Slashdot Mirror


Evelyn Berezin, Who Built the First True Word Processor, Has Died at 93 (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Evelyn Berezin, a computer pioneer who emancipated many a frazzled secretary from the shackles of the typewriter nearly a half-century ago by building and marketing the first computerized word processor, died on Saturday in Manhattan. She was 93.

In an age when computers were in their infancy and few women were involved in their development, Ms. Berezin (pronounced BEAR-a-zen) not only designed the first true word processor; in 1969, she was also a founder and the president of the Redactron Corporation, a tech start-up on Long Island that was the first company exclusively engaged in manufacturing and selling the revolutionary machines.

10 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Salute the innovators by Drethon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everything we have is an improvement of existing technologies going back thousands of years. We wouldn't be where we are today if someone didn't come up with a way to improve on what we had. The innovators will live on forever in the new technologies, whether or not we remember who made the improvement.

    1. Re: Salute the innovators by Drethon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a silly article. what the hell do you want me to do with this information besides forget about it because I don't know what the hell you want me to do with it. It's not relevant to anything I need to do

      Some people are interested in why computers work, which helps with how to make them work better.

    2. Re: Salute the innovators by whitroth · · Score: 2

      Let see, so you're saying you have no idea how the computer and software you use got to this point, and you don't care about anything before 15 min ago. You certainly don't want to know what your parents did before you walked out the door.

      You're an ignorant little snot, and when you wind up in big trouble, and can't get hold of support to fix it, you'll pound the desk and go "how did this happen."

      Grow up, kid.

    3. Re: Salute the innovators by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 2

      and here I thought Paul Lutus was a pioneer with Apple Writer - just kidding Paul -- ;-) your deal with Apple with 25% royalty was genius and a killer to Apple. Live long and prosper word processing... aka.winword pss support microsoft '91-92 bellevue washington. ;-) winword 1.10a - oh how times have passed and things still seem just the same... where is that darn normal.dot that i have to delete and start over..oh no.. my macros.. hehe.. and custom.dic -- really? named what?

  2. shackles? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    a computer pioneer who emancipated many a frazzled secretary from the shackles of a job nearly a half-century ago by building and marketing the first computerized word processor,

  3. Re:First word processor? by xfade551 · · Score: 2

    I think this is in reference to a piece of software, but to the hardware device known as a "word processor". They were basically mini-computers that booted directly into a word processing application (and had no other software applications), and had a build-in printing device and sometimes a built-in monitor. They were still being sold in the late-1980s, maybe even the first couple years of the 1990s, but were substantially less expensive than a PC & printer (that is, during the 1980s).

  4. Hmmm... by the_skywise · · Score: 3, Informative
    Buried in the FTFA

    In 1968, Ms. Berezin began working on ideas for a true computer for word processing, using tiny chips, known as integrated circuits, or semiconductors, to record and retrieve keystrokes for text editing. Since 1964, I.B.M. had been making word processors using a Selectric Typewriter and a magnetic tape drive to save and retrieve keystrokes. The tape could be corrected and used to retype text, but since the machine lacked semiconductor chips, Ms. Berezin said, it was not a true computer.

    And thus the vaunted NYTimes drops "Computerized" from the headline and crediting her with inventing "The First TRUE Word Processor" which means a wholly different thing.

  5. Deeper story in there somewhere... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the first I had ever heard of this system... it's really a shame she is gone now, because I would have loved to see someone interview her as part of a case study as to why that company failed.

    It sounded like they had great machines that advanced well over time, a head start in the use of microprocessors, and a. lot of high end clients. So how was it that the company was bypassed by so many others? Was it to specialized where IBM was more general computing? That doesn't explain how other competitors like Wang on Olivetti also surpassed them later on.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Deeper story in there somewhere... by jrumney · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are interviews where the curious can find more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... or if you have the patience for a 3+ hour interview, https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  6. Re:It maked me wonder... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2
    To add to what I wrote, consider this:

    Her chief competitor, International Business Machines, made devices that relied on electronic relays and tapes, not semiconductor chips.

    This is absolute bullshit. IBM was one of the leaders in digital circuit packaging at that time. Fuck, they already had standardized semiconductor logical modules five years before this alleged invention. Electronic relays, my ass.

    The whole article is garbage.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20