Slashdot Mirror
Sprint To Launch 5G Service in 4 Cities in May (techcrunch.com)
Sprint has shared some of its plans when it comes to 5G service in the U.S. The company announced at MWC in Barcelona that mobile customers in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas and Kansas City can expect 5G service as soon as May 2019. From a report: If you don't live in one of those cities, maybe you live in Houston, Los Angeles, New York City, Phoenix or Washington D.C. Sprint also promises 5G coverage in those cities soon after the initial launch, at some point before the end of June 2019. Overall, Sprint expects to cover 1,000 square miles in nine cities by the end of the first half of 2019. It's going to take years to roll out 5G coverage across the U.S.
Like the subject says. If I'm doing something important and bandwidth intensive, I'm using a laptop and Wi-fi or even better, ethernet. My cell service could have a million G's, and it wouldn't change how I operate.
I don't respond to AC's.
The release spec of 5G wont be ratified by that point. The early release will be ratified by April, one month before they expect to roll out. How do they expect to go in one month from a ratified paper spec to real hardware that is deployed and working in multiple cities? And that's not the finalized spec, that's due out next year. This reminds me of all of those "pre-N" wifi routers from 10 years ago. Each supported its own non-spec extension of G that was compatible with nothing and failed to give any real world performance gains.
If they still offered truly unlimited plans with reasonable pricing then I would use it for high bandwidth as long as latency wasn't requirement. They dont, so I avoid using it as much as I can.
While I congratulate Sprint, I need to know whether they have [any] Chinese built hardware on their network.
This is because although the American government hasn't produced any evidence to support its claims, I am inclined to "toe the line" and believe what my government says.
But from sources available, I should fear my government because it's the one that has done questionable acts in the past, like planting backdoors in CISCO equipment, spying on allies and in fact hacking Huawei itself!
I hear you. I'm not sure what I would use 5G for and I have Gbit service to the house and use it.
If I did have 5G and there was a reasonable plan I would probably tether my laptop to it so I could work somewhere other than my office. The main apps would be to monitor my infrastructure and to do teleconferences from the road. So far I just do that from the closest free WiFi like Starbucks.
5G is fine technology and all but I just don't see the killer app for it.
You're a fucking moron. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/16/technology/huawei-investigation-trade-secrets.html They're about to be indicted for ongoing crimes.
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2223272/cisco-subnet/60-minutes-torpedoes-huawei-in-less-than-15-minutes.html
IIRC Sprint is the only full-service provider in the USA that still has "unlimited" data on offer. Unlimited in the USA is essentially a misnomer; apparently you'll start getting complaints from your provider if you're using more than about 1GB/day no matter which service you have, but it does still have $60/month service plans with no explicit data cap.
I'm not sure what good it does to offer absurdly high bandwidth to mobile devices while capping data plans to insignificant amounts. Exceeding a data cap even faster doesn't sound all that appealing. I'm not sure when I've needed something delivered to my phone at higher than 20mbps and LTE is more than capable of doing that.
I've been on a SERO plan since approximately forever; I live by a major highway and I have a more or less perfect signal all the time. I know Sprint sucks for most people but it's never been a problem for me.
-- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
You're being myopic.
5G can replace your home internet connection. It will finally provide competition for cable, DSL, and fiber internet providers. Not on day one, but that's the goal here and the tech easily supports it.
Every time i see Sprint listed as doing something I wonder if they actually will or might be too busy dealing with a merger (or not) with T-Mobile. I know TMO is trying top buy Sprint for the bandwidth but the FCC and Dems don't like the prospects.
(Note: I am a TMO customer.)
The Kai's Semi-Updated Website Thingy
I'm not sure what good it does to offer absurdly high bandwidth to mobile devices while capping data plans to insignificant amounts. Exceeding a data cap even faster doesn't sound all that appealing. I'm not sure when I've needed something delivered to my phone at higher than 20mbps and LTE is more than capable of doing that.
The benefit is that the ISP can effectively advertise faster rates than you truly get. It would be better is there were no data caps and providers simply sold rates based on what level of network saturation they could maintain. But if they did that then they would loose profits. Its no secret ISPs, wired and wireless both over subscribe their networks. They bank on not everyone using full bandwidth at the same time. It would be great if the FCC would do its job but as long as government appointees can be corrupted with kickbacks and cushy jobs from the industry leaders it ain't happening.
The goal here is the for the local teleco's to abandon the rural market by claiming the cellular network provides equivalent or better service.
Let's hope Sprint doesn't hitch their wagon to the wrong 5G horse, like they did with WiMAX for 4G.
If this puts cable companies out of business, they can charge me double.
Unfortunately, the merger needs to happen, since AT&T and Verizon are giants and consolidating equipment and frequency ownership is really the only compelling option for either Sprint or TMO to continue to operate. There just isn't a path forward for either one unless they start to work as a single entity.
The FCC is very much pro-industry right now and I don't think there's a right-left bias in this particular consolidation so much that every time anyone gets a look at Sprint's books and up-close business practices, it's a pretty ugly story that by rights should scare away investors.
Sprint is GOING to be bought. As a Sprint customer, I'd rather see it join with TMO to make a third viable competitor in the US. Giving either ATT or VZW utter market leading dominance would just be the excuse to make service plans and bandwidth allocations that much worse for everyone else.
-- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
Sprint needs to catch up with the rest of the carriers regarding simultaneous voice/data on 4G before hawking 5G fantasy.
As for 5G replacing my home internet, I don't see much benefit in requiring a 5G cell on every telephone pole when I already have perfectly good fiber coming from the same pole. More infrastructure, more complexity, more failure points. The 5G story for fixed internet in lower-population-density areas (e.g., those without fiber to the home) doesn't seem much better, but maybe I'm missing something.
I'm not sure what good it does to offer absurdly high bandwidth to mobile devices while capping data plans to insignificant amounts. Exceeding a data cap even faster doesn't sound all that appealing.
I see this sort of comment quite frequently, and it really doesn't make sense to me. Please tell me what you're doing that you would do much more of if only your cap was removed. The only reason you would exceed your data cap faster is if you consume more content just because you can. Really now, how many cat videos and superhero movies can you watch before your brain turns to mush?
Disclaimer: I know my use case is not your use case. I just can't imagine what your use case really is.
AC when the extra big new pipes are in place to that 5G.
The services that allow a lot of data to get used and for every 5G users to get their speed and data limits.
Lots of speed and a less data is not a new way of selling.
A slow speed and an average data amount is not great.
Much slower speeds and much more data is not the expected speed.
Big pipes, new plans and each 5G user getting more data at a much faster speed on day one AC.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
Yeah right. The usa has not yet developed the technology. That's what this whole hubub with HUAWEI is over. Huawei developed and holds most of the patents to . that are requisite for 5G.
their product is currently better than ours and anything we can make.
And so the USA is doing a standard u.s. business tactic of running they're Superior opponent through the mud rather than admit the competition makes a better product.
Sprint continues to operate as its own company and build out its M-MIMO infrastructure. It has to, until the merger is approved. 5G NR ("New Radio") is really cool tech and between T-Mob's low-band stuff and Sprint's 2.5GHz stuff (80MHz channels, anyone?) they could tilt the tables away from VZW and the Death Star.
I don't need it. I never claimed to. I've exceeded 80GB use in a month one time in five years, because a customer site had nothing faster than a basic rate ISDN line and I turned on the access point on my phone for around a dozen people to use while I was on site. Sprint called me to ask why my data usage spiked and to please not do that again.
I recognize some people will consume 4k video on a phone, given the option to do so. I can't think of another high bandwidth personal application for a mobile device, but in many cases I think the people doing that aren't really aware of why that's a problem.
-- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
America does not produce this. So, did they go with China or Europe?
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
So in a shared commodity like spectrum, they should allocate a special slice for just you and keep it 24/7 just for you to use. And have a separate special slice for each and every subscriber, just in the off chance every single one of you need to use it to the fullest at exactly the same time. LOL.
TLDR Why post on a tech site showing you have absolutely no understanding of the tech?
There was a 4g and will be a 5g, all that other stuff you mentioned was just marketing to hide the fact you didn't have 4g yet but wanted to pretend you did. Will you do the same with 5g? probably, if your idiocy is common enough, for people to believe they have 5g when they don't.
LOL, you American lawyers are funny.
Not where I live, the signal sucks. I live in a city of 250,000 people and there are many parts of the city where the signal strength is pretty craptastic.
Four years on, I'm still waiting for a real VoLTE rollout. It's 2019 and I have a flagship phone... Why can I still not call and use data simultaneously? Because Sprint is dragging ass behind the other three. Only reason I'm still with them is because they're still the cheapest for true unlimited. And I've topped 80GB/mo of traffic.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
He will call you a liar instead of admitting he was wrong.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/2... “The Federal Reserve and Treasury make 99 dollars for every $100 dollar bill they print and sell offshore,” Colas said. “There’s a natural desire to keep printing these things — the U.S. government makes a lot of money selling them.”
Why manufacture when you can borrow and print?