Slashdot Mirror


US Investigators Probing Years of WikiLeaks Activities, Report Says (reuters.com)

WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange are the subject of a long-running criminal investigation in the U.S., Reuters reported on Friday, citing sources familiar with the matter. Investigators have dug into the website's activities going back years, people who have been in contact with witnesses in the case say. From the report: American investigators are gathering information and pursuing witnesses involved in both recent WikiLeaks disclosures and the website's large-scale postings of U.S. military and diplomatic messages over several years from 2010. Officially, U.S. authorities have issued no public comments about the status of Wikileaks-related investigations. But a document which U.S. authorities said was mistakenly filed in open court in an unrelated case last November alluded to a sealed U.S. criminal complaint against Assange, though the document does not provide specifics regarding which laws U.S. prosecutors believe Assange violated.

28 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. Classified Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't it the job of the US Government to protect information it deems classified?

    What crime did Julian Assange commit by publishing this information that cleared persons passed onto his organization?

    Does Julian Assange, an Australian Citizen, have some obligation to protect US classified information?

    I don't think he does, but I'd welcome an explanation or rebuttal.

    1. Re: Classified Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      NYT and Washington Post are the only official leaking channels recognized and used by the FBI.

    2. Re:Classified Information by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You will be punished for embarrassing powerful people. The crime will be discovered to fit the punishment.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Classified Information by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only government officials, and those they contract with, are bound to keep it secret, and that's akin to a company requiring you to keep trade secrets.

      A news organization is free to publish classified material if they are given it, so long as they are not complicit in getting it, say, by paying for it to be taken, or helping to take it.

      Ergo either they suspect he paid for it, or are harrassing him, knowing he cannot be found guilty of anything. This part makes no difference where he is or his citizenship. If he paid for it, he's acting as a spy or foreign agent, and can be gone after. If not, he's as protected as any American journalist.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Classified Information by hackingbear · · Score: 1, Interesting

      or you will be punished for leaking the biggest secret of the U.S.: that the U.S. is the biggest hypocrite.

    5. Re: Classified Information by ASCIIxTended · · Score: 1

      You forgot CNN

      --
      I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
    6. Re:Classified Information by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Ergo either they suspect he paid for it, or are harrassing him, knowing he cannot be found guilty of anything.

      I think they are aiming to make him guilty.

      Like, "Un-American Activities", back in the McCarthy days.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:Classified Information by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He violated the "The Country With the Biggest Military Gets To Make the Laws For Everyone Else" Act of Forever.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re: Classified Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's very simple. It is better to have values and fail to live up to them than to embrace evil whole heartedly.

      China has chosen the latter.

    9. Re:Classified Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are not classified for non US citizens

    10. Re:Classified Information by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      The stench before or after the totemization ?

      --
      Nullius in verba
    11. Re:Classified Information by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The rebuttal is that you obviously don't know if that is what they're investigating, or if they're investigating something else, like involvement in the act of leaking itself, rather than just the act of publishing.

      The publishing is obviously legal. When he first hid in the embassy, all that was publicly known about was publishing, which is obviously legal under US law. And yet, he was worried about something more. And now he's being investigated for something more. We don't know what yet, because the process hasn't moved that far. It is unlikely we'll know at all until sometime after he is in custody; generally the public will get the details during the trail, and not before then. Sometimes only after the trial.

    12. Re:Classified Information by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      wait, wait, wait, you've got to tell us what backwater you're from where you didn't know that the US has been accused of hypocrisy.

      Oh, nevermind, it's in your username.

    13. Re:Classified Information by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You leave out possibilities like, maybe he did more than pay for it, maybe he actively coached people through the exfiltration process.

      That seems to be the direction indicated by what has leaked so far.

    14. Re:Classified Information by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Yes. I want to live in a world where political parties can not hide behind Trade Secret protections. When Debbie had to resign, it was a victory for truth.

