Slashdot Mirror


UPS Tries Delivery Tricycles As Seattle's Traffic Doom Looms (wired.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Pushing the cargo bike across a rain-soaked parking lot at a UPS distribution center in Seattle, where the shipper showed off its newest delivery vehicle, I had a realization once the pedal assist kicked in. "Yep, this will totally work," I thought. Bike messengers have long known cycling is the fastest way to get around traffic-choked cities. More commuters are getting it too. Now UPS is giving it a shot: The 111-year-old delivery service has started moving packages around Seattle by electric tricycle, in a yearlong pilot.

The vehicle in question was designed and built by Truck Trike in Portland, Oregon. When the rider starts to pedal, human power pushes the front hub. With a thumb throttle, the rider can draw power from a pair of battery packs in the base of the trike to rear hub motors for the back two wheels, with enough juice for 12 to 18 miles of range. The extra power comes in handy because the trailer, made by Portland's Silver Eagle, can fit as many as 40 packages, or about 350 pounds worth of stuff. For UPS the move is pretty spot on, because while the Emerald City is always congested, it's less than two months from what its traffic engineers call the "period of maximum constraint."

That ominous-sounding constrained period arrives on February 4, when the Alaskan Way Viaduct elevated highway along the waterfront is torn down and the 2-mile tunnel Seattle dug to replace it comes online. Crews are finishing the ramps that connect the tunnel to surface roads, and for three weeks, the city won't have a road to get through downtown on the city's waterfront side. To dodge the traffic horror show, Seattleites are planning vacations, renting Airbnbs to stay downtown, anything to avoid driving, including working from home.

12 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. Bicycle yes, tricycle no. by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

    Bike messengers have long known cycling is the fastest way to get around traffic-choked cities.

    A bicycle can be much faster over short/medium distances in a congested city, because of their ability to trivially by-pass stationary traffic.

    However, a tricycle does not have this ability, being orders of magnitude wider than a bicycle. Now add the encumbrance of a trailer - especially one of sufficient capacity to make the exercise even remotely worthwhile - and you have no chance of moving through or around stationary traffic... unless you plan on riding on the pavements ("sidewalks" as the Americans call them).

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:Bicycle yes, tricycle no. by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As long as they qualify to use the bicycle lanes -- which I'm pretty sure they do -- they can still pass the stopped traffic that can't use bicycle lanes. It remains to be seen how much motorists are willing to watch non-automotive traffic pass them on the right before driving in that lane themselves.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:Bicycle yes, tricycle no. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unless things have changed recently, Seattle allows bicycles to ride on the sidewalks. It also has a lot of bike lanes, thanks to a previous mayor who biked himself and decided to arbitrarily take lanes away from cars. Believe me, you don't want to be driving in Seattle.

      But the article has its dates and underlying assumptions wrong. The traffic nightmare up here is scheduled to start January 11, when the viaduct gets shut down - it ends on February 5, when the new tunnel is scheduled to open. The three-week closure is apparently necessary so they can finish the ramps from the old viaduct approaches into the tunnel. During that closure, all the cars which normally would use the viaduct (or the tunnel) are going to be shunted onto the already-overburdened Interstate 5 and downtown surface streets.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Bicycle yes, tricycle no. by sexconker · · Score: 2

      A bicycle can be much faster over short/medium distances in a congested city, because of their ability to trivially by-pass stationary traffic.

      You misspelled "cut over to the sidewalk, run stop signs and red lights, and otherwise break the law with impunity because cops won't try to stop you and if you get yourself injured/killed people won't dare blame the cyclist or hold them responsible for their actions especially since their shit won't be insured or registered".

    4. Re:Bicycle yes, tricycle no. by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      Actually, you don't need title for any vehicle under $500

      What percentage are those?

      you don't use gasoline

      What percentage are those?

      a lot of places charge for parking bikes (bike lockers, bike cages)

      Which negates the charges paid by vehicles (including the electric vehicles costing less than $500) how?

      everyone pays sales taxes

      Which negates the sales taxes paid on vehicles (including the electric vehicles costing less than $500) how?

      WE HAVE NO STATE COUNTY OR CITY INCOME TAX

      You have federal income tax and federal transportation "matching" funds (which make up more like 80-90% of funds on many projects)....

      , and our property taxes (which renters pay too) are what pay for roads here.

