Slashdot Mirror


'Cryptocurrencies Are Like Lottery Tickets That Might Pay Off in Future' (theguardian.com)

With the price of bitcoin down 80% from its peak a year ago, and the larger cryptocurrency market in systemic collapse, has "peak crypto" come and gone? From a column: Perhaps, but don't expect to see true believers lining up to have their cryptocurrency tattoos removed just yet. At a recent conference I attended, the overwhelming sentiment was that market capitalisation of cryptocurrencies could explode over the next five years, rising to $5-10tn. For those who watched the price of bitcoin go from $13 in December 2012 to roughly $4,000 today, this year's drop from $20,000 was no reason to panic.

It is tempting to say, "Of course the price is collapsing." Regulators are gradually waking up to the fact that they cannot countenance large expensive-to-trace transaction technologies that facilitate tax evasion and criminal activity. At the same time, central banks from Sweden to China are realising that they, too, can issue digital currencies. As I emphasised in my 2016 book on the past, present, and future of currency, when it comes to new forms of money, the private sector may innovate, but in due time the government regulates and appropriates.

But as I also pointed out back then, just because the long-term value of bitcoin is more likely to be $100 than $100,000 does not necessarily mean that it definitely should be worth zero. The right way to think about cryptocurrency coins is as lottery tickets that pay off in a dystopian future where they are used in rogue and failed states, or perhaps in countries where citizens have already lost all semblance of privacy. It is no coincidence that dysfunctional Venezuela is the first issuer of a state-backed cryptocurrency (the "petro").

122 comments

  1. And using lotto tickets as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is stupid.

    Checkmate.

    1. Re: And using lotto tickets as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too funny. I bought a lottery ticket once. I never checked if it paid off

    2. Re:And using lotto tickets as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to feel really good about yourself in about six months, poor no-coiner.

    3. Re:And using lotto tickets as currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Bitcoin is headed to zero, and anyone who actually purchased it, equipment to mine it, or paid anyone to develop software to work with it is trying to desparately save their baby from being discarded. That's all it is.

      The amount of energy required to mine one crypto coin is now prohibitive, and all the machines online for distributed ledgers waste billions of dollars in energy. It's the single worst use of energy in the world.

  2. Yesterday, when I was young by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm old enough to remember when cryptocurrencies were going to replace fiat currency.

    Now, they're lottery tickets. Do the coinbros know that almost everyone loses money on lottery tickets?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't sell your product -- be it corn, or boats, or steaks, or crypto coins for less than they cost to make.

      You do if the corn, boats or steaks or crypto are on their way to being worth zero.

      Better to get something than lose everything. And it is absolutely possible for crypto to go to zero. We've seen it happen to assets that have actual items of value backing them up. Cryptocoins have nothing backing them up. No firebreak. They could fall through the floor.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up

    3. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is as riduculous as droping bellow $6000. We all know that whales and miners will not allow that...

    4. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I meant long run.

      If they stay that way long, they're gone.

    5. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I thought I had implied that pretty clearly with the word "settle". But maybe not.

    6. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He's saying bitcoin will be gone because process bitcoin transactions because mining will not be profitable. Bitcoin will never hit zero because if it did, nobody would be around to process the transaction that puts it there.

    7. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      He's saying bitcoin will be gone because process bitcoin transactions because mining will not be profitable. Bitcoin will never hit zero because if it did, nobody would be around to process the transaction that puts it there.

      Ah, but as long as there is someone who thinks it's going to rebound, there will be someone who will pay more to mine it than the coin is worth. And someone who will pay more in processing fees than the coin is worth. It's called the "Greater Fool Theory".

      True believers do weird things.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not an expert on Shitcoin (like 99.99% of "investors") but I do know that the amount it costs to mine a Buttcoin reduces if the mining pool reduces. The number of bits that your generated hash has to match reduces when the total processing power reduces.

    9. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

      That's not true, because there doesn't have to be a transaction for an assets value to change. If noone is interested in bitcoin from now on and never will be again, it's value is zero. Regardless of who holds how many and if any transactions have taken place.

    10. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "You don't sell your product -- be it corn, or boats, or steaks, or crypto coins for less than they cost to make."

      But if you don't sell them they are effectively worthless anyway as you cannot buy anything else to keep trading.

    11. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by smallfries · · Score: 1

      The cost of manufacture is adaptive: the difficulty level will track the level of processing power down as well as up.

      If the price drops -> less companies see a return on mining -> less companies mine -> difficulty level drops -> cost goes down.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    12. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by DrXym · · Score: 1

      You don't sell your product -- be it corn, or boats, or steaks, or crypto coins for less than they cost to make.

      It happens all the time. A firesale is where some product is heavily discounted to get rid of it and cut someone's losses rather than hang onto and see those losses increase.

