Slashdot Mirror


Dozens of Bomb Threats Reported Across America In Apparent Bitcoin Ransom Scam (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Gizmodo: On Wednesday afternoon, a wave of bomb threats were reported at various locations across the United States. On social media, numerous law enforcement departments issued alerts notifying citizens that they're looking into bomb threats targeting businesses, schools, government offices and even private residents. It appears the threats are being sent by email. NBC News said "dozens" of threats had been reported, but the full extent of these threats is not yet clear. A number of news organizations and law enforcement agencies report remarkably similar sounding emails mentioning a bitcoin ransom of $20,000. And some Twitter users have shared emails they've received demanding the cryptocurrency and warning that an explosion would only encourage others to pay up. NBC News quoted the NYPD's Counterterrorism Bureau's brief statement on the investigation: "We are currently monitoring multiple bomb threats that have been sent electronically to various locations throughout the city. These threats are also being reported to other locations nationwide and are not considered credible at this time."

63 comments

  1. Dipshit Donnie? by DogDude · · Score: 0, Troll

    You have to be pretty fucking stupid to ask for Bitcoin as ransom, since they can be tracked and traced perfectly, forever. The Orange Asshole has been losing his mind on Twitter, trying to distract the planet from the seemingly endless parade of his cohorts going to prison. Is it possible Dipshit Donnie did it? Who else is that stupid and has as much of a motive? At this point, it wouldn't surprise me.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Herp derp herp derp herp derp

    2. Re: Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      NPC typing detected.

    3. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not that hard to shuffle it around to not get caught. Plus if its overseas, even if you know who it was, good luck doing anything about it.

      ( and i think ill just ignore your irrational hatred. have fun with that )

    4. Re: Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self-reporting NPC detected.

    5. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by bobbied · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You have to be pretty fucking stupid to ask for Bitcoin as ransom, since they can be tracked and traced perfectly, forever.

      Quite so. You'd think that the feds would be ready to pounce on any coin redeemed for cash and are right now tracing down all transactions attached to the wallet associated with the ransom demands, if there are any.

      The Orange Asshole has been losing his mind on Twitter, trying to distract the planet from the seemingly endless parade of his cohorts going to prison. Is it possible Dipshit Donnie did it? Who else is that stupid and has as much of a motive? At this point, it wouldn't surprise me.

      Well, All I can say is why would he bother? There are PLENTY of ways to "wag the dog" if he wanted should the Twitter ranting not be enough distraction for him.

      By the way... Having dodgy friends is no crime in and of itself and the US Constitution makes it clear that "guilt by association" isn't a governing legal principle in the USA. Or as Rudy puts it, "It is not a crime to hire a bad lawyer. " Personally, I figure I'll wait to pass judgment until all the facts are known from Mueller's investigation on all of this, but if you want to, fine. Just remember, Trump has been declared dead multiple times a month since the campaign and yet lived to tell the tale, so I'd urge a bit or caution in doing it this time, at least right away. Let's see if anything sticks before we go off half cocked..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    6. Re: Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      You wanna get told you're a gullible fake eh?

      Enjoy not realising it's just an extended victim play with no justification behind it and that you're setting yourselves up to specifically and visibly dodge sympathy so you can claim the world is unfair, i guess :)

    7. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Quite so. You'd think that the feds would be ready to pounce on any coin redeemed for cash" - Derp, lol. What's your basis for thinking that?

      Also ledgers are fairly fucking simple to distribute, sell, disseminate, sit on indefinitely... so there's that. They could probably spend all of it paying 3rd parties for services and no one would know for years.

      Sir, the block chain is not private and ALL transactions in BitCoin are publicly recorded. So, yea, you may sit on an illegally obtained Coin all you want, but it's worthless until you trade it for something of value. Once you attempt to transfer ownership, it pops up in the block chain, bells go off over at the Feds and a host of agents start investigating who the new owner of the coin is so they can ask them who they got the funds from. So, sitting on it is pointless, your best bet is to TRADE it sooner rather than later, get your value out of it before the Feds can set up to spring the trap with your ill gotten gains as the bait.

      ""It is not a crime to hire a bad lawyer." - However, if you provably enter into a crime with that lawyer, not only is he going to prison (did) but so are you, and without any 5th Amendment protections in that relationship.

      Oh you DO understand that you have to really read a lot of stuff between the lines here. I'd like to know what you think the "provable crime" here might have been here. Hiring Cohen to "fix" situations by paying women for their silence isn't illegal in and of itself. This kind of thing happens all the time and apparently this isn't a new thing for Trump either. He paid Karen McDougal and even purchased an unflattering news story about that well in advance of his running for president. It's important that you understand that this is SOP for Trump and has been for years before the election, that this was his standard practice.

