Slashdot Mirror
Apple Blocks Google From Running Its Internal iOS Apps (theverge.com)
Apple has now shut down Google's ability to distribute its internal iOS apps, following a similar shutdown that was issued to Facebook earlier this week. From a report: A person familiar with the situation tells The Verge that early versions of Google Maps, Hangouts, Gmail, and other pre-release beta apps have stopped working today, alongside employee-only apps like a Gbus app for transportation and Google's internal cafe app. UPDATE: Apple has restored Google's Enterprise Certificate so its internal apps will now function.
Good to see that Apple are not letting these big corps get away with breaking the rules.
So... as usual the summary (and even TFA in this case) had me confused about what is going on here. At first I thought Google was redistributing Apple's internal iOS apps. I thought maybe they were embedding iOS apps within their own apps or something. Anyway here's what this is about.
An enterprise developer license for iOS allows a developer to sign an app for limited *internal* distribution of an app. This is for testing and enterprise use internally within the company the license was issued to. This is in contrast to apps intended for public distribution, which as we know can only be done through the iOS App Store, and which requires Apple to approve the app.
What Facebook and Google have been doing is publicly distributing what should be internal-use-only apps to the public - apps that would not be approved by Apple for various reasons (including privacy issues) - through their enterprise developer license. So it's clearly a violation Apple's terms, and it sounds like both FB and Google are doing the overreaching data collection through these special apps.
Apple has reacted, disabling the signing keys for these apps so they no longer function.
Better known as 318230.
Oh, you mean instead of following the letter of the contract you signed, you do something that violates that contract, and when you are caught, and the other party terminates their part of the contract, it is their fault?
You are a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
Isn't it a message to every enterprise everywhere that Apple are in total control of your platform and can disable your work without notice or warning, rendering any investment you made worthless?
"Without notice or warning"? They flagrantly disregarded the cardinal rule of the license they agreed to, which is spelled out in plain language in the subtitle, first paragraph, second paragraph, definitions, appropriate use section, etc. of the license. The license is even subtitled "for in-house, internal use applications". It really couldn't be any clearer. You can make pretty much anything you want for internal use, so long as it remains internal.
If I were a corporation looking to deploy an internal app, I'd be looking at non-apple options. Having your internal platform disabled could cripple smaller business to the point of threatening their viability.
Why? Is your hypothetical corporation breaking the cardinal rule too? The only people who need to be worried are those who haven't been using the license in good faith. So long as you're using the license as it was plainly intended to be used—to develop and use apps internally—you have nothing to fear, despite suggestions to the contrary.
By all indications, Facebook and Google agreed to the same license as everyone else, and the license is anything BUT ambiguous, given that it's subtitled "for in-house, internal use applications" and then only gets more explicit about how it's intended to be used from there. I ran through a lot of the details about the license in a comment yesterday.
Yes, we'll all take note - that Apple considers the privacy of their users to be of paramount importance. So important, in fact, that Apple will drop even facebook and google from their platform if that's what it takes.
Blatant violation requires extreme response. This was a message to Google and Facebook to stop being total dicks