Slashdot Mirror


Australian Email Service FastMail Says It is Losing Customers and Facing Calls To Move Operations Outside of the Country Over Local Anti-Encryption Laws (itnews.com.au)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Email provider FastMail says it has lost customers and faces "regular" requests to shift its operations outside Australia following the passage of anti-encryption laws. The Victorian company, which offers ad-free email services to users in 150 countries, told a senate committee that the now-passed laws were starting to bite.

"The way in which [the laws] were introduced, debated, and ultimately passed ... creates a perception that Australia has changed - that we are no longer a country which respects the right to privacy," FastMail CEO Bron Gondwana said. "We have already seen an impact on our business caused by this perception. Our particular service is not materially affected as we already respond to warrants under the Telecommunications Act." "Still, we have seen existing customers leave, and potential customers go elsewhere, citing this bill as the reason for their choice. We are [also] regularly being asked by customers if we plan to move."

65 comments

  1. We love and support anti-encryption laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Australia,

    We love and support anti-encryption laws.

    See you soon,

    -Hackers and Malicious State Actors Everywhere.

    1. Re:We love and support anti-encryption laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The legislators were probably thinking: "Nobody's going to hack our uranium and opal mines." See what I did there in completely plain text?

    2. Re: We love and support anti-encryption laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The encryption laws are totally misunderstood and said wrong in media.

      There is no back door or weakness.

      What the law does ask is that if the government gets a court order for a users information, the company needs to help by logging that particular users encryption key or password, next time they log in for instance.

      There is no law banning encryption.

        It actually changes nothing because judges can already order you to capture a password or encryption key for you, it just sets up a commission that makes the process faster.

      The truth is, no one reads the bills anymore.
      The bill was actually called telecommunication assistance act, and does not ban encryption, and actually has a clause preventing government from ordering any weakness insecurity for anyone other than the one individual in question.

    3. Re: We love and support anti-encryption laws by angle_mark · · Score: 1

      The problem is the perception and not the reality. Damage is already done.

    4. Re: We love and support anti-encryption laws by MrKaos · · Score: 3, Informative

      The truth is, no one reads the bills anymore.

      I read it, twice. I wrote two forty page submissions to government about why this Bill was bad. The bill was actually called telecommunication assistance act, and does not ban encryption, and actually has a clause preventing government from ordering any weakness insecurity for anyone other than the one individual in question.

      What it does is order is a front door be constructed so that government can access everything.

      The encryption laws are totally misunderstood and said wrong in media.

      There is no back door or weakness.

      Inherently, the bill does not define what a "systemic weakness" is whilst relying on it as a primary concept in the bill.

      What the law does ask is that if the government gets a court order for a users information, the company needs to help by logging that particular users encryption key or password, next time they log in for instance.

      No it does not. The Bill delegates powers through the Attorney General to the heads of various police department. Except the ones investigating government corruption - they are excluded from accessing these powers in pursuit of a politician.

      It specifically criminalizes information technology professionals who do not want to have their skill set used to spy on fellow citizens through Technical Assistance Notices and other legal mechanisms to compel an innocent 3rd party to co-operate.

      There is no law banning encryption.

      Just by-passes it.

      It actually changes nothing because judges can already order you to capture a password or encryption key for you, it just sets up a commission that makes the process faster.

      10 years jail and $60,000 in fines for not co-operating hardly qualifies as no change. You need read these laws if you hope to understand why they are so bad.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    5. Re: We love and support anti-encryption laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love watch naivety in action

    6. Re: We love and support anti-encryption laws by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What does this change for me as a user? I cannot trust this provider so I have to move my business elsewhere.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re: We love and support anti-encryption laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is, no one reads the bills anymore.

      Most tech businesses have read the bill (now act), and they know just how vague it is and have no idea how it will be interpreted.

      It's not true that it doesn't change anything. As you said yourself, these requests and notices no longer need to go through an impartial judge. The test as to whether or not they are "reasonable" lies with politicians and bureaucrats, with essentially no opportunity to challenge them.

      The wording is so open that it could require companies to build tools like targeted malware which, it is fair to say, the vast majority of companies do not know how to build safely. If a company does that in good faith, and accidentally installs a backdoor on your device even though you're not the target, you have no recourse.

      None of the purported privacy and civil rights safeguards were written into the Act itself.

