Slashdot Mirror


House Democrats Tell Ajit Pai: Stop Screwing Over the Public (arstechnica.com)

slack_justyb shares a report from Ars Technica: The House Commerce Committee is "reassuming its traditional role of oversight to ensure the agency is acting in the best interest of the public and consistent with its legislative authority," Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.) and Communications and Technology Subcommittee Chairman Mike Doyle (D-Penn.) said in an announcement yesterday. Pallone, Jr. and Doyle wrote a letter to Pai, saying that he has made the FCC too secretive and has repeatedly advanced the interests of corporations over consumers. They wrote: "Not only have you have failed on numerous occasions to provide Democratic members of this committee with responses to their inquiries, you have also repeatedly denied or delayed responding to legitimate information requests from the public about agency operations. These actions have denied the public of a full and fair understanding of how the FCC under your leadership has arrived at public policy decisions that impact Americans every day in communities across the country. Under your leadership, the FCC has failed repeatedly to act in the public interest and placed the interest of corporations over consumers. The FCC should be working to advance the goals of public safety, consumer protection, affordable access, and connectivity across the United States. To that end, it is incumbent upon the Committee's leadership and its members to oversee the activities of the FCC."

On Thursday this week, the Communications Subcommittee will hold a hearing about the impact of Pai's net neutrality repeal on consumers, small businesses, and free speech. Witnesses who have been invited to testify at the hearing include former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, cable industry chief lobbyist Michael Powell (who is also a former FCC chairman), and representatives of Mozilla, Free Press, and Eastern Oregon Telecom.

11 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Re: More partisan shilling by h4x0t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shilling? I have never read a positive post or comment regarding Ajit Pai on slashdot. He is universally hated by anyone who is aware of his professional existence.

  2. Re:More partisan shilling by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Will Slashdot ever again bother to pretend to be impartial journalists?

    Dude, I've been here 20 years, this place has never been impartial. Always a strong left-lean with healthy doses of unixlove, windowshate and appledisdain.

    It's only recently -- the past 5 or so years -- that a certain cadre of very loud right-wingnut boors have shown up.. and I fully suspect they are paid trolls. Whoever is doing the paying... get a refund, we see right through you.

    You must come from some imaginary site.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  3. Re:You First! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, I'm glad the politicians are through with me after I vote. I'd hate to see that level of idiotic political advertising year round.

    --
    That is all.
  4. And he cares because?..... by Snotnose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once he's finally booted out of the FCC he's got several cushy jobs with lots more $$$ at any of the several companies he's helped. The consumer once again is fucked, over and over and over, while the fucker is well compensated.

  5. Re:More partisan shilling by TigerPlish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    sure seems that right wing opinions have crept up in the past several years.

    I don't have a problem with civilized opinions from any side. What gets tiresome is what this very thread is full of, should you read it at -1 (which I do, because I'm a sucker for punishment I guess)

    It's the incessant, schoolyard name-calling and stick-hurling that makes me want to line them up against the wall and give them a taste of true jack-booted, foot-stomping authoritarian firing-squad.

    Seriously. If all that AC drivel name calling truly reflects America today.. we're so fucked it ain't even funny. It's not even smh funny... it's just... ugh. No intelligence. Just parroting and namecalling.

    But y'know? I used to think the same of forums. This place here, this is the last that I visit. I gave up on all others. Pointless exercise.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  6. Re:You First! by SirAstral · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most liberals and conservatives are not assholes. The new problem is that the left and right are being mislabeled as liberal/conservative. All of these terms have been turned on their heads.

    The origin of the word Liberal is from Liberty... and today's liberals are anti-liberty to the core. Suppression of free speech, public vilification to ruin people, anti-gun rights, pro-heavy regulation... none of which sounds like liberty.

    The origin of the word Conservative is "generally" to preserve what is currently already present and to not change that. Desire to change government institutions, shrink government, repeal laws, and facilitate a police states... none of which sounds like conservatism.

    That said... Liberals and Conservatives can get along... if you find out that you cannot get along... then it is more likely that you belong to either the extreme right or extreme left... and there is low chance that being extreme is healthy for either you or your enemies!

  7. Re:We don't need Democrat's "help"` by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    90% marginal tax rates?

    You mean like the 1950s?

    Remind me again....that was a massive economic wasteland for the US, right? It must have been from that tax rate. Why, if something else happened it might indicate a particular school of economics isn't actually based in reality.....

    Legalized post-birth abortion?

    Nah, that's you folks and your gun fetish. So many dead, but it'll be worth it when you get to re-enact Red Dawn. Any day now. Any day. Real soon now....

    Geez, you'd think the Democrats would be forced to call their opponents "Hitler!" and "Nazis", those ideas are so fucking lame.

    You need to catch up on your talking points. You're supposed to pretend the NAZIs were left-wing. Remembering that they were a right-wing party is double plus ungood.

  8. Re:More partisan shilling by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It does not matter if opinions are "right" or "left".
    It only matters if they are stupid or not. Or scientific wrong.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  9. Re: More partisan shilling by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aaaaand my point gets made for me.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  10. Re:More partisan shilling by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean it's not a left-wing echo chamber like you're used to, and people with diverse opinions can be heard? Gosh, how awful. And you try to delegitimatize such opinions by calling them trolls. This kind of shit is how we got Trump. Go back to your safe space. You can't compete in the marketplace of ideas.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  11. Re:More partisan shilling by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Serously? I can't read a single fucking article without the standard ORANGE MAN BAD off topic bullshit AT THE TOP OF EVERY PAGE.....

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016