Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The UK's Health Service Told To Ditch 'Outdated' Pagers (bbc.com)

Posted by msmash on from the it's-time-to-move-on dept.

The UK's NHS has been told to stop using pagers for communications by 2021, in order to save money. The health service still uses about 130,000 pagers, which is about 10% of the total left in use globally. From a report: They cost the NHS about $8.6 million a year, because only one service provider supports them. Health Secretary Matt Hancock called them "outdated" and said he wanted to rid the NHS of "archaic technology like pagers and fax machines". However, many in the medical industry say that pagers are quick and reliable - especially in emergencies -- and proposed replacements have their own shortcomings.

8 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Here is why pagers are so important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should keep the pagers, absolutely. The reason is this:

    Pagers use slow transmission protocols that do not need a huge S/N to be properly decoded. That means pagers are going to work almost everywhere you would otherwise get an annoying "No Service" notification on your phone, such as elevators, parking garages, basements, and so on.

    It would be a blunder of gargantuan proportions to stop using pagers for critical messaging. Just because the mobile carriers want to take over the pager spectrum for 5G doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.

    1. Re:Here is why pagers are so important by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      130,000 of them for $8.6 million a year. What are they going to replace them with that costs only $5.5 per month and has the same reliability?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Here is why pagers are so important by lgw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      hey should keep the pagers, absolutely. The reason is this:

      Pagers use slow transmission protocols that do not need a huge S/N to be properly decoded. That means pagers are going to work almost everywhere you would otherwise get an annoying "No Service" notification on your phone, such as elevators, parking garages, basements, and so on.

      Amazon made the transition from physical pagers to an app just a few years ago. Turns out that pager coverage and reliability isn't as good as you'd expect once you get down to only one vendor. Plus, in a disaster where thousands of pages get sent in a short time, you saturate the vendor's infrastructure and pages get delayed by tens of minutes.

      The app also sucked at first, and most people on call used both, but within about 2 years it was more reliable on average than physical pagers, and they were lagely abandoned.

      For those who don't know, Amazon cares very much about paging people. Paging doctors is merely a matter of life and death; while paging engineers when amazon.com is broke affects profit. Needless to say, far more money gets spent addressing the latter.

      It is really cool though to see the machine work from the inside. When anything goes wrong anywhere that affects your ability to buy stuff on amazon.com, it takes less than five minutes before engineers representing dozens of teams are fully engaged with the problem, with most people checking in within 2-3 minutes. Problems are usually localized to one team, usually with an initial theory of cause, within about 10 minutes of the problem appearing. It's amazing to watch from the sidelines when you're not the one on the hook.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Here is why pagers are so important by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Informative

      Add to it that a pager also is fine when you have radio-sensitive medical equipment like EEG and EKG measurement equipment.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  2. Sounds like a lot by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But that's only $66 US per year. If all you need yo do is contact someone to call or come in, that's way cheaper than providing phones to employees.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  3. Deploy their own Paging system by mprindle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have several customers in our area including hospitals that have their own private paging systems. The spectrum is licensed and dedicated to their use. The are only designed to work with-in their facilities, which in the case of hospital staff, is mainly where they need the quick response. Outside the facilities then standard phone calls, text messaging can be used to call someone in.

    The major downside is the support of the infrastructure to keep the system running, but with regular maintenance it's not that big of an ask.

    1. Re:Deploy their own Paging system by Pascoea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The major downside is the support of the infrastructure to keep the system running

      I think you've hit the nail on the head. The issue is that the equipment and expertise available to maintain a 1980s era network is dwindling. I used to work at a company who had the contract to maintain the local hospital's private pager network. I have no idea of the contract value, but they were the only game in town that had the knowledge to do it. There was literally no competition in the pager space around there. If they went tits up, the hospitals would have been screwed. I can see the desire to get away from a system like that.

  4. Re:lots of advantages by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    battery life that smartphones (hell even feature phones) can only dream of.

    Most pagers I know of still use AA batteries. Why? Rechargables just don't last as long!

    They literally will last for months on a single AA battery. A busy pager may last a month (one that's constantly beeping and vibrating). Off a single AA battery.

    But one that isn't so busy can probably go up to a year on a single AA battery.