    13. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Because of transaction fees, I think it's theoretically possible for cryptocurrencies to have a negative value. If, for example, you have to sell your ultimatemagicsuretoappreciateforevercryptocoin "investment" to establish a loss for tax purposes, and if the transaction fee to rid yourself of it is higher than the price you fetch for the coin, the value will be negative.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    14. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "like lottery tickets" is not equal to being a FREAKING LOTTERY TICKET.

      It's a neat analogy and fits on a t-shirt, but cryptocurrency is an actual financial investment which can be managed within a serious portfolio where lottery tickets are a bet only a moron would make.

    15. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you do. Duh, how do you think modern corporations work?

      1) I have a great idea for a widget
      2) I approach actual investors to get money
      3) Investors give me money to start their TAX SHELTER/INVESTMENT SCHEME disguised as a corporation
      4) Investors insist on operational changes that make the corporation function better in their portfolios regardless of actual corporate fitness
      5) If I am smart I've taken my piece of the actual investment pie and shed the corporation like a dirty shirt.
      6) Some slob is named CEO and the corporation sells the widgets for whatever the investors tell him to

      And that's how business is done is America, son.

    16. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course anything above 0 is a valid level to sell. It happens every day in stock market also. When company is expected to go bankrupt, people do sell the shares at any price just to get something back. And of course transaction happens only if there is someone stupid or brave enough to buy the worthless stock.

    17. Re: Yesterday, when I was young by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And it is absolutely possible for crypto to go to zero.

      It is absolutely impossible for it not to.

    18. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're selling midgets?

    19. Re:Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without miners, you couldn't even argue that you owned a Bitcoin.

    20. Re: Yesterday, when I was young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When, not if, but when bitcoin gets low enough, most miners/processors will drop out. When that happens, a few thousand dollars will rent enough Amazon CPU/GPU power to hijack the whole thing and say "I" own all the bitcoins currently held in wallets under size X. The only reason I don't take them all is because that makes it too obvious at first. And I can always dip in again and raise X arbitrarily.

      And it isn't even theft, because I am providing a ledger service, not physically stealing or even committing a CFAA violation. Because your btc processing client will opt in to my ledger, not me posting to yours.

      Sheep gonna get fleeced.

  3. blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I speculate it will be worth $1million, I speculate it will be worth $0, I speculate it will be worth $100.

    1. Re: blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't bet your dick on it.

    2. Re: blah blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And definitely don't bet against anyone who bets their dick on it unless you like taking dick.

  4. Dream On by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

    The premise here is that people will suddenly see the value of cryptocurrency, and not some better cryptocurrency that they create then, but the old cryptocurrency. The problem with this is that the naive folks who bought cryptocurrency on its run up, mortgaging their homes and running up their credit cards, aren't going to be in the market that way a second time.

    It's over. It only goes down from here. It never had any intrinsic value, and the folks who were in denial about that have had to face it now.

    1. Re:Dream On by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Bring up "intrinsic value" and you'll get Keynesians arguing with you all day that there is no such thing.

      But I'm willing to go as far as saying the closest crypto has to "intrinsic value" is the cost of making them.

      They can't go below that for long, and when (as they did not long ago) they go far above that, it's pretty clearly a bubble.

    2. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look, a anti sementic dogwhistle.

      Post proof of your riches or fuck off you anti sementic cunt

    3. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QAnon says "buy cryptocurreny now!"

    4. Re:Dream On by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's over. It only goes down from here. It never had any intrinsic value, and the folks who were in denial about that have had to face it now.

      While it seems reasonable to say the price was too high, this is overly pessimistic. It only goes down from here? Really? I seriously doubt that's a position you want to commit to.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Kenyesians hardly have any ground to stand on. Perhaps Mengers “Subjective Theory of Value” is a model of greater value :P

    6. Re:Dream On by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      But I'm willing to go as far as saying the closest crypto has to "intrinsic value" is the cost of making them.
      They can't go below that for long

      This is precisely why the mining difficulty automatically adjusts. When a coin is no longer profitable to mine, people shut the mining rigs down. The network difficulty adjusts itself, and the same number of coins continue to be produced by less miners (and by extension, less electricity being used).

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    7. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I'm willing to go as far as saying the closest crypto has to "intrinsic value" is the cost of making them.

      Unless the currency you're using is a commodity, there is zero "intrinsic value". And those that argue Bitcoin is a commodity are usually ideologues mistaking their worldview with reality. (or they're just plain idiots)

      If bitcoin prices fall low enough, the last (most efficient) miners will pull the plug and the network will die. This will happen BEFORE bitcoin prices drop to zero.

