Additionally, the only egress path was blocked since the hatch was designed to open inwards. Under all that pressure it was impossible to open from the inside.
Wouldn't the simplest solution be to simply kill all the rhinos thus removing the source of illicit trade? Besides, how they cook their rhinos is their own business. I prefer deep fried rhino to poached.
Truthspace:
We are each reflections of both god and demon,
thus cursed with the emergent gift of free will.
The choices are yours alone.
Choose wisely.
You touch on the importance of the Amiga (yes, I do miss my beautiful 2000/68030), but by and large emulators do run better today than than the originals. The point that's being missed is that it was a philosophy of design that made it so special. Take the things that suck up the most CPU cycles and offload them to hardware, then seemlessly (more or less) integrate them back into the os. Today gpus, soundcards, etc perform the same functions. In order for any "new" Amiga to be anything more than than just sentimentality on steroids, it's going to require an extension of the philosophy, and not just hacking on a few more modern ports. For example, one might consider incorporating machine learning, not just in hardware, but as an integrated part of the os as well. Anything short of that simply can't be competitive in today's market. Just for the record, I still fire up uae or winfellow once in a while to relive the heavy playing, heavy drinking glory days.
I think it's important to note that all context is tied to action. State (nouns) carries no inate sense of context with it. It's only when an action takes place that dependencies and conditionals come into play. The fact that you are awake or asleep is just a state. If I try to talk (action) to you, THEN your state becomes significant (context).
Change of state is only accomplished through action ergo all context is aquired through action.
Verb you, ya bunch of nouns!
The problem (as I see it) is one of context. Each answer is possible, but given "context", one answer will be more likely than another. It's this notion of context that's the difficult part to grok, and must be accounted for in any system intended for "intelligent" processing.
Given that SOMEone is going to weaponize ai, isn't nicer to know who we're supposed to be watching? Better to know it's google than be blind to the fact that it's probably also being developed in some under ice bunker in the arctic by Killco Inc.
Better the evil you know than the one you don't.
Why? What is so important about everyone else that you have to have the ability.. Let alone time to run EVERYbody elses life... Wtf... Get a clue.... Sing, dance, learb to play an unstrument.. SOMEthing..grow... Destruction is easy... Creation is a bitch. Personaly.. I prefer bitches to ho's. Just a.. Not sayin that i dont like hos........... Im straite . Mmmmmmmpuuuuuussssssayyyyy tatst.. Ill shut up now.
Like we obey copyright law bullshit anyway...
Get a clue asshats.. We obey life.
We hang together or surely we hang like stupid bitches.
Or not... Whatever..
We as human beings live and die based on information. Just like all the rest live and die based on self vs universe. If no human has access to human knowledge, we all die very quickly. If we share knowledge, we as individuals (and as a sum) gain. No, immortality is a myth, even the universe as we know it doesn't live forever, and subsequently neither do we. However, we CAN do the best can with it.. Live as long as we can... And try to have a good time doing it. As for the rest trying to use knowledge as a tool for enslavement? Fuck you... Bring it on! Wait.. . Just a moment... On the..... Can... Ahhhhhhh.. O....k.. Now you can bring it on...
Where did the information come from that allows you to use a computer to type your thoughts out to the world? What price? Our ancestors certainly never even concieved the possibility. Just sayn'
Given the topic of fake news and such, I found this class from the University of Washington to be quite enlightening.
http://callingbullshit.org/ind...
It does raise an interesting possibilty of building versioning into a game from the outset. Normaly in a versioning progression, small revision changes are usually more compatible than the big ones. So the server itself would simply look up the correct environment for the user's choice. Same hardware, just different looks to suit user tastes.
If we (humans) are so much smarter than they are, why is it we keep trying to force them to learn our languages
rather than us learning theirs? Just sayin'....
I wrote an assembler that used speedscript. Lol.. Those were the days. Just to date me though, my 1st programming experiances were 8080 machine code (entered in binary) and my highschool's Dec PDP-11. Well before my beloved C64 and Amiga days.
Slashdot Mirror
Censorganda is not propership. Now back to our state sponsored movie "My Glorious Leaders Love Me", and remember to wear more hats.
Additionally, the only egress path was blocked since the hatch was designed to open inwards. Under all that pressure it was impossible to open from the inside.
Wouldn't the simplest solution be to simply kill all the rhinos thus removing the source of illicit trade? Besides, how they cook their rhinos is their own business. I prefer deep fried rhino to poached.