      I'm sure that nobody, including renters, will object to the share of their taxes that are going to car infrastruture being expropriated for other purposes while they are told that their "handouts" are over and they should pay even more. If you aren't paying a tax specifically earmarked for something, then that something is obviously a handout. Like bike lanes, and sidewalks, and policing...

      Bikes aren't allowed to ride on highways, which is where the state gas tax goes.

      WRONG. "'Those taxes go to pay for Washington highways and local roads,' said [Washington State Department of Agriculture spokesperson Mike] Louisell."

      Try again, comrade.

      No, you try again, comrade. Those roads and that infrastructure have been paid for by car owners. If you think that tax rates could have been set as high as they have been without those services, then I have a bridge to sell you.

    5. Re:Bicycle yes, tricycle no. by DRJlaw · · Score: 2

      Wrong. Our roads were built for horse and wagon and bicycle and streetcar. Cars came later.

      Look, there are pictures of Seattle up till World War I...

      So Seattle has not built any new roads or rebuilt and widened roads since World War I.... Good to know.

      Cars came much later.

      And infrastructure was purpose-built and upgraded to match. Horse and wagon and bicycle and streetcar do not require 8" thick pavements and foot plus subbases.

  2. Need to stop stealing from bike lanes by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    The major problem we have is all the wasted public space used for private car storage on our surface streets, which would be better repurposed to higher-capacity bike and transit usage.

    I for one look forward to our new Amazon-controlled UPS bike overlords, provided they don't get massive subsides like the private car storage on surface streets get.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  3. Re:The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep. Pretty much. 98% of everyone on a bike is an epic douche.. it's up to 100% when they're delivering something.

  4. No need for the batteries by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

    The extra power comes in handy because...40 packages, or about 350 pounds worth of stuff.

    350 lbs requires power assistance huh? I guess UPS has never seen a guy on a bike in India deliver a package the size of a school bus on his own power.

    1. Re:No need for the batteries by sexconker · · Score: 2

      The extra power comes in handy because...40 packages, or about 350 pounds worth of stuff.

      350 lbs requires power assistance huh? I guess UPS has never seen a guy on a bike in India deliver a package the size of a school bus on his own power.

      Hills are a thing.

  5. Motor assist is a good idea by steveha · · Score: 3, Informative

    350 lbs requires power assistance huh? I guess UPS has never seen a guy on a bike in India deliver a package the size of a school bus on his own power.

    Hi, I live in the Seattle area and I spend a lot of time riding bikes.

    Seattle is hilly. The downtown core where the packages most likely need delivery is... also hilly.

    If any packages need delivery to Queen Anne Hill, that's so steep I wouldn't want to ride that even with 10 pounds of packages. If any packages need delivery to the hospitals, we literally call that area "Pill Hill", as in there is a big hill with the hospitals on it.

    Wikipedia has a list of hills in Seattle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_hills_of_Seattle

    And here's an article about how the hilly streets are challenging to folks with mobility issues: https://crosscut.com/2017/02/seattles-hills-are-the-worst-heres-a-way-to-cope

    The hills are sufficiently bad that there is an official city program of rights-of-way that go through skyscrapers downtown. Instead of walking up a hill you cut through a skyscraper and use their escalators. I say again this is an official thing... I spent some time working in one of the skyscrapers on one of the routes. (I haven't found anything about this online with Google searches, but I remember reading a plaque in the skyscraper where I worked listing the guaranteed hours that the escalators were open to the public as part of this program.) Of course, UPS tricycles can't use escalators and wouldn't be allowed to even if it were possible.

    It is entirely appropriate to have a motor assist if we are talking about 350 pounds of packages.

    Actually it wouldn't surprise me if UPS wanted to have a motor assist even in flat places (Kansas maybe?), because it won't add that much to the expense of a special delivery tricycle and the motor will provide more speed. More speed is more packages delivered and thus more money.

    So your comment is +1 snarky but -2 clueless.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Motor assist is a good idea by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Funny

      So your comment is +1 snarky but -2 clueless.

      *whooosh* Lemme teach you some math: +1 snarky x -2 clueless = +1 funny. ;-)

      Seriously, if you've never seen it, look up some pictures of Indian guys loading like entire sofas and stuff onto a bicycle and peddling it. I've been there: it's real, and it's crazy. And when people joke about cows being on the road and cars swerving into oncoming traffic to get around them -- that's real too.