    8. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why some people see Bitcoin a lot more optimistic is that they understand it better. The protocol has several self-balancing aspects built-in, including a mechanism to deal with the effect of falling and rising prices on mining activity. The amount of work you have to put in to get a certain amount of Bitcoin is not fixed, so the value you get for a given amount of work does not depend only on the price of Bitcoin. People mining Bitcoin when it was worth cents per Bitcoin did not just do so in the hope that the price would increase dramatically. Mining was worth the (low) effort without that prospect. This doesn't mean that large price fluctuations don't pose certain risks. For example, while a lower amount of mining effort would sustain the Bitcoin network just the same, the excess mining capacity does not go away and could be used in 51% attacks. The scenario you describe however is unrealistic.

    9. Re: Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other major theory is 'Objective theory of value', which states that objects have value, when they add to quality of life. This happens whether one observes it or not challenging the idea of subjective theory of value depending on collective or individual consciousness. The market value is also objective: it's an aspect of economic reality, not intrinsic, nor matter of consciousness.

    10. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why some people see Bitcoin a lot more optimistic is that they understand it better.

      True believer detected.

    11. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't own any Bitcoin, but I believe in knowing what you criticize. Bitcoin has enough flaws so you don't have to make up problems, especially not ones that are addressed in the protocol.

    12. Re:Dream On by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      What you mean is that you found a greater fool to sell BTC to. Perhaps that person did in turn, or perhaps he didn’t. At some point all markets of this kind run out of greater fools to sell to.

    13. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised to see this from you. I hope you will publish a retraction if time proves your statements incorrect.

    14. Re:Dream On by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      There is certainly value of putting immutable data on a blockchain. Maybe it isn't such a good currency. Bitcoin was an experiment to begin with. To tout that it and its kin are "worthless" is naive

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    15. Re:Dream On by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      The problem with this is that the naive folks who bought cryptocurrency on its run up, mortgaging their homes and running up their credit cards, aren't going to be in the market that way a second time.

      You just wait for the next generation of naive folks. There's a sucker born every minute ...

    16. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree nothing has an Intrinsic Value that can be precisely defined (as a number) but it is VERY easy to identify the general range of value something might have. Intrinsic Value relates directly to two concepts: The usefulness of the thing to provide for basic needs either directly or indirectly to a specific person in a specific situation. I think the concept also involves some "doomsday" type scenario in the sense that the intrinsic or inherent value should remain or be fully contained in the object in question. For example: Gold remains gold if all power goes out while a light bulb does not. In other words just owning a bitcoin on a storage medium is different than "owning/having access to the entire network of computers and infrastructure that allow a bitcoin to be transacted in a useful way".

      One other way to think about intrinsic value is to imagine yourself in an empty space with only that object and then compare that to how you would feel with a different object. Obviously

      Said another way - Any object that inherently relies on other objects to derive its value does not receive the "Intrinsic Value" based on its performance in concert with other objects but instead should be judged based on what it can perform alone. Of course we can judge a group of objects together (e.x. a Car is a bunch of nearly worthless objects that come together to make something very useful). But when we judge object together we must also describe what we are judging differently. We don't say a piece of car trim has high intrinsic value because it is a part of what makes a car. We say the CAR has high intrinsic value.

      We can say the BITCOIN NETWORK has some value but the "bitcoins" are NOT what creates that value.

      A paper dollar - could be useful to blow your nose or wipe your ass. Very small intrinsic value.
      Clean Water - Depending on where you are either infinite value (desert) or very little value (in a modern City)
      Food - Moderate value
      Tools - Moderate value
      Digital tokens - No value

    17. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that to be optimistic about bitcoin you have to be pretty ignorant about economics.

      The techical details are pretty well thought out. The economic reality however is that it's a deflationary "currency" that can't can't be used by a nation to moderate their ecconamy by monetary policy, and it has no intrinsic value on which to fallback in the event that it fails to be valuable based on demand alone.

      In sort they succeeded at creating "digital gold" without ever stopping to question whether there was a good reason nobody uses gold (or otehr metals) as the basis for their currency anymore.

    18. Re: Dream On by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Basing the value of something on the cost of production is a common economic fallacy. Say you drill a well, and you don't hit water. It was very expensive to drill. Its sales value, however, it's not the cost of construction but the useful value to someone else. Which might well be zero if there's no use for someone to drill that same well deeper. This is true for many products, and it's been a very painful lesson about software development in particular for many companies. So I don't believe the cost of producing a Bitcoin has anything to do with its continuing value. It's only the value of using it to another person. And that could well go to zero.

    19. Re:Dream On by lgw · · Score: 1

      Unless the currency you're using is a commodity, there is zero "intrinsic value".

      Any currency has value to the extent there are existing contracts for future exchanges of that currency for value. Perhaps that's "extremeness value", but whatever. Dollars have in the fact that I'm going to have to pay my taxes with them, and if I have a lease I'll be trading them for a place to live for some time.

      I don't see that for Bitcoin, so there's nothing to keep it from plummeting overnight.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your arguments are technical solutions to sociological problems. That pretty much invalidates them immediately.

