Slashdot Mirror


Apple Blocks Google From Running Its Internal iOS Apps (theverge.com)

Apple has now shut down Google's ability to distribute its internal iOS apps, following a similar shutdown that was issued to Facebook earlier this week. From a report: A person familiar with the situation tells The Verge that early versions of Google Maps, Hangouts, Gmail, and other pre-release beta apps have stopped working today, alongside employee-only apps like a Gbus app for transportation and Google's internal cafe app. UPDATE: Apple has restored Google's Enterprise Certificate so its internal apps will now function.

8 of 175 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I have to think this will be restored sometime. by the_B0fh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, you mean instead of following the letter of the contract you signed, you do something that violates that contract, and when you are caught, and the other party terminates their part of the contract, it is their fault?

    You are a special kind of stupid, aren't you?

  2. Re:Good to see by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How was Apple supposed to know? The whole point of enterprise apps is that enterprises can run anything they want on any of their devices without going through Apple. The users who were involved in this stuff were installing provisioning profiles that identified their devices as belonging to Facebook and Google. Given that Apple isn't privy to employee records at Facebook and Google, they have no way of telling whether provisioning profiles are being abused, so again I ask: how was Apple supposed to know?

  3. Re:Walled gardens are trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, not really. Your premise is false. Normal people can't secure their device; Windows before the garden was "insecure" because people installed stuff without performing a security audit first.

    Everyone I know looked at me really weird when I told them what I had to do to stay secure on an open platform.

    They all asked me if they could just buy something secure and not have to get a CS degree.

    So they have an iPhone now. /shrug

  4. Re:I have to think this will be restored sometime. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't it a message to every enterprise everywhere that Apple are in total control of your platform and can disable your work without notice or warning, rendering any investment you made worthless?

    "Without notice or warning"? They flagrantly disregarded the cardinal rule of the license they agreed to, which is spelled out in plain language in the subtitle, first paragraph, second paragraph, definitions, appropriate use section, etc. of the license. The license is even subtitled "for in-house, internal use applications". It really couldn't be any clearer. You can make pretty much anything you want for internal use, so long as it remains internal.

    If I were a corporation looking to deploy an internal app, I'd be looking at non-apple options. Having your internal platform disabled could cripple smaller business to the point of threatening their viability.

    Why? Is your hypothetical corporation breaking the cardinal rule too? The only people who need to be worried are those who haven't been using the license in good faith. So long as you're using the license as it was plainly intended to be used—to develop and use apps internally—you have nothing to fear, despite suggestions to the contrary.

  5. Re:I have to think this will be restored sometime. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Insightful

    By all indications, Facebook and Google agreed to the same license as everyone else, and the license is anything BUT ambiguous, given that it's subtitled "for in-house, internal use applications" and then only gets more explicit about how it's intended to be used from there. I ran through a lot of the details about the license in a comment yesterday.

  6. Re:Good to see by divide+overflow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This should demonstrate to enterprise level purchasers the peril in becoming involved with Apple, who are historically an enterprise-hostile vendor.

    Or perhaps it will demonstrate that Apple won't let them get away with abusing their internal use certificates that allow less restricted use of device resources in order for those licensees to take further advantage of public end users and violate Apple's software license agreements.

  7. Re:Further clarification - not limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we'll all take note - that Apple considers the privacy of their users to be of paramount importance. So important, in fact, that Apple will drop even facebook and google from their platform if that's what it takes.

  8. Re: Further clarification - not limited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blatant violation requires extreme response. This was a message to Google and Facebook to stop being total dicks