Slashdot Mirror


Self-Harm Clips Hidden in Kids' Cartoons (bbc.com)

Children's charity the NSPCC has accused YouTube of failing to tackle dangerous content on its youth channel. From a report: YouTube Kids, dubbed as a safer, child-friendly version of the video-sharing site, has been criticised by parents for failing to remove cartoons that contain clips depicting suicide methods on its platform. The clips show a YouTuber demonstrating a suicide method. Google told the BBC it works hard to remove such content. "We have strict policies that prohibit videos which promote self-harm. We rely on both user-flagging and smart-detection technology to flag this content for our reviewers," the firm said in a statement. "We are always working to improve our systems and to remove violat[ing] content more quickly." It is unclear how or why the clips depicting suicide methods were embedded in children's cartoons. The BBC has received no response from the YouTuber. It also asked Google, which owns YouTube, if it had spoken to him directly but did not get a reply.

5 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Easy answer by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is unclear...why the clips depicting suicide methods were embedded in children's cartoons.

    People are dicks.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re: Easy answer by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is if you don't unload and clear the chamber first. A lot of people forget about that one in the chamber. One little slip while taking the slide off and bang.

      You just don't point the gun at your face until it's disassembled. I've never heard of anyone who didn't understand that, even when very drunk. It's the most basic rule of gun safety: all guns are loaded, until you're looking through the empty chamber through the locked-back slide. It's perhaps believable for someone to shoot themselves in the leg, through the table, though even that is an unlikely chain of events.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  2. Can't Promise Curated Content and Not Curate It by Koreantoast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Should be important to note that this is not talking about YouTube in general but specifically a product that the company setup promising carefully curated content for children. If you're going to create a curated set of programs intentionally marketed toward children, they really should be reviewing videos before putting them on the app versus just hoping detection algorithms and self-reporting are going to catch clips spliced in. For this kind of program, once your credibility is shot, you're not going to recover anytime in the near future.

  3. Or you could just get over it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's lots of bad things out there in the world. Shielding your kids from it is largely pointless. You're better off just explaining it to them to the limits of their understanding. That way they don't develop morbid fascinations with anything.

    My kid very, very briefly tried to "rebel" with music. I showed her the kinds of music me and my brother grew up with (Slayer, Gore Guts, Testament, etc) and that made it all kind of pointless right there. These days the only "rebelling" she does is trying not to turn out to be as much a loser nerd as I am.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Or you could just get over it by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Shielding your kids from it is largely pointless. You're better off just explaining it to them to the limits of their understanding.

      That depends on the age of the kid. There is not much a 13 year-old needs to be sheltered from. But there is plenty a 5 year-old should not see.

      YouTube kids to targeted at 3 to 8 year olds. The "shielding" is its raison d'etre.