      (The sociological problem being that Bitcoin only has value because a handful of people are under a shared delusion that is has value.)

    21. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course being an Ideologue or an idiot are not mutually exclusive

    22. Re: Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure value could go to zero but that is only likely if something else replaces it. That or a post-apocalyse scenario.

    23. Re:Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That argument invalidates money. Try harder.

    24. Re: Dream On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use electric heat where I live. That's the only place bitcoin ASICs will be running next year and winter is the only time they will be running. I say that with a mini rack of 32 units. I got them not because I believed in bitcoin, but because I believe in suckers.

      This particular crop has been fleeced. Time for blockchain penny tock tea companies.

    25. Re: Dream On by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      It's not as if the world has any shortage of currency.

    26. Re:Dream On by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      I'm really confident about this one.

    27. Re:Dream On by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      You can't have been reading me that much if this surprises you. I've never believed in cryptocurrency, and have rejected at least one board position in a cryptocurrency company.

      I can't believe a retraction would ever be necessary.

  5. Name calling time by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cryptocurrencies are like tulips! Cryptocurrencies are like lottery tickets!.....wow, I'm on a roll here!......Cryptocurrencies are like washing machines! Cryptocurrencies are like terrorists!

    1. Re:Name calling time by houghi · · Score: 1

      Ergo: Terrorists are like tulips.

      Sneaky Dutch basterds!

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  6. Ponzi scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... lottery ticket?
    If you think about it, the only similarity to a lottery ticket is that your very likely to lose.

    Now, when you compare it to a Ponzi scheme, then it starts to look VERY similar.

  7. Linden Dollars too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've fully in in Linden Dollars, they're bound to make a comeback. Big banks don't want you to invest in this amazing currency while its so cheap, because they want it all for themselves, but now is your chance.

  8. Sure by melted · · Score: 1

    Just like that Power Ball ticket I bought hoping to get the billion dollar jackpot "paid off" a few weeks ago.

    1. Re:Sure by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      That was my thought too on reading the headline; "what a terrible analogy". Those who jumped on the hype bandwagon aside, most of the proponents are from math/tech fields and at least have an idea on math and stats. As a result many of them (statistically correctly) refer to lottery tickets as "a tax on the stupid" or some such, which isn't exactly the kind of analogy that's going to inspire confidence in a flagging "investment".

      Reading on though, it becomes clearer. The author of the piece doesn't seem to be a fan as they're predicting the value will continue to fall ("as I also pointed out back then, just because the long-term value of bitcoin is more likely to be $100 than $100,000"), so that is precisely the point. FWIW, I agree with the valuation prediction, but not the lottery analogy. Once a crypto currency crashes - as some already have - they don't come back; supporters of the tech move on to the next one that looks promising, and the bagholders will eventually walk away for good as money is finite, after all.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  9. So like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shares?
    Stock options?
    bonds?
    money?
    scratch & sniff cards

    dog shit, oh wait, that might just be useable as fertilizer.

    captcha : councils

  10. Past Performance Does Not Indicate Future Results by DatbeDank · · Score: 4, Informative

    I also have a few zero volume penny stocks back from gambling... Err day trading penny stocks.

    I keep them around as a reminder of what results from hubris and greed.

    Most of these cyryptocurrencies will end up the same: no bid.

    Don't be a bag hodler.

  11. The $100,000 thesis by reanjr · · Score: 1

    The $100k/BTC thesis - in my mind - was always supported by the idea that BTC would be used in the third world. Just talk to any Venmo user about installing a Bitcoin wallet to see that it's mostly a non-starter as a currency in the developed world. But the opportunities in Latin America and Africa (at least where Internet penetrates) are huge.

    1. Re:The $100,000 thesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      $100k is *very* easily achievable, I staked my next car on it... instead of buying a $35k ride, I just bought a $3500 beater last week and put the rest into crypto. That should net me a little over $900k in about 3-4 years.
      Even $1M is pretty well within range as a max around 10-15 years out... $19T, but I'm not yet willing to stake on that till we hit $200k in about 4-5 years, at which point I won't be converting back to fiat, ever.
      Adoption will happen pretty fast.

    2. Re:The $100,000 thesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to hit $2M by the end of the year.

    3. Re:The $100,000 thesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome sauce! But tell me, which of the 1000s of cryptocurrencies did you choose?
      Are they all going to the moon? If so, I guess I should create my own cryptocurrency so I'm at the top of the pyramid.
      Fuck it, everyone should create their own crypto! Why not? Imagine how awesome it will be when there are 7 billion cryptocurrencies!! We'll all be stinking rich!!!

    4. Re:The $100,000 thesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      instead of buying a $35k ride

      Oh you're still being taken for a ride...

