacker Now Charged With Drone-Smuggling Scheme Orchestrated From Prison (washingtontimes.com)

In 2010, Max Ray Butler received a 13-year prison sentence for "hacking" -- at the time, the longest one ever -- after stealing nearly 2 million credit cards and running up fraudulent charges over $86 million.

But eight years into his sentence, he's now being charged with commiting five more counts of wire fraud while still in prison, as well as possessing stolen credit card numbers and contraband in prison, plus two more related counts of conspiracy.

An anonymous reader quotes the Washington Times: Previously known as Max Ray Butler and by his hacker alias, "Iceman," Max Ray Vision has been charged in a nine-count indictment filed by federal prosecutors that places him at the center of a scheme that allegedly involved using a smuggled cellphone, stolen banking data and a consumer-grade drone to make an airdrop into prison, The Daily Beast first reported Friday.... Prosecutors alleged in the indictment that Vision used a smuggled T-Mobile "My-Touch" cellphone while incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Center in Oakdale, Louisiana, to access the internet and obtain stolen debit card numbers.

"Using MoneyGram and Western Union websites, and their respective mobile applications," a grand jury charged in the indictment, "Butler wired funds from the bank accounts associated with the stolen debit card numbers to other inmates at Oakdale FCC," including five co-defendants also charged in the indictment. He later instructed his fellow inmates to transfer the funds obtained from the stolen debit cards to a former cellmate who had been released in May 2015, according to the indictment... Vision's former cellmate allegedly used the stolen funds to purchase an unmanned aerial vehicle, or drone, that was then used in April 2016 to attempt to smuggle another cellphone and other unspecified contraband into prison, according to the indictment...

He allegedly began using the smuggled Android phone in Oct. 2014, according to the indictment, roughly 18 months before the airdrop.

"The potential for greater crimes [sic] opportunities are obvious," complained the Bureau of Prisons concluded in a report cited by The Daily Beast, "i.e. escape, introduction of firearms, etc.

"Although [Vision] was only equipped with a smartphone, he proved that he is more than capable to disrupt and circumvent the security of the institution and present a clear danger to the community in general."


18 of 39 comments (clear)

  1. Back to court... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    I assume that he will go back to criminal court with new charges, any chances of early release for his 13 year term are gone, and for the new charges he will get the maximum sentence possible by law.

    1. Re: Back to court... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some people just never get the message. If he's pulling shit like that while serving a prison sentence, perhaps he would be better served getting cained instead.

    2. Re:Back to court... by mermeid007 · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't even forgive you for that typo in Saudi Arabia

    3. Re:Back to court... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      For $86 million lots of people will do things.

    4. Re:Back to court... by mermeid007 · · Score: 2

      Wow. I thought maybe just belonging in that jail for life was harsh enough.

    5. Re:Back to court... by gweihir · · Score: 2

      The "cruel and unusual" thing is not to reserve such punishments to the extra-vile. It is what such punishment says about those dishing it out and what it does to them.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Back to court... by tsqr · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "cruel and unusual" thing is not to reserve such punishments to the extra-vile. It is what such punishment says about those dishing it out and what it does to them.

      First, the "cruel and unusual" thing isn't a "thing"; it's part of the 8th Amendment to the US Constitution: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Second your assertion about its purpose is wrong. Its purpose is to protect you from the possibility of a tyrannical government imposing harsh punishments for minor infractions. Find out more here.

    7. Re:Back to court... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the claimed reasons are the true reasons?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    8. Re:Back to court... by tsqr · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the claimed reasons are the true reasons?

      What makes you believe they aren't? The wording is pretty simple and straightforward. Are you reaching back across the centuries to read the minds of our Founding Fathers? Or have life's little disappointments left you cynical and bitter? Perhaps you have some enlightened insight you'd like to share?

  2. His mistake by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    His mistake was using an Android phone. If he used an iPhone he would have gotten away with it.

  3. Re:Hacker hacked hacks by mermeid007 · · Score: 1

    Yes, very nice and not even any side bars for eidfication. Can we get back to talking about multicore 1.44GHz processors now?

  4. Impressive! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Wow, they smuggled a drone into a prison up some guys butt?! I'm not even mad because that's impressive, like, goatse impressive. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Impressive! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wow, they smuggled a drone into a prison up some guys butt?! I'm not even mad because that's impressive, like, goatse impressive. ;)

      According to TFS it was a T-Mobile My-Touch phone, which is a well-rounded phone with a 3" screen, that's smaller than my junk. It's not that impressive.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Impressive! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Its worrysome that a mytouch up the ass is "no big thang" ...because, uh...it is lol.

      I guarantee you that many prisoners are "smuggling" larger things in their buttholes on a daily basis, IYKWIM

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. possessing stolen credit card numbers by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    How does one 'possess' an information?
    By writing it down?
    Remembering it?

    Is this a more awful crime than 'possessing' somebody's home address or phone number?

    It must be a copyright violation.

  6. Re: Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Having served a 2.5 year sentence in a medium security prison, it is absolutely possible to fly in an unnoticed drone.

    Also, the COs were robbing the place blind. Using inmates to take stuff off the delivery trucks for food and commissary and bringing cases right to their personal vehicles.

    I also witnessed COs bring in knives, have sex with inmates, violate the work release segregation law, and several other egregious crimes.

    The moral of the story? The police are the real criminals.

  7. Consecutive sentences by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this jerk is expecting that any more sentences he gets for this will be served concurrent with his original 13 years, meaning that this costs him little if any extra time in prison. If you really want to make him pay for what he's done, make all of his new sentences run consecutive, meaning that he doesn't even start on his first new one until after he's completely finished his current stir time, and he won't be eligible for parole until he's into his last one. With any luck, he'll be stuck in the graybar hotel for the next 40 to 50 years, without Internet access, so that any skills he might have will be completely obsolete if he's lucky enough to remember how he used to do things like this.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  8. I have yet to figure out why by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    in light of all the cell phones that are smuggled into the prison system, why on earth are jammers not allowed within the confines of the facility ?

    Before you go off the deep end and tell me they can interfere with comms outside the facility, I will say you don't need the Death Star sized Jammer that wipes out an entire Cell tower area. They do make smaller units that only have a range of $pick_your_range based on how powerful the unit is. Would be trivial to keep it inside the facility itself.

    Better yet, place a local tower ( I'm sure they have plenty of Singrays laying around ) so the phones will connect to it instead. This gives them both ends of the call and / or the ability to monitor it in real time.

    Perhaps it's just a problem they just don't want to solve.

    -shrugs-