Despite CRISPR Baby Controversy, Harvard University Will Begin Gene-Editing Sperm (technologyreview.com)

Even as a furious debate broke out in China over gene-edited babies, some scientists in the US are also hoping to improve tomorrow's children. From a report: [...] Amid the condemnation, though, it was easy to lose track of what the key experts were saying. Technology to alter heredity is for real. It is improving very quickly, it has features that will make it safe, and much wider exploratory use to create children could be justified soon. That was the message delivered at a gene-editing summit in Hong Kong on Wednesday, by Harvard Medical School dean George Daley, just ahead of He's own dramatic appearance on the stage (see video starting at 1:15:30).

Astounding some listeners, the Harvard doctor and stem-cell researcher didn't condemn He but instead characterized the Chinese actions as a wrong turn on the right path (see video). "The fact that it is possible that the first instance of human germ-line editing came forward as a misstep should in no way lead us to stick our heads in the sand," Daley said. "It's time to ... start outlining what an actual pathway for clinical translation would be."

Comments

Re:Harvard

[lgw]

The fight you started with "my general impression is that the right is more likely to support modification via breeding over modification via DNA engineering, typically by killing off, sterilizing, or banning entry of "races" they deem to be inferior"?

Democrats: the party of slavery, the party of Jim Crow, the party of lynchings, the party of the KKK, the party of Margaret Sanger, who founded Planned Parenthood as a eugenics program, the party of anti-Antisemitism dressed up as "BDS", the party of Identity Politics.