Slashdot Mirror
Google Glass is Still Around (nymag.com)
Google may have discontinued the sale of Google Glass years ago, but die hard fans have not given up. From a report: Glassholes still exist, just not as boogeymen haunting the tech section of your newspaper. There's a small group of fans still talking and updating and buying and selling on Reddit. Somebody who picked up a pair for $150 and wants help using the device to display sheet music; somebody with questions about installing an older operating system onto Glass Enterprise; another person looking for foldable frames; somebody else trying to fix a broken device; people looking to buy, as well as a number of people asking if it's even worth it to spend any money on the now-defunct tech. (Spoiler: survey says it's not.) There is also, weirdly, somebody asking if Google nixed Google Glass "because 'someone' was made aware of the book 'The Circle' by Dave Eggers?"
Reading through the forum, it seems wrong to regard the dwindling frequenters of /r/googleglass as Glassholes. On the contrary, they seem to bust out their devices at incredibly appropriate moments. "I pretty much only use Glass for taking pictures/video while running/hiking or anywhere I don't have access to a phone or don't want to carry one," writes one Redditor. "It's a great way to capture highlights of a marathon, for instance, without having to stop and pull out a phone." "Text notifications. Phone calls whilst driving, pix and video while on the go," writes another.
Reading through the forum, it seems wrong to regard the dwindling frequenters of /r/googleglass as Glassholes. On the contrary, they seem to bust out their devices at incredibly appropriate moments. "I pretty much only use Glass for taking pictures/video while running/hiking or anywhere I don't have access to a phone or don't want to carry one," writes one Redditor. "It's a great way to capture highlights of a marathon, for instance, without having to stop and pull out a phone." "Text notifications. Phone calls whilst driving, pix and video while on the go," writes another.
While driving? How about you don't!
The walk-in services part of one of my local hospitals has some doctors use Google Glass. It is great for several reasons. The doctor can focus on care while an associate that has eyes on a computer screen can do 2 things to help the whole process: deal with documentation and provide research into records info as needed. It is really a good fit for healthcare in this way. They see 100's of patients a day at the walk-in services location, this saves time for the doctor, they don't have to write up very much and they just review what was written to refine/correct/accept the docs and move onto the next patient. I hope Google Glass, or very similar, stays around for this simple reason.
I am a photographer. I'm often surprised at how camera shy people are, considering that they are being photographed and under video surveillance nearly constantly when in public. Nevertheless, I still ask permission most of the time when taking candid shots of people and I can tell you that they fully expect you to do so or they will get pissed very fast. There are good reasons people act like this, though. So, I imagine the same is true about "Glass" since it's a real live person there videotaping you.
The actual concept behind Google Glasses wasn't a bad idea par say. There are a lot of people who want overlay smart video technology. For something such as Car Navigation where it virtually pops up an arrow or indicator in your vision for where to go is a lot better for example than having people look at their GPS and then crash into things or people! Unfortunately both the ability to miniaturize this technology and battery isn't quite there yet so it was more of a test concept than a real device.
In the past all that surveillance footage just went in the rubbish heap unless they were actively looking for a shoplifter, criminal, etc. Furthermore it was of such low quality you could rarely identify a person after the fact, unless they were looking up at the camera or their face was completely unobscured.
Today however, a lot of that footage may be stored in the cloud somewhere, and most people are more concerned with facebook/google/etc getting their likeness in public for free and being able to analyze and categorized their locations, activity, etc without their permission or consent. Or have their likeness in a controversial shot that might disrupt their home or work life, like being associated with a controversial political rally they weren't actively involved or publicly supporting.
The western world in general, and the US in particular need to rapidly get their act together with regards to their legislation and legal rulings surrounding privacy, because soon only the wealthy will have any left.
The politically/financially connected get their houses blurred out on google maps, why don't get the rest of us have to opt in our houses being visible from space or streetview?
Honestly, sheet music is a pretty genius use for something like glass. That would be way better than paper music or tablets or whatever, especially for instruments you have to hold with your hands and use a stand for.
But I'd love this even for the piano.
Glass should never have been a consumer product. Hindsight 20/20, that was foolish of Google.
That said, Glass DOES have LOTS AND LOTS of obvious business related uses. Any professional, technician, or worker that uses their hands could have made a lot of use of this product. It's a tragedy it was killed. It should have just been rebranded and re-marketed to professional customers.
Read Daemon by Daniel Suarez to get some interesting ideas on how augmented reality will be used/useful.
Great read, though will put the fear of God in you about AI.
"Phone calls whilst driving, pix and video while on the go," writes another."
"The frustration, perhaps, stemmed from the mathematically proven fact that only half of the puzzle configurations are solvable (likely unbeknownst to the addicted)."
I'm loath to digress thusly, but I so fearfully fervently eptly wonder, can we ever be done with "whilst" and "unbeknownst?" No one should be permitted to utter a para that contains either of these two most foul words without at least one "thee" or "thou" as well. If Old English must still be used, if thou simply must use such archaic and embarrassing silly words, thou shouldst at least do it fully. Shakespeare would be proud, or at least have a good snicker at thee.
OK, I'm done.
msmash you seem to have a point of view u wish to boost with a rare anecdote. There are people who still have potato clocks. Who gives a shit?
I have never seen these things. But Ashland, KY is far from anywhere.
Corporatism != Free Market
Remember the story of a guy with GG who went into a bar (in Seattle I think) wearing them and got punched out, glasses broken. Why?
Theory: People HATE being recorded all the time, and REALLY hate being recorded in the bar. Maybe they're meeting someone they shouldn't be seeing. Maybe they are making a deal with someone. Whatever. Bars had always been the last bastion of private socialization.
Yeah cell phones can do it but video recording is obvious when they are doing it so you can defend yourself by shutting up and getting out of the camera eye. Some people use their cells to record audio but that's considered dirty. Prepare to be hated if you get caught.
The difference with GG is it made surveillance easy and obvious and personal. It became a focal point for society's brewing anger around being watched all the time. Knowledge is power, data-gathering is bullying.
it seems wrong to regard the dwindling frequenters of /r/googleglass as Glassholes.
Based on what I see here on Slashdot the term Glasshole was used to describe generic use of google glass. A generalised statement along with a counter-intellectual assumption.
I originally thought it was something that Slashholes here came up with but apparently making broad negative generalisations about people is something that is done elsewhere too.