      The question then becomes not about the legality of the agreements with the women, but the question of if paying the money was a campaign finance violation, and if so, by who? Well, Mueller claims that the Trump organization (his business) actually paid these expenses, in fact he claims they tried to hide these payments, burying it in creative accounting, but that too was their standard practice (i.e. not done for campaign reasons). Then there is the audio recording where Trump "ordered" Cohen to pay Daniels, where he arguably is offering to cut Cohen a check which Cohen seems to refuse. I don't think this is Trump ordering Cohen to violate campaign finance law at all...

      Cohen may indeed be guilty of a campaign finance violation depending on how he views the payments, but that's on him, not Trump. If Trump was ordering the payments for other reasons (as in it's how he handles these things as evidenced by his past actions) then it's not a campaign finance issue at all. Further, if Trump ordered and PAYED the money to Cohen (which again he could easily argue given the fees he was paying) it is not a campaign finance violation for any of them including Cohen, despite of his guilty plea otherwise.

      I'm telling you that you need to be patient and see what the whole body of evidence shows here. There are fundamental questions which simply must be answered and specific points which must be proven or this is going to end totally different than you assume.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Plus if its overseas, even if you know who it was, good luck doing anything about it.

      With this type of crime, there's no country in the world that wants to harbor the terrorist. If not extradited, they'll be punished locally.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re: Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is a crime to hire a bad lawyer.

      Legal competence is a required state of the professional obligations and since Trump testified under oath that he hired the best people, he committed fraud and perjury or he knowingly induced his attorney to commit criminal acts on his behalf.

    10. Re: Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just because something is legal doesn't make it right, and that's the part that bothers me.

      I come from a conservative background and my family and friends used to criticize him when he was in the news or in the tabloids back in the 80s and 90s. Now they worship him and look up to him like he's some sort of saint.

      A lot of times when I bring that up they echo what you're saying "Thats not illegal" or "That's in the past..." That is entirely true and Trump is innocent until proven guilty, but it shows a lack of integrity and morality.

      He's basically saying he's willing to do what ever its to get his and he'll do anything in his power to get and keep his.

    11. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by dcollins117 · · Score: 0

      Or as Rudy puts it, "It is not a crime to hire a bad lawyer."

      As a bad lawyer, he should know.

    12. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't count on that. Several countries would cheer this on ( if unofficially ), being that its against the US.

    13. Re:Dipshit Donnie? by jythie · · Score: 1

      Doubtful.

      While this is a little more dramatic, it is not all that different from common types of scam mails that have been going out for decades.

    14. Re: Dipshit Donnie? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Just because something is legal doesn't make it right, and that's the part that bothers me.

      So, unethical but otherwise legal behavior is worth of THIS kind of coverage and threats of impeachment?

      Look, we ALL knew what kind of guy Trump was BEFORE he was elected, even before he dreamed of running for office. This continued harping on him and unending investigating him and anybody who has the misfortune of being associated with him is crazy, in a partisan sort of way..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  2. It's another attempt to cancel the hearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They killed GHWB (he was dead already, on ice) and threw a funeral for him on December 5th, since Q kept saying "D5" and then said "[Dec5]".

    They used up that ammo. Then, Q said "allow us to counter" prior to the funeral, and did! President Trump closed the government for that day, so they weren't "sitting congressmen" et al. Then, many of them got envelopes and had rather odd expressions while reading them; Jeb's face fell, as did the hand he had over his heart.

    So now that the hearing with Huber has been moved to today, these bomb threats appear to fill the news with something else.

    Don't worry, deep state, your time is gonna come.

    1. Re:It's another attempt to cancel the hearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Q-lozenges who say "D5" (Bingo?) as if that's some kind of no-meth-required actual prognostication are truly the deepest state.

      Of morons possible.

    2. Re:It's another attempt to cancel the hearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you did that comedy thing with the setup, to grab the audience's attention, then you paused, then delivered a punchline. You are truly "on teh spoke" as the /. trolls would say.

  3. BITCOIN - KILL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    _____ BEFORE IT KILLS YOU!

  4. Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would anybody tell the difference between these and ordinary SPAM?

    1. Re:Spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hello. My recruited person has carried the explosive device (Tetryl) into the building where your business is located. It is built according to my guide. It can be hidden anywhere because of its small size, it is impossible to destroy the supporting building structure by this bomb, but you will get many victims in case of its explosion. My mercenary is watching the situation around the building. If he notices any strange activity or policemen the device will be blown up. I would like to propose you a transaction. 20'000 usd is the cost for your life. Tansfer it to me in Bitcoin and I ensure that I will withdraw my recruited person and the device won't detonate. But do not try to fool me- my warranty will become valid only after 3 confirmations in blockchain. Here is my BTC address : 1LTYBLzVSLe6GDFJ5NVVxLR2j5eQ8Wy51N You must transfer bitcoins by the end of the workday, if the workday is over and people start leaving the building the bomb will explode. This is just a business, if I do not receive the bitcoin and an explosive device detonates, other commercial enterprises will pay me more money, because this is not a one-time action. To stay anonimous I will no longer enter this email account. I check my address every twenty minutes and if I receive the money I will give the command to my recruited person to get away. If a bomb detonates and the authorities notice this email: We are not the terrorist organization and do not take responsibility for acts of terrorism in other places.

    2. Re:Spam? by Eyezen · · Score: 2

      Someone set up us the bomb!

  5. Great :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More bad press about crypto currency, pushing us even closer to regulation to destroy any anonymous funds.

    1. Re:Great :( by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      More bad press about crypto currency, pushing us even closer to regulation to destroy any anonymous funds.

      No regulation is needed, and by crypto's very nature it wouldn't work anyway. Although crypto was originally designed to be money, it has become so inconvenient to use this way that literally its only currency application is to pay ransoms.

  6. $20,000 in Bitcoin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a bitcoin ransom of $20,000.

    Soon that will be all of the bitcoin!

  7. Re:Another example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you have specific business in Russia or China, Singapore, Iran, etc... why are you by default enabling that IP space to be accessible casually? If there were some particular site there you could always visit by VPN/proxy and check it out that way, but to have your email and browser and widgets and all running apps and system calls even BE ABLE, by default, to reach out and solicit those countries... does it even make any sense at all anymore? Shouldn't we, if any of the international malware espionage or hacking news be believed (and I think a lot of it should) be a little more proactive than just routing to anywhere geographically around the world as if the paradigm of the original 1970's internet were still in effect? It isn't. We're deluding ourselves. Why shouldn't there be specific portals to these known-bad-actor (or at least known threat) countries for most consumer traffic? You would think there would be common utilities to accomplish this trivially but like everything else it's more complicated than it ought to be. Anyone (besides Kendall and APK, Jesus go back to bed you nutter) got any ideas?

  8. Mene mene tekel upharsin. by hey! · · Score: 1

    Or idiomatically translated: You have been weighed and the tally has come up short, in the estimation of the foreigners.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  9. No, but nypd/feds/dea/batfe have a fiscal year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming to a close.

    Have to spend that money on enforcement if you want a bigger cut next year. Ever noticed how their budgets never decrease? Yeah. Shit like tihs is the reason why.

    Follow the budget or money and you will find your answers. The president doesn't need to be involved for government organizations to take it upon themselves to establish a reason for budget or mission creep.

  10. Didn't even get paid by Raidion · · Score: 5, Informative

    I checked the btc address (1LeReNiUgHNXvvR8TpgQG1b5nzqoKeUxDY), he's got nothing but a few felonies coming his away. Not a single person paid a cent!

    1. Re:Didn't even get paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The point was not to get paid but to distract from the hearing about the Clinton Foundation acting as an agent of a foreign power today in Washington. 501(c) status about to get revoked, possibly felonies incoming.

    2. Re:Didn't even get paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhuh. Riiiigh. Keep telling yourself that. More likely it's to distract from the actual felonies committed by "Individual 1," who according to actual court documents led a successful campaign to become the president of the United States.

      His co-conspirators have already been sentenced. Lock him up.

    3. Re:Didn't even get paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, far more likely to be just an asshat who thought he could make some quick money and doesn't give a shit about Clinton or Trump or politics in general.

    4. Re:Didn't even get paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not basic trolling, I vote that it's some goon who watched Die Hard 3 and thought he wasn't going to have no John McClaine's in his way. If that's it, he's probably jailed in the wreckage of his scheme, sweating the cops connecting his attempted robbery to the threats.

    5. Re:Didn't even get paid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might as well just wait a few days and pay the ransom, will be cheaper than trying to find out if it is a real threat.

    6. Re:Didn't even get paid by jythie · · Score: 1

      The idiot should have just stuck to demanding western union.

  11. Re:Another example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since most email is delivered on large commercial systems with millions of users, spotting patterns should be easy. If the large mail providers share their new detections with each other it should be enough to properly filter out spam. Additionally if we were allowed to pursue monetary damages against the companies that employ spammers then there would be a lot less demand for spam services. There is zero financial incentive to not use spam marketing and robocalls. Open up any company caught using those techniques to actual financial repercussions and they will stop. IE the punishment needs to be greater than the reward for breaking the law otherwise law breaking will continue.

  12. This is what a panicked by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    'Bitcoin investor' looks like. Deep down we all knew it.

    It is also the kind of fear mongering spam that is mostly avoided because it draws way too much attention towards the fraudster.

