Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Blames School Text Provider In Dispute Over 'Spam' Fee (arstechnica.com)

Last week, Ars Technica reported that Verizon's new "spam" fee for texts sent from teachers to students might stop working on the network because of a dispute over texting fees that Verizon demanded from Remind, the company that operates the service. Now, it appears that Verizon "has backed down from its original position slightly, and ongoing negotiations could allow the free texting service to continue," reports Ars. From the report: As we reported Monday, the dispute involves Verizon and Remind, which makes a communication service used by teachers and youth sports coaches. Verizon is charging an additional fee, saying the money will be used to fund spam-blocking services. The fee would increase Remind's costs for sending texts to Verizon users from a few hundred thousand dollars to several million dollars per year, Remind said. Remind said it would absorb the cost in order to continue providing the paid version of its service. But most of Remind's 30 million users rely on the free version of the service, and Remind said it could no longer provide free text message notifications over Verizon's network unless the fee is reversed.

Verizon issued an announcement today, titled "App provider Remind threatens to eliminate a free texting service for K-12 education organizations (which will cost it nothing)." The title reflects a new offer Verizon said it made on Tuesday, which would reverse the fee for K-12 users of the free Remind service. "Verizon will not charge Remind fees as long as they don't begin charging K-12 schools, educators, parents and students using its free text message service," Verizon said. "Despite this offer, made Tuesday, Remind has not changed its position that it will stop sending free texts to Verizon customers who use the service regarding school closures, classroom activities and other critical information."
The report goes on to note that simply limiting the offer to K-12 users means the fee "would still be charged for preschools, day-care centers, and youth sports coaches who use the free Remind service."

2 of 46 comments (clear)

  1. Verizon by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, it's Verizon...did you expect them to be fair or reasonable? Or even honest?

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  2. This is a valid anti-spam measure by Solandri · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I hate Verizon and refuse to get service from them. But one of the anti-spam measures commonly touted is to simply add a per-message fee which is small enough not to bother regular users (who send only a few thousand text messages a month), but big enough to cripple spammers (who send a few million text messages a month).

    Such a fee is effective, but does have consequences for high-volume users. That is by design. This isn't a "Verizon is evil so this is wrong" thing. This is a "do you want to try to reduce or eliminate spamming by making it unprofitable?" thing.

    The fee would increase Remind's costs for sending texts to Verizon users from a few hundred thousand dollars to several million dollars per year, Remind said. Remind said it would absorb the cost in order to continue providing the paid version of its service. But most of Remind's 30 million users rely on the free version of the service, and Remind said it could no longer provide free text message notifications over Verizon's network unless the fee is reversed.

    Several million dollars a year / 30 million users = about 10 cents per user per year.

    Even if you assume "several million" is more than $5 million and divide by Verizon's 35% market share, that works out to less than a dollar per user per year. The fee is not ruinous. Unless you're a spammer.