Slashdot Mirror


Google Will Launch the Pixel 3 and 3 XL 'Lite' on Verizon in Spring 2019, Report Says (androidpolice.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Speaking to a source familiar with the company's plans, we've learned that Google intends to launch two new Pixel smartphones on Verizon in early spring 2019 -- the Pixel 3 and 3 XL "Lite." An exact announcement date and pricing are not yet known. A Pixel 3 Lite prototype was leaked on a Russian tech blog last month, fueling rampant speculation about where the phone would be sold and how it would be positioned in Google's larger smartphone lineup. Later, renders of the 3 Lite and a larger XL variant were released by OnLeaks. These "Lite" Pixels will be the first phones in the mid-range Google has released since the Nexus 5X, which launched at $379 in the US in 2015.

30 comments

  1. WHO CARES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO CARES?

  2. Too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Phone needs to be in a 250 to 300 range to be bought. Judging by the estimated price, one should either go for a flagship or a cheap xiaomi or android one device. It won't sell very well unless the camera is basically the same as the Pixel 3.

    1. Re:Too expensive by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. Starting with about 2015-2016 there was pretty much no reason for anyone to spend more than 300 bucks on an android phone. My current Honor 6X, I got for under 200USD, it has a great screen and camera, great battery life and SD card slot, gets security updates every other month, and runs pretty much the same apps that a 800 dollar Galaxy S9 runs, sans the bloatware (surprisingly, Huawei's Android is actually less bloated than Samsung or LG)

    2. Re:Too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agree. I use moto G5Plus which I got for $180. It gets security updates every couple of months and has Android 8 available. And if one is feeling lucky, one can always unlock it and get something like lineage os or AOSP from xda.
      There is almost no reason to pay more than $200 for a phone, unless you are Apple fan.

    3. Re:Too expensive by guacamole · · Score: 1

      There is almost no reason to pay more than $200 for a phone, unless you are Apple fan.

      You are certainly correct about Apple. I don't mind the more expensive Apple iProducts because they get to run the latest iOS for 6-7 years since the original release date and they're significantly more secure. If I was a big-time drug dealer, tax evader, or a bitcoin fraudster, I'd make sure to get an apple phone because I suspect even the feds are going to have a hard time getting your data out of it. But for most other purposes, Android should suffice.

  3. Re: iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And can these phones compose poetry on the fly and whisper it in my headphone jack?

  4. Why should I care, really? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    ...we've learned that Google intends to launch two new Pixel smartphones on Verizon in early spring 2019 -- the Pixel 3 and 3 XL "Lite."...

    A multibillion company that can't get messaging right on itswholly owned platform launches new products... Why should I care?

    1. Re:Why should I care, really? by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Why does Google keep beating the overpriced vanity product with insignificant market share dead horse?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  5. Re: iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Prefer something that works and has useful features.

    But sure, some people use iPhone in spite of all that

  6. pixel line has been mostly garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back Nexus, but keep the good camera tech and 3.5mm and SD slot and larger battery for a lower price and maybe I'll look at it

    The camera is basically the only thing the pixel brought to the table, and Google has tried too hard to be apple, both their products are dirt at the moment

  7. Still gargantuan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Lite" is rumoured to have a 5.5inch screen - bigger than the already too-big 5X.

    There was a time when the aim for phones was to make them so small you could accidentally swallow them. Now there's a race to make them the size of a Psion Series 5.

  8. Google stop sucking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone please make a Linux phone that isn't a partial abortion?

    Also find a real manufacturer, as Google's hardware is not only bad looking, but lacking major features

  9. On Verizon? by Teckla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On Verizon? We're not past this carrier locked nonsense yet? Sheesh.

    1. Re:On Verizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Verizon? We're not past this carrier locked nonsense yet? Sheesh.

      It's not carrier locked though. Pixel phones you buy from Verizon are unlocked once activated. And you can buy unlocked units directly from Google too.

  10. Does Google/HTC have any RF engineers on staff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it have a functional antenna in areas with marginal signal? (I made the mistake of getting a Pixel 1 and still can't use it in one of the two places where I spend most of my time. Works great outside, absolutely refuses to pull in more than 1xRTT indoors. On the rare instances when it picks up LTE, it lasts for about 5-10 seconds before falling back. Disabling VoLTE doesn't help - voice comms are spotty too. Countless others have reported similar problems with the 1 and the 3. It's the reason I skipped the 2 and judging from the anecdotal reports of similar problems with the 3, I have to write off the entire line. Root cause seems to be that compared to Motorola, the hardware/antenna/baseband part was designed by HTC, who are known to be less-than-competent (compared to Motorola) in that business.

