Slashdot Mirror
Internet is Getting More Civil, a Study by Microsoft Says (fortune.com)
While social media may feel like a trash heap at times, Microsoft released a new study on Tuesday that claims civility is spreading on the Internet... at least slightly. From a report: Microsoft's Digital Civility Index fell two points, to 66, in 2018, signaling that Internet users around the world are treating each other slightly better, although there's still plenty of room for improvement. The closer the index is to zero, the more civil people are toward each other. The survey measured the perceptions of teens and adults in 22 countries about their online experiences and the risks they face when spending time online. If the news that the internet is apparently becoming more civil comes as a surprise, U.S. readers may want to hold onto their seats. The civility index in the U.S. fell ten points in the past year to 51, showing the biggest improvement, according to a blog post from Microsoft.
There is no common ground anymore, so there is no point in trying to discuss things with people at the other end of the political spectrum.
I dont even try anymore, if youre a Trumper, youre not worth my time.
Your sentiment is probably indicative of what is happening here. You don't want to talk to "Trumpers" and they almost certainly don't want to talk to you either.
Certainly with news sites we're seeing polarization occurring. You can't just have news anymore- you have to have liberal news OR conservative news. People go to their own sites. There is enough internet for everyone now that conservative people tend to congregate around conservative sites and liberal people congregate around liberal sites.
If there is more civility, it's because we're isolating ourselves more now. We're going places where we are comfortable in our ideology. We don't meet in middle ground anymore, there are special havens online for people that think like we do.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
I suppose you could say that the internet is more 'civil' than in the past, but the reasons why aren't what you think. If my small circle of friends is any guide, it's because everyone is scared to death to say ANYTHING that can be considered 'non-PC' or taken the wrong way by the internet lynch mobs. So they just keep their comments private among a chosen few or don't bother saying anything at all. Why risk saying something, even the most benign comment, that can be used to get you fired or destroy your life by a bunch of nameless people on the internet looking for trouble? It's just not worth it anymore, so the sane people just drop out. Even my 'woke' friends (hate that term, but they seriously do use it) walk on eggshells these days.
So yes I guess the internet is more civil than in the past, but only because a small but vocal group of people have effectively silenced the rest (this isn't a left/right conservative/liberal thing, this is something much more sinister). I really had hoped that people would eventually start getting tired of the latest outrage de jour, but people just seem to feed on it so it continues to grow to ever larger and more bizarre forms of outrage. After all, outrage and victimhood is power these days. Who would willing give that up?
"The regional governors now have direct control over their territories. Fear will keep the local systems in line."
From mass permanent public shaming for singular statements or 30-year-old acts of indiscretion, people will simply drop out from internet communication if they think earnest honesty, openness, or youthful rebellion will come back to ruin their lives.
I dont even try anymore, if youre a Trumper, youre not worth my time. You dont believe in objective reality, and since thats what all my arguments are based on, there is nothing really i can say to you that will click.
You know what's really funny? Idiots like you that think their crap doesn't stink are the reason the orange putz became president in the first place. You walk into a conversation already believing you're better than everyone else and then call someone a nazi as soon they disagree with you. You may think you're a big man but you're really just a tool.
And the other side consists of Anti-Fascist authoritarian terrorists and violent anarchists.
Or we could just admit that some people on one side believe that we shouldn't try to erase history and some people on the other side believe we shouldn't build monuments to traitors and slave owners. But that would require actually talking to each other and coming to some kind of accommodation. I don't know like a big brass plaque next to a confederate statue that says something like: This racist monument brought to you by the Democratic party. The party that tried to destroy the Union in support of slavery. They built this statue after the war when they retook the government by denying civil rights to people of color. Let us never forget.
I think you'll find that most conservative pundits/hosts/whatever, when they take questions after a speaking engagement, will ask those who disagree to go to the front of the line.
Rush welcomes Liberal callers.
Fox almost always, if not always, has a representative of the Left included in discussions.
When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
Christian and Christian belief is hard to talk about in absolutes because there are thousands of individual Christian religions many of whom have divergent beliefs. So if you say some Christian group believes that anyone who doesn't follow their understanding of Christian faith will go to eternal damnation I'm absolutely sure you'll find one that does.
My understanding is that anyone who rejects God will not go to heaven, because to be in heaven is to be in the presence of God. If you reject him why would you want to be with him?
As revealed in scripture before the creation of the physical world Lucifer rejected God and he was banished. If you die and don't go to heaven you're fair game for Lucifer, also known as the devil to do with as he pleases. Does that mean eternal torture? I don't know, but Satan doesn't seem like avery nice guy.
At best God created everyone to be with Him. If you reject Him then eventually you'll feel the loss of being separated from Him. Think of it as they way you feel if someone you love has broken up with you or died. Is that feeling torture? Maybe, but you're the one who rejected God, so if you're torture over it then why blame God for it?
This implies that talk radio came from no where. It became popular on the right because they were excluded by other medians.
And they may have had a fair point with that, I wouldn't say they were excluded, but there has always been a slight bias against the right in media; it wasn't a deliberate bias though. In general, I think the kind of people who are most into journalism tend to lean to the left. Historically, the more artsy people have been left leaning, and journalists have been recruited more from the language arts crowd.
I think TV and radio may have had a gentle bias because of that towards the left. (newspaper media has always been polarized politically on both ends of the scale).left mimicked them and we ended up with the ridiculous polarization of the media that we have today).
What people like Rush, and Fox News did in reaction to that "accidental bias" against the right was to go full scale right-wing with a deliberate bias. In the course of three decades we've gone from small natural biases to massive opposing armies of biased journalism.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch