Slashdot Mirror
Oceans Are Getting Louder, Posing Potential Threats To Marine Life (nytimes.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times: Slow-moving, hulking ships crisscross miles of ocean in a lawn mower pattern, wielding an array of 12 to 48 air guns blasting pressurized air repeatedly into the depths of the ocean. The sound waves hit the sea floor, penetrating miles into it, and bounce back to the surface, where they are picked up by hydrophones. The acoustic patterns form a three-dimensional map of where oil and gas most likely lie. The seismic air guns probably produce the loudest noise that humans use regularly underwater, and it is about to become far louder in the Atlantic. As part of the Trump administration's plans to allow offshore drilling for gas and oil exploration, five companies have been given permits to carry out seismic mapping with the air guns all along the Eastern Seaboard, from Central Florida to the Northeast, for the first time in three decades. The surveys haven't started yet in the Atlantic, but now that the ban on offshore drilling has been lifted, companies can be granted access to explore regions along the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific. And air guns are now the most common method companies use to map the ocean floor.
Some scientists say the noises from air guns, ship sonar and general tanker traffic can cause the gradual or even outright death of sea creatures, from the giants to the tiniest — whales, dolphins, fish, squid, octopuses and even plankton. Other effects include impairing animals' hearing, brain hemorrhaging and the drowning out of communication sounds important for survival, experts say. So great is the growing din in the world's oceans that experts fear it is fundamentally disrupting the marine ecosystem, diminishing populations of some species as the noise levels disturb feeding, reproduction and social behavior. A 2017 study, for example, found that a loud blast, softer than the sound of a seismic air gun, killed nearly two-thirds of the zooplankton in three-quarters of a mile on either side. Tiny organisms at the bottom of the food chain, zooplankton provide a food source for everything from great whales to shrimp. Krill, a tiny crustacean vital to whales and other animals, were especially hard hit, according to one study.
Some scientists say the noises from air guns, ship sonar and general tanker traffic can cause the gradual or even outright death of sea creatures, from the giants to the tiniest — whales, dolphins, fish, squid, octopuses and even plankton. Other effects include impairing animals' hearing, brain hemorrhaging and the drowning out of communication sounds important for survival, experts say. So great is the growing din in the world's oceans that experts fear it is fundamentally disrupting the marine ecosystem, diminishing populations of some species as the noise levels disturb feeding, reproduction and social behavior. A 2017 study, for example, found that a loud blast, softer than the sound of a seismic air gun, killed nearly two-thirds of the zooplankton in three-quarters of a mile on either side. Tiny organisms at the bottom of the food chain, zooplankton provide a food source for everything from great whales to shrimp. Krill, a tiny crustacean vital to whales and other animals, were especially hard hit, according to one study.
crushed by nuclear and renewable
Nuclear and renewables are used to generate electricity. Petroleum is used for transportation. They are two different markets.
The petroleum market may be crushed by better/cheaper batteries, but not by more efficient electricity generation. Electricity is already way cheaper than gasoline. The problem is how to take it with you on the road.
Bill sometimes you are just so full of shit that it is almost funny. Number one dollar driven use for oil and gas is for petrochemicals and the plastic industries not energy. Low sulfur oil is only at a premium because it can be sold to the petrochemical industry at higher rates, so that is what they are looking for off the east coast of North America. Right now the largest supplier of cheap oil to the US just happens to be Canada which is getting screwed up the ass and paid way down at only 25-30% of market price because we are having a hard time building pipe lines fast enough to dump our glut of crude and natural gas.
The petrochemical industry is pressuring Canada to put two pipes out to the Pacific and bypass the American industry all together and dump our oil and gas into the Asian market where most of the plastic and petrochemical industries do not suffer from tree huggers and environuts bitching about pipe lines and pollution. Contrary to popular belief the US market is shrinking in a big way because labour is not cheap enough and it is almost impossible to build new pipe lines and refining infrastructure in the US. Whereas China does not give a shit whether or not it pollutes the hell out of the atmosphere as long as a few of the oligarchy there remain in power and continue to get rich on the cheap labour that China provides.
Here in Canada we gladly offshore our petrochemical refining and secondary industries, we take it up the ass economically just as much as the idiots who elected Trump do. NO problem offshoring our pollution, who gives a shit as long as we have access to cheap plastic products and some economy based upon the sale of raw materials. We are living on an economy of borrowed time no doubt and will pay heavily for it very soon. The price of food is going up rapidly and when the rich can no longer supply enough bread and circuses for the plebs all hell will break loose the same way it has when ever a society becomes economically stagnant and stratified the way we are currently headed. As we lose the protein sources from the oceans because of our ecological greed and stupidity the price will be social collapse and starvation on a scale that has never been seen before in the history of the human race. We have caused these problems before but never on the scale we are doing it this time around.
Nuclear power is only dead because of NIMYism. The moment the anti-nuke crowd's ideas started to gain traction, it was all over. We stopped building reactors, which meant R&D slowed to a crawl because there was no reason to design something that would never get built. Thus, improvements that would otherwise have driven down the cost of nuclear power, improved the safety, improved the efficiency, and reduced the size never happened.
And so we're stuck with technology from the dark ages and forty-year-old reactors that keep getting permission to keep running for decades past their design lifetime. And over time, these are going to get less and less safe, again because of NIMYism. Eventually, they will all be discontinued, and everyone will conclude that nuclear power just isn't feasible, when in reality, we just never really tried.
Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.
Whilst science-bashing is depressingly popular on slashdot (news for nerds who think science is a vast left wing conspiracy). At least go to the effort of engaging with the story? Theres literally a link to the primary study ( https://www.nature.com/article... , plug it into sci-hub if you don't have academic or institutional access ) in the article, which is pretty much on point for the story. The NYTimes story itself actually answers who "Some scientists" and "experts" are.
So heres the thing. Either you didn't actually read the article, or you did and aren't quite bright enough to parse it.
Or your a boring alt-right virtue signaller who wants to be the first to post "REEEEEE" into a comment, because clearly posting the same joke over and over and over again is the height of wit.
Embarassing!
Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
Nuclear power got its fate sealed in 1986. It *has* all to do with NIMBY'ism, you can try to repeat the opposite it won't change the fact that people don't understand the basic physics behind nuclear and will always fear it, and Germany is paying the high price of higher emission because of this, ie. deploying unreliable renewable and requiring gas burning plants and imports to deal with load demand.