Slashdot Mirror
Seattle City Council Members Visit New York To Warn About Amazon HQ2 (bloomberg.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Two politicians from Amazon's hometown traveled across the country to New York to deliver a cautionary message about the company's expansion in the city. Members of the Seattle City Council, Lisa Herbold and Teresa Mosqueda, are urging elected officials in New York to pass legislation now that will address potential housing and transportation issues that will inevitably follow in the wake of Amazon's decision to build a major new campus in Queens. Both are speaking Monday at an event hosted by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, which has been backing efforts to organize workers at an Amazon fulfillment center in Staten Island.
Amazon announced in November a major expansion in Long Island City, New York, and Crystal City, Virginia. In New York, Amazon would spend about $2.5 billion to create an 8.5 million square foot campus on the East River waterfront facing Manhattan from Long Island City. In return, the internet giant is set to receive almost $3 billion worth of state and city incentives. While Amazon could generate more than $27.5 billion in additional tax revenue for the city over 25 years, local politicians and community activists have already come out against the deal. Opponents fear the high salaries promised by Amazon and influx of as many as 40,000 employees eventually will push out residents in one of the city's fastest growing neighborhoods, and lead to even more congestion in the already overburdened subway system.
Amazon announced in November a major expansion in Long Island City, New York, and Crystal City, Virginia. In New York, Amazon would spend about $2.5 billion to create an 8.5 million square foot campus on the East River waterfront facing Manhattan from Long Island City. In return, the internet giant is set to receive almost $3 billion worth of state and city incentives. While Amazon could generate more than $27.5 billion in additional tax revenue for the city over 25 years, local politicians and community activists have already come out against the deal. Opponents fear the high salaries promised by Amazon and influx of as many as 40,000 employees eventually will push out residents in one of the city's fastest growing neighborhoods, and lead to even more congestion in the already overburdened subway system.
This isn't about warning NYC of the Evils of Amazon. This is about preventing Amazon from establishing a new HQ outside Seattle.
Because if Amazon did that, they'd be in a position to tell Seattle bye-bye....
"I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
Seattle city council is not in a position to give anyone advice about anything, outside of how to spread an opioid epidemic in their city.
if they don't handle this correctly, NY,NY could end up with one of the highest costs of living in the country.
Ok. I live in Washington and I've watched the city of Seattle crap on itself (no really) over the years till they have the problems they've created. But what the heck is two CITY council members flying across the country on the cities dime doing in New York? YOU'RE A CITY COUNCIL MEMEBER! THAT'S IT! Try working on your own disaster of a city you've created (not Amazon or Microsoft or anyone else) and here is a clue: USE THE PHONE TO GIVE NEW YORK YOUR OPINION! Save the tax payer money instead of taking a New York vacation.
Maybe there actually scared because Seattle is only a couple pony town (Boeing, Microsoft, Amazon) and if they push Amazon will be out all that tax money people spend...... Naw, they're not that smart.
New York, feel free and absorb Amazon HQ2 and start sucking jobs from Seattle. It won't be hard when the Seattle city council thinks you're the causes of all the problems in Seattle. Wait, isn't the city council supposed to keep the city working right? Right.
Not trolling. Sarcastic, but not trolling. The President of the United States controls neither spending nor taxation. That's Congress's job. What you're actually saying is that the (almost always Republican-controlled) Congress ran up more national debt under Obama than under all other presidents before him combined.
As a rule, Democrats raise taxes to cover their spending, while Republicans borrow money to do so. There are exceptions, but they are rare. Thus, the national debt is mostly a Republican-caused problem. Tax cuts (the heart of the Republican platform) inherently increase the national debt. Anybody who says otherwise is kidding him/herself. It's like selling products at a loss, but making it up in volume.
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.