SpaceX Fires Mars-Bound Raptor Engine (extremetech.com)

Elon Musk took to Twitter Sunday evening to announce the "first firing of Starship Raptor flight engine." While SpaceX has fired individual components before and experimented with various designs, this is the first time the now-completed design has been assembled and fired in its intended spaceflight configuration. ExtremeTech reports: Raptor has gone through a number of design changes -- originally, SpaceX planned to mount it to the ITS launch vehicle back in 2016 (powered by 42 Raptor engines), before changing gears and unveiling its BFR rocket concept (officially known as "Super Heavy" for the first stage, and Starship for the second). The Super Heavy mounts 31 Raptor engines, while the Starship has seven. The engine has been designed with a priority on lowering overall wear and tear and removing failure points that could limit its reusability or increase long-term operating costs. Unlike SpaceX's Merlin engine, which runs on a mixture of RP-1 and LOX, the Raptor engine is fueled by cryogenic liquid methane and LOX. The Raptor uses subcooled methane (subcooling refers to keeping the temperature of the liquid well below its boiling point). Subcooling the methane allows SpaceX to increase the amount of propellant stored in the rocket. It increases specific impulse and reduces cavitation.

The actual test burn only goes on for a few seconds, but yields tremendously valuable information about the actual performance of the rocket and its ability to ignite in a controlled fashion. The green glow in the exhaust near the end of the firing indicates the copper liner in the engine chamber burned by accident. While this should not have happened, it's precisely to find these pain points that engineers conduct test firings in the first place. There is no substitute for this kind of test-firing and, as Ars Technica notes, "any 'first' test firing of a new, full-scale rocket engine that doesn't end in an uncontrolled explosion is a good thing." Ars also states that this specific engine may be deployed for "hopper" flights this year when SpaceX attempts to fly the Starship roughly 5km high, then land it again.

Comments

Re:Moon-Bound at Least

[Kjella]

Nobody is going to the moon or Mars on a tourist trip in your lifetime, try to stop being an idiot before you die.

You underestimate how much money some people have.
Jeff Bezos: Net worth $142 billion (before divorce)
Apollo program: $125 billion in today's dollars

Jeff Bezos could single-handedly fund the Apollo program. In fact, that should now be the new unit when describing how just how rich they are. Is there a market for $10 million joyrides to the moon? Well we know 7 tourists went to the ISS on the Soyuz when the Russians were selling seats for $20-40 million and that was a very limited opportunity. The moon sounds grander and cheaper.

Of course to normal people spending millions of dollars on this is crazy talk. But I remember passing by a TV show that was selling crazy stuff to the super rich, the store had made a gold plated $200k bicycle that was actually just intended for show. A Sheik's buyer came in, thought that was cool and that was it. That's $0.2 million for a bicycle, that sounds like the type of guy who could hire an entire flight just to throw a destination wedding.

Basically, don't underestimate what can happen when billionaire wants something.