Slashdot Mirror


Hackers Broke Into An SEC Database and Made Millions From Inside Information, Says DOJ (cnbc.com)

Federal prosecutors unveiled charges in an international stock-trading scheme that involved hacking into the Securities and Exchange Commission's EDGAR corporate filing system. "The scheme allegedly netted $4.1 million for fraudsters from the U.S., Russia and Ukraine," reports CNBC. "Using 157 corporate earnings announcements, the group was able to execute trades on material nonpublic information. Most of those filings were 'test filings,' which corporations upload to the SEC's website." From the report: The scheme involves seven individuals and operated from May to at least October 2016. Prosecutors said the traders were part of the same group that previously hacked into newswire services. Carpenito, in a press conference Tuesday, said the thefts included thousands of valuable, private business documents. "After hacking into the EDGAR system they stole drafts of [these] reports before the information was disseminated to the general public," he said.

Those documents included quarterly earnings, mergers and acquisitions plans and other sensitive news, and the criminals were able to view it before it was released as a public filing, thus affecting the individual companies' stock prices. The alleged hackers executed trades on the reports and also sold them to other illicit traders. One inside trader made $270,000 in a single day, according to Carpenito. The hackers used malicious software sent via email to SEC employees. Then, after planting the software on the SEC computers, they sent the information they were able to gather from the EDGAR system to servers in Lithuania, where they either used it or distributed the data to other criminals, Carpenito said.

60 comments

  1. My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So this is where we get to put forth a lawsuit to establish legal president for the liability organizations have when collecting and holding onto user data who then lose that data to theft, right?

    Anyone can collect any amount of info on me they want. If they lose it, it puts my wellbeing in jeopardy, so I should have the right (/responsibility) to sue them for every penny they have.

    1. Re: My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish they would hack into Slashdot and lock the fake news editors Miss Mash, Beau, and David out. This site is a dumpster fire.

    2. Re: My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations please, you crybaby millennial fuckwit.. Time to detach from Mamma's titty.. It's a big world out there, you aren't fucking special, you won't always get what you want, and sometimes you just need a bit of luck. Blood is thicker than water and the rights of, increasingly tiny and specific, minority groups are more valid than yours.. A gay, black, crippled, down's syndrome woman deserves a job more than you no matter how much time, effort, and hard work you've put into trying to achieve your goals.

    3. Re: My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds wike somebody is having twouble competing with handicapped pweople...poor widdle guy. Don't worry, somewhere out there is a job for people of your mental capability. Just keep trying! Poor widdle guy...

    4. Re:My data, my way. by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Mildly interesting, but what does your point have to do with EDGAR or Lithuania?

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    5. Re: My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably just another aging baby boomer that forget to save his money during the good years. Let's hope the trickle-down effect hits him like R. Kelly at a high school prom.

    6. Re:My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this is where we get to put forth a lawsuit to establish legal president for the liability organizations have when collecting and holding onto user data who then lose that data to theft, right?

      Anyone can collect any amount of info on me they want. If they lose it, it puts my wellbeing in jeopardy, so I should have the right (/responsibility) to sue them for every penny they have.

      So you are OK with them having the data as long as they are insured the cover the risk of it leaking and having to buy you some credit monitoring service for a year, or every penny, you know, whichever your lawyers are able to get. Good luck with all that.

    7. Re:My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't all SEC data be public anyway? I don't get why the SEC has "secret data" that could be traded on / taken advantage of.

    8. Re:My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this is where we get to put forth a lawsuit to establish legal president [sic] ...

      How funny when a word is misspelled in a sentence that causes the meaning to change :p.

    9. Re: My data, my way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, this happened while the non-citizen from Kenya was president.

  2. How dare they!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only bankers, politicians, and politically connected billionaires are allowed to get away with this!

    1. Re: How dare they!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen

    2. Re:How dare they!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And members of the House and Senate who regulate businesses and learn insider information while doing so.

  3. The SEC's bizarre focus on insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of corporate malfeasance and all they give a shit about are people making pennies from less information than Congress is legally allowed to insider trade with.

