Slashdot Mirror


Tech Firm Sigfox Develops Tiny Tracker To Help Fight Rhino Poaching (reuters.com)

French tech company Sigfox has developed a bite-size tracker that can be inserted into the horns of rhinos to help conservationists monitor and protect the endangered species. From a report: With the dramatic decline of animal species in the past century mostly due to poaching and urban expansion, wildlife organizations have turned to technology to help safeguard species being pushed towards extinction. The global number of rhinos dwindled to about 20,000 a decade ago due to relentless poaching, though they have rebounded to about 29,000 thanks to conservation efforts. Cameras, infrared and motion sensors, electronic bracelets and drones have been used over the years to protect endangered species, but have at times been limited by vast distances and limited resources in the countries concerned. Sigfox, known for building networks that link objects to the internet, has developed sensors able to give the exact location of rhinos using the firm's network over a longer period of time. [...] The sensors can alert park rangers when rhinos approach an area identified as particularly dangerous due to previous instances of poaching. Combined with other warning sensors, they can be used to get rescue teams to the location in real time.

46 comments

  1. Especially one great famous Rhino! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Especially one great famous Rhino living in the area between San Jose and Palo Alto.

    1. Re:Especially one great famous Rhino! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Do you mean RINO?

    2. Re:Especially one great famous Rhino! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea that was the joke bro.

    3. Re:Especially one great famous Rhino! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a shitty joke, brah.

    4. Re:Especially one great famous Rhino! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reimer Is Not Online?

    5. Re:Especially one great famous Rhino! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Correct. He announced in a tweet in November that he left Slashdot.

      After two long years I can finally leave @slashdot. My trolls are more interested in falsely accusing other users of being me than they are in harassing me. The timing is good. My first year of posting weekly videos and my 100th video on YouTube is in six weeks. Busy, busy, busy.

    6. Re:Especially one great famous Rhino! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing creimer. For a guy claiming to not be creimer you sure do know all the links to all his social media accounts.

  2. Target the customers by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    Poison the horn with chemical castration drugs.

    1. Re:Target the customers by Z80a · · Score: 1

      In terms of "solutions" like that i was thinking more on terms of killer drones.
      Of course, the poachers will start to use drones on their own and shit will get whizzy.

    2. Re:Target the customers by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Poison the horn

      Now there's an idea. If there is a large enough scare about it killing the users then people may actually stop seeking it. However, this doesn't stop poachers from moving onto another animal. A better solution would be to spray certain animals weekly (via drone?) with the malaria virus which is harmless to them but quite harmful and contagious for humans. This would likely wipe out the poachers, the distributors, the end users and everyone around them. If I didn't care about my fellow humans then this would be the ideal solution.

      with chemical castration drugs.

      That won't work as what you describe is something that needs to be taken daily.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re: Target the customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Something lethal to only humans, absorbed through the skin, would be more appropriate than castration. Killing the poachers and consumers would solve the problem outright.

    4. Re:Target the customers by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If it was about boners, Viagra would have saved the Rhino.

      It's about conspicuous consumption. They want the horns because they are expensive and will impress their friends.

      Fake horns could destroy the market. Build a 3d Rhino horn printer that takes fingernail clippings as feedstock.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Target the customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as soon as the poisoned rhino horn gave chinks en masse a permanent flaccid cock, they'd immediately stop using it.

    6. Re:Target the customers by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You assume there is significant actual rhino horn in the product currently being sold.

      The really rich ones, have cups made out of the horns, which somehow is supposed to make the liquid in the cup effective.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re:Target the customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The really rich ones, have cups made out of the horns, which somehow is supposed to make the liquid in the cup effective.

      LOL, you mean like those gold plated pimp cups all the rappers had a bunch of years ago?

      They were awesome.

    8. Re:Target the customers by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "with chemical castration drugs.

      That won't work as what you describe is something that needs to be taken daily."

      The thing is, the horn doesn't work either but people believe it.