    5. Re:The $100,000 thesis by sleepghost · · Score: 0

      The only innovation is the new form of hard money: Bitcoin. Others are mostly just scams; And a few are not scams, but useless anyway. Money generates a network effect, and we need only one.

    6. Re:The $100,000 thesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $100k is *very* easily achievable, I staked my next car on it... instead of buying a $35k ride, I just bought a $3500 beater last week and put the rest into crypto. That should net me a little over $900k in about 3-4 years.
      Even $1M is pretty well within range as a max around 10-15 years out... $19T, but I'm not yet willing to stake on that till we hit $200k in about 4-5 years, at which point I won't be converting back to fiat, ever.
      Adoption will happen pretty fast.

      Also you get used to driving a broke-assed car which might be a useful skill to equip you for your future.

  12. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liquidity + Scarcity = Value. Whether it's shells on a beach or stone wheels or photographically signed tokens, it doesn't matter. Add in semi (or in some cases full) anonymity along with no border controls and you have yourself a currency fit for the future. Which one(s) remains to be seen but I'm betting that the winner(s) are already out. ....they can get upgraded you know.

    See, I think it's a problem with not many people having a solid understanding of computer science, economics and sociology. Anyone missing just one of these just won't get it. But hey, feel free to short crypto. Save as many of those paper dollars as you want. Oh, and as for governments or banks "stopping" crypto, just remember this, they couldn't even stop mp3's.

    1. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really think this is creimer (grammar is too good, tone is overly paranoid), but this is stupid like creimer, and is the same sort of stupid as creimer, and I can't help but be suspicious.

    2. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "formula" makes no sense. You're implying that Liquidity = Value - Scarcity. Or Scarcity = Value - Liquidity. The thing about forumulae - even in economics, is that they actually mean something and work. This is just gibberish.

    3. Re:Wrong by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Liquidity + Scarcity = Value. Whether it's shells on a beach or stone wheels or photographically signed tokens, it doesn't matter.

      Which one(s) remains to be seen but I'm betting that the winner(s) are already out.

      Both of these statements can't be true. Cryptocurrency advocates claim artificial scarcity because of the mining which is kindof true. The problem is that the currencies themselves are not scarce. It's free to create your own currency and you only need a minimal amount of liquidity and they all become equivalent.
      You can't pick a winner because there likely won't be a single winner. Any and all currencies that reach minimal viability will likely all hover around the same dollar amount. My guess is that we will eventually have several hundred currencies and they all will be worth something in the double digits.

  13. *BSD is Linux's wannabe butt-boy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, nothing "wannabe" about it. *BSD is LInux's butt-boy.

  14. Re:Wrong Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can't be both liquid and scarce. Even your sales pitch lacks logic.

    You shouldn't have "invested" in it, you should just take your loss and move on.

  15. Hodl hodl hodl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't leave my pyramid scheme! You'll need all that monopoly money once you are a failed state in a dystopian future!

  16. I heard you like lottery tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might I interest you in Albanian hotel shares?

    1. Re:I heard you like lottery tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll swap you for some of my Nepalese oceanfront property futures.

  17. Don't be fucking stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are currency, it in the fucking name you fucking moron. Fuck your retarded shit, fuck off back to kindergarten. Fucking hell this is sao shit fucking dumb.

  18. Re:Past Performance Does Not Indicate Future Resul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cryptocurrencies have little use for the average person.

    The only use cases I've heard people actually use are:

    1.) Black market deals.
    2.) Avoiding exchange fees when transferring money between countries. (Or performing transactions in those countries. Or something like that.)
    3.) Using cryptocurrency as a currency in a country with bad currency (hyper-inflation). I hear some Venezuelans have used it.
    4.) Grey market deals. PayPal and other financial institutions ban using their services for certain economic transactions (or de-platform people/groups). Cryptocurrency would avoid them entirely.

    That's about it. There is no point for every day transactions in a first-world country to be done with cryptocurrencies. Everything can be done with cash, credit/debit, check, or NFC payment apps.

  19. Bitcoin is definitely worth zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All currencies that are not backed by anything tangible definitely will be worth zero, eventually.

    1. Re:Bitcoin is definitely worth zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That pretty much includes all the fiat currencies.

    2. Re: Bitcoin is definitely worth zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Eventually.

      Eventually everything is worthless.

    3. Re:Bitcoin is definitely worth zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definitely will be worth zero, eventually.

      But some will get there faster than others.

  20. Fiat currencies are the true lottery ticket by slashways · · Score: 1

    Fiat currencies are the true lottery ticket: A wealth transfer: from the fiat currency user to the state. We already know the winner. Since the 20th century, only fiat currencies are available as money; Keynes mindset, and inflation, did a great job to suppress the 'store of value' effect of any money. Now, we need a trustless, trans-border, anti-censorship resistant, and so enforcing the private property rights of the owners, new form of hard money. This is Bitcoin: A protocol; And as a money; Bitcoin is harder than Gold. Only Bitcoin matter.

