Unless you somehow also give them legal control over the computer systems of all other departments, it won't help protect government information. You can't expect security when your software is essentially legislated through appropriations. As for private security, it would be much simpler to legislate around fines and penalties for breach and let the market handle the problem.
That just means that social capital was the primal currency for that society. Which makes sense. It works pretty well for groups small enough so that everyone knows everyone.
This isn't a job for politicians. Just stop using Facebook. We'll spend the next half decade letting politicians learn about and debate social media, then they'll pass some nearly antiquated law right around the time Facebook is going My Space.
Try literacy, it helps. "Public water utilities" does not include private companies with lucrative monopolistic contracts. It covers municipal water utilities et al.
Or maybe you just don't know the first thing about what you're talking about, maybe?
This is what we call a carbon market. It's the goto proposal by the left for how to fight climate change. American liberals point to these policies as an example for the U.S.
Back in the day, you would put your video on YT, but then you would embed it into your own site and link to it from places you think people would like to see it. YT wasn't a destination, it was a place to host videos.
That shit died with monetization, not with changing algorithms. YT put themselves in this position by providing a revenue share.
That's not really true. Plenty of people find legit ways to get a masters for free. The Ivys hand those out for free all the time.
Now, if you're telling me marginal students can pay gobs of money to obtain a masters, I'd concur. But if you're saying intelligent qualified students have to pay more than $20k for an education, you might not be playing in the big leagues, education-wise.
We have too much medicine being practiced in the world. We're not fighting disease as much as throwing chaos into the system. We start progressing on cancer and then we introduce diabetes. We start whittling away at heart disease and the we give everyone heroin.
Unless you are in debilitating pain or obviously deteriorating medically, you shouldn't be going to the doctor. None of us should.
This annual checkup, ridiculous vaccine panel, constant changing dietary recommedation, juice cleanse, organic shopping nonsense is killing us.
Just chill. You'll be fine. And if you're not fine, take solace in the fact that you can improve the survivability of the species by taking one for the team and letting you genes die out.
The difference is drunk driving spreads the liability onto relatively poor drunk drivers, who are then taken off the road to make us all safer. This device would be 100% the liability of the manufacturer. It only takes one wrongful death suit to put most companies out of business, and rightly so.
The person who posted that picture doesn't know how to drive.
When you merge, it is far safer and more orderly for everyone to merge at the same place, so that it's easy to "zip" the cars together. The only obvious place for this to occur that everyone can see and agree upon is at the very end.
When you don't have dipshits merging in early, the whole merge can become a thing of grace of beauty with little slowdonw.
When one asshole decides they have too much anxiety to properly merge left-right-left-right is when problems crop up.
Isn't that the opposite of cord cutting? I suppose you can now go "corded" (subscription) then subsequently cut the cord. How does this shit pass editors?
Yeah, I don't really think it was a money grab. It just really struck me that the whole article complains about not being appreciated with thank yous and how the devs are depressed, and then ends with several sentences about sending money. The strong implication is that monetary compensation would be just as good as thank yous. Which is totally reasonable. But it's an obfuscated way of just saying "give me money". Which is also reasonable to do. But putting it at the tail of begging for sympathy is poor taste.
What are you smoking, dude? I've set up hundreds of systemd services and have almost never had to do that. Systemd doesn't do environment or config files well?
So, what you're saying is you don't understand systemd. If that's your experience with it, I assure you, you're doing it wrong. No system packages come with services that complicated, why do you think your services should be?
Yes, you need an OCCASIONAL shim. In my experience, this shim is typically fewer than 5 lines, including the shebang.
The only software developers that might be construed as "heroes" are those involved in forward military operations. If you wanna be a hero, sign up to do something heroic, instead of signing up to fiddle with your favorite software.
I don't know much about water, but in general it's driving a huge part of the global economy. Public water utilities aren't raking in much profit, and they should be. Water utilities aren't appreciated nearly enough.
If Mint hackers are doing it to make a desktop they love, then there's no need for users to tell them they're doing good. If Mint hackers are doing it for any other reason, they should get the fuck out. If volunteer work makes you depressed and you continue to volunteer and then go on the web to complain how depressed you are, you deserve any and all shit that comes your way.
Slashdot Mirror
Unless you somehow also give them legal control over the computer systems of all other departments, it won't help protect government information. You can't expect security when your software is essentially legislated through appropriations. As for private security, it would be much simpler to legislate around fines and penalties for breach and let the market handle the problem.
The airline industry is heavily regulated. We have an entire agency dedicated to it.
We sort of broke the franchising somehow and would really like some advice on how we transition out of this...