      Flood the internet with videos showing rhinos with a drug-filled hoodies soaking on their horn for a couple of days and explain that consuming any of it makes you impotent and sterile for years.
      Push it on every media in Asia for months.
      I bet it would make a dent.

    9. Re:Target the customers by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      The thing is, the horn doesn't work either but people believe it.

      Your solution is problematic because most end users don't even know they are ingesting ground up rhino horn.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    10. Re:Target the customers by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Maybe not poison, but a permanent dye of an unpleasant color would serve to make them undesirable on the black market.

    11. Re:Target the customers by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      https://science.slashdot.org/s...

      Ask them how successful they are.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  3. The obvious question to ask: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have they properly secured these tracking devices so that the poachers can't hack into the system and find their prey easily? Or is this going to be another iteration of typical 'IoT' crap, where nobody even bothered to use basic encryption or passwords more complicated than 'password123'?

    1. Re:The obvious question to ask: by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Given the state of IoT, it's not an unreasonable question to ask. I poked around a bit, and it looks like this company (based in France) at least seems to take security seriously: https://www.wndgroup.io/2017/0...

      They use a fundamentally different technology than most IoT products, broadcasting a unique protocol over their own radio networks, and appear to focus on industrial products like water meters rather than consumer devices. Of course anyone can say anything, but it sounds like they're not as likely to make the same sort of braindead security mistakes as some random Chinese manufacturer selling cheap consumer crap.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    2. Re:The obvious question to ask: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      My concern would be making the mistake of relying on 'security via obscurity', using the fact that they use a proprietary communication protocol and calling it 'good enough'. Considering the value of the 'objects' being tracked I'd hope they'd go the extra mile to be sure no 3rd parties could gain access to their network.

    3. Re:The obvious question to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Security doesn't even particularly matter. Triangulating the source of a signal doesn't require being able to understand the signal, so unless these are somehow placed with directional satellite antennas that reliably point upwards, they can be used by poachers to locate rhinos.

    4. Re:The obvious question to ask: by mspohr · · Score: 1

      TFA is remarkably free of tech content and specs so only can speculate.
      It does say the device only wakes up and broadcasts intermittently so difficult to track by it's transmissions. They should also encrypt the data so location can't be decoded.
      They could use something like LoRa which supports long range, low power, low bitrate data transmission and can be set up as a wide area mesh.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:The obvious question to ask: by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      Security! Seriously, Worry about the whole damn RF signal as it is probably the only 900 MHz around for miles. Even if it is spread spectrum it should not be too hard to track in the Savannah.

    6. Re:The obvious question to ask: by PPH · · Score: 1

      Shhh!

      The obvious tactic is to deploy a bunch of these trackers inside of a trap. Surrounded by military and law enforcement. The poachers go in but never come out.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    7. Re:The obvious question to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigfox is not encrypted. The protocol is quite simple, so if you want to build a sniffer you most likely will succeed. However, they stress this quite clearly in their marketing materials, if you need encryption you can add it yourself before the modem.

  4. speed detection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could they notice when a horn starts going over 40mph? Say like when a poacher is driving off with the horn?
    btw: Old Chinese guys trust ancient secrets more than medical science. They want the horn used by their grandfathers, not pill used by Murica.

    1. Re:speed detection by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Old guys have a huge blind spot when it comes to making their wang hard!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. Possession punishable by death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always said the only way to stop rhino horn & elephant tusk poaching is to make possession of either punishable by summary execution worldwide. Literally from positive ID of said item to a bullet in the skull within seconds. Any existing pieces in private hands worth saving should be given to a museum, the rest destroyed.
    These are critically endangered animals and when they're gone, they're gone whereas there's over 7 billion humans; the execution of a few thousand of whom would actually have a net benefit to the environment.

    Once possessing even a tiny quantity is rhino horn is a guaranteed death sentence, especially combined with a number of sting operations resulting in public executions, should reduce the demand by a huge factor.

