Former Apple Lawyer Who Was Supposed To Keep Employees From Insider Trading Has Been Charged With Insider Trading (cnbc.com)

Posted by msmash on Wednesday February 13, 2019 @06:58AM from the how-about-that dept.

The SEC Wednesday charged a former Apple executive with insider trading. From a report: Gene Levoff, senior director of corporate law and corporate secretary until September, "traded on material nonpublic information about Apple's earnings three times during 2015 and 2016," according to the lawsuit filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey. "Levoff also had a previous history of insider trading, having traded on Apple's material nonpublic information at least three additional times in 2011 and 2012. For the trading in 2015 and 2016, Levoff profited and avoided losses of approximately $382,000," the complaint says. Levoff's position at Apple granted him insider access to not-yet-public earnings results and briefings on iPhone sales, the complaint says. On more than one occasion, he disobeyed the company's "blackout" period for stock transactions, selling or buying stock worth tens of millions of dollars, according to the SEC.

1 of 63 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Re:I think Apple folows the simular logic. by Anubis+IV · 2019-02-13 08:25 · Score: 3, Informative

Just as we tech people say. Lets hire a convinced black hat hacker, as your IT security expert, because they would know how it is done. Lets hire a lawyer convicted in insider trading
You've got your facts wrong; he's never been convicted. The CNBC article and Slashdot summary are rather ambiguous in their phrasing, hence your understandable confusion, but if you check other reporting on the story, you'll see that what's actually going on is that he's just now being accused of crimes committed in 2011 and 2012, as well as 2015 and 2016. Apple didn't hire a convicted inside trader and he's never been charged with insider trading prior to now.
In fact, so far as Apple's response to his activities go, they put him on a leave of absence last summer when they were first notified that he was being investigated, then fired him themselves a few weeks later when their internal investigation turned up evidence of wrongdoing. The SEC is now following up with formal charges of their own, again, for the first time.