Slashdot Mirror


Opinion: 5G Has an Exciting Future When It Comes To Dedicated Mobile Apps But Will Do Little To Improve Our General Browsing Experiences. (zdnet.com)

Charlie Osborne, writing for ZDNet: However, there is a problem that no-one is talking about: the conflict between the rapid acceleration of wireless technologies and politics which is, unwittingly, going to render some of these improvements potentially pointless.

In the UK and across Europe, there are two laws of particular interest: the EU's 2018 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the so-called Cookie Law, passed in 2012. Ever heard someone expel a breath and a long list of expletives while they are attempting to look something up, book a service, or fact-check through the Internet on their smartphone? The likelihood is, they've come across both regulations in full force, stirring up annoyance and a rapid, frustrated smashing of fingers to screen as pop-ups scream for consent, T&Cs demand acceptance, and visitors must go through tick-lists of what data they are happy to be collected and in what manner.

The EU's GDPR, which enforced data reform, protection, and collection changes across Europe, has resulted in a plethora of pop-ups which delight in lecturing visitors on data collection practices. Combine these two well-meaning regulations and you have a melting pot of sheer frustration when it comes to mobile browsing. When you are forced to stop and be lectured by pop-ups at every turn which must be manually shut down, one by one, it really doesn't matter how quickly you were brought to the page in the first place.

51 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. in the UK/Europe by DredJohn · · Score: 2

    The subject line should include "in the UK/Europe"..... Their regulations may not impact other countries....

    1. Re:in the UK/Europe by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Companies will probably set a uniform policy worldwide in order to protect against lawsuits and just because it's easier to maintain one code base. At least, that's the hope.

    2. Re: in the UK/Europe by houghi · · Score: 1

      ... and a pony.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:in the UK/Europe by Freischutz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The subject line should include "in the UK/Europe"..... Their regulations may not impact other countries....

      Sure they will. The EU is collectively the world's largest economy and it is the world's largest single market. If you want to export your stuff there you have to meet their standards and abide by their laws and regulations and in that case companies are in many cases best off applying these to their entire production California has a similar effect within the US, if they set emissions standards, most car companies in the US have to abide by them however much they may loathe having to do it. The alternative is deciding not to market their cars in the world's 5th largest economy which may be ideologically satisfying from a ultra-conservative point of view but which would be pretty stupid from a strictly capitalist point of view. So if you are a US, Canadian, Brazilian, Chinese software company and you want to market your stuff in the EU and draw revenue from there you'd better bone up on EU regulations or you may find yourself nursing a rather large headache. I suppose software companies are in the unique position that they can geo-locate customers and selectively screw them over or not based on whether they are rest-of-world or European, in which case I'm pretty happy to be in the latter category.

    4. Re:in the UK/Europe by RickyShade · · Score: 1

      Second largest economy.

    5. Re:in the UK/Europe by CastrTroy · · Score: 2

      It's not just UK/Europe though. Even though I live in North American, I still have to click throw all the warnings about cookies and data protection.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:in the UK/Europe by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      Oh, they do! I found I've been getting hit with these stupid, "we collect cookies" messages in English here in the US and in Spanish when I visit Mexican sites.

      I didn't realize they were part of the new law. It's like, "of course they collect cookies, that's why I set to delete when I close my browser."

  2. "The warnings are annoying!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stop collecting my data, assholes.

    1. Re:"The warnings are annoying!" by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If the GDPR is making it harder for companies that spy on their users to do their thing, it's doing its job. As the old joke goes, this is a feature, not a bug.

    2. Re:"The warnings are annoying!" by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "Stop collecting my data, assholes."

      Noted.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  3. Don't collect user data... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't collect user data beyond what's absolutely needed for a website or app to work and the need for popups suddenly becomes less of a problem. For example, a taxi hail site or app would actually work fine anonymously, same as calling a taxi service. Payment would be negotiated between the driver and rider, with the driver paying the app authors for referrals. Another example: I recently downloaded a step tracker app that required creation of a cloud account to even start up. Never mind that step tracking can work 100% locally, and that another app I used was purely local.

    End "cloud creep" and "data storage creep" and the GDPR becomes much less of a problem. If it makes it harder and more annoying to collect data on customers, it's doing its job.

