Slashdot Mirror
South Australia To Be Home To Australia's New Space Agency (abc.net.au)
"South Australia, which has a history with space events long ago, is set to become the base for the Australian space industry," writes Slashdot reader Badooleoo. ABC News reports: Prime Minister Scott Morrison has announced Adelaide will be the home of Australia's new space agency. South Australia beat strong competition from other states to secure the headquarters, after enlisting homegrown NASA astronaut Andy Thomas to help with its campaign. The agency will be based at Lot Fourteen, the former Royal Adelaide Hospital site, which is being transformed into an innovation precinct. The Prime Minister said South Australia was an ideal home for the new agency and was already a key hub for the space and technology industry. "This agency is going to open doors for local businesses and Australian access to the $US345 billion global space industry," Prime Minister Scott Morrison said. "Our Government's $41 million investment into the agency will act as a launching pad to triple Australia's space economy to $12 billion and create up to 20,000 jobs by 2030."
Kangaroos?
I missed the article on Slate blackholes last week (travel day), I note the comments descended into a lot of frak against me, crackpot tag, banana whatever and musings on the scientific method. I have two comments coming up, this one, a thought experimental disprove of existing models, and a second one, an experimental proof of resonant universe.
Scientific method is expanding the known body of truths by hypothesis and experiment.
So if you break known truths (conservation of energy, causality, geometry) it's not science.
How can anyone meaninfully disprove your model since you'll even reverse time, and bend space to fix it up again?
No experiment can disprove it, because experiments imply cause and effect with requires a flow of time.
No measurement can disprove it, because you'll bend the units over which the measurement is taken.
The only way is a thought experiment.
Here's three such thought experiments.
1. Light has an oscillating electric field (by observation)
2. So light must have charges oscillating (because other electric fields derive from charged particles)
3. Light comes from matter (e.g. turn on a torch)
4. So matter contains the charges that form light's oscillating charges
5. Matter can COMPLETELY be converted to light (e.g. particle+anti-particle to photon)
6. So matter must be ONLY made of these two particles with no residue.
7. And the only forces derive from electric if we only have charged particles.
Standard model fails a simple seven sentence sniff test.
1. Earthlings define space are Cartesian coordinates and time as seconds, as observed here on earth.
2. Martians defined space based on gravity, and time as a function of gravity.
3. Earth people's equations don't correctly work for gravity, they need mass to bend their coordinate system, and time unit
4. Martians DOES work correctly for gravity because they were designed that way.
5. How can the Universe mass both 'bend space and time' for Earthlings and yet not for Martians? It cannot do two conflicting things at once, that would be impossible.
6. So mass does not bend space and time, at best it fixes up some faulty equations to match an observation.
Relativity fails a simple 6 sentence sniff test.
1. Light's has no mass
2. If matter is completely made of the same stuff light is made of, it has no mass either.
Mass fails a two sentence sniff test. Without mass there is not bent space from mass either.
Postulate A: Mass isn't real
Postulate B: the energy in light is also 'kinetic'
Postulate C: Light bind force must be cyclical
Postulate D: only 2 fundamental particles are possible
Postulate E: the only force is electric
Postulate E2: The binding force (Postulate C) is electric
POSTULATE F: The speed of light is obvious
POSTULATE G: Time is measured in spins
POSTULATE H: All dipoles are equal, matter,even red and blue light
Postulate I1: Donut Particles
Postulate I2: Donut Particles are themselves dipoles
Postulate I3: Anti-particles
Postulate I4: Bigger particles twist and break
Postulate J0: How light binds to matter
Postulate J1: A Slit is a phase sorter
Postulate J2: Gravitational lensing is just diffraction
Postulate J3: Electron is a Donut Sandwich
Postulate J4: Binding force is harmonic electric
Postulate J5: Photons from Electrons
Postulate J6: Wrapped electrons from photon
Postulate K: How fast do forces propagate?
Postulate L: Warp, Time Machine, Light squared computers
Postulate M: The Hydrogen Atom
Postulate M4: 50% matter 50% anti-matter
Postulate M5: Found your Quarks, Leptons, etc. sortof
Postulate N1: Black Holes are 2F universes (we're inside one)
Postulate Crackpot: 7 + 6 + 2 sentence sniff tests
Postulate Proof: Entanglement is proof of resonance
Postulate V1: Massless Velocity Momentum Gravity Magnetism
Postulate A: https://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12866516&cid=57598384
Postulate B: https://science.slashdot.org/comm
Entanglement as 'understood' currently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs
Entanglement as reality:
1. All entanglement experiments filter for 'successful entanglement', in Quantum Eraser this is a 'Coincidence circuit', selecting photons that arrive at the same time. In the Delft's recent experiment it was an explicit filtering before the Bells threshold test.
2. Selecting photons ejected by the beta barium borate (BBO) crystal at time T=0, selects a subset of photons with a particular polarization.
3. All the matter in the BBO crystal must be in the same oscillating mode at T=0, that causes all photons to be ejected with a corresponding polarization.
4. T =0 is arbitrary, the experiment does not force a time, so all of the matter across the crystal must in the same state at any given time.
4. i.e. matter is resonant.
5. Since the only known force in light is electric (and its magnetic relative), that resonance must be electric.
6. Entanglement is proof of electric resonance in mass.
Entanglement Mk II:
You can extend the experiment to prove more:
1. Every 1F spin, the matter should be in the same state.
2. So if you can make an experiment that compares photons at T=0, against protons at T=1 spin, they will also be 'entangled'.
