Slashdot Mirror
WeWork's CEO Makes Millions as Landlord To WeWork (wsj.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: For more than two months after employees at IBM moved into a Manhattan building managed by office space giant WeWork, frequent elevator problems forced workers to climb the stairs of the 11-story building and prompted complaints to the company. One of the landlords behind the building was no ordinary owner: It was Adam Neumann, WeWork's chief executive, who leased the property to WeWork after buying it [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source], according to people familiar with the situation.
Mr. Neumann has made millions of dollars by leasing multiple properties in which he has an ownership stake back to WeWork, one of the country's most valuable startups. Multiple investors of the privately held company said the arrangement concerned them as a potential conflict of interest in which the CEO could benefit on rents or other terms with the company. [...] WeWork, which was recently valued at $47 billion by investor SoftBank, signs long-term leases for office space with landlords, then subleases the space on a short-term basis to companies. Mr. Neumann, the 39-year-old executive who founded WeWork in 2010, is WeWork's largest individual shareholder and has voting control over the company.
Mr. Neumann has made millions of dollars by leasing multiple properties in which he has an ownership stake back to WeWork, one of the country's most valuable startups. Multiple investors of the privately held company said the arrangement concerned them as a potential conflict of interest in which the CEO could benefit on rents or other terms with the company. [...] WeWork, which was recently valued at $47 billion by investor SoftBank, signs long-term leases for office space with landlords, then subleases the space on a short-term basis to companies. Mr. Neumann, the 39-year-old executive who founded WeWork in 2010, is WeWork's largest individual shareholder and has voting control over the company.
I was told a yarn when I worked at Hess about how all the artwork in the building in Houston was owned by Hess himself and when he retired he leased all the artwork back to the company. He allegedly made more after he retired then when he ran the company.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
I wonder if the whole Millenial hipster open-space preschool workplace thing will survive this latest tech bubble...but WeWork is guaranteed to profit. Apparently they're one of the largest commercial landlords in the world and they seem to specialize in this free-flowing startup space. It's akin to selling prospectors supplies on their way to the gold fields.
Whenever I see self-dealing like this, I simultaneously think that it's totally unfair that things can be set up this way, and wonder why I don't take advantage and profit from it. :-) Most business owners structure their affairs in such a way that their company is buying everything they own to offset any profits that pass to the owner. And then they complain bitterly about taxes. It seems ludicrous that I can set up Bob Smith LLC, have Bob Smith LLC purchase a car in the company's name, rent houses and offices, etc. and I would work for Bob Smith LLC as the CEO paying myself a salary of $1/year. This happens all the time with small business owners. I know that the "corporate veil" can be pierced if the IRS or someone suspects this is going on, but the reality is there are way too many ways to avoid it.
We'll see what happens when Dotcom Bubble 2.0 crashes in the next year or two and the VC funds used to rent these offices dry up. I'm assuming WeWork will be just fine though...here in NYC people will give you their life savings for a closet and a hot plate.
The president of the United States makes billions sending dignitaries with deep pockets to his own resorts and hotels; perhaps that is the bigger issue.
Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
Exactly my thoughts. It could be an elaborate tax dodge - or he could be a crook. I have no idea without details, and there is no way to get that kind of detail about a private company. This is firmly in the realm of "somebody else's problem".
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
So, Neumann takes on the debt of buying the building, rather than WeWork, while providing the stability that WeWork won't lose their lease because the building owners don't like them, or get a better offer.
What's the problem?