Ethereum Thinks it Can Change the World. It's Running Out of Time To Prove It. (technologyreview.com)

The blockchain system has daunting technical problems to fix. But first, its disciples need to figure out how to govern themselves. From a report: The handful of idealistic researchers, developers, and administrators in charge of maintaining its software are under increasing pressure to overcome technical limitations that stymie the network's growth. At the same time, well-funded competitors have emerged, claiming that their blockchains perform better. Crackdowns by regulators, and a growing understanding of how far most blockchain applications are from ready for prime time, have scared many cryptocurrency investors away: Ethereum's market value in dollars has fallen more than 90% since its peak last January.

The reason Devcon (the annual "family reunion" organized by the Ethereum Foundation; this year's edition was held in October) feels so upbeat despite these storm clouds is that the people building Ethereum have something bigger in mind -- something world-changing, in fact. Yet to achieve its goal, this ragtag community needs to crack a problem as complicated as any of the toe-curling technical challenges it faces: how to govern itself. It must find a way to organize a scattered global network of contributors and stakeholders without sacrificing "decentralization" -- the principle, which any cryptocurrency community strives for, that no one entity or group should be in control.

Comments

Never Going to Work

[SirAstral]

The currency issue is religious/political.

You are never going to institute a currency that cannot be fiddled with by the powers that be. One of the cornerstones of Crypto Currency is a static rate of inflation. They it can be easily stolen by hacking exchanges, or taken possession of by authority. It's volatility is directly linked to the currently established and highly manipulated currencies that people use to exchange them with.

Investors only care if it gets them money, governments only care if it gets them spend and traceability, and Central Bankers only care if they have direct control over it's production and distribution.

Right now, the only thing going on is the wait... when the Central Bankers find a cryptocurrency they like and can control like they do fiat currencies then we will finally have a cryptocurrency that has some traction. Until then... this is all "expensive" novelty shop antics.

Re: Never Going to Work

[SirAstral]

based on what evidence?

Cryptos are mined, which means over time more and more are added to the available pool. How does this fact fit into a "deflation mode"?

Inflation has a basic component... "amount of x". It is a key principle of supply and demand. More supply = less value. Less supply = more value. Demand has the same model in the opposite direction. If there are only 1000 coins in the market a demand for only 1 of them means its value is low. If there is a demand for 2000 of them then the value is high. Now... if the market flood with 1 million... the value AND demand for 1 or 2000 is low & low.

Re: Never Going to Work

[SirAstral]

As long as the pool grows, regardless of the rate of growth it creates inflation.

Look at Venezuela and it's hyper inflation. What is growing? The amount of money. Everyone is a millionaire down there but only in the way everyone with $10k are penny millionaires in the USA.

" Inflation isn't just the injection of more supply,"
Correct, but the injection of more supply always guarantee's inflation. Just because OTHER factors can also increase or even LOWER inflation does no mute the basic fact that adding more X to the pool increases inflation.

What you and the other commenters are missing is that you think just because another mechanism can create deflation that somehow can mean that this does not create inflation.

It's simple as explain int he supply and demand model.

If there are 1000 coins and 10 more are created then inflation of 1% just occurred. This inflation may not be immediately felt by everyone but it is there. Additionally, if the demand for a lot of things fall, and cause deflationary effects of 2% that means that deflation was 1%. But if those 10 coins were not added then deflation would have been 2%. This is oversimplified for educational purposes but makes it clear that just because overall inflation is based on multiple things... adding currency to a pool is always inflationary and will never not be, no matter how many other factors offset that inflation.

Re: Never Going to Work

[omnichad]

I did state that I am only talking about 1 element did I not?

Go look up the definition of inflation. It never describes one element. It talks about entire systems.

Buh-bye Speculators

[bill_mcgonigle]

The best thing to happen to the future of fintech is all these speculators running for the doors. Back to where things were in 2015 would be just dandy, so serious developers can get back to making real, workable solutions. For some reason crypto caught fire before most people working on it thought things were ready for primetime - that was quite unfortunate because it got regulations interested in a nascent technology. It's like the USPS got hold of SMTP in 1986 and decided to take it over. :/ Quite a setback.

Re:Buh-bye Speculators

[ewibble]

And that trust-less society is one that is incredibly inefficient. Just stop and think what would happen if society didn't enforce any trust.

Go to the supermarket, well the food maybe poison, you should have to test it yourself. How would you test well you couldn't ask someone they could be lying, you would have to do your own research to determine those test food safety. That would be all everybody would be doing checking that everybody else is not lying.

Install software? did you read the source and then compile the source yourself? did you check the compiler and compile that too? did you get an electron microscope and check the hardware your software is running on? what about that electron microscope you sure someone didn't mess with that?

Society runs on trust, that is one reason I believe people don't read terms and condition, they trust that they are reasonable, imagine the total time used if everybody read all the terms and conditions, and constantly checked for update for every site they visited, all the software they ran, and service they used.

It is usually better to trust and sometimes get screwed over than never trust.