Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Lowered Cable Investment Despite Net Neutrality Repeal (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Comcast's cable division spent 3 percent less on capital expenditures last year, despite promises that the repeal of net neutrality rules would boost broadband network investment. Comcast's cable division spent $7.95 billion on capital expenditures during calendar year 2017, but that fell to $7.72 billion in the 12 months ending on December 31, 2018. Comcast's overall capital expenditures went up 2.3 percent, from $9.6 billion in 2017 to $9.8 billion in 2018. But that company-wide capital expenditure number includes the Comcast-owned NBCUniversal, which spent $1.7 billion in 2018, a 15.2 percent increase, "primarily reflecting investment at Theme Parks," Comcast said.

The cable capital expenditure statistic thus provides a more accurate picture of whether Comcast increased or decreased investment in its broadband network. Cable capital expenditures as a percentage of Comcast's cable revenue dropped from 15 percent in 2017 to 14 percent in 2018. Comcast's network spending should have risen in 2018 if predictions from Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai and Comcast had been correct. Pai's net neutrality repeal took effect in June 2018. But the vote to repeal net neutrality rules was in December 2017, and Pai claimed in February 2018 that the repeal was already causing increased broadband investment.
While Comcast's cable capital expenditures did rise year over year in the fourth quarter, from $2.15 billion to $2.32 billion, it wasn't enough to offset the full-year decline. Ars Technology also notes: "The corporate tax cut implemented as 2018 began also didn't stop job cuts at Comcast and AT&T, despite promises that the tax cut would create new jobs."

3 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Correlation? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The only reason that cable companies have given for Net Neutrality is that they will increase investment in infrastructure if they have a financial incentive.

  2. fucking idiots by viperidaenz · · Score: 5, Informative

    when big companies say good things will happen when laws and regulations get changed for their benefit, they're lying.

  3. Re: Zombies never die it seems by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 4, Informative

    So the Bureau of Labor statistics is unquestionable when your favourite President is in office, but not valid when Obama was in office? Because when unemployment figures were looking good, cunts like you were saying the the Bureau of Labor were fudging the numbers.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.