Slashdot Mirror


Senate Confirms Former Coal Lobbyist Andrew Wheeler To Lead EPA (cnn.com)

The Senate voted Thursday to confirm Andrew Wheeler as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, ratifying President Trump's choice of a former advocate for business interests to lead the agency. From a report: Wheeler, also a former Republican Senate aide on environmental issues, has been acting administrator since July, when former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt resigned amid a host of ethics controversies. Since Wheeler began leading the agency, he has continued work on many of the same priorities as his predecessor, including looking to roll back Obama-era air and water pollution regulations. But Wheeler has brought a level of stability to the agency that didn't exist under Pruitt, keeping a relatively low profile while continuing to make progress towards meeting the Trump administration's policy goals for the agency. He has met often with industry representatives. Wheeler attended or held more than 50 meetings with representatives of companies or industry groups regulated by the EPA between April and August of 2018, a CNN review of his internal schedules found.

19 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Fuck coal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And fuck coal miners. Leave that poison in the ground.

  2. Agency name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Environmental Pillaging Agency

  3. Fox meet by CodeHog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    hen house

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    1. Re:Fox meet by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AKA Trump's standard approach to appointing anyone to a position in government.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  4. This is what people voted for by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if you want coal to come back you'll need somebody in charge who wants it to come back and wants it at any cost. Natural gas is just too competitive (let alone Solar and Wind). You're gonna have to start loosening environmental regs around coal.

    One of the key reasons for the "Green New Deal" (the "New Deal" part) is jobs for ex coal miners. These folks are clustered in critical voting districts where there is literally no work outside of Walmart, the mines and a handful of service jobs (doctors to treat black lung, police to lock up the occasional drunk miner, etc).

    Folks are confused why these guys would fight so hard to mine coal given the health and safety risks. Folks who wonder that have never been without a job for 12 months and counting....

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is what people voted for by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Folks are confused why these guys would fight so hard to mine coal given the health and safety risks. Folks who wonder that have never been without a job for 12 months and counting....

      I do get that dying slowly and killing a lot of others slowly becomes an attractive option when the alternative is dying pretty fast. It is still something that people should be prevented from doing. They need to be given an alternative that does actually not do this incredible amount of damage.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:This is what people voted for by radarskiy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Folks who wonder that have never been without a job for 12 months and counting"

      I was unemployed for 19 months. What I did during that time is look for a *different* job.

      The confusing part is why they are fighting for jobs that aren't coming back even if coal comes back.

  5. Re:Senate = non representative corrupt dictators by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Senate = non representative corrupt dictators. They don't represent the people.

    You are a moron. Senators are representatives of their state. If you want representatives of the people you go to the House.

    This is by design, for good reason.

  6. USA is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tell us again how great your democracy is , how wonderful your freedom is.
    Because countries with real democracies and greater freedoms are laughing hard at you.

    Its obvious to the rest of us that your politicians are bought and paid for by industry, it is industry that actually runs the USA now, and you can NOT vote them out.

  7. Re:So ... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the same way that a lobbyist for buggywhip manufacturers might "know" about cars when crafting regulations. He'll have a skewed view that will favor old, out of date technology because that's what makes his former employers rich and will work against newer, cleaner technologies because those take business away from his old employers.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  8. Re:And In Other News... by WhiplashII · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What did Obama say? Elections have consequences?

    It would be nice if no matter who got elected, things basically stayed the same. But if we can't have that, don't complain when the guys you don't like do things you don't like when elected.

    (Specifically, this is why rule by presidential fiat is awful. But it was no less awful under Obama.)

    --
    while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
  9. Re:And In Other News... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fact of the matter that coal still exists and provides many jobs and lively hoods for thousands of Americans.

    You could make the same argument for crystal meth.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Re:And In Other News... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be nice if no matter who got elected, things basically stayed the same. But if we can't have that, don't complain when the guys you don't like do things you don't like when elected.

    Don't complain? In a democracy, it's a citizen's right (perhaps even her/his duty) to complain.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  11. Re: And In Other News... by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We go back to the 70s and rivers start catching fire again?

  12. Re:Donald Trump is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hearsay is when the person testifying wasn't in the room and is relying on 3rd party info. He was in the room, he heard what he heard, he testified under oath. That's evidence, it's testimony. Fact. You're a moron.

  13. Re:Donald Trump is going to prison for TREASON by greythax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I listened to the whole testimony yesterday and I have got to say, I keep seeing some QUALITY cherry picking going on today.

    Comey testifies that a convicted russian mobster had a rent free office basically across the hall from Trump's, nothing.

    He says he has no evidence that Trump colluded, but basically everything Trump ever said or did points in that direction, and all of the MAGA crowd start shouting "See, no collusion!"

    And even better, the spin is, "He's a liar, you can't trust anything he said, except that no collusion thing."

    Ya gotta laugh at it to keep from crying.

  14. Re:Donald Trump is going to prison for TREASON by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And even better, the spin is, "He's a liar, you can't trust anything he said, except that no collusion thing."

    Unfortunately, all this testimony from these various people is all suspect, because they're all liars and generally terrible people. Manafort, Cohen, Stone, Papadopoulos, Flynn, on and on. Far from bringing in "the best people," he has surrounded himself with the worst people, which unfortunately means when they're cast off you have no idea if the tell-alls that they tell are in any way accurate or just new lies to save their own miserable skins.

    In other words, "yeah, I know, I lied for years for this guy, but now I'm telling the truth, honest" makes for witnesses that are easily dismissed. Now, if they can provide hard proof, like the 12 years of checks that Cohen said he had, then that makes for something.

  15. Re:Donald Trump is going to prison for TREASON by greythax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I take your point, but shouldn't that same standard apply to Trump, given how frequent and well documented his lying is? How do you dismiss liars while believing whole heartedly their king?

    (I'm using the impersonal you of course, it doesn't seem like you are defending him.)

  16. Re:Making America Great Again by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do the politicos always pitch a fit about an appointee, even before they have a chance to do anything good or bad?

    Because time did not start today.