    My annoyance isn't really with the phone, it's with the industry "standard" that every review of every phone on every site concentrates solely on software -- software which doesn't do much good if it can't actually receive or transmit RF in the longer LTE bands, let alone the short ones.

    Would be nice to see at least some discussion about reception. If the PC reviewing sites can set up test rigs for heat/power/stability every time someone comes out with a new motherboard, surely it's an underserved market for phone reviews: could be as simple as making a makeshift Faraday cage out of chicken wire and gradually lowering it / moving it around the phone and observing RSRQ/RSRP while streaming video and seeing when/where dropouts occur.

    tl;dr: Reviewers: get your shit together and evaluate what is arguably the most important part of a cellular phone -- the part where the phone talks to the cells.

    1. Re:Does Google/HTC have any RF engineers on staff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A similar thing with the new Nokia feature phones (3310, 3310 4G and the other one). I wanted to know about the call quality : is the audio quality great, and do you get heard well and clearly? Reviews were about the software and bitching about the camera (which is miles above the 0.3 megapixel standard for dumb phones).

      The Nokia phones are a failure, still, because they use web applications for the phone features - contacts, call logs, and implemented them badly so they get extremely slow (despite the extremely high specs : quad core CPU and 256MB RAM)

    2. Re:Does Google/HTC have any RF engineers on staff? by bernywork · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've had the opposite with my HTC U11, it's flawless with the RF side, I'm on constant 4G / LTE. What lets it down is that the software hasn't been updated in a year.

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
  11. Google are Android's Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their phones are tremendously over-priced for what you get, and when there are issues and defects they sweep it under the rug. No refunds. You have to wait until there's patch. If there is one.

  12. No headphone jack, no SD by jddj · · Score: 2

    No want.

    1. Re:No headphone jack, no SD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an idiot stuck to obsolete ways? What are these for? You google cast the google you want to google to your google. Google it.
      Next year it will mandatory to register your google to google. New tax forms ask for your google and if you don't file your taxes the googlice will get you and put you into a sandbox.

    2. Re:No headphone jack, no SD by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      DOA: No headphone jack, no SD

      Will not buy

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    3. Re:No headphone jack, no SD by samwichse · · Score: 1

      The Lite version ironically has a headphone jack, according to the leaked renders.

  13. Check List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headphone jack? No. I'll pass. Thanks.

  14. Too late by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"These "Lite" Pixels will be the first phones in the mid-range Google has released since the Nexus 5X, which launched at $379 in the US in 2015."

    Too late. I (and probably many, many others) moved on, after waiting years for a nice, affordable, capable phone from Google to replace the Nexus 5 (the last one meeting the criteria). I bought a Moto G5+ from Costco for $189 and couldn't be more pleased. Plus, unlike the Nexus/Pixel, it has an SD card, which as been EXTREMELY useful. Also still has a headphone jack (as does the Moto G6).

    1. Re:Too late by guacamole · · Score: 1

      I recall very well what a fuckup the LG Nexus 5X was. Pretty much all of those phones boot-looped sooner or later. The Nexus 5X was the only American-market smartphone based on Snapdragon 808/810 SoC with only 2GB of RAM. (Meanwhile folks buying the Moto G4/G5 plus for under 250USD with 4GB of memory and 64GB of storage could laugh all day at people who still thought 5X was a good value).

      The screen on many 5X phones developed a yellowish tint and needed a settings option to correct it. This was the only phone I ever owned that had poor contacts in the 3.5mm audio jack. The battery life was horrendous. Every time you turned on the phone, you could literally see the charge going down by 5 percent just loading a web site or checking/writing messages.

      Nexus 5X was absolutely the worst, half-assed attempt by google to make a mid-range phone. No wonder that less than one year since the 5X release, the still unsold stock of 32GB model was being unloaded for just 225USD in the following summer. I have never seen such horrendous depreciation, but it was more than justified.

      These days, my go-to budget and affordable midrage phones are either Moto G series or Huawei's various Honor phones.

  15. Re: iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPhones do work. And best of all, they get timely OS patches and upgrades for many many years (at least 5).

  16. Re: iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the software is shit. And the hardware is slightly worse shit

  17. Re: iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says the person probably using windows 10. LUL.

  18. Kiss my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey google. Iâ(TM)m not buying your POS phones. Especially if your going to restrict what network I can use it on at launch. Fuck you.