    1. Re:Don't collect user data... by chispito · · Score: 2

      Don't collect user data beyond what's absolutely needed for a website or app to work and the need for popups suddenly becomes less of a problem.

      I'm pretty sure that's what a lot of those pop ups say. The problem is the SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio).

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Don't collect user data... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

      It gets tiring because the "GDPR" ads result in full pop-overs stating that someone has to accept an entire EULA, be it no sue clauses, opting into data collection, with the site saying, "if you want to decline, leave the site immediately."

      The Internet worked for decades without massive data collection. It worked for decades without ads.

      I'm just hoping the GDPR gets enforced and adapted more places. A few years ago, I had a friend of mine take a photo of me in a humidor and slap it on Facebook for friends only. A week later, I got a physical mail from my health insurance company demanding I take a physical or pay smoker's rates.

    3. Re:Don't collect user data... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Precisely. If you're annoyed by consent requests, take their advice and "leave the site immediately." If enough people do that then sites will adapt or lose to competitors who don't engage in assholery.

  4. Re: Porn will be awesome on 5g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I banged your mom last night with 5g force. She loved all three seconds of it.

  5. Realtime Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To me the worst thing that ever happened to the web was all of this "let me go off and do a bunch of stuff while you're typing, that you must wait for me to complete before you can type the next letter" crap. I don't know what the technical voodoo name for that is, but I hate it.

    Instead of running one search for what I'm looking for, I must now suffer the wait time of doing 40 searches based on what the ghost in the machine THINKS I might be typing.

    1. Re:Realtime Response by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      It all started with Google Desktop. Blame them for EVERYTHING.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  6. Malicious Compliance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All the popups are is a wanton act of malicious compliance. Of course, all that is required for compliance is to NOT COLLECT ANYTHING, but have a link at the bottom of a page that a user can follow to a page where they can enable data collection.

    Instead, web hosts are complying with the law in the most obstructive, annoying way possible, so that users will complain about the law and get it overturned, again allowing site hosts to collect data transparently and without the users' knowledge or consent.

  7. Hilarious, So true by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ...making 1000 tiny connections and all shifting the DOM around. Maybe I sound like an old man trying to return soup at a deli,...

    Just had to say that transition really made me laugh. :-)

    I totally agree with you on mobile browsing being especially sucky, I swear they load mobile browsers down with even more ads than desktop (and it's also subject to stupid ad hacking where ads on a website can trigger an immediate load of some other entirety different site).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hilarious, So true by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      The worst are certain websites that put a big pop-up on the screen. "GET THE APP!!!" with a smaller link saying "continue with mobile browsing". If I wanted the app, I'd get it. Don't cripple my browsing experience to push your app, TYVM.

    2. Re:Hilarious, So true by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with that as well, and a great example of another horror that is unique to mobile browsing.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Hilarious, So true by Falos · · Score: 1

      THE APP!! is gonna be a web wrapper anyway. Just with more telemetry.

      I die a little when I hear people, especially in the meatspace, crowing about how the privacy of phone OS. Amazon doesn't give a fuck what phone you did your search on. See how well THE APP!! works when it can't phone home (hint: not at all) with everything it learned. Even for 100% local functionality like the step counting fad.

      It's https://xkcd.com/934/ all over again, but for s/browser/app.

  8. But can I make clearer phone calls with 5G? by the_skywise · · Score: 2

    what you say?! Use my smart phone for TALKING!?

  9. What does it matter when it costs so much? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Are the wireless companies going to increase your data cap size commensurate with the bandwidth increase? Probably not, I think.
    Speaking as someone who has never owned a smartphone, in part because of how hideously wireless companies price-gouge you for an undersized 'data plan', I can't see the advent of '5G' as being anything to get too terribly excited over, at least not while the wireless companies in this country (U.S.) continue to stick to the same business plan they've been using for years and years now: screw the consumer every way they can get away with.
    Between this and what a security swisscheese any smartphone is (even iPhones), I continue to see no reason to ever own a smartphone, and I feel sorry for anyone who does and actually pays for a 'data plan' from a U.S. wireless company.