      Most disturbingly of all, you can be asked (though not forced) to spy for reasons unrelated to crimes, such as anything "the interests of Australia’s national economic wellbeing". That's vague enough that there's nothing stopping someone asking you to install target malware on the phone of an official of a foreign government just so an Australian company can get a better deal.

  2. Bad Customer Service by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sure their downfall has nothing to do with bad customer service... like closing down someone's account because they haven't used it in a few months- despite paying for a LIFETIME no ad membership over a decade ago.

    If I have a paid membership; whether I use the account on a regular basis or not is my business, I paid for it.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Bad Customer Service by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Did you request a refund? Anyone who had a lifetime account can request a refund now they have moved to subscription.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Bad Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you request a refund if you can ask instead to uphold the previous subscription?

    3. Re:Bad Customer Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lolwut - I'm sure he doesn't give a flying fuck about the money, it's that all of his e-mail was deleted!

    4. Re:Bad Customer Service by t0rkm3 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Sometimes my fastmail account info pops up, and that vein in my forehead starts throbbing over their crappy behavior.

  3. Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not anymore, apparently. It looks like tough, independent Australians are being turned into an obedient little slaves to Big Brother.

    I would recommend Proton Mail, either the free or paid version. It's based in Switzerland and dedicated to protecting the privacy of its users.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    1. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Red_Forman · · Score: 1

      I would recommend Proton Mail, either the free or paid version. It's based in Switzerland and dedicated to protecting the privacy of its users.

      Switzerland, eh? I heard their security was full of holes .

    2. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? The Swiss are some of the worlds...

      oh

    3. Re: Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Swiss is Swiss cheese?

    4. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by cayenne8 · · Score: 0

      Not anymore, apparently. It looks like tough, independent Australians are being turned into an obedient little slaves to Big Brother.

      Well, it starts when they take away your guns, and then the govt figures the populace has no way to fight back, and then they start slowing eroding your rights.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The actual data centers arn't in Australia, they are located in the US (New Jersey and Washington) and the Netherlands. This is the same problem that Microsoft faced with data hosted in Ireland when it was served with a request from the US government. It boils down to if the company has control and access. If so, then it doesn't matter where the data is located if the company has presence in the country making the request.

      At my company, we partition our data operations. Our EU data centers are operated by an EU subsidiary, nobody else in the parent company has access to the data or operational control. Same with our data centers in the US, Japan, and India.

    6. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, it starts when they take away your guns, and then the govt figures the populace has no way to fight back, and then they start slowing eroding your rights.

      So how many people with guns showed up at the FCC or NSA or local government offices or TSA or ICE or HS when your rights have been eroded?

      And what do you think would happen if they did.

      If you think having guns is protecting you from the gubmint, you're seriously deluded.

    7. Re: Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're in a sort of an awkward position; it's too late to work within the system, but it's too early to shoot the bastards. It's the purgatory between the slippery slope and the rock in a hard place. Exactly where they want us.

    8. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not anymore, apparently. It looks like tough, independent Australians are being turned into an obedient little slaves to Big Brother.

      Bah, I would say the same is true of Americans as well

      Land of the Free? Home of the brave? More like the land of simpering idiots cowering in fear for the next amber alert.

      Now America is a bunch of whiny assholes wondering why they aren't getting treated fairly and blaming everyone else for their own problems, looking to a shallow narcissist to play to their fears and tell them it will all be OK as long as they continue to hate everyone who doesn't look like them.

      This shit isn't unique to Australia, pathetic losers everywhere are more concerned about their security and blaming other people than anything else.

      Throw in some anti-science bullshit and other stupidity, and you have a burgeoning mob mentality made up of the biggest losers in society. When the stupid and uneducated hand the reins of power to crooks and thieves, bad things happen.

    9. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Aussie Rules never meant ballsy. It meant "Go grab and egg and run around kicking it as if there were no rules what so ever".

    10. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Americans, who have all kinds of guns, are such natural-born cowards they didn't have the balls to protect their rights when the so-called "Patriot Act" was dropped on them by their government?

      Or are you maybe just full of crap, and guns have nothing to do with it one way or the other?

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    11. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Loved the link. Well played, sir!

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    12. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Don't believe Proton's claims. They won't let you make an account without one of:

      • identifiable IP address
      • identifyable payment method
      • public blockchain addresss

      They say they offer private mail but go try to make an account over Tor or pay with XMR and see how you do.