    1. Re: The SEC's bizarre focus on insider trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think obtaining any classification of info without explicit permission and legally allowed is literally the worst behavior and should always be terminated and punished as quickly as possible

    2. Re: The SEC's bizarre focus on insider trading by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Literally the worst behavior eh?

      I'd argue murder is literally worse than stealing money via insider trading, but then again I know what the fucking word literally means.... *shrug*

    3. Re:The SEC's bizarre focus on insider trading by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Troll, write in English. WTF?

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
  4. Shareholders by UperPoti · · Score: 1

    Will get nothing from this and continue to bear the cost of public price discovery except for the institutional traders that do not use the public exchanges.

    1. Re:Shareholders by UperPoti · · Score: 1

      The criminals and profits in Russia are not seizable and given the public prosecution will likely never appear in an extraditable country. If the feds were serious, then they should have fixed the problem at the SEC and arrested and seized the criminals under sealed court orders and only announce the case details after that was complete. The SEC has not learned the lesson and does not need to continue to have a database with the Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and other personal details of all traders that is just waiting to be abused.

    2. Re:Shareholders by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Who is saying SEC agents have not learned their lessons, they probably have learned them all to well, there are many organised crime groups who are more than willing to pay for network security information, millions to be made and bribes in the tens of thousands.

      So the US controls the Ukraine but there is no extradition treaty with the Ukraine, what the fuck is going on there, you send them weapons and don't at least get criminals in return what kind of fucking idiots are you. Successful phishing attacks, hmm, pay me fifty thousand dollars and I also would also be tempted to click the email, whoopsie.

      It's called parrallel networks, an external communications one and an internal data one. Traffic only travels from the external to the internal, via operator data input or as actual data transfer in the data security office by a data security officer. Otherwise expect people to make mistake on purpose when they are pay tens of thousands of dollars to do so.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Shareholders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, we talking about whiney SJWs here. Your reality is false. The government is good, democrats love us, and Trump is an ex-KGB operative.

  5. Did they start in orange juice futures? by Walter+White · · Score: 4, Funny

    Manipulating the futures market on the morning when the report was to be released by providing a fake report to a competitor. And in the process ruining Mortimer and Randolph Duke.

    1. Re:Did they start in orange juice futures? by heena+jain · · Score: 0

      thanks for sharing interesting post and The essential role played by data processing cannot be defined in mere words. And, in order for an organization to stay organized read more... http://blog.backofficeindia.co...

    2. Re:Did they start in orange juice futures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manipulating the futures market on the morning when the report was to be released by providing a fake report to a competitor. And in the process ruining Mortimer and Randolph Duke.

      I'll bet you a dollar it won't work

  6. THESE are the cryptocurrency gatekeepers?! HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The SEC can't even safeguard and regulate what they've already got. And for some reason, everyone's waiting with baited breath for this same group of morons to provide regulations around cryptocurrency. These people are a joke, and the reason cryptocurrency was created; to bypass the power brokers who are as fallible and/or corrupt as everyone else, who through their continual ineptitude, prop the financial systems up like the precarious house of cards they are.

  7. There is an easier way by chispito · · Score: 1

    Short the stock on a company, then reveal you--I mean, someone--hacked them. Rinse repeat. You can even do it legally. Well, maybe wait until the lawsuit plays out first before trying that maneuver.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  8. US pols are allowed to LEGALLY inside trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a sickening FACT that all significant US politicians and judges are granted FULL IMMUNITY with regards to insider trading. The 'excuse' is the 'tripod'- the two houses, the president and the superior courts- each of which is supposed to be independently powerful. While the two houses (senate and house of representatives) can create new laws that would eventually change the powers of the other two 'legs'- this is ignored when it comes to the utter corruption of the US 'elites'. No matter which 'leg' the 'elite' belongs two, the other legs, for mutual benefit, agree that members of all three legs are above an extraordinary number of laws that otherwise impact ordinary Americans.

    Guess why insider trading is one of these exceptions. Becoming president, a superior judge or member of the senate of house of represenatives means a LEGAL path of hyper corruption (if the person is so inclined- many are not). So the warmongering Obama and Clinton, for instance, literally make billions of dollars during their terms in office from large corporations providing them with insider information.