    1. Re: What does it matter when it costs so much? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm boring, but I've seldom gone over the 2gb on my plan.

    2. Re: What does it matter when it costs so much? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      (assuming the AC above you will see this also)
      My impression is that people are streaming Netflix, YouTube, and other video sources on their phones. That would eat up data like crazy. With higher-resolution screens on newer phones, capable of at least 30fps, it would be even worse, even with modern codecs providing more efficient compression. And, of course, wireless companies encourage people to do just that, because they want to make money on overages (i.e. it's a trap).

    3. Re:What does it matter when it costs so much? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Between this and what a security swisscheese any smartphone is (even iPhones)

      You DO realize, of course, that iPhones don't run Android, right?

      Otherwise, please provide Citations showing how iPhones are "security swisscheese[sic]".

    4. Re: What does it matter when it costs so much? by tepples · · Score: 1

      5gb. I have a hard time imagining using that much data in a month.

      Try tethering a couple desktop or laptop computers in a household to your phone and downloading a semiannual Ubuntu upgrade or a semiannual Windows 10 upgrade on each.

    5. Re: What does it matter when it costs so much? by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Well that us not what your data plan is for, they(at least here in Norway) sell mobile broadband pagages with prices/GB that are weay better allso you usualy get a home gatway included with antenai that are a bit more oprimized for signsl quality then your smart phone (optimized more for space. I must say I find the segmentation a bit strange as they ar mostly base on 4G on the same bands as rhe one used by your phone, but oh well I might be missing something here

  10. Re:We're free now! by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

    Free healthcare from 20 years ago sound pretty good compared to my situation, which is paying for a healthcare plan I can't use.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
  11. Blame regulatory pop ups not the advertisement by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Informative
    My browser experience has gone down seriously with auto playing videos, videos that relocate themselves to thwart scrolling past them, annoying animations that follow you around, nagware asking for permission to push notifications, sites begging to turn of blocker, sites graying out payload and asking for registration....

    That little pop-up from European regulations saying "this site uses cookies" is not even a flea bite compared to what the ad-networks do to the browsing experience.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  12. Re:Most mobile browsing experiences still suck by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Craigslist is the best-designed major website out there. Clean, relatively simple, and fast. They've "modernized" it a bit since their original 1990s design, but not so much as to be obnoxious and slow. The only problem is that it requires Javascript to show contact info, so it doen't work well in text-mode browsers for the blind or disabled.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Single-language market by tepples · · Score: 1

    The EU is collectively the world's largest economy and it is the world's largest single market.

    I guess it depends on to what extent the cost of translation into multiple languages affects your product or service. A video game might need to be subtitled and dubbed into multiple languages, and social platforms might end up self-segregating on language lines. China and the United States are larger single-language markets.

    1. Re:Single-language market by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Made safe for German content laws and history.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  15. I agree with philosophy but example won't work by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    For example, a taxi hail site or app would actually work fine anonymously, same as calling a taxi service. Payment would be negotiated between the driver and rider, with the driver paying the app authors for referrals.

    I admire the philosophy you are putting forth, but I don't think that is a good example of how to apply it.

    Ride sharing is an example where both sides really need to be sure of who the other is to have the whole thing be safe. If both drivers and riders are anonymous, you are really asking for criminals to spend an evening robbing as many people as they can by pretending to be a real driver, and taking them out somewhere to be mugged or raped. In fact, you had mentioned how this was similar to a taxi service - that very issue is a big problem with taxi services in smaller countries.

    Similarly the same is true of riders, there's no way I would drive for a service where the service I am working for does not at least have identities of riders to the level of payment info, along with ratings from other drivers knowing the potential riders are not going to trash or steal my car. Again, taxi drivers get robbed quite often from random fares.

    Not to mention if you are always having to negotiate payment info with each rider before you arrive, I (as a driver) have lost any incentive to actually go out to any place even slightly far away because it could be a compete waste of time if they are not willing to pay enough. Even taxi services have fixed rates for rides and sometimes you get charged more on top.