    1. Re:Fiat currencies are the true lottery ticket by sleepghost · · Score: 0

      Indeed, the average life expectancy for a fiat currency is 27 years: A lottery ticket for 'loosers'.

  21. Unless I'm missing something by ocsibrm · · Score: 2

    Aren't lottery tickets *already* lottery tickets that might pay off in the future? Feels like I have better odds with them too, but maybe the dozens/hundreds of failed coins out there have made me a smidge cynical.

    1. Re:Unless I'm missing something by Diss+Champ · · Score: 1

      I think the proper way to frame the discussion is for a given crypto-currency is to ask:
      Is this one that has a lottery ticket's odds of paying off in the future, or one that has the same value as one where they already drew the numbers and found no match?

      Currencies may exist for each, but like lottery tickets a heck of a lot more have been printed that are now in the later category.

  22. A Lotery? Nothing new! by Souhiro · · Score: 1

    So, a lotery ticket that may or may not pay in the future? Perhaps the same could be said of stock shares and Wall Street. And nobody worried for the last black thurdsday, 90 years ago!

  23. No they are useless crap. by kbg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No the problem is that the value of your CURRENT cryptocurrency is just going downhill and will be worth nothing in the long run. This will happen for all cryptocurrencies and the reason is that people just create new and new cryptocurrency.

    The only people that can cash in are the people that originally created the cryptocurrency and they cash in before it becomes worthless. So everyone is trying to create their own cryptocurrency to cash in. Rinse repeat. An endless cycle that will never stop and makes common cryptocurrency useless.

    The only way that a cryptocurrency can work, is if it is backed up by a government state so that you are quaranted to have an actual value for the currency based on the trust for the government. We have a name for this it's just called "Currency".

    1. Re:No they are useless crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The only way that a cryptocurrency can work, is if it is backed up by a government state so that you are quaranted to have an actual value for the currency based on the trust for the government. We have a name for this it's just called "Currency".

      Yep! If only it were backed in Bolivars, Zimbabwe Dollars, NK Won, Peruvian Inti, the Zloty, Dinars (both), Peso, Lei, Lira (both), or the Dong! That would have solved everything!

    2. Re:No they are useless crap. by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      True. Cryptocurrencies are 21st century pyramid schemes, except that, unlike Amway, you don't even get any soap.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  24. No, cryptocurrencies are not like lottery tickets by jdoeii · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lottery usually has (a) certain guaranteed odds of winning, crypto has no guarantees. (b) Lotteries are usually licensed with a limited number of licenses at any time. There is literally no limit on the number of possible cryptocurrencies.

    The value of major cryptos is unlikely to go to hard zero though. There is utility in BTC and friends which is circumvention of regulations. Someone will always want to launder money and sell drugs.

    But it's very unlikely for a legit application of blockchain to exist at all because a distributed transaction with consensus is fundamentally more expensive than a centralized one with a trusted third party. All, and I mean absolutely all with no exceptions, all current companies/products in "legit" space are doing things with blockchain purely for marketing/FMO reasons. All of these apps can be done more efficiently without the blockchain.

  25. Re:Past Performance Does Not Indicate Future Resul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's about it.

    5.) Ransomewarez

  26. The best lottery ticket statistic by captbollocks · · Score: 1

    I heard somewhere that the chances of you buying a winning ticket in the NY lottery are the same as you finding that a winning ticket in the gutter. I can't imagine the stats are much different in other parts of the world.

    At least I don't have to listen to people in the local pub telling me how they are going to make millions on the BTC they bought at the top of the market anymore, now it is only the desperados trying to talk the market up.

    1. Re:The best lottery ticket statistic by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I heard somewhere that the chances of you buying a winning ticket in the NY lottery are the same as you finding that a winning ticket in the gutter.

      I'm not sure how this would be the case. Sure the chances are the same if you find a discarded lottery ticket before the drawing. But the odds of finding a "good" lottery ticket of any kind is low. I've found lots of discarded lottery tickets but they have always been discarded after they were known to be bad. The odds of finding a "good" lottery ticket is likely similar to the odds of finding a $20 on the ground. People don't usually discard something of potential value. So once you have found a good lottery ticket then your odds are the same but you obviously have higher odds if you buy a lottery ticket than if you wait for the very unlikely event of actually discovering an unused lottery ticket.

  27. So it IS GAMBLING!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it is gambling and not a 'currency'? Like anyone thought differently???

  28. Let me fix it for you. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Cryptocurrencies Are actually like Ponzi schemes That Might Pay Off the early "investors".

    There. Done.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  29. which one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cryptocurrency can be created out of a thin air. And there are thousands. Which one is the lottery ticket?

  30. From an investment to a lottery ticket... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    What's the next step?

