Slashdot Mirror
Two Android Apps Used In Combat By US Troops Contained Severe Vulnerabilities (zdnet.com)
According to a Navy Inspector General report, U.S. military troops used two Android apps that contained severe vulnerabilities in live combat scenarios. "The two apps are named KILSWITCH (Kinetic Integrated Low-Cost Software Integrated Tactical Combat Handheld) and APASS (Android Precision Assault Strike Suite)," reports ZDNet. From the report: Both apps work by showing satellite imagery of surroundings, including objectives, mission goals, nearby enemy and friendly forces. The two apps work as a modern-day replacement for radios and paper maps and allow troops to use a real-time messaging client to coordinate with other military branches, and even call in air-strike support with a few simple screen taps, according to a DARPA press release and accompanying YouTube video. The apps have been under development since 2012 and starting 2015, they have been made generally available to all U.S. troops via a public app store managed by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. But according to a Navy Inspector General report from March that was made public today, both apps contained vulnerabilities that could have allowed enemy forces access to troops' information.
The heavily redacted report doesn't detail the nature of the two vulnerabilities, but it does point out that the Navy had failed to control the distribution of these two applications, and later failed to act in warning troops of the danger they were in for almost a year. The report says that the two apps, KILSWITCH and APASS, were never meant or approved to be deployed in live combat zones. But the two apps, because of their flashy features and easier to use interface, became wildly popular among U.S. troops, but also other military branches, including foreign allied forces.
The heavily redacted report doesn't detail the nature of the two vulnerabilities, but it does point out that the Navy had failed to control the distribution of these two applications, and later failed to act in warning troops of the danger they were in for almost a year. The report says that the two apps, KILSWITCH and APASS, were never meant or approved to be deployed in live combat zones. But the two apps, because of their flashy features and easier to use interface, became wildly popular among U.S. troops, but also other military branches, including foreign allied forces.
"call in air-strike support with a few simple screen taps" ...
"The two apps, KILSWITCH and APASS, were never meant or approved to be deployed in combat zones."
So it has an "airstrike" button, but it was never meant to be used in war zones. Where, exactly was it meant to be used? I suppose it would be useful for handling used car dealers and pay day lenders?
For every 10 triggerpuller "Failed jock-strap douche bags" as you put it, there is a literal army of support personnel. An infantryman is not fooling around with tech like this, that's commos job, and the reason their not all dead is in part because commo don't fuck around with toys like this.
As a commo guy who has deployed to Afghanistan during OEF, I can tell you... The toys are all compromised. Every piece of tech not deemed mission critical is 100% owned by all of the pirated entertainment that gets shuffled around in theater. Every soldier on an outpost has a laptop with enough pirated holywood content on it to shame even the most unabashed pirate back home. It's all traded like baseball cards, and run on any damn thing with a screen that can be found.
Cam rips are "publicly" screened in the USO lounge in Khandahar. There are some real tools that get real field usage, but your not going to read about them on slashdot.
I was given the chance to"Demo" a lot of this kind of toy. At the end of the day they all have the same problem. Reliability. Real fighting men don't use these stupid toys for the same reason they take the scope off their rifle when qualifying with it. They can't be trusted when it counts.
Also, fuck you, you whimpy little bitch. The failed jockstrap douche eating dirt on the other side of the planet is why your ass is still speaking english.
You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
Have gnu, will travel.
They get their software from a public app store? Do they get targeted ads during combat?
Yemen. Other people's war zones don't count.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
It's fake news. For one, you don't take security hazards like an Android into battle and two, you don't ADVERTISE it's flaws to your adversaries on the news if they were real. Some poor SOB's in a tent are gonna be trying to download these apps to hack, and WHAM, a MOAB drops on them out of nowhere.
Things are not what they seem under the fog of war.
Should the troops not get their entertainment they get distracted. They start to miss home.
The esprit de corps becomes a need for entertainment and how to share entertainment.
US mil networks and computers are then used to "attempt" to copy any new entertainment.
With their own unlimited entertainment that need to be distracted to look for entertainment is reduced.
People feel more happy in the US mil and might even stay longer in the US mil as they have their own entertainment when not on duty.
Bad things happen when a lack of entertainment and lifestyle problems start in mil a camp/fort/base/port.
Should the US mil go back to a total ban on all entertainment? The only mission ready tech that is fully NSA and GCHQ passed and approved?
Back to mil/gov approved movies, books and magazines?