Truthspace: We are each reflections of both god and demon, thus cursed with the emergent gift of free will. The choices are yours alone. Choose wisely.
You touch on the importance of the Amiga (yes, I do miss my beautiful 2000/68030), but by and large emulators do run better today than than the originals. The point that's being missed is that it was a philosophy of design that made it so special. Take the things that suck up the most CPU cycles and offload them to hardware, then seemlessly (more or less) integrate them back into the os. Today gpus, soundcards, etc perform the same functions. In order for any "new" Amiga to be anything more than than just sentimentality on steroids, it's going to require an extension of the philosophy, and not just hacking on a few more modern ports. For example, one might consider incorporating machine learning, not just in hardware, but as an integrated part of the os as well. Anything short of that simply can't be competitive in today's market. Just for the record, I still fire up uae or winfellow once in a while to relive the heavy playing, heavy drinking glory days.
I think it's important to note that all context is tied to action. State (nouns) carries no inate sense of context with it. It's only when an action takes place that dependencies and conditionals come into play. The fact that you are awake or asleep is just a state. If I try to talk (action) to you, THEN your state becomes significant (context). Change of state is only accomplished through action ergo all context is aquired through action. Verb you, ya bunch of nouns!
The problem (as I see it) is one of context. Each answer is possible, but given "context", one answer will be more likely than another. It's this notion of context that's the difficult part to grok, and must be accounted for in any system intended for "intelligent" processing.
Because the message is "Corps are important, you're not."
Life is a GAN.
Given that SOMEone is going to weaponize ai, isn't nicer to know who we're supposed to be watching? Better to know it's google than be blind to the fact that it's probably also being developed in some under ice bunker in the arctic by Killco Inc. Better the evil you know than the one you don't.
Due to an uprising of drone discontent in zone 37, All you're drone are belong to us!
Gawdam Murica's fucked up!
Did I mention that Im kunda srubk.. Drubk. ..nm...Have a nice dat...
Why? What is so important about everyone else that you have to have the ability .. Let alone time to run EVERYbody elses life... Wtf... Get a clue.... Sing, dance, learb to play an unstrument.. SOMEthing..grow... Destruction is easy... Creation is a bitch. Personaly .. I prefer bitches to ho's. Just a.. Not sayin that i dont like hos....... .... Im straite . Mmmmmmmpuuuuuussssssayyyyy tatst .. Ill shut up now.
What is it we all want? Most of us want to live forever.. and die of a terminal orgasm. Copywrong is just a method of ensuring that don't.
Like we obey copyright law bullshit anyway... Get a clue asshats.. We obey life. We hang together or surely we hang like stupid bitches. Or not... Whatever.. We as human beings live and die based on information. Just like all the rest live and die based on self vs universe. If no human has access to human knowledge, we all die very quickly. If we share knowledge, we as individuals (and as a sum) gain. No, immortality is a myth, even the universe as we know it doesn't live forever, and subsequently neither do we. However, we CAN do the best can with it.. Live as long as we can... And try to have a good time doing it. As for the rest trying to use knowledge as a tool for enslavement? Fuck you... Bring it on! Wait.. . Just a moment... On the ..... Can... Ahhhhhhh.. O....k.. Now you can bring it on...
Where did the information come from that allows you to use a computer to type your thoughts out to the world? What price? Our ancestors certainly never even concieved the possibility. Just sayn'
I missed you. Good to have you home again.
The real fun doesn't start till we start coding ais in dna. Now who's up for a game of CRISPR?
Given the topic of fake news and such, I found this class from the University of Washington to be quite enlightening. http://callingbullshit.org/ind...
Awesome book. Couldn't put it down till I read it twice.
It does raise an interesting possibilty of building versioning into a game from the outset. Normaly in a versioning progression, small revision changes are usually more compatible than the big ones. So the server itself would simply look up the correct environment for the user's choice. Same hardware, just different looks to suit user tastes.
If we (humans) are so much smarter than they are, why is it we keep trying to force them to learn our languages rather than us learning theirs? Just sayin'....
The only measured and resonable response is "Bring it on Bitch!!"
I wrote an assembler that used speedscript. Lol.. Those were the days. Just to date me though, my 1st programming experiances were 8080 machine code (entered in binary) and my highschool's Dec PDP-11. Well before my beloved C64 and Amiga days.