Slashdot Mirror


China Announces Punishments For Intellectual-Property Theft (bloomberg.com)

China has announced an array of punishments that could restrict companies' access to borrowing and state-funding support over intellectual-property theft. The news comes after the G20 Summit in Argentina, where the Trump Administration agreed to hold off on tariff action for at least 90 days as they negotiate to resolve specific U.S. complaints. Bloomberg reports: China set out a total of 38 different punishments to be applied to IP violations, starting this month. The document, dated Nov. 21, was released Tuesday by the National Development and Reform Commission and signed by various government bodies, including the central bank and supreme court. China says violators would be banned from issuing bonds or other financing tools, and participating in government procurement. They would also be restricted from accessing government financial support, foreign trade, registering companies, auctioning land or trading properties. In addition, violators will be recorded on a list, and financial institutions will refer to that when lending or granting access to foreign exchange. Names will be posted on a government website. "This is an unprecedented regulation on IP violation in terms of the scope of the ministries and severity of the punishment," said Xu Xinming, a researcher at the Center for Intellectual Property Studies at China University of Political Science and Law. The newly announced punishments are "a security net of IP protection" targeting repeat offenders and other individuals who aren't in compliance with the law, he said.

13 of 67 comments (clear)

  1. I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    will find some negative spin to this

    1. Re:I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure the anti-Trumpers will find some negative spin to this

      China has some very excellent and stringent environmental protection laws. Why does China have a shitty environmental record? Simple, China only enforces the environmental protection laws on foreign companies as tool to keep them from being competitive.

      What you need to realize is that "China First" has always been China's policy and this will do nothing to change that. What will likely happen is that China will simply demand the IP using it's existing laws and then share it as part of the government funding. China is a dictatorship and dictators only pretend to play fair.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      will find some negative spin to this

      It's too early to know the outcome. Giving lip-service and token actions to reform plans has happened quite often in the past, but the follow-through is where it usually fails.

    3. Re:I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Say what you will about Trump, I would argue this trade war is because Trump agrees with you; China is always China first. The difference here is that this trade war is about the US showing it's teeth, and altering China's calculus on this.

      While you're right China is about "China first", the complex game here is that Trump is showing that "China first" is better served by not stealing IP, because the US has the ability to cause economic damage and weather China's response. Say what you will about China's strength; their resource and supply chain is long and their markets are foreign as they are an export driven economy. The US is mostly a service economy, and thus is less hurt by tariffs from China then China gets hurt.

      So now the question is, did it work? If China thinks so, then they will enforce this rule, because teh alternative is economic pain from the US.

    4. Re: I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      His move to get China to respect IP will be at least as effective as his move to disarm North Korea.

      Do the US negotiators seriously believe this will change anything, or are they just playing along in order to claim a propaganda victory?

    5. Re:I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dude... I'm not sure if I count in your definition as anti-Trump. I am against any person who believes they belong in that office... especially the ones who try really hard to get there.

      Let's take the commitment made by China as with most of the other "commitments" Trump has forced out of China so far.

      "We promise to consider doing this...."

      "We promise to consider doing that...."

      "Now that we've completely collapsed the entire American soy bean market value, we promise to buy some at pennies on the dollar but we don't really need them that badly since we bought out South America's supply and they agreed to plant more."

      Let's also consider that my company and its customers are cancelling or placing on "indefinite hold" billions of dollars in American purchases as we look for non-American suppliers because we don't trust the volatility of the American dollar or the American tariff system. So, if we commit to "buying American", we can't be sure that our 5+ year commitments are safe since they can easily inflate by 10-25% at any time due to increased American import costs as well as lack of stability of the dollar. We are also holding off on stateside investments since the dollar could rebound 10% with no hope of recovery at any time. So... put simply... it will probably be 2-3 years before we buy American again and by then we'll have established suppliers outside. If American companies are willing to operate in Euros instead and therefore assuming the fiscal risks themselves, we may reconsider, but this would likely hurt them and then we are worried about the health of the companies we're committing to.

      Since Trump came in, the DHS and Treasury has made it particularly difficult to invoice American companies. If we can't sell to the US, we can't buy from the US. This means that we need to be able to rent people and equipment to the US. As a company attempting to invoice a US company, it is required to fill out tax forms that provide information to prove that you're not laundering money. This is because the US doesn't trust their own companies or foreign companies to operate fairly. If you refuse to or are simply unable to fill out these forms, the American company is required to withhold 30% of your payment and pay it to the US government instead. This may sound like no big deal, but to properly fill out these forms requires that you're invoicing at least $25,000 to justify the cost of employing an international tax lawyer to handle the process. So, the solution is to open a shell corporation in the US, then buy bonds in Apple and then take a loan from Apple in Europe... which in turn is money laundering. But it's legal money laundering.

      I'd be remiss if I didn't explain that we always had to file these forms in the past as well. It's simply that with the added trade restrictions since Trump took over, it's much worse. The form used to be something you could fill out yourself. Now it requires actual accountants and tax attorneys.

      Now, let me approach the specific topic at hand.

      IP Theft.

      The Chinese have now declared that there are lots of possible punishments for IP theft. This is a big issue.