3. You would probably find it easier to work with W, the wavelength, which should be approximately the size of a current model of the proton (p*r*oton). The photon at X=0, should be 'entangled' with the one at X=W and X=2W, and X=3W...
Light rides electric resonance wave
1. Matter is resonating the electric resonance wave by the previous Entanglement experiment.
2. Light has an electric wave property.
3. So light is also riding the electric resonance wave., since it has an electric oscillating field it cannot do otherwise.
Experiments:
Obviously to be resonant, we need the electric force to propagate at infinity (even if the effects propagate through matter spins at the speed of light). So that would be the real winner here: Can you devise an experiment that can detect the initial push of electric force propagates at infinity velocity?
If the speed of matter and speed of light result from the dipolar oscillation over the resonance wave (with 0 and C being the lowest energy velocities, and C/2 being the maximum energy in velocity). Then *monopoles* are not limited to travel at C. (They wiggle, but this is the field from their wrapper). A discharged electron is a -ve monopole without its wrapper. Can you devise an experiment that measures the speed of these monopoles through a vacuum? Can you prove monopoles travel faster than light?
Postulate A: Mass isn't real
Postulate B: the energy in light is also 'kinetic'
Postulate C: Light bind force must be cyclical
Postulate D: only 2 fundamental particles are possible
Postulate E: the only force is electric
Postulate E2: The binding force (Postulate C) is electric
POSTULATE F: The speed of light is obvious
POSTULATE G: Time is measured in spins
POSTULATE H: All dipoles are equal, matter,even red and blue light
Postulate I1: Donut Particles
Postulate I2: Donut Particles are themselves dipoles
Postulate I3: Anti-particles
Postulate I4: Bigger particles twist and break
Postulate J0: How light binds to matter
Postulate J1: A Slit is a phase sorter
Postulate J2: Gravitational lensing is just diffraction
Postulate J3: Electron is a Donut Sandwich
Postulate J4: Binding force is harmonic electric
Postulate J5: Photons from Electrons
Postulate J6: Wrapped electrons from photon
Postulate K: How fast do forces propagate?
Postulate L: Warp, Time Machine, Light squared computers
Postulate M: The Hydrogen Atom
Postulate M4: 50% matter 50% anti-matter
Postulate M5: Found your Quarks, Leptons, etc. sortof
Postulate N1: Black Holes are 2F universes (we're inside one)
Postulate Crackpot: 7 + 6 + 2 sentence sniff tests
Postulate Proof: Entanglement is proof of resonance
Postulate V1: Massless Vel
when some random dude can launch a very successful space agency himself... just saying.
[($)]
There is IAS coaching in Jaipur where teaching faculty is very experienced and professional and guide students how to crack IAS exam easily.
1. If the universe is resonant electric, then it has a resonant center to it. (Think of ripples in a pond spreading out).
2. And the most energy efficient path is along those ripples, toward to away from the center.
3. To cross ripples, you still get F resonance, but lots of phase differences, i.e. energy in and out and in and out...
4. So, (speculative) over time matter will orient its velocity more towards or away from the center of the universe. i.e. everything will appear to have come from or be collapsing towards a central point.
5. So there must be effects (other than entanglement) that prove the resonant field, and those effects must relate to the direction of the center of the universe.
6. That scintillation effect in lasers (the pattern of dancing light lasers produce), that will be interference from these ripples, which in turn will be F field related. If you point a laser towards the center of the universe is the scintillation in lasers less than if you point it normal to that direction?
Ligo guys, this is your field, I ask the same question to you. (Also congrats those gravity waves were beautiful the other day, but isn't there a right side to that wave, a mirror image, but with much smaller magnitude?).
Closer to the equator is better. So Far north QLD or the Norther Territory makes sense technically.
... that does not make me an owner of my "own" screwdriver industry. It's satellite industry. Not space industry.
Space industry is the industry of building and launching rockets. It's the industry of breaking the first cosmic velocity.
And it will stay that for a while. Unless you are building and flying your own rockets, stop yapping about space industry.
I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
May as well put it in Tasmania ? It's even further from the equator.
https://spaceaustralia.com.au/
It could be the equivalent of the National Broadband Network, which cost billions to lay down a third national data network and ended up being so slow that most 3rd world countries I have visited have much higher internet speeds in the countryside than my mother who lives in a major city.
what could possibly go wrong?
https://quokkaspace.wordpress....
It's a long read but full of ire at mismanagement and dashed hopes. Here's hoping they turn a corner someday.
Are they going to hire based on discrimination? Australia seems to be a leading force in racism and sexism these days. This move could be a massive waste of money if this ideology continues
Wouldn't Northern Australia be better, as it's closer to the equator?
Australian Research & Space Exploration.
Or "ARSE" for short.
Wouldn't Northern Australia make more sense since it is closer to the equator and thus would require less fuel, aka money, to launch rockets?
"Our Government's $41 million investment into the agency "
It's Australia, they are taking giant leaps with an empty pouch, even the animals there are doing it that way.
Without knowing a whole lot detail on the topic, being an Australian, I would hazard a guess that where there's public money, someone's mates get a good gig and get jobs where they do very little, have no appreciation of the subject, and achieve absolutely nothing, while getting a decent paying job in the process.
So the problem is, I don't think anything will change. The set up of this agency is already an endeavour in pork barrelling, so I doubt anything will come of it.