      They've also wiped old accounts that were made privately.

      It has all the signs of being a honeypot. Be informed and beware.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:Remember when "Aussie Rules" meant ballsy? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      It has all the signs of being a honeypot. Be informed and beware.

      Thanks. Any suggestions?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  4. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least you know they are spying and they pass laws to do it. Here in the US alphabet agencies illegally spy on our citizens all the time without their knowledge. When someone brings it up they become the bad guy cause terrorism and rigged elections and Russia and ... Brown man scary.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least you know they are spying and they pass laws to do it. Here in the US alphabet agencies illegally spy on our citizens all the time without their knowledge. When someone brings it up they become the bad guy cause terrorism and rigged elections and Russia and ... Brown man scary.

      Pretty sure the majority of the people in the US know they are getting spied on. The problem is nobody cares. They just keep staring at their screens regardless.

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure the majority of the people in the US know they are getting spied on. The problem is nobody cares. They just keep staring at their screens regardless.

      Bread and circuses

    3. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would venture to say the majority don't.. Oh many do know..but as options are limited, its a cross we must bear.. better ones move their content to more secure locations/resources or just shift gears all together. But I would say the lions share of people assume (incorrectly) that OTHERS are being spied on (and for some supposed good reason).. not them.. THEY would never be spied on.

      Its usually the same people that claim "I have no problem with this because I have nothing to hide" forgetting that the winds of change can mean they are in violation of someone's issue sooner or later but by then the tools are already in place.. (MUCH harder to roll something back than it is to not enact it in the first place).

  5. Math by maxbuzz · · Score: 0

    the greatest nemesis of the State

  6. Excellent tech support and service by Rashkae · · Score: 2

    Fastmail customer support is *awesome*. As a longshot, I once asked their support to send me logs from the SMTP server showing the handoff of e-mail to the receiving mail server, (to settle a dispute with another party.). And much to my surprise, they *did*, in less than a business day.

    The fastmail system is much more capable and user friendly to manage multiple users and domains than Gmail, and includes some good old file based webhosting.

    And,, umm, it's already a given that e-mail is not an encrypted protocol, and I'm already well aware that their storage is not encrypted.

    (Neither is Google's.. don't be fooled)

    1. Re:Excellent tech support and service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't really matter if Google encrypts it or not.
      They are the ones having the key and that are also the one who will abuse your data.

    2. Re:Excellent tech support and service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fastmail customer support is *awesome*. [...])

      Yesiree, it sure is awesomely slow! When I was a paying Fastmail customer, it only took them a week to restore a backup of my account, AFTER I clicked on the 'Restore' button in the web interface.

    3. Re:Excellent tech support and service by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

      it's already a given that e-mail is not an encrypted protocol

      Not in its original design. But I think most e-mail servers use TLS or SSL nowadays for their connections.

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    4. Re:Excellent tech support and service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it had to come off of tape. That takes time. You are not the only customer.

    5. Re: Excellent tech support and service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the initial transport is over encryption (spoofed certs? naw) doesn't mean that the subsequent retransmissions and relays don't silently store all messages unencrypted.

    6. Re:Excellent tech support and service by Bronster · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the kind words! We're very proud of our support department and their close integration with the technical team.

    7. Re:Excellent tech support and service by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The key part is that this is not at all within your control. Your message may be encrypted between you and your server, but that's where your knowledge and control ends.

  7. Dear concerned applicatoion programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy my collection of hairpulling painal mother-daughter lesbian strapon porn and my disposable prepaid gift debit cards and whatever other information you think is useful from my Fastmail email account. I didnt leave because of you; on the contrary, i left because the free service expires too soon.

    1. Re: Dear concerned applicatoion programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to hide... so it's okay to siphon passwords and upload some files to your lappy eh?

    2. Re: Dear concerned applicatoion programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you've got nothing to hide... Perhaps I should give you something to hide, and blackmail you with that."

  8. Oz government replies by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

    We don't give a shit. A few might move overseas, most emailers are too thick to understand the laws - so we will read their email when we want to. Those who moved: we'll just send the cops round with a $5 wrench.

  9. How about telling us the facts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many customers they have exactly?
    How many of them complained exactly?
    How many of them closed accounts because of the new law exactly?

    The point is, maybe just 1 in million complained? How do we know? Where is the data/facts/evidence/proof?

    But, what really important is all citizens & companies need to respect laws of their government & country!!!

    Making all emails encrypted would benefit general public very little, but it would benefit all criminals immensely!!!

    1. Re:How about telling us the facts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a fact... you're an idiot

  10. Ahead of their time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had email back in Victorian times - wow

    1. Re:Ahead of their time by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, they're on AEST (UTC+10), so they're ahead of almost the whole rest of the world now!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  11. Re: AUSTRIA LAST PLACE I WANT MY EMAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you don't know the difference between Australia and Austria you probably should STFU.

  12. The 'cloud' is doomed if governments do this. by sjwest · · Score: 1

    As somebody who looks after mail servers a skill deemed worthless by cloud fanboys how is the cloud dream living up to reality?

  13. Fastmail + Protonmail? by UnConeD · · Score: 2

    It sucks for them because fastmail is genuinely good at what they do. I too switched to Protonmail over this, though i realize not much has materially changed. But the chilling effect is real due to the amount of secrecy surrounding the new laws.

    As two big alternative providers, it seems they'd be well positioned to take the lead on fast and encrypted email. Form an industry alliance, make a new protocol to integrate encryption and help obsolete IMAP, and offer e2e encryption between their customer bases as the incentive for other providers to join in.

    Google isn't going to do it any time soon, but Apple might also be interested with their push for privacy. Having first class modern encryption support in Mail.app on macos and ios would be fantastic.

    1. Re:Fastmail + Protonmail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a new protocol being developed to replace IMAP. It is called JMAP by Fastmail.

      https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jmap/documents/

      Slashdot, news for dumb nerds.

  14. Re: AUSTRIA LAST PLACE I WANT MY EMAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dundee... will... be... back

  15. Stupid is as stupid does, Aussie Edition by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Well I guess on the one hand it's a good thing that this nonsense is contained to it's own separate continent; we can use Australia as a negative example when (not IF, but WHEN) their 'anti-encryption' bullshit blows up in their faces, proving what everyone has been saying (saying? More like screaming in their ears!) all along. Maybe, just maybe, when that happens, the rest of the fucktarded politicians of the world will wake up.

  16. I left Fastmail last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a user since 2002. Fantastic service, but I cannot abide what the Australian government have done. What is it with all the western governments feeling the need to have access to everything? This is why I buy certain things in cash and in face-to-face transactions. Booze, tobacco, firearms. I have a squeaky-clean record, but it's just none of anyone's business what I do as long as I'm not violating the law. Insurance companies, too, are tracking the daylights out of people from all angles, hoping to find something to raise your rates. I don't use social media tied to my real name or real IP address because I know what they're up to. My life, my rules.

    1. Re:I left Fastmail last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you tell if Schrödinger's cat is doing something illegal or not if you don't check?

  17. Victorian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti-encryption laws and a Victorian company running a email service?

    They are even more outdated than I thought.

  18. it is not only perception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The way in which [the laws] were introduced, debated, and ultimately passed ... creates a perception that Australia has changed - that we are no longer a country which respects the right to privacy,"

    Is he trying to claim that the right to privacy has not changed in Australia? That it is all in peoples mind?
    Does he really think that "data protected by government regulation" can be as good as "technically impossible to access data" and that all those people have it wrong?

    note: That his customers are leaving for all the wrong reasons, only prove they are technically clueless. But it also proves they do care.

  19. Re: AUSTRIA LAST PLACE I WANT MY EMAIL by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    We had someone leave where I work, and left his forwarding address as Melbourne, Austria. Not sure he ever found the place.

  20. you have no rights by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    Is that the Australia which doesn't have a bill of rights for it's citizens ?
    Is that the Australia which doesn't talk about operational matters ?
    is that the Australia which has a broken freedom of information system ?
    is that the Australia which is a member of 5 eyes, and doesn't mind watching Australian citizens ?
    is that the Australia in which both major parties lick the eagles arse ?

    --
    Go well
    1. Re:you have no rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

    2. Re:you have no rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a big fat YES on all counts!
      I'd also like to add one to your list...
      Is that the Australia in which both major parties are owned by the Chinese government.

      Refer to the first line above if you need a hint on the answer to the additional question.

  21. Well till opensource is legal there is choice. by Kuruk · · Score: 1

    Run your favorite Linux and openVPN to the rest of the world and lets australia burn.