      1) The commitment doesn't define what IP theft means. It doesn't state whether US patents are recognized in the consideration.
      2) It doesn't declare how IP theft is identified. Is it something that is reported? Is it something they have to discover themselves?
      3) It doesn't specify where the burden of proof lies. Is this a guilty until proven innocent or vise versa environment?
      4) It doesn't specify whether IP theft claims can be filed remotely.
      5) It doesn't specify whether simply making something similar is actually IP theft

      I can go on. It basically says "We will treat IP theft badly" but what's more important is that China recognizes less than 1% of all claims made regarding IP theft as actually being IP theft. It's not like you can just say "China stole my thing". There's been a rough total of 2 big cases ever filed regarding IP the

    6. Re:I'm sure the anti-Trumpers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. This.

      The reality is, as China's lot in life improves -- much due to their own work, its citizens are certainly better off, but this also causes a raise in cost for foreign firms buying from China.

      Most people don't want to see impoverishment of others, only that their own lot in life not be hindered. And IP theft is one way that China is significantly hurting the livelihood of others.

      There was a case I recall, where a company made fish finders. They started to notice all sorts of warranty claims that made zero sense, and after a bit of digging? Discovered a company in China making, and selling, perfect clones of their product. Well, perfect externally, internally they were crap -- hence all the warranty calls.

      When then investigated further, they found an entire company in China. Same name as theirs. Answered the phone as them. Pretended, 100%, to be them.

      Yeah. That's gotta help a family built business.

      This is the sort of thing that borders on just plain evil and absurd. So does a Western firm spending $100M dollars developing something, and having it stolen 12 days after it hits the market.

      It'd be one thing if these products remained in China. For example, providing access to tech not obtainable otherwise, to their domestic population.

      But when you see your own hard work, competing against you? That's beyond harsh.

      It's unfair. It's wrong.

      This isn't a Trump, or even an American issue. Every Western nation, hell every nation on Earth, has this problem with China.

      I'm not sure this will fix it... but what I can say is this...

      Even a broken clock is wrong twice a day, and any leader is 100% right to call China on this, or place barriers to trade if they don't play ball.

  2. China Announces Punishments For Intellectual-Prope by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    China Announces Punishments For Intellectual-Property Theft

    Yawn ... call me when they are enforcing this regardless of the nationality of the owner of the stolen IP. The way things are at the moment China benefits from rigorous patent enforcement in the west but Chinese companies enjoy considerable priority and get massive preferential treatment over foreign ones when it comes to patent enforcement on Chinese soil. There is no reason to believe IP enforcement will be any different.

  3. Re:Communist China doesn't care about IP theft by quenda · · Score: 3, Informative

    Things change.
    Once, America did not care about IP. Europeans were fuming at the rampant patent and copyright infringement, and blatant espionage to steal trade secrets.
    American factories were mass-producing cheap knock-offs of British goods. Printers paid no royalties.

    Eventually, the American companies started innovating, and American writers became common. So some of the states started to make and enforce IP laws.
    This annoyed a bunch of people, so they moved West to avoid patent law, and that is how we got Hollywood.

    Why America was the China of the 19th century.

    This is not an excuse, not saying China's theft should be ignored. Just adding some context.

  4. Let me know when they actually enforce this by jonwil · · Score: 3, Informative

    If the Chinese were genuinely serious about this, they would shut down (or blacklist/apply these new restrictions to) all the hundreds of factories producing bootlegs of everything from smartphones to LEGO bricks to golf clubs to handbags.

  5. Who gets to decide? by larryjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, the Chinese government has laid out punishments to be meted out by the Chinese government. However, the real meat of the any punishment depends on who gets to determine guilt and mete out punishment. I assume that the Chinese government would reserve that right for themselves, as would any sovereign nation. If so, can we expect any change from the current situation? If the US government determines that Huawei is guilty of stealing IP, would the Chinese government even bother to consider any punishments, or would they bog down any investigation in bureaucratic maneuvering or assign blame to individual scapegoats instead of the accused Chinese companies.

  6. Re:China Announces Punishments For Intellectual-Pr by Freischutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's hoping the IP non-sense will end soon. We're all just wasting time and resources fighting a losing battle otherwise.

    Not holding my breath, you can try to convince us all day long that creating IP is a cost free exercise but it isn't. So instead of pontificating about how IP rights are the work of Satan and information yearns to be free, can you come up with any concrete proposals for a mechanism by which people can recoup the money they sank into IP creation? Something besides donations and collecting the imaginary goodwill dollars they get from all the people pirating their work? ... because at some point in some way, in a world where you are completely free to profit off of anybody else's IP without compensating them for it, the IP creator still has to pay the bills for it to be worthwhile for him/her to bother.

  7. Catch 22 for engineers by hackingbear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your grandma may have told you: be careful what you wish for.

    1. If the claim of Chinese intellectual property violation is not exaggerated and that it will be fixed soon, then that would give American companies more incentives to do more research and development in China, tapping low cost engineers and other college graduates, instead of hiring expensive U.S. engineers.
    2. China already files more patents than any other countries. The natural trend would be that there will be more patent trolls suing everyone including American companies, just like those opening up offices in East Texas.
    3. once China enforce harder, their hi-tech industry will only become more competitive.

    Eventually what happened was that, as China’s domestic copyright industries found themselves competing with cheap knock-offs of foreign goods, they pressed the Chinese government to fortify the IP enforcement process on its own. (To put this in perspective, this is also what happened a century earlier in the US, which until 1890 failed to protect foreign works, and then waited yet another century before joining the major international copyright treaty.)