    15. Re:Classified Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only criminal charge the US could possibly levy against Wikileaks or foreign individuals is receiving stolen goods. And that charge is iffy at best. This most recent announcement of US government investigations comes up every time Assange thinks about leaving the embassy in London. That moron is still trying to put himself up a martyr to cover up his over the top narcissistic behavior.

      And has Wikileaks ever provided the one thing it was founded on? Wikileaks was supposed to be a mechanism where individuals could release information anonymously. Instead Wikileaks took ownership of the information and placed their own controls over what gets released. This has lead to information being cherry picked to support a political viewpoint. The people with Snowden's stolen documents have masterfully managed the selective release of only pieces of the information. From the millions of documents stolen by Snowden the only ones that have been released are the ones supporting the political stance of those holding the data. The public is suppose to believe that the ones releasing the information are honest and fair minded but in reality they are no different than the people the information was stolen from in the first place. The public is suppose to believe that every piece of information released is true and unaltered when in reality there is no way to verify the veracity of the information.

    16. Re: Classified Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Got it, pretending to have values is better than not pretending.

  2. Mike Russia Today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Trying to figure out if you are a Russian advocating for your country (fair enough...) or an American advocating for the most infamous traitor in recent US military history.

    Military academies will spend the next 50 years training cadets how not to betray their country like Mike Flynn.

    1. Re:Mike Russia Today? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      When they have RT in their username, I just figure they're Russian.

  3. No worries by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    It's all about a vague sexual assault charge or jumping bail, or some shit. The UK and Sweden would NEVER engage in legal system theater just as cover for extraditing him to the U.S. Nope, this is all about some charge in Sweden that got dropped and Britian's endless noble quest for justice. No extradition worries for that bloke.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Haven't you heard? US law is applicable to everyone else in the entire world, regardless of where they were born. However, the US reserves the right to ignore any laws it finds inconvenient.

    Move along, citizen!

    1. Re:Laws by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Golly, but it almost seems like if something was leaked from a place, part of the activity happened in that place. So laws of that place might actually apply.

    2. Re:Laws by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      Right. So if some dude leaked information from the People's Liberation Army, you want him railroaded back to China.

      You're quite the little fucking martinet, dude.

    3. Re:Laws by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Derp derp derp.

      Shorter you: "I can't read! Everybody must be a moronic stereotype!"

      Learn how to read, then you'll be capable of being in discussions about policy.

  5. Whistleblower hall of fame by nanospook · · Score: 2
    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  6. Re:Yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You need to get your news from somewhere other than /pol/ or infowars or Qtard videos.

    Mostly for your own sake.

  7. There are NO VIABLE Charges against Assange. by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Its all been nothing more than a series of bluffs to cause constraint and spying on him. The indications of bluffing is all over the place, never a yeah or nay on anything. The UK police had him in custody and did not extradite him. Julian offered to turn himself over for Mannings release but Obam nullified that offer right before granting Manning release. Sweden never had charges against Assange but refused to talk to him remotely or directly in the UK. Australia stays neutral. Even the incident of the UK Police going into the Embassy was not to take Julian out but only to verify he was still in there. How I know is on the only chat channel with video of the event that night I posted "Julian left the building two weeks ago" and this was followed by someone asking for verification. I stayed silent, they went in. all this in less than ten minutes. And who really think the UK Police are ignorant of Embassy law? Not I! I've also personally dealt with a different long-running elaborate bluff so I do understand Julian's concern given he has seen how nasty and manipulative some in the position of influence and power can and have been. But it all is a bluff against him as that is the only way those in power can constrain him while also sending a message to the people gov is supposed to be working FOR, that they don't but the people should fear them.

    CALL THE BLUFF!

    1. Re:There are NO VIABLE Charges against Assange. by 3seas · · Score: 1

      Given all the years this matter has been going on are we to believe they are still probing the leaks? Or maybe they are trying to figure out how to correctly redact information for public release? The real Life MAD Mag Spy vs Spy blunders .....They don't need wikileaks to blunder themselves i.e. https://list25.com/25-cia-blun...