    Maybe a variant where a central company verified identity of riders and driver but names were otherwise kept anonymous, and the rider has the ability to offer up an escrowed amount of money for a trip they wanted to take... I could see that being pretty interesting. The rider still needs enough info to know where the driver is and what kind of car they can expect though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I agree with philosophy but example won't work by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Drivers wouldn't be anonymous, since they'd have to pay the app. Passengers would be anonymous, same as with a "regular" taxi service. Yeah, yeah, it's less safe. Well: some crime is the price of freedom.

    2. Re:I agree with philosophy but example won't work by hjf · · Score: 1

      What kind of "freedom" exactly do you get from "everyone swears they're not collecting MUH DATA"

  16. Ad industry sock puppet? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Methinks Charlie Osborne is in the pocket of the ad industry.

    Hey, heard about this cool new technology? It's pretty much unrelated to my point that your browsing experience sucks because my corporate overlords have to ask for permission before they spy on you.

  17. Re:We're free now! by Falos · · Score: 1

    Well he should have had some kind of coverage assurance solution.

    Oh wait, when you need insurance for your insurance you're not just getting "increased chocolate rations", you're paying for it.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. The only reason... by aj50 · · Score: 1

    The only reason for all the popups is that the website you're reading wants to do a load of bullshit with the data they gather about you.

    If you only use personal data to fulfil user's requests, there's no need to ask for consent.

    --
    I wish to remain anomalous
  20. Modern assistive browsers execute script by tepples · · Score: 1

    The only problem is that it requires Javascript to show contact info, so it doen't work well in text-mode browsers for the blind or disabled.

    You mean it doesn't work in obsolete text-mode browsers for the blind or disabled. Modern assistive browsers execute script, as demonstrated in Karl Groves's "Mother Effing Tool Confuser".

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Re: Most mobile browsing experiences still suck by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

    So for up the money and get youtube premium, no more ads anywhere on youtube (unless some scombag has included message from sponsor in the video) personaly i love youtube premium, the original content is not a big it with be but wharever that is no wy I got it

  23. Or push them to the app by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    Most websites would rather you download their app. After all, they cannot keep running their snooping software on your phone when you leave the page, but the app is always there.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  24. Data miners protesting by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    "Data miners are protesting the GDPR rules on gathering users' data by annoying the hell out of their users." -- There I fixed the headline for you.

    I wonder how long they'll keep this up before websites start losing traffic, dropping the data mining, & going with content-based targeted advertising, i.e. People who read articles about Star Trek might want to buy Star Trek & other SciFi paraphernalia. Google & Facebook probably wouldn't like it though.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  25. Fee for article 27 representative service by tepples · · Score: 1

    A smaller site with very little relevant traffic from the Union might not be able to afford the $2,700 per year (source: VeraSafe) to comply with the letter of article 27 of the GDPR.

    (If you claim that an entity outside the Union selling to customers in the Union or serving ads to viewers in the Union does not need to hire a representative in the Union pursuant to article 27, please begin by explaining how EU courts are likely to define "occasional" for purposes of article 27.)

  26. 5G is banned by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    North of San Francisco the City of Mill Valley said ' Hell No' to the antennas, the radiation and frequency load in their community and their schools for the sake of young developing minds. Doubt they'll be the last.

  27. Power improvements? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I know that 4G had this great super low latency, high speed 'handshake' I saw articles on it. When you first request a packet, it's way quicker than 3G was (not just bandwidth)

    However, ever switched your phone into airplane mode entirely? MAN does the battery last a long time.

    I just got the new Huawei Mate 20 and man oh man, it's well reviewed for battery but with the SIM disabled, it's out of this world. Was going to last a full week (was backing up old phone)

    Hopefully 5G continues to be efficient in this regard.

  28. Hysterical exaggeration by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

    T&Cs demand acceptance, and visitors must go through tick-lists of what data they are happy to be collected and in what manner.

    This is nonsense. I frequently get a popup asking my consent before proceeding with a web page, but it is a simply Accept / Deny choice. No tick-lists, no further questions. But pause, click, continue. No big deal.

    When you are forced to stop and be lectured by pop-ups at every turn which must be manually shut down, one by one

    Again, simply not my experience. I have no doubt that if site access became as annoying or onerous as this person suggests, there would soon be a browser extension or add-on that would do the job for people.

    This piece seems to be intent on creating misinformation and stress, simply to attract an audience

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons