Slashdot Mirror
Burnout, Stress Lead More Companies To Try a Four-Day Work Week (reuters.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: Work four days a week, but get paid for five? It sounds too good to be true, but companies around the world that have cut their work week have found that it leads to higher productivity, more motivated staff and less burnout. "It is much healthier and we do a better job if we're not working crazy hours," said Jan Schulz-Hofen, founder of Berlin-based project management software company Planio, who introduced a four-day week to the company's 10-member staff earlier this year.
In New Zealand, trust company Perpetual Guardian reported a fall in stress and a jump in staff engagement after it tested a 32-hour week earlier this year. Even in Japan, the government is encouraging companies to allow Monday mornings off, although other schemes in the workaholic country to persuade employees to take it easy have had little effect. Britain's Trades Union Congress (TUC) is pushing for the whole country to move to a four-day week by the end of the century, a drive supported by the opposition Labour party. The TUC argues that a shorter week is a way for workers to share in the wealth generated by new technologies like machine learning and robotics, just as they won the right to the weekend off during the industrial revolution.
In New Zealand, trust company Perpetual Guardian reported a fall in stress and a jump in staff engagement after it tested a 32-hour week earlier this year. Even in Japan, the government is encouraging companies to allow Monday mornings off, although other schemes in the workaholic country to persuade employees to take it easy have had little effect. Britain's Trades Union Congress (TUC) is pushing for the whole country to move to a four-day week by the end of the century, a drive supported by the opposition Labour party. The TUC argues that a shorter week is a way for workers to share in the wealth generated by new technologies like machine learning and robotics, just as they won the right to the weekend off during the industrial revolution.
What good does having an extra day off if you're just going to be interrupted by the BOFH who refuses to follow any company policies and calls you on your personal line any time they want?
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
Many companies are striving to relieve their employees of burnout and stress through "early retirement offers" and "layoffs" thus taking the "work" out of "work/life balance". It's great for the companies, but not so much for the former employees and the remaining employees who have to take up the slack.
...whether they want it or not -- so they can still be considered "part time," with no benefits.
The 4x10 work week is great for people with low to moderate stress desk jobs. It's awesome because they work the same cycle of 1.5-3 high productivity hours each day and the rest filler, faffing, and socializing. The huge WLB benefit is having a weekday to deal with all the bullshit personal business which is not available after hours or on the weekend (e.g. every interaction with state and similar -- all the shit businesses working banker's hours).
It's an awful idea in healthcare, emergency services, and law enforcement; the same applies to 3x12/4x12 cycling hot in healthcare specifically. The only reason it's being pushed in those fields successfully is each one of those lacks oversight, accounting, and personal responsibility for mistakes up to and including death of those being served. And it's just piles of additional days off for those people who corner themselves (accident I swear) into as much overtime as the bosses will let them get away with.
Side note: these remarks apply to the US. I've heard the rest of the world is mostly more reasonable and people who work public service jobs are actually interested in public service rather than Cadillac pension plans.
Grow a pair.
Yes. You heard me. Grow a pair.
The minute you say, "No", is the minute they back off. You work too much, because you're afraid they might decide they don't need you. But, if they needed you so much to force you to work that much, they need you too much to fire you.
Simply say, "No. You don't pay me for that. You pay for 40 hours. You got 40 hours. See you Monday."
Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
in the 20s, 30s 40s and even up till the 60s there was talk of less and less hours. And then it just stopped. 40 hours was "standard" with most doing 50+. Why the hell was it so easy to get the working class to work so hard for so little and just grin and bear it?
For the record, 86% of the manufacturing jobs lost were due to automation, not outsourcing. We're not being out-competed, there's just plain less work to do. And instead of working less we're all fighting among ourselves to see who gets to be the lucky guy that gets to do what little work is left.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
A company I worked at had a 9/80 schedule. you worked 9 hour days, got every other friday off and the friday on was a 1/2 day. It worked out really nicely easy to schedule all those errands that you normally have to fit in after or before work. Though I must say that the best contract I had was 4/32 and you could pick friday or monday as the day off it was amazing how refreshed you were at the start of each week after a 3 day weekend and it didn't hurt that I was also able to work from home a day each week as well.
People have. The average white-collar worker does about two to three hours of productive work per day. The rest is playing on the Internet, chatting, wandering the halls, daydreaming, etc.
Many jobs are superfluous. Apparently, some people in these superfluous jobs experience significant amounts of stress due to having to convince themselves that their job is actually useful.