The troops start to look for anyone with entertainment outside the camp/fort/base/port.
People who can go off base to get new and more entertainment become the centre of attention. That breaks rank and unit cohesion as the person who has the new "entertainment" gets to become friends with a lot of people.
Fraud and corruption sets in. MP and CID undercover work has to start again as "entertainment" products become something of value to people who cant often get new and more "entertainment".
The US mil solution to this is to allow "entertainment" to all as it keeps its troops from wondering around outside away from base meeting spies and criminals with endless "entertainment" for sale.
Conversations start, lifestyles and US base gossip spreads. Enemy spies gather a lot from every meeting with US troops seeking more entertainment and a conversation.
US mil equipment can be swapped/sold for "entertainment" too. Good prices, good trade.
Romeo spy networks that offer "entertainment" rather than friendship start around every base.
Once the lifestyles and interests of the entire US mil command structure is understood, enemy spies start to have other conversations.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
He's actually not. If you have an Android device I highly recommend paying a visit to https://myactivity.google.com/ Putin is the strongest leader in the world right now, because they dominate in cyber warfare and he's a baddass. Trump is nothing more than a glorified reality tv star and a lardass.
Why would they even allow these apps on equipment that is also used to watch pirated entertainment? This sort of equipment should be locked down, with stuff like Bluetooth (and sometimes WiFi) physically disabled, USB ports locked, and connectivity restricted to the tactical network or whatever. You’ll have a hard time getting compromised apps on these terminals to exploit that weakness, let alone getting your apps to phone home. And that’s nothing new, rules for equipment running stuff at a certain level of classification already exist. If someone decided to distribute this app, which displays objectives, troop positions, fire missions etc. to every soldier on BYOD devices or open military issued ones, then someone “done messed up but good.”
As for soldiers using them, you’re only partly right. They will use these toys if they are deemed useful (the article suggests that this is the case). However if something gets in the way, the software doesn’t work, the network is down or there is a hardware issue, they will drop them in a heartbeat and fall back on other tools. Its not an aversion to high tech (on the contrary, they are just as eager to try new things as the rest of us are). Rather, it’s a low tolerance for defects. In the field, one does not have the time to fiddle around with iffy equipment.
If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
War games.
They almost certainly meant that it had been approved for use in exercises and war games in order to evaluate it with the intent of determining whether it would be approved for use in combat, but had not yet approved it's use in combat situations likely in fear of problems like this exact vulnerability.
The failed jockstrap douche eating dirt on the other side of the planet is why your ass is still speaking English.
I support the troops. In fact I did eight years in the reserve myself, including getting orders to Kuwait during Desert Storm (though my unit and I didn't actually go; that's a weird story), and many members of my family serve and have served in active duty, guard and reserve roles, including in active combat theaters. On Memorial Day we raise full-sized, period-appropriate flags over the graves of all of my ancestors who were veterans, and there are a lot of them.
So I'm not disrespecting the military when I say that the quoted statement above is dead wrong.
There has been no serious threat of invasion of the sort that would result in a change of government and change of culture and language in the United States' entire history. Even in WWII there was no serious threat of invasion of the mainland. I suppose if the Axis had succeeded in taking the rest of the world they might have eventually decided to try a strike across the pond, but it would have been tough (less because of the bravery of the American soldier than the productivity of the American worker, but both would have been relevant -- as would the "rifle behind every blade of grass" as the apocryphal quote says). During the Cold War there was some risk of nuclear destruction of the US mainland, but not invasion.
For the vast majority of US history, US military power has all been about projecting power around the world, not defending the homeland. Yes, this has had benefits to people back home, but the benefits have been primarily economic. By encouraging the growth of liberal democracy around the world and an associated atmosphere of international openness, free trade and mutual support, we've made a better world for ourselves and most of the rest of the world. We've all gotten wealthier, happier, safer.
But there have been no threats to our choice of language or culture or form of government. Or our freedom. When people say that soldiers "defend our freedom", they're factually wrong. American soldiers often do defend other peoples' freedom, and always defend our national interests, including economic interests (and, BTW, defending our economic interest is a Good Thing, leftist whining notwithstanding). There's plenty to be lauded in the truth; no reason to make up lies.
No, the only threats to our freedom have been purely domestic. And we can largely thank activists and lawyers for the battles we've won there, not soldiers. And there have been no threats to our choice of spoken language at all. No, not even from immigrants.
Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.