    Yanks are so thick, they never question a system where monsters like the two Clintons enter office penniless, and leave with billions in the bank. I think Yanks are so thick, they think this system of corruption applies to other nations too- and it does not.

    Oh, for sure, the corrupt rewards for leaders of political parties certainly happens elsewhere- but no other nation gives immunity for criminal business transactions for 'ordinary' members of parliament. Or for their senior judges (US senior judges cannot be prosecuted for almost any offense, for the same reason the British queen is above the law- because conceptually those judges and the queen are the law).

    In general insider trading is the real way in which 'elites' build their wealth- and this form of evil only became illegal when stock markets were opened to 'ordinary' people. In the USA, insider trading literally means when the 'WRONG' types of citizen benefit from insider info. The depraved monster who ran Intel, and sold his shares BEFORE the scandal of Intel's broken (by design) CPUs hit the press (spectre and meltdown) was officially CLEARED of insider trading charges despite engaing in what most people would describe as a texbook example of this 'crime'.

    Throughout Human History, I don't think there's ever been a population as thick as the American one. Americans happily swallow every lie their Deep State spews, and then boast about their subservience to their masters.

    Anway, isn't it time for another story demonising Russia or Iran on slashdot?

    1. Re:US pols are allowed to LEGALLY inside trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we have here is a post from a American college student, probably a sophomore. It's stating something mostly true that every adult knows but exaggerates it wildly, but the kid thinks he's making a new observation.
      It like a when a child first finds out about the word 'fuck' and begins using it all the time, and they can't believe that grown-ups know about that word and what it means.
      FWIW AC, you're absolutely wrong. Insider trading is not how these people build their fortunes. What they actually do is indeed sleazy and often illegal, but the insider trading the stock market is way too slow and far far too unreliable.

    2. Re:US pols are allowed to LEGALLY inside trade by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Russian trolls, you are tempting me to filter AC posts entirely.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    3. Re:US pols are allowed to LEGALLY inside trade by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      Oh interesting, there is something to this but it is not exactly insider trading.
      https://www.cnbc.com/id/434715...

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
  9. EDGAR... Seen that system before... by ClarkMills · · Score: 1
  10. Rigged market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know that Euronext now SELLS corporate actions filings, delaying open publication to create an arbitrage it can sell to corporate investors. Ordinary investors are deceived by stale information, here buy their ignorance from Euronext!

    https://www.euronext.com/fr/market-data/products/corporate-actions

    And practically every US market SELLS timely price data, delaying the real price data from open publication. Again in order to sell the fake arbitrage to professional investors.

    Bloomberg, well they sell "Bloomberg terminals", and they really f*cked up. They use to publish the data opening on their website 3 days to 2 weeks late, giving their terminal users access to the best data they had, so terninal users were primarily buying the ignorance of the website viewers. Then someone in Bloomberg got greedy and removed a lot of the data from the public website. The more people they blocked from the delayed data, the less arbitrage they had to offer. People simply went elsewhere for their data.

    See without patsy's to deceive, you can't sell the arbitrage from that deception.

    Again these are all examples of insiders having special access to data by paying for it. All the crooks needed to do what call themselves a data broker and PAY the SEC a cut of the proceeds, and SEC would sell them an "early preview access" feed for resale.

    1. Re: Rigged market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nasdaq prohibits publishing the quotes generated, to sell the data. So not public info.

  11. deja vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very similar to: https://m.slashdot.org/story/344988

  12. Impressive by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

    Gotta admit, it's a pretty impressive scheme. Probably going to be low priority for law enforcement since the victims are mostly just faceless bank accounts, retirement funds, and related financial instruments.

    1. Re:Impressive by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

      What I don't get it how could you have this access, and only make $4M? Only RTFS but it doesn't seem to connect. Unless they were purposely holding back on the amounts to avoid getting caught.

      --
      Take off every 'sig' !!
    2. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they didn't have sufficient start up capital to leverage the data effectively.

    3. Re:Impressive by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they didn't have sufficient start up capital to leverage the data effectively.

      Very good point... The data just says which stocks to buy.. It doesn't provide you with the money you need to buy the stocks initially and most of the stocks probably aren't swinging around wildly.. A few points in one direction or the other, I would guess, after this SEC stored data was made public.. I suppose it's possible that some stocks could generate significant profits, but that's if you can afford to buy enough of them initially..

