Slashdot Mirror


FCC Fines Swarm $900,000 For Unauthorized Satellite Launch (reuters.com)

Swarm Technologies will pay a $900,000 fine for launching and operating four small experimental communications satellites that risked "satellite collisions" and threatened "critical commercial and government satellite operations," the FCC said on Thursday. "The California-based start-up founded by former Google and Apple engineers in 2016 also agreed to enhanced FCC oversight and a requirement of pre-launch notices to the FCC for three years," reports Reuters. From the report: Swarm launched the satellites in India last January after the FCC rejected its application to deploy and operate them, citing concerns about the company's tracking ability. It said Swarm had unlawfully transmitted signals between earth stations in the state of Georgia and the satellites for over a week. The investigation also found that Swarm performed unauthorized weather balloon-to-ground station tests and other unauthorized equipment tests prior to the satellites' launch. Swarm aims to provide low-cost space-based internet service and plans eventually to use a constellation of 100 satellites.

16 of 119 comments (clear)

  1. Now this is how you avert global warming by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Funny

    By the time the race of various companies to deploy swarms of satellites to provide internet is over, solar rays won't even be able to reach the Earth, much less warm it...

    The globe will appear wholly a steel orb from above. Only that dude driving the Tesla Space Roadster will be able to get a tan.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Now this is how you avert global warming by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lets do some back of the envelope calculations.

      The total revenue of all ISPs in the world is apparently about 600 billion dollars per year. A falcon 9 launch costs about 60 million dollars. So total worldwide ISP revenue could pay for about ten thousand launches per year. Lets ignore the cost of the sattelites themselves and the availability of radio channels to communicate with them. Lets say that goes on for 10 years making a hundred thousand launches. Lets say each one launches 25 small sattelites that weigh a ton each and are about the size of a car with an area of about 5 square meters.

      So in our somewhat ludicrous scenario we have a total of 1.25*10^7 square meters of satellites. The surface area of the earth is about 5*10^14 square meters.

      Satellites won't be blocking out the sun any time soon.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re: Now this is how you avert global warming by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2

      The space junk will be blocking on-trivial launches, though.

      All so Facebook users can share their baby pictures and cat videos. And so Amazon can spam their mail order catalogs.

  2. 100 Satellite Swarm by mentil · · Score: 2

    I'm really wondering how this startup, hoping to deploy up to 100 satellites, is going to have the infrastructure or economy of scale to offer cheaper service than Iridium Next (with 75 satellites) or SpaceX's 12,000 Starlink satellites.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re: 100 Satellite Swarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1) raise funds
      2) spend funds on proof of concept. Lie about future costs
      3) raise lots more funds.
      4) huge pay raise, bonuses and company leases all around.
      5( bankruptcy.

      Remember, excessive optimism is legally distinct from fraud, even if it looks realllllllllly similar.

  3. Re: jurisdiction by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, but it *does* unambiguously have jurisdiction over the transmitters the company operated in Georgia.

  4. Re:jurisdiction by rossdee · · Score: 2

    Especially as they were launched from India

  5. America is circling the drain by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    America isn't much of a space power anymore. The rest of the world and the corporations it has surrendered its launch capacity to should tell Uncle Sam to just fuck off.

    Russia, China and India are already eating America's lunch. No doubt Kim Jung Nukem will soon be putting up satellites whenever they like, and telling the US to take a long, hard suck on his Taepodong.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:America is circling the drain by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      This has nothing to do with America's space power and everything to do with an American company using American airwaves refusing to follow the rules laid out by the regulator for this sort of thing.

  6. Re:jurisdiction by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

    last time i checked, the fcc didn't own outer space

    According to the consent decree any entity launching satellites wishing to serve a U.S. market must adhere to all commission rules. Swarm's satellites becomes subject to US jurisdiction the moment one of their satellites transmits or receives a signal to or from a US destination or source.

    Also, as a US company, Swarm is automatically subject to US jurisdiction, and they must adhere to FCC rules and licensing requirements prior to operation of any radio equipment on a ground station or on a satellite in orbit.

  7. Just to clarify by Solandri · · Score: 5, Informative

    The fine isn't for putting satellites in orbit via India after permission from the U.S. was denied. And it's not for operating said satellites after their launch per se. Those factors probably contributed to the FCC being harsh with this company, but they're not the justification for the fine.

    The fine is for transmitting on certain frequencies reserved for communications with satellites. Broadcasting on those frequencies requires a license from the FCC, which this company apparently didn't obtain. According to TFA, they've now obtained that license, and are operating the satellites again.

    1. Re:Just to clarify by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >"The fine is for transmitting on certain frequencies reserved for communications with satellites. Broadcasting on those frequencies requires a license from the FCC,"

      Exactly. There might be a lot of hate on Slashdot toward the FCC for perhaps exceeding their mandate in certain other issues, but THIS particular example is exactly why the FCC exists. If anyone were allowed to just broadcast on whatever frequencies they like for whatever purpose they like, critical infrastructure could be severely impaired and cause real damage/loss/chaos.

  8. Re:We can't have that! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Informative

    No wonder the FCC is up in arms. A new ISP that is independent from cables down here? That could cut into the profit margins of their masters!

    Actually, the problem is that the satellites are smaller than 10cm in one of their dimensions and thus may become untrackable. The US has a duty and authority under the Outer Space Treaty to regulate their citizens to ensure continued access to space for all. Since Swarm Technologies is a US company, it falls under this jurisdiction. India is also a signatory to the treaty and shouldn't have launched this payload if the US didn't approve it.

    From the wiki article:

    "the activities of non-governmental entities in outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies, shall require authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate State Party to the Treaty" and that States Parties shall bear international responsibility for national space activities whether carried out by governmental or non-governmental entities.

    What's absolutely retarded is that it's easy to make your tiny satellite larger artificially by inflating it. No additional mechanism, you just put a few grams of benzoic acid in a balloon and it will self inflate when it's in space.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  9. Never seen a satellite dish? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    I guess you've never seen a satellite dish?
    It actually matters where you point it.

    Btw, I'm transmitting this message to Slashdot's server, with instructions to post it (htttp verb "POST").

  10. Re:jurisdiction by mysidia · · Score: 2

    I got news for you about transmissions... they arent "to" a specific place.

    It doesn't matter. The US government has worldwide jurisdiction to regulate ALL the activities of any entity that either
    (1) Is US-based, or (2) Operates in the United States --- operating in the US includes doing any business in the US, residing in the US, or having any substantial activity in the US even through a subsidiary, partnership, or outsourcing arrangement ----- transmitting signals while over US airspace or that can be received at a location in the United States --- and definitely includes all operations of any US-based ground station.

  11. Re:How much power does the FCC have? by jythie · · Score: 2

    Then the FCC would not care. Their whole thing is trying to regulate a limited shared resource: spectrum. If someone develops a communication method that does not have this problem, the FCC likely is not going to care since it does not impact the things they are tasked with regulating.