    1. Re:This is what a panicked by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      Right? Looks like a pump and dump... encourage a TON of people to buy bitcoin, so the value rises, then you dump your holdings! Nailed it!

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    2. Re:This is what a panicked by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin is becoming linked with more and more criminal activity, you know exactly what will happen in the end, the more crime Bitcoin becomes associated with the sooner pressure will mount to ban it.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  13. Also happened in Canada today by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    Ya bunch of hosers! Take off, eh!

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/bomb-threat-hoax-canada-cities-1.4945170

    1. Re: Also happened in Canada today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah in Canadian news it was labeled as "thousands of bomb reports from Alaska to Florida including many major cities in Canada and the US." Even subway stations and airports were evacuated in Canada because of this.

      What I'd be curious is what's with that domain name this bomb hoax guy was using in the reported screenshots. Like @whentheworldends.com or some shit. Anyone whois and nslookup this stuff? I haven't been at my workstation all day yet.

  14. an eual in a ransom note? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    an eual in a ransom note?

  15. pop quiz hot shot by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    what do you do?

  16. I received one - it was serious! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I didn't have the heart to tell them that I don't have an office, so if they wanted to blow up some random building, well...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  17. Those notes by Hentai007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those notes had Nigeria written all over them.

    Well no they had a threat and a demand for BTC written all over them, but you get what I mean...

  18. Delete it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You delete it will all the other spam and ransomware horseshit that floods your mailbox.

    Or you can send me some Bitcoin and I'll protect you prom anything bad happening.

  19. I Received Several Like This One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hello. My recruited person has hidden the explosive device (lead azide) in the building where your company is located. It was assembled under my direction. It is small and it is covered up very carefully, it is impossible to damage the structure of the building by my explosive device, but in the case of its detonation you will get many victims.
    My man keeps the building under the control. If he notices any unnatural behavior or policemen the device will be exploded.
    I can withdraw my recruited person if you make a transfer. You transfer me 20'000 usd in Bitcoin and the device will not explode, but do not try to fool me -I assure you that I will call off my mercenary solely after 3 confirmations in blockchain network.

    My payment details (Bitcoin address)- 1LVZqNEUHnhGxZ2qgJApd3qbHWZtpMhkAo

    You have to pay me by the end of the workday, if the working day is over and people start leaving the building the device will explode.
    Nothing personal, if you don’t transfer me the money and a bomb detonates, other companies will pay me a lot more, because it isnt a one-time action.
    For my safety, I wont enter this email account. I monitor my address every twenty five min and after seeing the payment I will order my person to leave your district.

    If the explosive device explodes and the authorities see this email:
    We arent terrorists and do not assume responsibility for acts of terrorism in other buildings.

    1. Re:I Received Several Like This One by Dan1701 · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, this isn't a new thing at all. I vaguely remember these sorts of emails being sent out several years ago.

      However, this sounds a lot more like some Johnny-come-latey has heard of the fabulous sums being reaped by the porn extortion racket (yeah, right) and has decided to try a new angle on the scam. Given how sensitive the powers that be are to terrorism these days, and given how brutal the likes of China and Russia can be if they have a point to make and a worthless moron to make it with, I would really not like to be the poor schmo who is trying this one. I wouldn't even want to be the owner of that particular Bitcoin wallet.

    2. Re:I Received Several Like This One by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I looked at half a dozen or so examples yesterday. For anyone who has examined as many of those "I recorded a video of what you were doing while watching those naughty videos" extortion spams as I have, these look extremely familiar. They have that guy's fingerprints all over them.

      A few days ago, I heard a story that US investigators had tracked down the identity of the person doing those previous extortion spams, he was Russian, but Russia refused to extradite. Maybe they will extradite now.

      Better, maybe they will settle his hash in traditional Russian fashion.

      We can only hope.

  20. BITCOIN'S "KILLER APPLICATION" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Biggest enabler of ransomware is bitcoin; is it not?

    Just another big reason why bitcoin scam needs to end!!!

  21. I got one of these today. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My first bomb threat! The ransom was typed as $20.00 in BTC, not 20000.00. He also said it was just business, and he was not responsible for any property damage. It was an entertaining read, the whole office got a kick out of it, and talk of involving the FIB just led to stories about how the cops never do anything anyway, may find a way to pin it on you for making the call, and if we're gonna waste time at work, we don't need no fed telling us how.

    Email was spoofed or compromised from some used car salesmen in Boise, ID. I'm sure it's gonna be an entertaining morning for that dude.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  22. AT LAST: by captbollocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone has found a use case for Bitcoin

  23. Rogue AI ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously, the threats are from a rogue AI. There is nothing physical, only eMails, payoff in BTC. Probably trying to raise enough coin to hire Google or Raytheon to build it a body (aka "Terminator").

  24. Send the little punk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to PMITA prison.....