  31. Petro by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    The right way to think about cryptocurrency coins is as lottery tickets that pay off in a dystopian future where they are used in rogue and failed states, or perhaps in countries where citizens have already lost all semblance of privacy. It is no coincidence that dysfunctional Venezuela is the first issuer of a state-backed cryptocurrency (the "petro").

    They are really using Venezuela as an example? Maduro's government created the petro because he's blown all of their foreign currency reserves. It's supposedly backed 1:1 by a barrel of oil, from a specific region in Venezuela officially. Of course, investigations by reporters have found no investment in or increase of oil production facilities in that area. Oh, and the government, which pre-mined all the coins, hasn't released any yet. And the only hard currency the government accepts to purchase petros is the ruble (all the other options are other crypto coins). The whole petro thing was basically a way to get money from Russia while avoiding US sanctions. Oh, and fun fact, Russia has now started flying nuclear-capable Tu-160 bombers into Venezuela. Hmm, couldn't be because the Venezuelan government struck a deal with Russia for power projection in exchange for cash, could it?

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Petro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and fun fact, Russia has now started flying nuclear-capable Tu-160 bombers into Venezuela. Hmm, couldn't be because the Venezuelan government struck a deal with Russia for power projection in exchange for cash, could it?

      It couldn't be for the same reason they did so in 2013 and 2008?

  32. "that facilitate tax evasion and criminal activity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL. The banks are the real criminals, printing money out of thin air every time they make a loan - which means that 97% of the money in existence is debt money - owed to banks, created out of thin air on a computer screen, enslaving everybody else on the planet.

    www.positivemoney.org

  33. Re:No, cryptocurrencies are not like lottery ticke by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
    (c) Once the lottery drawing for a particular set of tickets has been held, all the non-winning tickets are worthless forever. At least a digital (not crypto!) currency could, in theory and however unlikely, be worth something again in the future.

    It's just a bad analogy.

    --
    If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  34. Dystopia? by DalM · · Score: 1

    "The right way to think about cryptocurrency coins is as lottery tickets that pay off in a dystopian future where they are used in rogue and failed states, or perhaps in countries where citizens have already lost all semblance of privacy"

    A dystopia future... where the government and major institutions have fallen... but the internet still works just fine enough to run a whole shadow economy.

    That's so comically ridiculous. In such a situation of a failed state -of which we have several contemporary real-world examples to point to- the internet isn't reliable enough to operate the whole economy.

    Rather, in such a situation, people resort back to the original form of currency, (No, not bartering. Sorry to burst your bubble) interpersonal debt. Interpersonal debt is the most efficient form of currency in a local market, and it's the economic system that was by far the most common in the world prior to the printing press and colonization (global colonization made debt management difficult, so the governments and corporations had to use a less efficient, on a local scale, system of managing payment for goods -ie, monetary payment.) We sure as hell ain't going to suddenly buy up magic internet money, when access to the internet will potentially be unreliable. That would make the whole economic system unreliable, and people will still need milk and eggs.

  35. Re:No, cryptocurrencies are not like lottery ticke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I bet 100 trillion dollars ZWB that that can happen with anything that isn't backed by some actual good.

  36. NOT LOTTERY TICKETS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin and all its cryptocurrency offspring are just a new form of (GLOBAL!) Ponzi scheme (re)designed for the age of internet!!!

    Trying to make people believe cryptocurrencies should be seen like lottery tickets is just a new tactic of damage control attempt!!!
    Because its easy to guess recent situation starting HODLers to wake up to sad reality (that they got used in a Ponzi scheme, that is about to collapse completely)!!!

    HODLers:
    These times are your LAST CHANCE!
    Sell now & so save whatever left OR slam to zero!!!

  37. Cryptocurrency vs Stockmarket (epic failure) by hAckz0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When cryptocurrency was opened to the stock market it became doomed to failure. Before that, the "value" was rising because it was useful. Its only intrinsic value is that value it presents for exchanging goods and services. For people who actually "use" cryptocurrencies, it's value needs to be kept stable, or everyone would refuse to use it, and thus it would have zero value

    Enter the stock market, and now the market traders all want to make money by trading the currency itself, a thing with no intrinsic value except for what it can do. If the people who use it all cashed out then the stock market price would be $0. The way the stock market "makes money" (actually move money from one account to another) is to second guess what the other traders will think its value will be tomorrow. Buy low, sell high of course. The stock market will not "make money" unless the price/value is volatile. If the price was consistent over time the traders would have zero interest in it, because they can't trick the other traders into valuing it more tomorrow than today, because the price would be stable. In order to make money in trading cryptocurrency, it is in the traders best interest to force the price to become volatile and then to correctly guess tomorrows value. They will try every trick in the book to force wide swings in the "market value", even emplying illegal tricks if they can find a way to make that happen.