    4. Re:Impressive by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Well if you have insider info than you'd be pretty safe buying with margin. So you could leverage your brokers money to an extent. Even E-Trade will let you buy on margin. However you have to have a sizeable set of funds or securities holding in the account before you will be extended to much credit.

      That said even starting with only 5 or 10K I would think you could with solid insider data on lots of companies blow that up to a good chunk of changes by the end of earnings season.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:Impressive by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      They were probably trying to avoid tipping their hand. Repeated huge wins like that would set off a lot of alarms. That's how the same group was caught before hacking newswire services.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  13. Government needs to just be shut down permanently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't magically regulate people outside of your country no matter how much you want to. The reality is the internet is made up of people you can't touch and the only way to stop this shit is to not let government have it in the first place. There is always going to be someone who has it a leg up on you. Get over it. If it were even possible to make the world a fair place for all we'd all be living in extreme poverty and nobody would be happy. That's why this thing call capitalism was invented. You see when people are rewarded for there efforts (ie work) at least those who can have an opportunity to prosper and it'll generally benefit those less able [even if we exclude the destitute]. If you want to expand wealth and prosperity for near all people open up the markets, eliminate taxes and government, and implement real free trade and free travel to everybody and eliminate "intellectual" "property".

  14. Law makers by NewYork · · Score: 2

    And Insider trading is not illegal to Law makers;
    http://cnbc.com/id/43471561

    1. Re:Law makers by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2
      It is now.

      The STOCK Act is an original bill to prohibit members of Congress and employees of Congress from using private information derived from their official positions for personal benefit, and for other purposes. With this bill in place, members of Congress are no longer allowed to use information garnered through official business for personal reasons. The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act prohibits members and employees of Congress from using "any nonpublic information derived from the individual's position ... or gained from performance of the individual's duties, for personal benefit".

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  15. But information wants to be free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See title.

  16. Government allows itself insider trading by 3seas · · Score: 1

    learn of trillion dollar bet of 90's draining southeast Asia economies leading to 9/11 coverup of SEC investigation of bet, war on Iraq distractions & wave of world economic fails we're still dealing w/ today. Who's in jail for it? Nobody! Gov allows itself insider trading.

    1. Re:Government allows itself insider trading by 3seas · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, what did come out of the Trillion dollar bet besides losers in the bet such as Enron, Worldcome, and more, anthrax threats to the MSM employees to keep quiet about it and the creation of the G20 summit. Go figure.Think about the story above, who is allowed by government to manipulate the world economies via world stockmarket wrongful manipulation.

  17. Executives of Nortel did it without hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how many insider traders have been arrested and put in jail, never mind to the level that these hackers will?

  18. Hey, snowflake, need a safe space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't like trump's illegality pointed out? In what way is complaining about it being pointed out a rebuttal? And what happened to the "fight to the death" for the freedom of speech of the ideas you don't like?

  19. Kinda slim profits there by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that hacking the SEC for this kind of info could net you more than 4.1 million. Seems like these hackers either lacked vision, or investigators didn't uncover their real game.

    1. Re: Kinda slim profits there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need capital to buy the stocks you know will do well (or to short the ones that won't). They may not have had enough money. Maybe they also purposefully invested timidly to avoid drawing attention. Making massively leveraged trades daily that also are always successful will be found out fast...

  20. Dag nab them Duke boys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dag nab them Duke boys!

  21. Re:Government needs to just be shut down permanent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SEC is supposed to be PROTECTING us, but they are putting us in danger!

    People are going to wonder why they should make an effort to do anything when these guys fritter it all off to the hackers.

    :(

  22. Re:THESE are the cryptocurrency gatekeepers?! HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bated breath, not baited breath.

    From https://grammarist.com/idiom/bated-breath-vs-baited-breath/

    "Bated breath is a phrase that means to hold one's breath due to suspense, trepidation or fear. Bated breath is a phrase first mentioned in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice. The word bated is an abbreviation of the word abated, meaning to lessen in severity or amount."

    You're welcome!