Slashdot Mirror
Australia Passes Anti-Encryption Laws [Update] (zdnet.com)
Earlier today, Australia's House of Representatives passed the Assistance and Access Bill. The Anti-Encryption Bill, as it is known as, would allow the nation's police and anti-corruption forces to ask, before forcing, internet companies, telcos, messaging providers, or anyone deemed necessary, to break into whatever content agencies they want access to. "While the Bill can still be blocked by the Senate -- Australian Twitter has been quite vocal over today's proceedings, especially in regards to the [Australian Labor Party's] involvement," reports Gizmodo. ZDNet highlights the key findings from a report from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS): The threshold for industry assistance is recommended to be lifted to offenses with maximum penalties in excess of three years; Technical Assistance Notices (TANs) and Technical Capability Notices (TCNs) will be subjected to statutory time limits, as well as any extension, renewal, or variation to the notices; the systemic weakness clause to apply to all listing acts and things; and the double-lock mechanism of approval from Attorney-General and Minister of Communications will be needed, with the report saying the Communications Minister will provide "a direct avenue for the concerns of the relevant industry to be considered as part of the approval process."
The report's recommendations also call for a review after 18 months of the Bill coming into effect by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor; TANs issued by state and territory police forces to be approved by the Australian Federal Police commissioner; companies issued with notices are able to appeal to the Attorney-General to disclose publicly the fact they are issued a TCN; and the committee will review the passed legislation in the new year and report by April 3, 2019, right around when the next election is expected to be called. In short: "Testimony from experts has been ignored; actual scrutiny of the Bill is kicked down the road for the next Parliament; Labor has made sure it is not skewered by the Coalition and seen to be voting against national security legislation on the floor of Parliament; and any technical expert must have security clearance equal to the Australia's spies, i.e. someone who has been in the spy sector." Further reading: Australia Set To Spy on WhatsApp Messages With Encryption Law.
UPDATE: The encryption bill has passed the Senate with a final vote of 44-12, with Labor and the Coalition voting for it. "Australia's security and intelligence agencies now have legal authority to force encryption services to break the encryptions, reports The Guardian. Story is developing...
The report's recommendations also call for a review after 18 months of the Bill coming into effect by the Independent National Security Legislation Monitor; TANs issued by state and territory police forces to be approved by the Australian Federal Police commissioner; companies issued with notices are able to appeal to the Attorney-General to disclose publicly the fact they are issued a TCN; and the committee will review the passed legislation in the new year and report by April 3, 2019, right around when the next election is expected to be called. In short: "Testimony from experts has been ignored; actual scrutiny of the Bill is kicked down the road for the next Parliament; Labor has made sure it is not skewered by the Coalition and seen to be voting against national security legislation on the floor of Parliament; and any technical expert must have security clearance equal to the Australia's spies, i.e. someone who has been in the spy sector." Further reading: Australia Set To Spy on WhatsApp Messages With Encryption Law.
UPDATE: The encryption bill has passed the Senate with a final vote of 44-12, with Labor and the Coalition voting for it. "Australia's security and intelligence agencies now have legal authority to force encryption services to break the encryptions, reports The Guardian. Story is developing...
I'd really like to see who they take to court to try and undo the encryption on the Monero et al. blockchains.
Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
Watching the debate that is happening right now, the lies being used to convince the house to pass this Bill are just sickening.
For US, UK, NZ, Canadian citizens their governments can access the powers via existing intelligence agreements.
The Australian government have escalated the information war, and don't understand the consequences of doing so.
Fraud. They talk about not building backdoors, they just want the keys to the front door by coercing IT professionals with fines, liability and jail time.
My ism, it's full of beliefs.
its pretty much the same as Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c.23) (RIP or RIPA) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom
they don't try and break encryption they simply ask that you hand over the Keys so they can break into the stream
the same thing as the :
United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC, also called the FISA Court) is a U.S. federal court established and authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) to oversee requests for surveillance warrants.
so americans do you want to examine your own systems because the people who Cant Infiltrate Anything simply go to court...
The first duty of an agency that wishes some unknown data to be decrypted would be to prove that it was, in fact, an encrypted message. If they were presented with a file containing random numbers they couldn't just say "you must provide the key to decrypt that" as they have not shown that such a key actually exists.
Of course, the only way to prove that such a key exists would be to use it to decrypt the data. But until the transmission of blocks of random junk becomes widespread and well known (possibly with the occasional encrypted message inserted, as government agencies do it) the "reasonable man" criteria would apply and courts would assume that all apparently random data is actually encrypted messages.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
Generally there are two ways this will work:
1. Companies/corporations that build or provide services using uncrackable encryption get fined and then sanctioned until they either build in backdoors or go out of business/leave the country.
2. Users of such services get fined or imprisoned until they render their passwords. Use of hard encryption first becomes evidence of wrongdoing, and then conclusive proof of it.
The problem is that about half the people vote for these asshats and actually agree with them.
There's an easy fix for that. Remove SSL from all Australian commercial websites, and enjoy the pandemonium as everybody gets hacked and loses their bank accounts and credit cards. Any public perception that encryption is only for the benefit of criminals and terrorists will quickly fade.
There's a rather straight forward solution to this problem, but I doubt tech companies have the backbone to do it. Every tech company should stop selling their products and services to Australia until this law is reversed. Take away the iPhones, Facebook, Android, and every all website from anyone in Australia. Let the people of Australia decide if they want these gadgets or if they want a government that can break encryption.
I didn't want to give up our firearms, we were compelled to on a wave of media hand wringing. The Port Arthur massacre was the impetus and it was conducted with an illegal firearm.
My criterion for the validity of the massacre argument for banning guns is that I would consider it a valid point the first time a gun were found to be autonomously walking around and firing at people.
I don't know what the stats are in Australia, but the problem in the US that we have no commonsense controls on the mentally ill. They can walk around wherever they want to, piling up in our cities as the "homeless problem," setting wildfires in the countryside, and annoying your children at public parks and libraries. Once we had mental hospitals where we could institutionalize people who would be a problem on the street. Even the assault mentally ill, those with high-capacity legal files of antisocial offenses, go free. All the rest of us can do is wait until the next one snaps.