    1. Re:Possession punishable by death by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, remove all the horns and tusks from the wild animals so there is no profit to be gained by killing them to remove the horns and tusks?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Possession punishable by death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Rhinos still get killed, as the poachers figure it will save them from tracking a de-horned animal next week.

  6. Additional benefit by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    The new trackers also help the Rhinos count their steps more accurately than the Fitbits used in the prototype phase.

    [ and, poaching a Rhino seems inefficient and dumb vs. broiling ... :-) ]

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  7. Another solution by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Instead of all the expensive, high tech stuff, might the just allow people to raise and harvest rhinos? When tried in South Africa, the rhino population spiked and the poaching dipped (why take the chance of getting nabbed poaching what has become a commodity item?)

    Of course, the "animal protectionist" don't care for that idea, because . . . REASONS?

    Alligator farming became a thing in the southern US, providing a valuable source of handbags, shoes and tough, tasteless, chewy meat, and the alligators are becoming the pests that they once were.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Another solution by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Get back to me with the prototype for a Rhino-proof fence...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Another solution by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Instead of all the expensive, high tech stuff, might the just allow people to raise and harvest rhinos?

      Alligator farming became a thing in the southern US,

      Now I really like that idea! In some southern US states, feral pigs are a serious problem. Apparently, they can be overly ornery.

      A rhino might be able to mix it up with them . . . as in, the rhino says to the feral pig:

      "You think you bad, mutha fucka? You think you bad?"

      providing a valuable source of handbags, shoes and tough, tasteless, chewy meat, and the alligators are becoming the pests that they once were.

      I think that minor detail can be solved when the winter cold kills the gorillas, or something like that.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Another solution by someoneOtherThanMe · · Score: 1

      I guess the one Mexico is saving money to pay for should do? There's even prior art: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  8. Better idea by PPH · · Score: 2

    Arrange some safaris for mercenarys. No penalties, take as many poachers as you wish.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  9. Stupid question: by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    So, um, the POACHERS can't use these trackers to find the location of the animals they are hunting?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  10. like most low power IoT, probably better with LoRa by Brulath · · Score: 1

    It looks like a neat little unit; a few seconds into the video they show a potted device with a sigfox module on one side, another photo shows a GNSS module on the other (with a patch antenna on top, similar to this), and a Saft LS14250 LiSOCl2 battery (nominally 4.3 Wh). A GNSS position fix consumes up to ~1 mWh, and a Sigfox transmission should consume less than that, so they should have more than enough energy budget to last the three years comfortably.

    Interestingly if they'd used LoRaWAN instead they may not have needed the GNSS module. Sigfox's geolocation via radio signal strength has a precision of 1 - 10 km, whereas LoRaWAN can use multilateration (time difference of arrival) and get down to ~200 metres. That should be more than enough precision to track a rhino's movement towards a dangerous area, which means the device could last longer without using a GNSS module. LoRa competes with Sigfox, so someone else would have to do it, but it could be an interesting approach to animal tracking.

  11. Variety of sensors by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    I was looking recently at some of the sensor options after I saw something about a water alert one (put it on the floor in flood-prone areas, it alerts if water is detected) with a multi-year battery life.

    There are a variety of other sensors available and I was thinking about use for server room temperature monitoring (possibly also door opening?), but the network coverage in the USA is only regional.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:Variety of sensors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your eye on the Australian company Myriota.

      It recently launched its first satellite in what will grow to be a fleet for receiving data from low power, long-life transmitter/sensor packages. Most of their secret sauce is apparently in doing the signal processing "in the cloud" rather than on the satellite.

  12. Why not cut off the horns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't they tranquilize the rhinos and cut off their horns to eliminate the appeal of poaching?

  13. Warning: Sadistic levels of satire approaching... by CyberRacer · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the simplest solution be to simply kill all the rhinos thus removing the source of illicit trade? Besides, how they cook their rhinos is their own business. I prefer deep fried rhino to poached.

  14. Pssst ... secret trackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article published about 'secret' trackers mysteriously makes it harder to catch poachers ...