That just means that social capital was the primal currency for that society. Which makes sense. It works pretty well for groups small enough so that everyone knows everyone.
This isn't a job for politicians. Just stop using Facebook. We'll spend the next half decade letting politicians learn about and debate social media, then they'll pass some nearly antiquated law right around the time Facebook is going My Space.
Try literacy, it helps. "Public water utilities" does not include private companies with lucrative monopolistic contracts. It covers municipal water utilities et al.
Or maybe you just don't know the first thing about what you're talking about, maybe?
This is what we call a carbon market. It's the goto proposal by the left for how to fight climate change. American liberals point to these policies as an example for the U.S.
Why does the title and summary sound so menacing?
I think the algorithm has more problems than the presentation.
Back in the day, you would put your video on YT, but then you would embed it into your own site and link to it from places you think people would like to see it. YT wasn't a destination, it was a place to host videos.
That shit died with monetization, not with changing algorithms. YT put themselves in this position by providing a revenue share.
That's not really true. Plenty of people find legit ways to get a masters for free. The Ivys hand those out for free all the time.
Now, if you're telling me marginal students can pay gobs of money to obtain a masters, I'd concur. But if you're saying intelligent qualified students have to pay more than $20k for an education, you might not be playing in the big leagues, education-wise.
You only had one job!
We have too much medicine being practiced in the world. We're not fighting disease as much as throwing chaos into the system. We start progressing on cancer and then we introduce diabetes. We start whittling away at heart disease and the we give everyone heroin.
Unless you are in debilitating pain or obviously deteriorating medically, you shouldn't be going to the doctor. None of us should.
This annual checkup, ridiculous vaccine panel, constant changing dietary recommedation, juice cleanse, organic shopping nonsense is killing us.
Just chill. You'll be fine. And if you're not fine, take solace in the fact that you can improve the survivability of the species by taking one for the team and letting you genes die out.
The difference is drunk driving spreads the liability onto relatively poor drunk drivers, who are then taken off the road to make us all safer. This device would be 100% the liability of the manufacturer. It only takes one wrongful death suit to put most companies out of business, and rightly so.
The person who posted that picture doesn't know how to drive.
When you merge, it is far safer and more orderly for everyone to merge at the same place, so that it's easy to "zip" the cars together. The only obvious place for this to occur that everyone can see and agree upon is at the very end.
When you don't have dipshits merging in early, the whole merge can become a thing of grace of beauty with little slowdonw.
When one asshole decides they have too much anxiety to properly merge left-right-left-right is when problems crop up.
This whole spiel makes them sound like Theranos. They're just making a cash grab from M.A.D.D. and related groups.
So, what you're saying is that you suck at building dependable, deterministic systems. That's cool. I prefer to write quality shit.
What shitty software are you using? Make better choices.
Isn't that the opposite of cord cutting? I suppose you can now go "corded" (subscription) then subsequently cut the cord. How does this shit pass editors?
Boycotts or perhaps sanctions. Divestment of current projects. Just some thoughts off the top of my head that I just came up with.
Yeah, I don't really think it was a money grab. It just really struck me that the whole article complains about not being appreciated with thank yous and how the devs are depressed, and then ends with several sentences about sending money. The strong implication is that monetary compensation would be just as good as thank yous. Which is totally reasonable. But it's an obfuscated way of just saying "give me money". Which is also reasonable to do. But putting it at the tail of begging for sympathy is poor taste.
Apparently. *whoosh* seems to be the sound of the sarcasm going over the head of the troll hunters who modded me down.
What are you smoking, dude? I've set up hundreds of systemd services and have almost never had to do that. Systemd doesn't do environment or config files well?
[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/my/config
Environment=FOO=42
You don't know what you're talking about.
So, what you're saying is you don't understand systemd. If that's your experience with it, I assure you, you're doing it wrong. No system packages come with services that complicated, why do you think your services should be?
Yes, you need an OCCASIONAL shim. In my experience, this shim is typically fewer than 5 lines, including the shebang.
Compare to init scripts...
The only software developers that might be construed as "heroes" are those involved in forward military operations. If you wanna be a hero, sign up to do something heroic, instead of signing up to fiddle with your favorite software.
I don't know much about water, but in general it's driving a huge part of the global economy. Public water utilities aren't raking in much profit, and they should be. Water utilities aren't appreciated nearly enough.
If Mint hackers are doing it to make a desktop they love, then there's no need for users to tell them they're doing good. If Mint hackers are doing it for any other reason, they should get the fuck out. If volunteer work makes you depressed and you continue to volunteer and then go on the web to complain how depressed you are, you deserve any and all shit that comes your way.