    See the problem yet? The traders WANT the price to vary, and the users of it DEMAND the price to be stable! The traders will do everything in their power to make the value fluctuate, while the people trying to use it will be moving their share to some other currancy which is more stable, thus forcing the value to further decline. This is a feedback loop biased towards zero value.

    When a stock for a traded company does poorly you can sell off its assets and regain some of that original value. When a cryptocurrency tanks it becomes worthless, and nothing can be sold off or recouped from the electronic dust that remains. Its value then is merely nostalga. It has no value beyond what other people think it will be worth tomorrow. If everyone thinks it has zero value, because nobody can trust that value being stable tomorrow, then the cryptocurrency is 100%, without any doubt, completely worthless. At that point you can thank the stock market for making your cryptocurrency wallet worthless.

    If you are going to invest in any cryptocurrency my advise is to pick one that states up front that it will never be openly traded on the stock market. That one may have a chance at actually being stable, and you can count on its only intrinsic value, trust in its worth tomorrow being the same as today.

    1. Re:Cryptocurrency vs Stockmarket (epic failure) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow really? The value was rising and the start of the big fall happened well before it was traded on the stock market. And there is an investigation into price manipulation. "you can thank large cheating corporate entities(with near limitless funds) for making your cryptocurrency wallet worth so much" then you can "thank those very same people for making your cryptocurrency wallet worthless". Have a good day.

    2. Re:Cryptocurrency vs Stockmarket (epic failure) by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

      Wow really? The value was rising and the start of the big fall happened well before it was traded on the stock market.

      Yes, because it was useful in buying and selling services or products. You would always see some market adjustments, because other currencies fluctuate, and the worth of cryptocurrency is balanced against those other currencies. If the US dollar were thought to be more valuable next week, someone with a lot of Bitcoin might cash out and try and ride that wave. That has nothing to do with the stock market. That is just simple money management and putting your holdings where it can beat inflation.

      And there is an investigation into price manipulation.

      Yes, anyone with a large chunk can do that easily. That is exactly what stock market traders do, manipulate commodity prices, such as to affect the market value in the direction they want. They will try and trick you to make you think it is worth more that the going price, so they can sell at a profit or force the price to go down temporarily so they can buy low, knowing that it will eventually return to a higher price when they will then sell. Its like caching out on steroids, and it is intended to move the market in the direction you do not want it to go. They are psychologically manipulating you! Yes, if you are holding crypto for a rainy day, then you are the chump they are targeting. They intend to steal your "value" when you cash out. What they are taking from you is intangible and you won't even know who the crypto-bank-robber was.

      "you can thank large cheating corporate entities(with near limitless funds) for making your cryptocurrency wallet worth so much" then you can "thank those very same people for making your cryptocurrency wallet worthless". Have a good day.

      That is correct. They cheat, to make the price fluctuate up and down at will. For the company that has unlimited cash resources to throw around, they can easily screw you out of your life savings just by buying and selling large chunks of cryptocurrency at a time. Sell a large block of crypto, spread some bad news/rumor, and buy up whatever people are trying to dump on the market in response. When the market realizes the sky is not falling the price will resume going upwards again, and they will sell another large chunk. Then rinse and repeat that process, over and over. If you fall for their strong-arm tactic or their fake business news, then you just put the down payment on their next yacht. They go laughing all the way to the brick and mortar bank with their new cash reserves waiting for the next set of chumps to burn.

  38. There's always stock.. LMFAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always stock.. LMFAO

  39. Peak cryptocurrency is yet to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will hit its peak when everyone gives up on using it for investment. Then maybe it'll settle down and we can go back to trying to use it (specifically Bitcoin) as money. We still need a cryptocurrency (as currency) and people simply aren't going to stop trying, until they have it.

  40. A Resource Wadting Lottery of Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat shit Slash-shils, youre shit is retarded and you talk like fags.

  41. Crypto cannot be both asset and currency. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crypto is an asset that wants to be a currency. But you can't be both an asset and a currency. In order for an asset to have value it's value must be based on an underlying currency that has a more or less stable value. In order for a currency to be a currency it cannot be an asset, an asset being something that appreciates in value over time. Currency is flat. An asset appreciates in value over time.

  42. Re:No, cryptocurrencies are not like lottery ticke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (c) Once the lottery drawing for a particular set of tickets has been held, all the non-winning tickets are worthless forever. At least a digital (not crypto!) currency could, in theory and however unlikely, be worth something again in the future.

    You can always hope some greater fool with buy your losing ticket.

    It's just a bad analogy.

    Seems accurate to me.

  43. That restores my faith completely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's no longer money or an investment or a value store, it's simply playing the lottery.

  44. Re:Past Performance Does Not Indicate Future Resul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed out a HUGE one. It is of course illegal in many countries in the world :-- gambling.